News

Board Spotlight: Why I Served 10+ Years on the Board of OFRF

OFRF’s Board of Directors brings together farmers, researchers, and industry leaders who share a common belief: organic agriculture is a proven solution and deserves investment to match. As board member Keith Richards steps down after 12 years of service, he sat down with former board member Katrina Heinze to talk about his path into sustainable agriculture, what OFRF’s work has meant to him, and his hopes for the future of organic.

Meet Keith Richards

No, not that Keith Richards. This is a different kind of rock star.

Keith has served on the board of the Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF) for 12 years, following nearly three decades of working for the Southern Sustainable Agriculture Working Group. There, he strengthened organic and sustainable farming across the Southern United States, coordinating thousands of conference sessions and training projects, all to meet the needs of family farmers and community organizations. He’s a true rock star of the sustainable, organic agriculture world. And after more than a decade of service on the OFRF board, he’s stepping down.

Katrina Heinze, a former OFRF board member herself, as well as a scientist and organic expert for food companies and boards like General Mills, Lundberg Family Farms, and the National Organic Standards Board, talks to Keith about why he gave so many years to OFRF.

They touch on everything ranging from how they became involved with organic (hint: from entirely different perspectives!) to the current moment in organic, to the work of OFRF, to what gives them hope.

If you’ve ever felt like the idea and practice of sustainability is your guiding star, you’ll want to watch this.

Transcript

Introductions

Katrina Heinze

Okay. Keith, hello. Hi. I am super excited that you’ve chosen me as your partner for this chat, celebrating your 12 years of board service with OFRF.

If I’ve got it right, we overlapped for eight years on the board, and we probably have a lot to talk about on the impact OFRF has had on us, on the things we care about.

So I thought for this conversation, we’d start by introducing ourselves. So go ahead. Tell whoever’s watching a little bit about you.

Keith Richards

All right. And it’s great to be chatting with you, too, after serving with you in the past. So thanks.

Katrina, I’ve been on the OFRF board for 11 and a half years, going on 12. And I started my career in sustainable agriculture 40 years ago.

So it’s been a big part of my life, of my adult life. I have worked on farms, I’ve worked with cooperatives of farmers who were organic, I’ve also worked for organizations regionally and nationally.

So I’ve worked at a lot of different levels, and both in production and marketing and in dealing with education, doing special projects to help farmers.

And after working in production early on in my life, I decided my niche was more in serving the farmers that are there, and not actually doing the production work. So once I realized that, that’s been what I’ve focused on: serving farmers who are trying to be more sustainable, more organic right from the start.

I grew up on a farm in Iowa that wasn’t organic, and I don’t remember much about it.

And the agriculture around me growing up, I wasn’t interested in at all. So what I came back to is this idea that you could be sustainable, that you could constantly improve and be a steward of the land.

So, that was my interest that stayed my interest all the way through. Probably the biggest thing that I have felt and taken away from 40 years is just the people.

I mean, that’s what’s given me back. Just the farmers, hundreds of farmers that I’ve gotten to know who are good stewards and are really trying to do the right thing with farming.

They’re just so wonderful and it’s so wonderful to serve them. And likewise, when I got on the OFRF board, I’m working with people who are either farmers or are serving in other capacities of this whole movement.

And it’s just a joy to be working with them, to work for those farmers and with the people that are at OFRF.

So that’s a little bit about me.

Katrina Heinze

Oh, I love that, having served with you, that really rings true. Let me give a brief background about me and then I have a follow-up question on that.

So I’m Katrina Heinze.

I also served on the OFRF board for nine years, ending in 2023. I’m a lifelong organic consumer, not a farmer.

And I think that’s part of what makes OFRF really cool is that, as you said, we represent lots of different parts of the movement and we come together, you know, to serve the mission and our farmers. I spent 20 years working with branded organic food brands.

And I think what would be useful for people to know is I came to organic for the environmental benefits and really starting with concern for water quality.

Growing up in California, it grew my commitment as a young adult, and then as I worked professionally, it accelerated through my work with OFRF, learning about all the other holistic benefits of organic, you know, these broad ecosystem benefits, farmworker safety and health.

And then something that you’ve really spoken a lot about is local community development, and farmer resilience, both their lands, but also economically.

And I think that’s something that the more you learn about organic, the more we really all become more committed to it.

So my follow-up question is, you’ve always said that you came to it, you rejected the agriculture you grew up with.

And really wanted to do something more sustainable, more sustainable. To you, what does sustainable mean? 

What does sustainability really mean? 

Keith Richards

Boy, that’s a good question. I once heard a speaker, I think he was from Texas, but I don’t have his name, at an early conference that I went to that described sustainability as something you never reach.

It’s like a star that guides you. And so the star that guides the farmers that are trying to be more sustainable, that are using organic methods to move themselves along, have this star out there. They’re trying to do everything possible to be good stewards of their land, to take care of the soil and to build the soil, to be good stewards of their animals, to, like you said, help the community and just be the best people that they can be.

But you’re never. You’re never going to reach there. You’re never going to be perfect. There’s always more to do.

There are always challenges to all that. So sustainability to me is this guiding star that you’re looking out for.

And organics is one way to latch yourselves onto a process that already has many people on that path.

So you can go along with those people and not be on your own. We can talk about it more, but the research is a big part of that too, but sustainability is the star that people are going for.

Connecting with OFRF 

Katrina Heinze

Oh, I’m really glad I asked that. That was really beautiful. Thank you. Let’s connect back to OFRF.

So how did you first encounter OFRF?

Keith Richards

Um, probably three or four years before I joined the board, I was working for the Southern Sustainable Agriculture Working Group, and we applied for a grant.

OFRF was giving out grants to research at that time, and we applied for one and didn’t receive it, but I learned a lot.

I talked to the person who coordinated the grants. I found out more about OFRF and what they do and realized that what they do is so important and needs to be supported because there were organizations like ours and farmers and researchers who have good ideas and want to do the research, and there wasn’t enough funding to go around.

So, it was being rejected for that grant. But realizing, wow, there’s a huge need for this.

Katrina Heinze

Well, I’m going to go off script again. That’s such a telling story about the history of research and organic.

Because I think that was a time before there was a lot of public funding. And a lot of the funding had to be privately supplied by organizations like OFRF.

So when you look at the history and the arc of the work that this organization does, I think something that I’m really proud of is how it’s evolved to meet the current needs.

But it all stays true to those roots of research and science and advocacy for research that helps farmers. Why do you think OFRF’s work is so important?

Keith Richards

That’s a big question. Or I’m going to answer it in a big way. Let’s say that.

Farmers in America, all farmers, are responsible for stewarding about half the land in America. Forty-six percent, I think, is the latest number.

And they are the ones that are determining how that use is going on in that land and the resources that go on it and the resources or the whatever, waste or other things that come off of it.

And that’s a huge… It’s part of our society, and I don’t think people think about that a whole lot, and of course their farmers are almost invisible, the people themselves, because they’re such a small percent, you know, one percent of the population or so. Farmers in general are so important, and good farmers are always trying to be good stewards, and to take care of the land, and to be more sustainable. They may not use those terms, but they’re trying to do that, and they need a lot of help, you know. 

Doing it alone is impossible, there are so many challenges to farming. When they’re met with a challenge, like, ‘I want to build my soil better, or I would like to figure out how to stop these diseases on my tomatoes,’ you know, specific challenges like that, they look to research. They look to ‘Where is the science? Where is the education behind that?’ And so OFRF, by really focusing on helping the farmers that have already been following the organic path, they’re helping all the farmers.

They’re helping all of them move more sustainably. They’re helping the farmers that are certified organic, they’re getting answers to their challenges and understanding how they can do their job better.

But any farmer can access it. You don’t have to join their organic club to, you know, to be able to access and find out, oh, there is research that helps me too, and I’m going to be a better farmer, and I’m not even certified organic.

And so I feel like the work that OFRF does, and the research, especially, then the advocacy for it, and the education that goes around it, helps move all farmers who want to be good farmers in America.

It especially helps the organic ones become even better. So that’s one long version.

Katrina Heinze

I like that really big picture, the why it really matters, that 46% of the land is farmed land, so it’s being nurtured and stewarded by our farmers.

But yeah, farmers are a really small percentage of the population. That’s good to kind of remind us of the big why, because my answer for this was maybe more from where I come from, further along in the supply chain, right, and was much more centered on- I don’t think there’s another organization that does exactly what OFRF does, right?

It’s always been farmer-centered, science-based, and it’s been about organic farming practices, and you alluded to that, right, that OFRF doesn’t have an us-versus-them mentality, you’re either organic or you’re not. By focusing on the practices, OFRF really recognizes that these are practices that can scale across the supply chain.

And OFRF celebrates every farmer who takes up those practices and kind of chases, circling back to what you said before, chases that sustainability star, right?

