From Classrooms to Congress

An Intern’s Journey into Food and Agricultural Policy with OFRF

By Julia Nelson

After spending a chunk of my first year of graduate school learning about food and agricultural policy in the U.S., I began my internship at OFRF with the goal of understanding how those policy mechanisms play out in the real world for the different parties involved in the process. Over the past 12 weeks, I have welcomed the opportunity to contribute to OFRF’s advocacy work focused on increasing funding for organic research in the most important U.S. agricultural policies – the agricultural appropriations and the Farm Bill. Through this experience, I have had the chance to practice a range of policy skills such as: writing catchy and persuasive email campaigns, synthesizing complicated federal data into a leave-behind document that tells a compelling story, and engaging in conversations with coalitions and members of Congress.

One major goal of this work is to spread awareness to Senators and Representatives on the various agricultural committees that funding organic agricultural research doesn’t just support the scientific community, but also contributes to the local economy and helps the country move closer to climate goals. Through this process, I have also been able to experience firsthand the nuts and bolts of the federal policymaking process and better understand how major political events (such as a looming presidential election) affect the pace of advocacy work.

Another hope of mine for this internship was to develop my professional skills in a way that would prepare me for future roles at nonprofit organizations or in public service. Because of its importance in the nonprofit world, I was interested in learning more about development and funding during my time at OFRF. I had the opportunity to help the Development team with prospect research, which meant I spent time researching and identifying foundations that were and were not a good fit for our needs. I enjoyed getting a sense of the funding landscape for organizations who work on organic agriculture and hope to continue working with grants in some capacity in my future career.

Additionally, I had the opportunity to put the data management and analysis skills that I have acquired through various statistics and economics classes to work. I helped with a few different data projects for the Policy team and the Research & Education (R&E) team, cleaning and categorizing large amounts of data on organic research from USDA and universities. The goal of my project for the Policy team was to be able to provide an honest estimate of the amount of federal funding that has gone towards organic agricultural research. The purpose of my work for R&E was to help populate OFRF’s soon-to-be organic research hub, which aggregates educational resources on organic agriculture to provide farmers with a one-stop shop of quality information. These projects reminded me of the importance of data in storytelling, illuminated the hard work that goes into any useful website that aggregates different resources, and reminded me that I need to keep up with my Excel skills.

Finally, on a different note, I appreciated being able to gain insight into how a remote, national organization operates and builds community. As I gear up for entering a workforce that is becoming increasingly virtual, it’s been helpful to see positive examples of how you can connect and develop relationships with coworkers without being face-to-face. I have really enjoyed the catch-ups that happen during staff meetings and our informal community-building Zoom calls.

Looking into the future, this experience has cemented my interest in pursuing the ‘policy’ part of my MS degree in Food and Nutrition Science & Policy after I graduate. My time with OFRF has reinforced my passion for working at the intersection of climate and food systems. As I begin the final year of my graduate program, I will be focusing my time on gaining the policy & organizational leadership skills I need to pursue a career at a government agency or nonprofit organization based in my home area of New England. I could not be more grateful to OFRF for providing me with an enriching internship experience, and also for the support and inclusivity of all of the team members I collaborated with throughout the summer.

By admin|2024-09-19T17:38:24+00:00September 19th, 2024|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

Conservation Scientist

email: rebecca[at]ofrf.org

Rebecca Champagne (she/her/hers) is the Conservation Scientist at OFRF and joined the team in September 2024. She is an agronomist by training with a research background in organic agriculture, having worked with a diverse array of crops and on practices such as cover cropping, reduced tillage, and managing weeds. She also brings experience in interdisciplinary science communications and policy work to the team. Rebecca previously worked for soil health non profit Land Core, and as an analyst for the ag-tech company Gro Intelligence. She is passionate about transforming our farm and food systems to be more sustainable and equitable for all people.

Rebecca has a PhD in Environmental Science from the University of Maine, an MS in Agronomy from The Pennsylvania State University, and a BS in Sustainable Agriculture from The University of Maine. In her free time you can find her at the gym, exploring Maine, reading, cooking, and finding more house plants to add to her collection.