You know, having worked for a company that was both organic and non-organic, people really resonate with that.

And when you look at how much, you know, farmers are really being hit right now with economic challenges and weather challenges.

It’s really hard for farmers, you know, every season is a different season. And having an organization that helps them try to figure out how to navigate that, I think can be really important.

The other kind of thought I had on this is, you know, we talked earlier that the more you learn about organic, the more you commit to organic.

And that’s true for farmers too, right? They take up one practice and then they’re like, oh, I see how that’s helping me. Now I’m going to take up another one. 

And OFRF, really, with how they connect farmers to each other, their farmer-led trials, I think, can be a part of that.

The other thing I think about sometimes, and you talked about this, you know, farming sometimes can be a lonely business, right?

It’s you and your land. That can be especially true for organic farmers. It certainly was true for the early pioneers.

But you think about the farmers today, still, sometimes they’re the only organic farmer in their county, right?

They can’t go to the neighbors. They don’t go to the local coffee shop. So having an organization today that’s trying to connect farmers, I think, can be really valuable.

And certainly there are other organizations doing that as well.

Keith Richards

Yeah, there are, but not, and you’ve really nailed it, but not with this specific focus. You know, through the lens of research, I don’t think there are any that are doing it the way that OFRF does it with that focus.

And it’s so key. I mean, research is key to so much that you do on the farm, understanding, you know, science, why this worked or that didn’t work, and what’s going on, and how can I make it better?

Katrina Heinze

Right. Well, especially now with farmers, like, dealing with new pests or new diseases, right? I used to say all the time, and many of the farmers that I worked with early on in my career would say that they were on-farm scientists, like, constantly doing research.

And part of it is capturing that and capturing those good ideas.

And I know OFRF, on the board, we’ve talked about, how do we do that better? How do we help that?

Because there’s a lot of knowledge out there that isn’t being grabbed. So let’s turn to, in your 12 years, you probably have a couple of these moments or stories that really stand out to you that were really rewarding or had a really big impact.

What are some of your favorite OFRF stories?

Favorite OFRF stories 

Keith Richards

Yeah. In my work with OFRF, I’m on the board. I’m one step back from working directly with the farmers.

You know, I’ve worked in all my other work, you know, when I’m doing non-board work, I have worked directly with farmers.

But with OFRF, what I see is more of a broader impact and not so much, you know, oh, this farmer told me this, you know, and that’s why I do the work.

That’s why OFRF is so important. What’s really stood out to me recently is getting the Organic Research Hub up and running. I’ve talked to farmers and let them know about it, or they’ve said, yeah, I’ve used that, and I found some research that is really useful for me.

And it’s easy to use. I can, you know, I’m not digging through books, and I’m not calling several people and everything.

So getting that up and running, one place where researchers and farmers can go to, and eventually we’ll be able to see all the organic research that’s ever been done and be able to find it through sorting.

So that’s been a huge one for me. Another one, you go ahead.

Katrina Heinze

Well, I was going to say, I agree, because that happened after I got off the board, you know. And that’s something we dreamed about for years, and to see it live and in action is pretty cool.

Keith Richards

It is very cool. It is huge. I mean, that’s a game plan. Another one, you alluded to it or mentioned it earlier, is getting up and running the Organic Farmer Research grants and assistance.

Katrina Heinze

It’s more than a grant.

Keith Richards

Assistance for farmers who are doing the on-farm research and actually getting a program running now that it’s helped a few.

Hopefully, my hope is that that will grow a lot more and OFRF will be able to work with farmers who are already doing research on their farm, but maybe they don’t know the scientific method, or they just need help in collecting results or so forth and putting it into context.

We’ve been doing that over the last couple of years. And again, if that continues, that could be really important research that I don’t believe those farmers are getting anywhere else.

Katrina Heinze

Yeah, like bringing that science off the farm, like we talked about.

Keith Richards

Yeah, I like that.

Katrina Heinze

I’m reacting to what you said and thinking about how I would answer this question. And being really grateful to have served on the board with an organization where dreams flourish.

So how I would answer this question is, you know, when I joined the board, Brise, OFRF was coming out of a tough financial time.

In general, lots of organizations were struggling. Brise came on, she was our new executive director and our only employee. And so she was really kind of scraping by, figuring out how to do the most important work and get funding for a couple of things that were really going to have impact.

And she called me. I was at General Mills at the time. And she explained the National Organic Research Agenda.

I was like, huh? Okay. Yeah, that’s kind of interesting. You know, General Mills likes to fund projects. I said, let me see.

And so General Mills funded it. And I’ll be honest, I kind of understood what it was, but I didn’t really understand the impact.

And then a year later, it got published. And I was like, oh, I get it. It was a national survey of farmers to say, what do you need?

What are the priorities? What are the biggest issues? And I look now at, you know, the most recent NORA that got published.

I think, how did we get this far? It’s got so much information. I use it fairly regularly when, you know, I’m here in Minnesota advocating with our Department of Ag, or I’m writing to my senators, trying to support organic research.

And there’s so much in there that you can come back to and say, here’s why it’s important or look, here’s the progress.

And that’s what I mean a little bit by, like, dreams flourish, because ideas like Farmer-Led Trials or the Research Hub, right, ideas that have stayed alive through different staff, different boards, and you see them happening now, it feels like an organization that’s really thriving, but also really committed to them.

Keith Richards

I’m really glad you brought that up because I brought up two recent examples, but the NORA, the National Organic Research Agenda, is just huge.

I mean, I worked for 30 years in my career for Southern SAWG, out of the 40 years that I said I’ve been involved in this, and I ran the annual conference for that, and got the speakers and put together the agendas for that conference for most of those 30 years.

And the NORA from OFRF was my bible. I mean, it’s just, it guided me all the way along. I could see, this is what farmers have said they need, and it’s divided by region.

This is what farmers in the South that I was focused on need. Here’s what they’re looking for. It’s a huge resource.

Katrina Heinze

I’m glad you brought that up. But it all ties together, right? Because NORA tells us what we need, and the OFRF works across the movement, across the industry to advocate for more funding, you know, gives tools to other people so they can advocate for more funding, helps farmers connect.

Keith Richards

One example of the way that OFRF helps that may not be seen… And let’s say because of changing climate or whatever, there’s something new going on on a farm.

A farmer is seeing a disease. So, Anna’s tomatoes or her tomatoes. And so you identify the disease, you know, through extension or online, then start to study.

‘What am I going to do about those?’ You can go to the Organic Research Hub and start to look at what research has been done.

You can go to talk to your extension agent or talk to somebody at the university, and they can use that resource too.

Or they may have gotten other information from OFRF in the past that helps build their body of knowledge. So that’s one way.

And then you may say, oh, what I need to do is I need to change some conditions on my farm.

I’ll get NRCS, which is the Natural Resources Conservation Service run by the USDA. You can get them involved. So OFRF has been working for the past three or four years to help their agents understand how to work with organic farmers and use the organic methods on their farms. So there’s another place where OFRF is already involved and already helping that farmer who’s trying to figure that out.

And then the farmer goes, okay, I got the disease figured out. I want to make some changes on my farm.

Now I need to do a little bit on-farm research about it. They apply for a grant for the organic research project from OFRF, and possibly they’ll get chosen to be in a cohort and learn about organic research, and be able to do that on their farm.

So all these places, they’re being touched. And meanwhile, there’s other research that’s going on that OFRF advocated for that helped ensure that the funding that some of these researchers got funded that are working on this problem and lots of other problems.

So one farmer trying to solve one problem may be touched by the work of OFRF in four or five different places.

That makes me really proud of the work that OFRF has done.

Katrina Heinze

Oh, I am so glad you said that. And as you described it, I was like, yeah, I am really proud of what OFRF is doing for exactly that reason, right?

And I’m so glad you mentioned the work they’ve done with USDA to help NRCS and extension folks have more access and awareness.

Because that really extends the reach, right? It’s not, you have to come to OFRF to get the data or you have to go, right?

It meets farmers where they’re typically going to go get the information and helps their extension agents be more familiar with practices, systems, the unique things that make being an organic farmer harder, challenging, or different. And there’s yet another place where, because OFRF is farmer-centered, they’d heard that that was a challenge, right?

The folks were going into their offices and had super helpful extension agents, but agents who maybe didn’t, you know, have as much familiarity with organic farming.

Okay. I’m like all in again. You know, I’ve been off the board for a few years and I’m like, look at all the great work OFRF is doing.

As you step away from the board, what are your hopes and dreams for OFRF and the organic movement?

Hopes and dreams for the organic movement 

Keith Richards

Another big question.

Katrina Heinze

Yeah, it’s a big question.

Keith Richards

Well, again, I’ll take a broader answer first and then narrow in. But broadly, my hopes for the whole movement and OFRF’s place in it are… Let me start with this.

When I got involved and found out that there was this movement of sustainable organic agriculture back in 1985, I naively thought, hey, this is the wave of the future.

I don’t see why all the farmers wouldn’t be learning what I’m learning and start doing this. And so my dream at that time was that organic would become the way of farming in the United States, that it would become the dominant form.

And that’s still my dream. That hasn’t changed at all. And OFRF has that same dream, that’s one of the missions of OFRF, that it works to make organic the dominant system of farming.

We are quite a ways from it, but it’s doable. It’s very doable. Other countries are moving much quicker than the United States.

So because OFRF does that, my dream is that it grows in the programs that it has and is able, like I mentioned earlier, that the farmer research program, you know, that instead of having 10 farmers that OFRF works with, that they could have 100, you know, at some point.

Or do a way where they could get other organizations involved regionally and be able to continue these so they can increase the impact of what they’re already doing and that they can continue to get more and more organic research done.

So it’s not so much a change of tactic or do this bigger, but taking some of the tactics that are really working now and just growing them much bigger, much bigger.

You know, so that would be my hope.

Katrina Heinze

Yeah, that is the common dream, right? That these practices become really widespread and used. And there’s times where you see a lot of success in that.

When you see mainstream farmers really embracing the benefits of cover cropping because organic has shown its benefits. And seeing OFRF continue to be kind of a really important cog in creating that leading edge knowledge, right?

There was a time where most of agriculture thought cover cropping was a bad idea. And now, you know, there’s, I think, a general consensus, not totally adopted yet, but there’s a general consensus that cover cropping is the next big idea.

Right? Or one big idea. And there’s so many other practices that with good science can continue on that continuum.

And like you, it’s a hope that OFRF can continue to grow their programs and see the ways to bring that science to farmers and to public policy figures to, to make those differences, right? And industry leaders. Who can really, you know, encourage those practices among all farmers.

Because the kind of science supports it. Okay, here, here’s a really big question, Keith. How would you describe the current moment in organic?

The current moment in organic

Keith Richards

I won’t try to talk about the whole history of organic. I would like to put it in context, but, uh, we don’t have enough time for that.

So, the current moment, I feel like there are a lot more resources for organic farmers than there have been in the last 40 or 50 years.

Technology has made those resources at their fingertips, you know, so that’s happened, you know, in the whole world with all of different sectors, but it’s especially important for farmers because, like we talked about earlier, they are out there alone and often don’t even have anybody they can talk to in their county.

So that has been a huge change, and I feel like organizations like OFRF are learning to use those technologies better and better to be able to get more resources into the farmers’ hands.

And that’s one thing that we’re at, that moment where that has already expanded, but it could probably go a lot further in ways that I can’t even envision.

So while that’s going on, the farmers are… They are able to access more information, and they’re able to do it on their farm, and it’s good information, science-backed information.

At the same time, there are so many challenges, and they’re just exploding on the farmers. I mean, there’s changing markets, there’s contamination coming in from other sources now on their farms, there’s changing technology.

A farmer’s job is unbelievable already, but they’re already challenged with all these other things.

So, the biggest one among all of those is the climate change. Right. And that, and that’s just, that’s just all the time now.

Farmers are constantly saying, I had an extreme weather event, it’s changed how I deal with my crops. 

It used to be that, you know, oh, we had a late freeze and then a flood, and that was the, you know, that was the ‘02, you know, or ‘82.

You would remember those years because they were only every 20 years, but now it’s every year. It’s every year.

It’s every season. So we’re at this point where the farmers have more technology and there’s more research available, but we need way more with the overview of climate change.

Now we need to look at all these ways that we need to do research and we need to help come up with systems under climate change, under a changing climate.

So I feel like those are the, those are some of the key points that we’re at this intersection with.

Katrina Heinze

Yeah. When I think about this, there’s so much that we could worry about, right? And climate change certainly centers that.

It’s such a challenge for farmers to think about even, you know, are they growing the right crops? Crops that have been grown in their region for generations now don’t seem to make sense.

And how do they think about that when, at the same time, they are, you know, really, really important parts of our survival because they grow our food and our food security and are the hubs of our rural communities.

And so we could be really worried. But at the same time, I think there’s hope that more and more of society is realizing that how we farm really matters.

And it matters for our economic health. It matters for our community, sense of community, maybe, right? It matters for our food security.

But there’s also, it’s interesting, earlier on, you talked about how, you know, when you started, there weren’t a lot of resources and how, you know, that has changed and grown.

You know, I think about me coming into it as a consumer, someone who is buying organic, and I think I had a really naive understanding of what organic meant and what its benefits were.

And there’s still so much opportunity, I think, for the people who buy food to understand- I think more folks are understanding that how it’s farmed matters, but how do they, how can they come to really understand that?

And I think that’s a challenge and an opportunity. I love that OFRF meets that by not getting involved in that, right?

They’re just saying, we’re helping farmers farm in ways that help the farmers. And we’ll leave this other challenge to other groups.

And I think that, that speaks to a wise organization that is kind of trying to navigate that and stay focused.

Keith Richards

When you buy organic, you’re supporting organic farmers. You’re voting with your dollar. You know, you’re saying, this is what I want. This is what I support. And that supports that percentage of farmers who are certified organic. When you support OFRF, you’re supporting all the farmers.

You’re supporting that you want good research. You want good information. You want advocacy for this type of research and education that is focused on the farmers that are already moving quite a ways on that continuum towards that star.

But you’re helping all of them because all of them have access to it. So you’re helping change 46% of the land use in America if you would support OFRF.

I still advocate for buying organic food, too.

Katrina Heinze

Yeah. But you’re doing even more when you support OFRF. Thank you for saying that because I’m thinking back to our conversation about the National Organic Research Agenda.

One of the things, and I talked about how much I’ve loved seeing that grow and evolve, like so many of OFRF’s programs.

One of the things that’s been added is the focus on transitioning farmers.

Keith Richards

Yes. Right. And what do transitioning farmers need and what are their unique challenges?

Getting involved

Katrina Heinze

And that’s a demonstration of how OFRF is trying to expand that net and help more and more farmers move along the continuum.

Yeah. I’m going to steal that if you don’t mind. Like, buy organic food and you’re supporting organic farmers. Support OFRF and you’re supporting all farmers.

I like that. So maybe we wrap up with, how do you recommend others get involved? And I’m going to kick off a little bit because there’s always dollars, right?

Dollars help, they help us do a wide range of work, contribute to all the different programs. I thought of, you know, other ways that for me as someone who is mostly engaged as someone who buys and eats food, getting to know your local farmers.

The organic ones, the ones who want to be organic, like get to know their challenges and connect that to the work of OFRF.

There are great resources on the OFRF website. My favorite, the one I use a lot, is the Get Active Guide, something that didn’t exist when I was on the board.

So another new thing where you can look, you can understand the state of organic in your state. There are guides to how to write letters or talk to your legislators. I work with the Department of Ag here in Minnesota.

And just recently, they asked for input on the need for public funding of organic research. And I thought, I know just the place to go.

And there was a really good blog post by the policy team at OFRF. And I said, here you go.

I said, here’s the state research. And let me point you to NORA.

And the team I work with said, wow, that was really robust. I thought, oh, thank you, OFRF. You know, because our Minnesota legislature is going to look at that.

And they’re going to make decisions about what to fund. And that public funding matters. And I’ve used it, you know, with private organizations as well.

So what are other ways that you think about that people can… get involved?

Keith Richards

Well, when you first find out about OFRF, and many people probably have already done this, get on the newsletter list, and then look at that newsletter.

And like you’ve already said, it can lead you to all these other things. There are so many resources, but get on that list and start looking at it.

Then look at the newsletters when they come out. They can lead you. 

You already covered so much. I mean, I would have also said, you know, talk to farmers if you’re not a farmer, or if you are a farmer, and you have maybe used OFRF a little bit, you know, let others know about it.

Let your neighbor know about it, that there are these resources. You don’t have to preach organic, just like you’ve talked about.

It’s useful for all farmers. Don’t be scared of the organic in the name, you know. Or don’t be scared about the farming in the name, for people who don’t know farming. Don’t be scared about any of those. You know, this is useful information for everybody in America.

Katrina Heinze

I love that.

Keith Richards

And if you are already involved in this work in some way, you know, or really passionate about it, you can always take other steps.

You can always talk to our executive director, talk to Brise, talk to a board member. You can look them up online and see if there is something you can volunteer for.

You know, maybe you want to become a board member in the future, or maybe become an advisor. We also have different teams of advisors that are helping with some of the work that we’re doing now, so you can really step up to that level, but just starting with seeing what all is there with OFRF and letting other people know about it, and like you said, sending dollars always helps.

That’s a key.