By Elizabeth Tobey|2024-09-19T17:21:32+00:00September 19th, 2024|Staff|

Why Technical Note 12 Is Such a Big Deal

By Gordon Merrick, OFRF’s Senior Policy & Programs Manager

Versión en español a continuación.

The Need that Technical Note 12 Meets

The Natural Resources Conservation Service of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-NRCS, NRCS) has been one of the most impactful modern agencies in the adoption of conservation practices and systems in the United States. Only recently did the NRCS publish a technical note that will aid Field Agents and other Technical Service Providers (TSPs) administer these programs on organic operations. Technical Note 12 – Conservation Activities in Organic Farming Systems (Tech Note 12) provides a wealth of knowledge needed to effectively support the unique requirements of organic producers. Recently, as part of our work for the Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP) in the West/Southwest region, we have developed a toolkit designed to raise awareness among farmers of this resource, which is now in the hands of NRCS staff and TSPs. In this blog post, we’ll briefly discuss what Tech Note 12 is, how it benefits farmers, and how it helps NRCS staff and TSPs.

What Is Tech Note 12?

A technical note, as defined by the NRCS, is an authoritative document designed to provide detailed guidance on specific technical subjects relevant to conservation planning and implementation. These documents serve as essential resources for NRCS field staff, TSPs, and producers, offering in-depth information and practical instructions to support the effective management of natural resources and address resource concerns. Technical notes are developed to address a wide range of topics, including soil health, water quality, wildlife habitat, and agricultural practices. They offer step-by-step procedures, best management practices, and innovative solutions to common challenges faced in the field. By standardizing and disseminating this knowledge, technical notes help ensure consistency and quality in applying NRCS conservation programs and practices.

Tech Note 12 is intended to provide all this information—as it relates to organic agricultural production. It offers detailed guidance on conservation activities that are compatible with organic standards and provides real-world examples that illustrate how conservation activities have been implemented.

How Tech Note 12 Helps Farmers

Tech Note 12 helps organic producers articulate the conservation benefits of their practices in the language used by NRCS field agents and TSPs. This clarity is crucial for accessing NRCS programs such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP), which provide financial and technical assistance to improve farm operations.

How Tech Note 12 Helps NRCS Staff and TSPs

For NRCS field agents and TSPs, Technical Note 12 is an invaluable tool for conducting thorough assessments of organic farming operations. By referencing the document, agents can identify appropriate conservation practices that address resource concerns while complying with organic standards. This approach ensures that the proposed solutions are both effective and aligned with the unique traits of organic farming, such as soil fertility, water management, pest control, and habitat conservation.

How to Access and Use Tech Note 12

To effectively use Tech Note 12 for your organic farming practices, start by contacting your regional Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) office. Your NRCS field agent can provide helpful guidance on applying the recommendations in Tech Note 12 to your conservation planning while meeting organic standards.

For additional information and resources, download our Tech Note 12 flyer here. The flyer includes a summary of Tech Note 12, practical tips for using it, and suggested questions to ask your NRCS agent. This will help you get the most out of your NRCS support and prepare for your discussion.

Don’t miss out on valuable resources like this one—subscribe to our newsletter for groundbreaking organic farming research, educational guides, and critical funding and policy updates.

¿Por qué es tan importante la Nota Técnica 12?

La Necesidad que Satisface la Nota Técnica 12

El Servicio de Conservación de Recursos Naturales del Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos (USDA-NRCS, NRCS) ha sido una de las agencias más influyentes en la adopción de prácticas y sistemas de conservación en Estados Unidos. Recientemente, el NRCS publicó una nota técnica que ayudará a los Agentes de Campo y otros Proveedores de Servicios Técnicos (TSP) a administrar estos programas en operaciones orgánicas. Nota Técnica 12 – Actividades de conservación en sistemas agrícolas orgánicos (Nota técnica 12) proporciona una gran cantidad de conocimientos necesarios para apoyar de manera efectiva los requisitos únicos de los productores orgánicos. Recientemente, como parte de nuestro trabajo para el Programa de Asociación para la Transición a la Agricultura Orgánica (TOPP) en la región Oeste/Suroeste, hemos desarrollado un kit de herramientas diseñado para concienciar a los agricultores sobre este recurso, que ahora está en manos del personal del NRCS y los TSP. En esta publicación del blog, discutiremos brevemente qué es la Nota Técnica 12, cómo beneficia a los agricultores y cómo ayuda al personal del NRCS y a los TSP.