Katrina Heinze

And telling your story. I mean, I think that’s another way. OFRF is always looking for folks to share why what OFRF does matters to them individually, how they’ve benefited, and that makes the newsletters richer and helps us all stay connected.

Is there anything else that you would want to talk about as you think about stepping off the board or would want to kind of share with the universe?

Keith Richards

When I was asked to do this, and we had a little warm-up talk, I thought, okay, I need to write down some notes.

I started writing down notes this morning, and this is a book. I’m just like, there is so much that I feel is so important about the work that OFRF has been involved in, has been leading.

And the small ways that I’ve been involved, and the people that we’re doing it for, and the outcomes, I don’t have any nice summary for all that, so I don’t have anything short to add.

But I just want to say, it’s such a good organization, and it’s doing such important work. And having to think about it, and trying to put it into words for this conversation, really made me realize that even more.

Katrina Heinze

Well, thank you, Keith. Thank you for your service to the organization, your passion for the organization, for being an amazing colleague, teaching me so much during our eight years together.

And as it continued, and even in this conversation, because I agree with you, I’m, you know, committed to OFRF.

I’m so proud of what they do. And I’m so much more so after this conversation. And that really speaks to what you said, the people, the quality of the work, the importance of the work.

So thank you.

Keith Richards

And thank you for your past service to OFRF and teaching me along the way. So it’s mutual.

Katrina Heinze

This is fun. We could do this for hours now.

Keith Richards

I know.

By |2026-11-02T11:55:29-05:00November 2nd, 2026|News|

Farmer-Led Trials Program Spotlight: Oxbow Farm and Conservation Center Digs Deeper in Year Two

Refining Cover Crop Management Under Drought: Building on Year One

Written by Mary Hathaway, OFRF’s Research & Education Program Manager, and Anthony Reyes, FLT Program participant

This on-farm trial at Oxbow Farm & Conservation Center test whether planting cover crops earlier than the farm’s standard timing can improve stand establishment, biomass production, and nutrient content under drought conditions. Results from this study will help organic farmers adapt their cover crop management strategies to an increasingly variable climate.

Farmer Anthony Reyes standing in the field.Source: Washington Soil Health Initiative

Anthony Reyes, Director of Agriculture at Oxbow Farm & Conservation Center.

Oxbow Farm & Conservation Center is a nonprofit farm nestled in the floodplains of the Snoqualmie Valley in Washington State. Anthony Reyes, the farm’s Director of Agriculture, oversees 81 acres of certified organic land, where he experiments with climate-adaptive and resilient agricultural practices alongside his team. Anthony’s work is driven by a commitment to reconciling human food needs with ecosystem health, integrating sustainable agriculture, forest management, ecological restoration, and education into the farm’s mission.

A key part of Anthony’s crop management strategy is strategically fallowing fields each year and planting them in cover crops. This practice helps protect the watershed, build soil nutrients, and manage weeds, pests, and diseases, while keeping the land productive and healthy for future seasons.

Not Just What Cover Crop to Use, But When

Oxbow Farm has long grappled with the challenge of selecting and managing cover crops that can perform reliably under the Pacific Northwest’s increasingly variable climate, particularly the dry summers and early-season drought conditions that have become more frequent in recent years. The farm typically plants cover crops in early June, a time when some early-season rainfall can still be expected, though little to no precipitation follows until September. In 2025, however, drought conditions set in unusually early, beginning in April, and significantly impacted cover crop performance across the region.

In their first year with OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials Program, Anthony and his team investigated whether seeding rate (planting at the standard recommended rate versus 25% above it) could improve biomass production and nutrient content in three cover crop varieties: German Foxtail Millet, Pearl Millet, and Sudex. In the trial, German Foxtail Millet and Sudex were the highest-yielding varieties under drought stress, while Pearl Millet struggled. Sudex showed the most vigor and tillering. Importantly, the higher seeding rate offered no yield advantage and actually diluted nitrogen concentration, pointing to the standard seeding rate as the more cost-effective choice under these conditions.

Read Oxbow Farm & Conservation Center’s 2025 FLT Final Report “Farmer-Led Trials: Impact of Seeding Rate on Cover Crop Performance.”

While the 2025 trial answered important questions about species performance and seeding rate, it also opened a new line of inquiry: if drought is a persistent and worsening reality, could adjusting when the cover crop is planted, rather than how densely, help improve establishment and biomass production? Anthony recognized that an earlier planting window might allow cover crops to take advantage of residual soil moisture before conditions dry out entirely, and set out to test this hypothesis in a second year of the Farmer-Led Trials Program.

Farm Trial Plan

A portion of the cover cropped trial field.

With technical support from OFRF, Anthony is conducting a second year of on-farm research to investigate the impact of planting date on stand density, biomass, and nutrient content of three cover crop varieties: German Foxtail Millet, Pearl Millet, and Sudex (‘Organic Blue River 225 Brand BMR,’ ‘German Foxtail Millet,’ and ‘Tifleaf III Hybrid Pearl Millet’). The trial uses a split-plot design across a roughly one-acre field (approximately 125 ft x 350 ft), with planting date as the whole-plot factor and cover crop species as the subplot factor. Two planting dates will be compared: an early planting around May 26 and a standard planting around June 9, which reflects Oxbow’s typical timing. There will be four replications of each treatment combination, for 24 total plots.

Measurements will be taken at two key points in the season. Shortly after each planting date’s emergence, the team will assess stand density by counting plants in a 2×2’ square area in each plot. At the end of the season, biomass and a nutrient density will be measured by analyzing plant material from two 2×2’ quadrats per plot. Together, these measurements will help Anthony and the OFRF team determine whether an earlier planting window meaningfully improves cover crop establishment and performance under drought conditions, and how the cover crops react with a different management variable.

Trial fields at Oxbow Farm and Conservation Center

“I have long been interested in conducting and furthering our on-farm research, having worked on and set up many trials throughout my career. The Farmer-Led Trial Program goes beyond and centers the experience and voice of farmers by identifying us as the content experts and by playing a highly supportive and facilitative role in creating sound research from our identified goals. I have greatly valued the time and care given by OFRF staff and am so appreciative of this program.” 

– Anthony Reyes, Oxbow Farm and Conservation Center

An overhead drone shot of Oxbow Farm and Conservation Center

This is part of a series of blogs highlighting farmers who are participating in OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials program. Farmers receive technical support to address their production challenges through structured on-farm trials. Learn more about OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials Program.

To learn more about Oxbow Farm and Conservation Center, visit their website.

By |2026-10-30T12:32:17-04:00October 30th, 2026|Farmer Stories, News|

Board Spotlight: Carrie-Anne Palmeri on Organic’s Next Chapter

OFRF’s Board of Directors brings together farmers, researchers, and industry leaders who share a common belief: organic agriculture is a proven solution and deserves investment to match. In this conversation, we sat down with board member Carrie-Anne Palmeri, Organic Program Manager at Nature’s Path Organic Foods, to talk about her path into organic farming and policy, what draws her to OFRF’s work, and where she sees the biggest opportunity for organic research to make a difference.

Meet Carrie-Anne

Tell us about yourself and how you became involved with Nature’s Path.

OFRF board member Carrie-Anne Palmeri in the woods in winter, black and whiteMy name is Carrie-Anne Palmeri, and I serve as the Organic Program Manager at Nature’s Path Organic Foods, North America’s largest independent organic breakfast and snack food company. In my role, I oversee the strategic development of Nature’s Path’s Organic Program and help lead the company’s work in organic advocacy, regulatory affairs, and public education to protect organic integrity and expand access to organic food. I also sit on OFRF’s Board of Directors as Secretary and as President of the Board of Directors at the Canada Organic Trade Association.

My journey into organics began as a diversified organic vegetable and berry farmer in Vermont. From there, I spent more than a decade living and working throughout Mexico and Latin America as a farmer, technical extension agent, community organizer, and regulator, helping advance organic agriculture, food security, and sustainable farming systems. That work gave me a deep appreciation for the interconnectedness of farming, policy, markets, and environmental stewardship. Today, I bring that systems-level perspective to Nature’s Path, where I am proud to help strengthen and grow the organic movement alongside farmers, researchers, industry partners like OFRF, and organic advocacy groups across North America.

And Nature’s Path itself, how does the company’s work connect to organic agriculture and research? 

At Nature’s Path, we believe organic agriculture is much more than a way of growing food. It is a pathway to healthier ecosystems, more resilient communities, and a food system that leaves the Earth better than we found it. As a family-founded and independently owned organic food company, we have spent over 40 years championing organic farming, investing in supply chains that support growers, and helping make organic food more accessible to families across North America.

OFRF Board Member Carrie-Anne at a farm in Kenya with three other people.

Carrie-Anne visiting a farm in Kenya with Nature’s Path.

Our work intersects with both organic agriculture and research because we understand that the future of organic depends on continuous learning and innovation. Through initiatives like our Regenerative Organic Oats (ROO) Program, we collaborate with farmers, researchers, nonprofits, and industry partners to test and scale practices that improve soil health, strengthen farm resilience, and support long-term environmental outcomes. We also actively engage in organic standards development, policy discussions, and industry leadership to ensure organic agriculture continues to evolve while maintaining the integrity that consumers trust.

For us, research is not confined to laboratories or academic institutions. It happens in farmers’ fields, across supply chains, and through partnerships that connect scientific knowledge with real-world agricultural practice. By helping bridge those worlds, our team works to ensure that organic agriculture remains a powerful solution and increasingly chosen option for advancing biodiversity, climate resilience, healthy food systems, and thriving rural communities for generations to come.

What draws you to organic on a personal level?

For me, the way we grow our food and the food we choose to eat is a deeply personal and communal endeavor—a lifestyle, a life’s purpose, and a socio-environmental movement that I deeply believe in.

OFRF Board Member Carrie-Anne Palmeri smiling near a bed of flowers.

Carrie-Anne got her start working at an organic farm in Vermont.

I came to organic through farming. As a small-scale organic farmer—first in Vermont and then in Mexico for many years—I experienced firsthand the intimate and deeply healing practice of tending a piece of land and, in return, being tended by it. Farming has taught me patience, humility, and reciprocity. It has shown me that healthy food begins long before harvest, fundamentally with healthy relationships between people and the living agroecology that we steward and become a part of on our farms.

That experience opened the door to a now two-decade career working alongside farmers around the world. I was fortunate to spend years working hands-on with small- and medium-scale farming communities throughout Mexico and Central America, learning not only from their agricultural practices but from their wisdom, resilience, and commitment to caring for the land. Those experiences gave me a profound appreciation for the central role farmers play in shaping both our present and our future. Farmers are among the original stewards of our landscapes, and every day they make decisions that influence the health of ecosystems, communities, and generations to come.

What inspires me most about organic is that it recognizes these connections.

“Organic is rooted in the understanding that the health of our planet and the health of the people we love and communities we serve cannot be separated.”

OFRF Board Member Carrie-Anne smiling in the mountains of Honduras.

Carrie-Anne visiting a farm in Honduras.

It asks us to view food as more than a commodity to be consumed and instead as a relationship and a deeply nuanced conversation between people and the places they inhabit.

For me, organic is also fundamentally about justice and equity. Justice in our food system depends on the deeply entwined decisions farmers make in the field and consumers make in the marketplace. Those choices create ripples that extend far beyond the farm, shaping and determining the livelihoods of farming communities, the resilience of local economies, the protection of biodiversity, and the future of our food system. Organic gives me an opportunity to align the seemingly simple decision in the marketplace with values that deeply resonate with me: stewardship, fairness, and long-term care.

Organic in the U.S. and Canada: Shared Roots, Different Paths

What are the similarities and differences in the successes and challenges of organic agriculture in the United States and Canada?

The organic movement in both the United States and Canada really comes from the same place. In both countries, it started as a grassroots effort led by farmers, environmental advocates, and consumers who believed agriculture could be about more than simply producing as much food as possible. It was rooted in a set of values: caring for the soil, protecting ecosystems, strengthening communities, and recognizing that a healthy food system is at the heart of a healthy society.

A groups of people walking around a farm under a blue sky with clouds.

Carrie Anne tours an organic farm with the Canada Organic Trade Association.

When you step back and look at how far organic has come, it’s actually pretty remarkable. What started as a collection of local and regional movements has grown into a federally regulated system with enforceable standards, accredited certification bodies, and international recognition. In both Canada and the U.S., organic has evolved from a niche movement into one of the most recognized and trusted certifications in the marketplace. That’s no small accomplishment.

At the same time, I think both countries are grappling with many of the same challenges. Organic has proven itself. Farmers, researchers, businesses, and consumers have demonstrated its value over and over again. Yet public policy, research investments, and agricultural support programs haven’t always kept pace. Organic delivers benefits that extend well beyond the farm gate, from healthier soils and greater biodiversity to cleaner water, climate resilience, and stronger rural economies. But many of the systems that shape agricultural funding and policy were designed around conventional production models, and organic farmers still often find themselves trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.

There are definitely differences between the two countries, especially when it comes to scale. The U.S. has a much larger domestic organic market, greater research capacity, and larger institutions supporting the sector. Canada’s organic community is smaller, but in many ways that’s led to an incredible culture of collaboration. With more limited resources, there’s often a greater emphasis on working together across organizations and sectors to move shared priorities forward.

The Board of the Canada Organic Trade Association posing for a group picture at a farm.

Carrie-Anne is the President of the Board of Directors at the Canada Organic Trade Association.

A great example of that is what we’re seeing right now through the Canadian Organic Alliance. Our colleagues at the Canada Organic Trade Association, Organic Federation of Canada, and Canadian Organic Growers have come together to build a stronger, more unified voice for organic on Parliament Hill. Their recent release of the first National Organic Action Plan for Canada is a tremendous milestone. It lays out a roadmap for strengthening everything from research and extension to market development, transition support, data collection, and government investment.

Honestly, I think it’s something the U.S. organic community can learn from. We have an incredibly vibrant and committed organic sector, but we also have a very diverse and sometimes fragmented ecosystem of organizations and stakeholders. It’s been more than a decade since the U.S. had a comprehensive National Organic Action Plan, and Canada’s recent effort shows what can happen when farmers, researchers, businesses, certifiers, nonprofits, and policymakers come together around a shared vision and coordinated set of priorities.

What gives me hope is that organic continues to punch above its weight in both countries. Despite limited resources, the movement has stayed remarkably true to its roots while growing into a sophisticated regulatory and market system. That’s not an easy balance to strike. Organic today is both a standards system and a broader vision for how agriculture can contribute to healthier ecosystems, stronger communities, and a more just and resilient food system. And I think that combination of values and practicality is exactly what has allowed the movement to endure and continue growing.

Why OFRF?

What draws you to OFRF’s work specifically?

We know organic systems are fundamentally different from conventional systems, and organic farmers need science that is designed specifically for the realities they face. What I appreciate about OFRF is that it starts with farmers and is a powerful platform for organic farmers’ needs to be heard and met. For decades, I have admired OFRF as a central convener—they work with farmers to help identify the problems that need solving, they work with researchers critical to helping develop solutions that meet farmers where they’re at, and they tirelessly convene actors and resources across the system to get those tools back to farmers in the field in the most impactful way possible.

2022 National Organic Research Agenda Cover

OFRF’s 2022 National Organic Research Agenda. The 2026 Report will launch early next year.

A perennial resource for me, and I think for many others across the organic community, is OFRF’s National Organic Farmer Survey and the resulting National Organic Research Agenda (NORA). These two initiatives are absolutely essential because they ensure that the national organic research agenda is informed directly by the people stewarding the land every day. Rather than researchers, funders, or policymakers deciding in isolation what organic farmers need, OFRF starts by (and returns to) listening to farmers and systematically identifying their most pressing production challenges, innovation needs, and knowledge gaps.

The National Organic Farmer Survey is a critical pulse check on the state of organic agriculture and NORA does a great job of translating the findings into actionable research priorities.  What do they do truly at the end of the day? They help direct scarce research dollars toward the issues that matter most.  They also provide researchers with a farmer-validated roadmap for developing projects that can deliver real-world impact and for those of us advocating on Capitol Hill, we’re able to point to a nationally representative body of farmer input that clearly articulates where barriers exist, where opportunities lie, and where additional public investment can have the greatest return. It lends credibility, depth, rigor and integrity to whatever ask we bring forward about the need for greater structural support for organic agriculture, so we’re not just relying on anecdotes.

Organic farmers are some of the most creative problem-solvers I’ve met, and they shouldn’t have to do that work alone. The research & advocacy support that OFRF has offered for decades has been essential to ensuring that organic becomes an accessible, viable and resilient choice for the farming community.

The Next Chapter: Investing in Organic Like It Matters

In your opinion, what is the most pressing challenge in agriculture that organic research can address? 

To me, the next chapter of organic is not about proving whether organic works. Farmers, researchers, and consumers have already demonstrated that. The challenge for us all now is ensuring that public policy, research investment, and agricultural support systems fully recognize organic agriculture as a proven public good and invest in it accordingly.

“The question now is less ‘Does organic work?’ and more ‘Are we willing to invest in it like it matters?'”

That’s one of the reasons I’m so drawn to OFRF’s work. It sits right in that space between the organic movement’s grassroots roots and the research, education, and policy infrastructure needed to help the movement grow and thrive over the long term.

A group of people smiling outside the US Capitol Building.