¿Qué es la Nota Técnica 12?

Una nota técnica, según lo define el NRCS, es un documento autoritativo diseñado para proporcionar orientación detallada sobre temas técnicos específicos relevantes para la planificación e implementación de conservación. Estos documentos sirven como recursos esenciales para el personal de campo del NRCS, los TSP y productores, ofreciendo información detallada e instrucciones prácticas para apoyar la gestión efectiva de los recursos naturales y abordar las preocupaciones de recursos. Las notas técnicas se desarrollan para tratar una amplia gama de temas, incluyendo la salud del suelo, calidad del agua, hábitat de la vida silvestre y prácticas agrícolas. Ofrecen procedimientos paso a paso, mejores prácticas de gestión y soluciones innovadoras a desafíos comunes enfrentados en el campo. Al estandarizar y difundir este conocimiento, las notas técnicas ayudan a garantizar la consistencia y la calidad en la aplicación de los programas y prácticas de conservación del NRCS.

La Nota Técnica 12 está destinada a proporcionar toda esta información, en lo que respecta a la producción agrícola orgánica. Ofrece orientación detallada sobre las actividades de conservación que son compatibles con los estándares orgánicos y proporciona ejemplos reales que ilustran cómo se han implementado las actividades de conservación.

Como la Nota Técnica 12 ayuda a los agricultores

La Nota Técnica 12 ayuda a los productores orgánicos a articular los beneficios de conservación de sus prácticas en el lenguaje utilizado por los agentes de campo y los proveedores de servicios de conservación del NRCS. Esta claridad es crucial para acceder a programas del NRCS como el Programa de Incentivos a la Calidad Ambiental (EQIP) y el Programa de Administración de Conservación (CSP), que de asistencia financiera y técnica para mejorar las operaciones agrícolas.

¿Cómo Ayuda la Nota Técnica 12 al Personal del NRCS y a los TSP?

Para los agentes de campo del NRCS y los TSP, la Nota Técnica 12 es una herramienta invaluable para realizar evaluaciones exhaustivas de las operaciones de agricultura orgánica. Al consultar el documento, los agentes pueden identificar las prácticas de conservación apropiadas que aborden las preocupaciones de recursos mientras cumplen con los estándares orgánicos. Este enfoque asegura que las soluciones propuestas sean tanto efectivas como alineadas con las características únicas de la, (agricultura orgánica) tales como fertilidad del suelo, manejo del agua, control de plagas y conservación del hábitat.

Cómo Acceder y Utilizar la Nota Técnica 12

Para utilizar eficazmente la Nota Técnica 12 en sus prácticas de agricultura orgánica, comience contactando a su oficina regional del Servicio de Conservación de Recursos Naturales (NRCS) (Oficina del Servicio Regional de Conservación de Recursos Naturales (NRCS) Su agente de campo del NRCS puede ofrecerte orientación útil sobre cómo aplicar las recomendaciones de la Nota Técnica 12 en su planificación de conservación mientras cumple con los estándares orgánicos.

Para más información y recursos, descargue nuestro folleto sobre la Nota Técnica 12 aquí. El folleto incluye un resumen de la Nota Técnica 12, consejos prácticos para su uso y preguntas sugeridas para hacerle a su agente del NRCS. Esto le ayudará a aprovechar al máximo el apoyo del NRCS y prepararse para su conversación.