The Nature’s Path team advocating for organic in Washington D.C.

As I shared earlier, there are persistent structural gaps in public investment and federal agricultural programming needed to support organic. Despite representing a significant and growing segment of the food economy, organic research funding has historically lagged far behind the sector’s contribution and capacity for impact.  Organic products account for roughly 6% of U.S. food sales, yet organic research receives well under 2% of USDA research funding.

I also hear consistently from farmers that many federal agricultural programs weren’t really designed with organic systems in mind. Whether we’re talking about conservation programs, crop insurance, or risk management tools, organic producers often have to work harder to access support for practices they’re already implementing on their farms. In many cases, organic farmers are delivering outcomes that policymakers say they want more of, things like improved soil health, biodiversity, water quality, and climate resilience, but the programs themselves haven’t always evolved to fully recognize that.

There are also some really practical gaps that don’t get talked about enough. Programs that support certification cost-share, organic data collection, transition assistance, market development, and organic integrity often find themselves back on the table during every Farm Bill or appropriations debate. For farmers, that uncertainty can be frustrating. For the sector, it makes long-term planning difficult.

And then there’s the transition to organic itself. A lot of farmers are interested in organic production, but those transition years can be financially and operationally challenging. You’re changing your practices, taking on new risks, and often not yet receiving the market premium that comes with certification. If we want more farmers to make that leap, we have to make the path more navigable. That’s why continued investment in transition support, technical assistance, farmer mentoring, and research is so important.

Organic is sitting at a crossroads. It is no longer an emerging movement, yet it still doesn’t receive the level of policy support it merits given the public benefits it delivers.

Supporting Farmer-Led Research

Conversations like this one are a reminder of why farmer-informed research matters. If you want to see what’s driving OFRF’s research priorities, explore our NORA Organic Producer Needs Assessment (2026 edition to be available in January). And if Carrie-Anne’s perspective resonated with you, consider supporting the work that makes farmer-led research possible.

Carrie-Anne serves as Secretary on OFRF’s Board of Directors. Her work at Nature’s Path Organic Foods and across the organic advocacy landscape reflects the same conviction driving OFRF’s research: organic farmers deserve science, policy, and investment built for the systems they actually farm.

By |2026-10-28T14:11:25-04:00October 23rd, 2026|News|

Organic Farmers Deserve a Seat at the NRCS Table

By Brise Tencer (Organic Farming Research Foundation) and Ben Bowell (Oregon Tilth)

On September 16, we sat down with USDA Under Secretary for Farm Production and Conservation Richard Fordyce. We came with one message: organic farmers need a conservation agency that supports them, and key programs and funding they rely on at the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) are being lost as programs are reorganized.

We’re grateful for the Under Secretary’s time and willingness to listen. But organic and transitioning-to-organic producers deserve more than a hearing. They deserve programs built with their farms in mind.

Organic Is a Conservation Opportunity 

Organic is one of agriculture’s great growth stories. U.S. organic sales hit a record $76.6 billion in 2025. Yet domestic supply isn’t keeping pace with demand, which means more of that money leaves rural America than it should. Helping farmers start and stay in organic production is a direct investment in rural economies.

It’s also a natural fit for NRCS’s mission. Organic farmers already rely on the practices NRCS champions: conservation buffers, crop rotations, cover crops, rotational grazing, and on-farm biodiversity. And because organic is defined by USDA-regulated standards, those practices are already built into organic systems. 

Those standards advance the same four soil health principles NRCS promotes: keep the soil covered, minimize disturbance, maximize living roots, and maximize biodiversity. Few groups of farmers are better positioned to deliver on the agency’s conservation goals.

What’s Changed: Direct Organic Support is Disappearing

Over the past several years, NRCS built a set of tools that finally made its programs work for organic farms. Recently, the agency has ended nearly all of them:

  • The Organic Management Conservation Practice Standard (CPS 823). This interim standard gave field staff a way to plan and fund conservation in organic systems. It was especially important for farmers in the difficult transition years, when income is often foregone.
  • The Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Organic Initiative. A dedicated funding pool within EQIP that helped organic farmers compete for contracts.
  • The Organic Transition Initiative. Targeted support for farmers making the multi-year shift to certified organic.
  • The organic set-aside in the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP). Funding reserved for organic operations ready to take conservation further.

NRCS has also stopped tracking organic producers in its contract management system, which included data on the number of contracts awarded to organic and transitioning-to-organic farms in each state, total acreage under these contracts, and contract funding amounts. Without that data, no one can measure whether the agency is serving organic farmers at all.

We understand USDA’s goal of streamlining initiatives and its commitment to locally led conservation. But organic production happens at a national scale, and organic farmers consistently tell us they struggle when working with field staff who aren’t familiar with their systems. Without national tools and dedicated funding, those gaps will only grow.

What We Asked USDA To Do

Our requests fall into three areas: measure, build capacity, and restore targeted support.

Count organic farmers again. NRCS should resume tracking organic producers in ProTracts and in the new contract tracking system it is developing for all programs. You can’t serve a group you can’t see.

Build lasting organic expertise. We asked for a long-term capacity plan that includes:

  • Consistent training for all field staff on organic regulations and production practices, drawing on the strong organic resources NRCS already has.
  • Hiring professionals with organic experience.
  • Long-term partnerships with organic experts to train staff and support farmers directly.
  • Two permanent organic positions on the agency’s science and technology team.
  • A national organic outreach plan to help states promote NRCS programs to organic farmers.

Restore support that works. Specifically, we urged NRCS to:

  1. Let producers identify as certified organic in EQIP without receiving a reduced payment.
  2. Reinstate dedicated national funding pools for organic producers.
  3. Work with state offices to replace CPS 823 with a workable national alternative.
  4. Make organic producers explicitly eligible for the new Regenerative Pilot Program (RPP), set aside a portion of its funding for them, incorporate the Conservation Plan Supporting Organic Transition (CEMA 138), and let an Organic System Plan (OSP) count toward RPP’s whole-farm planning requirement.

Where We Go From Here

Organic farmers are already doing the work NRCS exists to support. The question is whether the agency will meet them halfway. That means designing programs with organic practices in mind, training staff to understand organic systems, and tracking whether organic farmers are actually being served.

We’ll keep working with USDA to make that happen. In the meantime, we want to hear from you. If you’re an organic or transitioning-to-organic farmer, tell us about your recent experiences with NRCS, good or bad. Your stories help make the case for programs that work for every farm.

By |2026-10-22T22:40:58-04:00October 23rd, 2026|Advocacy, News|

Looking Local: Opportunities for Organic in State-Level Policy

By Katelyn Hemmer, OFRF’s Summer 2026 Policy Intern

Katelyn Hemmer headshot.

Katelyn Hemmer, OFRF Policy Intern.

For decades, the Farm Bill has been a consistent, bipartisan, omnibus piece of legislation passed every five years. However, as polarization becomes more and more entrenched in the federal government, the Farm Bill has become harder and harder to pass. The last Farm Bill passed in 2018, but despite a full negotiation process in 2023 under Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow, Congress has failed to pass a Farm Bill since then. Since 2023, we have seen Congress pass yearly extensions of the 2018 Farm Bill, but fail to make meaningful updates to meet the moment for farmers across the country. The Farm Bill currently under consideration reflects a complete breakdown of the traditional bipartisan negotiation process, especially given both sides’ refusal to budge on the SNAP cuts passed as part of H.R. 1 in 2025. With farm issues in limbo at the federal level, OFRF and other organizations are looking again for opportunities to advance progress at the state and local levels.

In an industry as place-based as agriculture, states can tailor policy and programs to fit specific climate needs, sectors, and communities. For example, Hawaii’s Farm to School program allows flexibility in school lunch menu requirements, enabling schools to serve more locally grown, culturally relevant produce. In Maryland, producers must follow strict nutrient management protocols to protect the Chesapeake Bay from pollution. California has become a powerhouse of agricultural research following a 2001 law that directs the University of California to direct resources toward sustainable agriculture adoption and research. Some states have even begun passing their own “Farm Bill” to address agriculture and nutrition issues at once.

Due to the strength of the National Organic Program (NOP), states have largely spent their legislative power developing other areas of the food and agriculture system. USDA Organic has become a trusted food label and has driven rapid growth in the organic food and products market. State policy often focuses on promoting state-grown food, especially through farm-to-school and other institutional purchasing programs. While these programs don’t specifically promote organic, they are a crucial support for organic farms, especially small-scale specialty crop operations.

Petunia starts for sale at a farmers' market with the Minnesota Grown Label. Source: Minnesota Grown

The Minnesota Grown label at a local farmers’ market.

Across the country, labels like Jersey Fresh, Louisiana Grown, and Minnesota Grown have been developed to promote local food and agricultural products. Building on the state-grown label, states can create programs that further support the local food system. In New Mexico, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s administration spearheaded an initiative addressing a number of food and nutrition issues in 2023, which included the creation of New Mexico Grown. New Mexico Grown works with local farmers, ranchers, and food businesses to connect them to preschools, K-12 schools, senior centers, and food banks. The program was specifically designed to support small-scale farmers and rural nutrition, with 67% of producers farming 10 or fewer acres and 85% of buyers reporting the program improved meal quality and food security. Many other states also have farm-to-school programs that provide grants going toward the purchase of local produce (like Pennsylvania, Alabama, and Iowa). Some states have also created programs in the last year that attempt to make up for the loss of the federal Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA). In Maryland, the Maryland Food and Agricultural Resiliency Mechanism Grant Program (MFARM) allows Maryland’s food banks, charitable emergency food providers, and nonprofits to purchase agricultural products listed in the state’s Certified Local Farm and Fish Program.

These programs and others like them support a network of small-scale farmers and strengthen the local food network. While these state programs do not set aside specific funding for organic farmers, they create market opportunities that allow organic farmers to stay in business. Evidence suggests that small farms are more likely to adopt organic practices. Regardless of discourse surrounding the efficiency of small and large farms, small farms have much more flexibility to experiment with different farming systems and sustainable methods. Though they may have smaller harvests, small-scale farms are often more connected to the community, more responsive to public opinion and cultural shifts, and catalysts for larger changes in the agricultural industry. To support the transition to a healthier food system, state and federal policies should support not only existing organic producers, but also small and large farms that are likely to become certified or consider transitioning.

Milk jugs with the PA preferred logo on the cap. Source: PA Preferred

The PA preferred logo.

Some states are beginning to create programs that specifically support organic agriculture. Pennsylvania is the first and only state to create a label for Pennsylvania-grown, USDA Organic produce. The Pennsylvania Preferred Organic label builds on the state-grown Pennsylvania Preferred label. This policy initiative grew out of the Pennsylvania Center for Organic Excellence, which also offers free consultation to farmers considering a transition to organic. Their work focuses on breaking down silos and connecting producers with resources, especially technical assistance providers. As much as the organic label has boosted marketing, it can force producers into a box. Sometimes, organic farmers don’t realize they can participate in programs not specifically targeted to organic. This barrier is exacerbated by the fact that many grant approval committees have less experience with organic systems than with conventional ones. In collaboration with the Center for Organic Excellence, Pennsylvania’s ​Agricultural Business Development Center is attempting to address this through offering business planning support, including helping farmers find grants they are eligible for.

Another example of state policy supporting organic is California’s Farm to Community Food Hub. The program was created in 2021 with the express intent to “increase purchasing of local, environmentally sustainable, climate-smart, and equitably produced food by schools and other institutions, build a better food system economy, support the local farming economy, accelerate climate adaptation and resilience, and employ food system workers with fair wages and working conditions.” The same legislation defines sustainable practices as “including, but not limited to, organic methods, biological control, and integrated pest management, and ecologically beneficial means of soil improvement, irrigation, cultivation, harvesting, transportation, and marketing for California agriculture based on methods, as identified by the department.” This specifically incentivizes transition to sustainable agriculture systems, including organic, by opening a new, reliable market avenue for producers.

Programs like these are concentrated in states that pride themselves on a vibrant local agriculture network and prioritize sustainability concerns. The amount of focus and type of programs that states have regarding agriculture varies greatly. States in the Southeast generally have fewer state-level programs promoting organic or local agriculture, while regions like New England and the Pacific Northwest have implemented innovative agriculture policies and programs. State advocacy and sustainable agriculture organizations in regions with fewer agriculture policies in place face a harder road in implementing new programs. However, they benefit from other states’ trial and error. While it may be harder to convince conservative state legislatures of the positive impact of government-funded grant programs and other support for organic farming, reports from successful programs across the country can help make that case.

As Congress drags its feet on passing a federal Farm Bill, states have an opportunity to pick up the slack. States with similar agricultural landscapes and industries can look at what their neighbors are doing almost as a pilot program. If policies or programs have succeeded, they can build on existing policy language from other states instead of reinventing the wheel. The Center for Agriculture and Food Systems at Vermont Law and Graduate School has begun this work by cataloging more than 1,400 state and municipal policies. OFRF is working to foster communication among state-level agriculture and policy organizations and state departments of agriculture. It’s easy to get caught up in what Congress is doing, but improving the farm economy and working toward a more sustainable food system requires innovative legislation at every level of government.

Does your state have programs or policies that support organic agriculture? OFRF would love to hear about them. Vinnie Trometter, OFRF’s policy manager, is mapping what states across the country are doing to improve their local organic agricultural economies. You can get in touch with Vinnie at vinnie@ofrf.org.

photo of cherry blossoms blooming with US Capitol building in the background and a button to "sign up for our newsletter"
By |2026-10-17T08:43:07-04:00October 12th, 2026|Advocacy, News|

Organic Week Was Full of Certified Smiles!

By Vinnie Trometter, OFRF Policy Manager

Last month I joined OFRF’s Executive Director Brise Tencer at the Organic Trade Association’s (OTA) annual Organic Week conference in Washington D.C. We gathered at a momentous time for agriculture, as the Senate Agriculture Committee had just successfully marked up their version of the Farm Bill after failing in their first attempt in early August.

Executive Director Brise Tencer and Policy Manager Vinnie Trometter at the Capitol Building.

Executive Director Brise Tencer and Policy Manager Vinnie Trometter at the Capitol Building during Organic Week.

The return of Senate Agriculture Committee Member Senator Mitch McConnell (TN-R) made it possible to push the bill out of Committee on a party-line vote. Insiders informed us that there would be no chance to offer amendments. Thus, onlookers only had to look at the draft text—which did not include key organic priorities like improvements to organic research or organic infrastructure—to know what was going to be in the draft bill. The process made the outcome of the markup feel predetermined, outside of unexpected fireworks by the Senators from Iowa who tried to force amendments around nullifying Proposition 12 and finalizing Biden-era Packers and Stockyard Act anti-trust rules.

The bill now heads to the Senate Floor, where it is unlikely to pass due to disagreements over delaying the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) cost-share provision from the One Big Beautiful Bill—a disagreement I’ve explained in an earlier blog post. It is looking likely that parts of the Farm Bill will get lumped into a year-end funding bill.

The timing of Organic Week was a breath of fresh air, allowing me to focus on the enlightening presentations and meet fellow organic industry professionals, rather than getting bogged down in the lackluster results of the Senate Agriculture Committee.

And goodness me, there was lots to be impressed by! Some memorable moments included hearing how a potato farmer chose to transition over to organic because his farm’s small size made his spuds close to last in the pecking order in conventional processing. Choosing organic moved him up the line, as he was no longer so small in an organic supply chain.

I also heard from Whole Foods how organic accounts for 30% of their meat and 64% of their produce and floral sales. Additionally, “Better for You” brands (organic, grass-fed, regenerative, etc.) comprise about 25% of all sales across the grocery landscape. They also mentioned that about 40% of their organic sales come from Gen Z and Millennials. The take away was clear—the demand for organic products is there, and the industry is building momentum.

Inaction on Capitol Hill and being around all the wonderful conference attendees also helped me appreciate how just down driven organic farmers are. Things like private and public infrastructure, research, data collection, technical assistance, and risk management tools have skewed towards conventional agriculture because of the relatively small size of organic and profit margins. Despite this lack of resources, the organic industry punches above its weight. Federal and state programs that support farmers have to be amended to incorporate organic agriculture. In some cases, entirely new programs have to be created, like dedicated organic agriculture research. These actions are crucial in making sure that organic farmers have the assistance, tools, and insights that are necessary for any industry to thrive.

True to its roots, the organic industry remains “organically grown,” having nowhere near the same support as conventional agriculture, despite consumer demand. The farmers I spoke to during Organic Week not only believe in (and demonstrate) the success of organic systems, they also find deep fulfillment in using practices that better the earth and their community. To put it plainly, sometimes loving what you do overcomes the obstacles in your way. To me, it’s this determination that shows how unstoppable the future growth of organic will be.

Stay up to date with our policy work by signing up for our newsletter:

photo of cherry blossoms blooming with US Capitol building in the background and a button to "sign up for our newsletter"
By |2026-10-08T12:38:56-04:00October 8th, 2026|Advocacy, News, Policy Corner|

Building Organic Connections through the Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP)

Written by Clare Boland, OFRF Communications Manager

Chris Barnett: Finding a Path into Organic Farming

Farmer Chris Barnett walks through a wheat field. Source: Christopher Organic Farm

Chris Barnett of Christopher Organic Farm.