No se pierda recursos valiosos como este: (Suscríbase a nuestro boletín) para recibir investigaciones innovadoras en agricultura orgánica, guías educativas y actualizaciones importantes sobre financiamiento y políticas.

By admin|2024-09-17T20:20:40+00:00September 13th, 2024|News, TOPP West|

A Call for Insights from Split and Non-Certified Operations

Our mission at OFRF is to “foster the improvement and widespread adoption of organic farming systems.” Organic certification has long been celebrated for its benefits to a variety of ecological and social systems; but we know that these benefits are not limited to fully certified organic farms. We understand that for a variety of reasons an operation will only have a portion of their land certified, or possibly forego certification entirely, but still operate as an organically-managed system. For those of you who manage operations like this, you have a unique perspective to observe and compare the impacts of organic practices across different types of land management systems.

We want to hear from producers like you about your relationship with and utilization of organic agriculture research. Research focused solely on conventional or chemical-based agriculture often cannot be applied to organic systems because it relies on inputs that are prohibited in organic farming. However, the opposite is not true: many organic practices can be beneficial for conventional farming operations as well. By understanding how split operations utilize organic principles, we can strengthen the case for increased funding in organic agriculture research that serves the entire agricultural community.

tractor driving across agricultural farm field

There are insights to gain from both split and non-certified organic operations about the benefits of organic.

Split Operations and the Potential of Organic Agricultural Systems

Split operations, where some fields are certified organic and others are managed using conventional chemistry- and genetic-based agricultural systems, provide an opportunity to offer valuable insights into the real-world application and benefits of organic farming practices and systems of management. This dual approach is a ripe opportunity for the observation of the effects of organic principles, such as cover cropping, complex crop rotations, reduced chemistry-dependance, and integrated pest management on their non-certified land.

We’re eager to hear your experiences and results from grasping this opportunity! The potential for healthier soils, increased resiliency of ecosystems, and even reduced input/fuel/labor costs is real.

Help Us Understand the Broader Impacts of Organic Research

Do you operate a split or non-certified operation that uses organic principles and systems? Do you know someone who does? We’re trying to hear from these operations to better understand how they might be using organic research in their decision making. Their experiences can help us better understand how organic agriculture research benefits the entire agricultural system, not just certified organic producers.

Quantitative analysis already shows that organic research benefits all of agriculture by developing methods that can improve soil health, enhance biodiversity, reduce input costs, and increase resilience against climate change. These benefits are not exclusive to certified organic farms—they are valuable to all farmers who are looking for sustainable, long-term solutions. Now we need your stories to make the qualitative points that illustrate these benefits!

Your Story Matters

Time and again, we hear in Washington that appropriators are hesitant to increase budgets for organic research programming because it is seen as too “niche” or doesn’t apply to all agricultural operations. If you or someone you know has a story to tell on this topic, it will be a crucial piece in helping us demonstrate the importance of organic agriculture research for the broader agricultural landscape.

Let’s work together to ensure that the benefits of organic agriculture are fully understood and leveraged for the good of all farming systems! Please reach out at gordon@ofrf.org.

Eat well and breathe deeply,

Gordon

By admin|2024-09-09T19:07:52+00:00September 9th, 2024|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

Farmer Led Trials Program Spotlight: Salad Days Farm

Written by Mary Hathaway, OFRF’s Research & Education Program Manager

A female farmer in a purple coat smiles as the camera in front of rows of lettuce growing in a high tunnel.

Maggie Dungan, farmer at Salad Days Farm

Salad Days farm is a diverse vegetable operation situated on 30 acres in Versailles, Kentucky. Certified organic since 2015, farmer Maggie Dungan’s interest in growing food started with an education in nutrition and the long dream for her family to be self-sustaining. The farm grows year round in the field and in hoop houses to supply their on-farm store, restaurants, schools, and four weekly farmers markets.

Maggie works hard to keep mechanization on her farm minimal, focusing on cover cropping, minimal tillage, and other soil health conservation practices. She keeps only 2-4 acres of the farm in production, allowing her to focus on the quality of her systems to grow high value and sustainable food for her community.

Impact of Solarization on Soil Microbiology

The inside of a high tunnel, showing alternating rows of uncovered soil and soil covered with clear plastic for solarization research.

Solarization plots in the high tunnel.

Maggie was first exposed to the practice of solarization using clear plastic in 2022 when the farm participated in a research project with the University of Kentucky. The project studied the effect of solarization in high tunnels on root-knot nematode populations. She was impressed by the results of the trial, and saw first-hand how this technique impacted a persistent soil pathogen.

Organic farmers like Maggie that focus on minimizing tillage must still manage pathogens, weeds, and other common challenges, and solarization offers potential benefits. However, Maggie was concerned about the impact of the treatment on her soil health, and had some questions – if solarization kills pathogens, won’t it kill the good microbiology, too? How does heat smothering with a plastic tarp impact soil microbial activity? What is the impact on fungal to bacterial ratios?

Before beginning to incorporate soil solarization into her field plans, Maggie wanted some answers, and applied for OFRF’s Farmer Led Trial program to help her build out a solid research plan and find reliable results that would have a positive impact on her operation.

Farm trial plan

With technical support from OFRF, the Salad Days trial on soil solarization took shape. By refining her research question to: “What is the temporal and population effect of solarization on the beneficial microbes in the high tunnel?,” the research team was able to build an approachable and testable project on the farm.

Maggie and OFRF built out a block design with two treatments: No soil solarization in the hoop house, used as her control, or regular practice compared to soil solarization in the hoop house. Using her 30’x100’ hoop house as the location for the trial and mapping areas for the treatments, Maggie used a microbiometer to take three different soil samples: first a baseline reading, then one 2 weeks and 4 weeks, respectively, after the tarp had been removed from the treatment plots.

What is solarization?

Solarization is the process of placing a clear plastic tarp over a field or garden bed to heat up the soil underneath. The intention of solarization is to kill weeds or grass, but is also known to reduce pathogen populations in the soil.

On-farm trial updates

Maggie took her final soil reading in early August, four weeks after she removed the tarps from their beds. While she originally hypothesized that the soil microbes would bounce back, she guessed that their populations would need some time to recover after the tarp treatment.

8 bags of soil sit on a metal counter next to a soil testing kit.

Soil testing for the On Farm Trial.

The OFRF team has begun to work with the data collected to get an understanding of any significant differences. In Maggie’s experiment, we see that microbial biomass over time differed depending on whether or not the area had been tarped. Under solarization, microbial biomass increased over time, while biomass decreased over time in areas that had not been tarped. As well, the Fungal to Bacterial ratio was higher under solarization than bare soil. The ratio was not affected by time after tarp removal.

The data is compelling, and OFRF will be looking into similar research to better understand the why of these results and give Maggie the assurance she is looking for to deploy a practice that continues to foster the health of her soil and improve her farming system.

“Being able to tailor a research project specific to my farm but useful to all growers has been a great opportunity and having the technical assistance from OFRF has been integral.”

– Maggie Dungan, Salad Days Farm

A graph showing the microbial biomass in solarized and non solarized plots over time, with solarized plots higher than the control.

This story is part of a series profiling farmers who are taking part in OFRF’s Farmer Led Trials (FLT) program. Farmers receive technical support from OFRF to address their challenges through structured on-farm trials. To learn more about OFRF Farmer Led Trials Program, visit our website page at https://ofrf.org/research/farmer-led-research-trials/

To learn more about soil solarization, check out these helpful resources on the web: https://extension.umn.edu/planting-and-growing-guides/solarization-occultation

To learn more about Salad Days Farm visit https://www.saladdaysfarm.com

Learn more about OFRF’s Farmer Led Trials Program

By admin|2024-09-10T18:26:23+00:00September 5th, 2024|Farmer Stories, FLT Highlight, News|

From Classrooms to Congress

An Intern’s Journey into Food and Agricultural Policy with OFRF

Rebecca Champagne (she/her/hers)

Conservation Scientist