Chris Barnett describes himself as “a second-generation rancher and first-generation farmer.” He is the owner and operator of Christopher Organic Farm, a 1,600-acre livestock and organic row-crop farm in Fort Scott, Kansas. His family has been stewarding their land in Southeast Kansas for over 40 years, all without chemical inputs.

Returning to his family’s ranch as an adult, Chris took a leap into pursuing organic row crops in addition to ranching. In 2025, he began growing organic wheat, obtaining organic certification through OCIA.

After years of careful stewardship, Chris is beginning to see the results of his hard work: the native prairie is flourishing, wildlife is returning, and the health of his 300-head cow-calf herd is improving.

“It’s a whole ecosystem boost,” Chris says. “Everything is just flourishing out there. It’s been a beautiful process.”

As a first-generation farmer, and an organic farmer at that, mentorship was pivotal for Chris. Diving into certification, Chris said that the administrative side was daunting. He decided to enroll in the Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP) to ease the process.

“I wouldn’t be where I’m at, doing what I’m doing, without the TOPP program,” Chris shared. Through the TOPP program, he was matched with mentor Jack Geiger, of Geiger Grains in Robinson, Kansas. Since Chris’s land had been farmed without synthetic inputs, he was able to break sod and plant organic row crops in his first year. Throughout the process, Jack was a go-to source of information. “Because of my mentor, I successfully harvested a wheat crop my first year farming.” 

Through the program, he was also able to plug into existing organic markets and build relationships with other farmers. One of these farmers was Alan Wilson, of Renegade Farms.

Alan Wilson: Starting From Scratch

Alan Wilson poses on a tractor with his children.Source: Renegade Farms

Alan Wilson of Renegade Farms and his children.

Alan Wilson has started a farm from scratch—twice. A first-generation farmer, Alan began farming in 2015 with “zero acres and zero experience” in Northeast Kansas, before moving to Huntington, Indiana, where he has been farming for the last five years. Alan is the owner and operator of Renegade Farms, newly renamed, growing organic row crops including soybeans, corn, oats, and wheat. Cover crops are central to Alan’s farming philosophy: “We like to have something living in the ground 340 days out of the year, if we can get away with it.” 

Alan first turned to organic for a reliable income stream: “From the initial starting point, it was like how are we going to make farming work as a business and not a really expensive hobby?” But over time, the benefits to the land, and especially the soil, became more clear. “I understand that we’re taking [from the land], but we’re trying to give back at the same time.” 

Alan’s farm has been certified since 2018—of their 475 acres, 170 is certified organic, and about 275 are in transition. “I don’t think there’s been a year yet that we have not been transitioning land in some way, shape, or form.” Starting from scratch, starting over in a new location, and consistently transitioning land have had a steep learning curve for Alan, and, like Chris, he found guidance through peer networks and mentorship.

Alan first met Jack at a farming event and began to pick his brain about organic row crops to see if it would possibly be viable for his operation. Since then, Jack has been his main source of guidance. “I talk to him almost daily,” Alan shares.

Jack Geiger: Building a Network of Farmers

Jack Gieger speaking in front of his cattle. Source: Geiger Farms Youtube channel

Jack Geiger of Geiger Grains on his YouTube channel.

Jack Geiger’s family has been farming their land in Kansas since 1856, but the decision to farm organically was spurred by the 1980’s farm crisis. As the price of synthetic inputs became prohibitively expensive, organic methods presented a path to economic viability. Since Jack’s father certified the farm in the 1980s, they have been growing organically ever since.

Today, Jack owns and operates Geiger Grain in Robinson, Kansas, growing organic wheat and seed, and raising organically managed cattle. For Jack, sharing knowledge has been foundational to his farming career. At the time the farm became certified, “the organic movement” was still relatively new. To learn more about organic farming practices, he sought out other farmers in a similar situation. “I’m part of a class of five guys who all started out at basically the same time. We were young kids when the organic thing took off. And so we formed a peer network.”

In 2016, Jack began posting farming how-to videos on YouTube as Geiger Farms. The response was enthusiastic—the videos amassed over 3 million views on the platform, and farmers began reaching out to Jack for advice.

That’s how Jack met the first of his mentees. More recently, Jack became a mentor through the TOPP program. He says joining the program has encouraged him to “be more professional” in his mentoring. One example was creating a group chat for his mentees.

“Peer-to-peer learning is the most important. And the reality is, I am not a peer to most of them. They consider me to be like a subject matter expert. So when I started hooking the guys up amongst themselves, wonderful things happened.” 

Both Alan and Chris mentioned the 15-20 person group chat, where they share crop prices, input sources, marketing information, and practical advice. For Alan and Chris, who are both surrounded by conventional farming operations, the ability to get multiple perspectives from growers working in different regions, and quickly, has been a huge help. “I have the group listed as Jack’s Misguided Children,” Alan jokes.

Reciprocal Learning

Cows on the bunk at Geiger GrainsSource: Geiger Grain

Calves on the bunk at Geiger Grain.

For organic farmers, learning is an essential principle. “So much of organic is knowledge-based, but it’s also learning how to fine-tune that knowledge base to your particular climate and your particular skill set,” Jack shares. He sees a fundamental difference between what he calls conventional agriculture’s “farming by prescription” and the management required in organic agriculture. “There are basic rules and principles that all organic farmers are bound to, in the National Organic Standard, but you have to tune them to your abilities and to your environment. And that is the trick, because everybody has different abilities, and everybody has different skills.”

What works on Jack’s farm might not be a perfect fit for his mentees’ farms, but through adaptation, they can still learn from these organic strategies. One example of this is Alan incorporating livestock into his operation. Jack’s farm benefits from the integrated use of cattle, reducing his need for soil inputs and increasing the overall health of his land through grazing. Alan doesn’t raise livestock, but his neighbor does. This year, Alan began bringing his neighbor’s cows onto his land to help with his soil fertility.

Jack’s mentees have also challenged him to rethink some of his own practices, particularly their interest in organic no-till and lower-mechanization systems. Jack is a mechanized, full-till farmer. Their questions have pushed him to reconsider his own approach. “Their pursuit of no-till has inspired me over the last, you know, decade to increase my use of cover crops and reduce my tillage.”

“Mentoring is a two-way street,” Jack shares. “My mentees actually teach me just as much as I teach them. It’s a wonderful exercise where we both learn from each other.” 

Farmer Alan Wilson walking through a field hand in hand with his son. Source: Renegade Farms

Alan walks the farm with his son.

Alan echoed this sentiment, reflecting on how his relationships with other farmers have improved his craft. Farming takes a lot of trial and error, and learning through the organic farming community, you can save yourself some mistakes. “If you can learn something that’s going to save you two or three years’ worth of mistakes, that’s a big deal. It can save you a lot of time and a lot of heartache and a lot of financial stress as well.”

“I think that the organic farming community is one of the most open groups of people that are in competition with each other, maybe on the planet,” Alan says.

Chris agreed, sharing “TOPP is the most meaningful and impactful program available to anyone seeking to start or transition into organic farming.” 

Fostering these types of relationships is what Jack sees as the greatest benefit of the TOPP program. “[It’s] a wonderful program. The things that we have built and the relationships, they’re going to continue on long after this.” The farmers who receive guidance today may become mentors themselves, carrying knowledge into new communities and new farms. “I think of it as teaching teachers.”

For Chris, Alan, and Jack, TOPP didn’t just create mentor-mentee relationships; it created a growing network of farmers learning from each other.

“The best way to go through life,” Alan says. “To be continuously learning. And when you find something you love doing, learning isn’t painful, it’s enjoyable.”

Learn more about the Transition to Organic Partnership Program: 

By |2026-10-04T19:32:43-04:00September 30th, 2026|Farmer Stories, News|

Beating Pests and Disease: What Northwest Farmers and Researchers Have Learned the Hard Way

Written by: Mary Elizabeth Kidd, Communications Associate

As the Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF) team continues its work facilitating the USDA’s Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP) to strengthen organic farming communities and encourage farmers to transition their farming systems for organic certification, we’re hosting Seeds of Success virtual networking sessions across the country. 

These sessions give regional farmers a platform to share knowledge and ask questions about organic production systems and the organic certification process.

OFRF recently hosted a farmer- and researcher-led Seeds of Success panel discussion on the realities of pest and disease management for organic farms in the Northwest.

The featured panelists included: 

Sarahlee Lawrence,
Rainshadow Organics (Oregon)

Sarahlee Lawrence of Rainshadow Organics farm in Oregon standing in a vegetable field smiling with arms stretched out.

Ellie Costello,
Trust Land Farm (Montana)

Ellie Costello of Trust Land Farm in Montana smiling and wearing a sun hat

Dr. Robert Orpet,
Oregon State University

Robert Orpet, Assistant Professor of Entemology at Oregon State University, outdoors among yellow wildflowers.

When Weather Stresses Crops, Pests Move In

Pests and disease outbreaks, intensified by weather variations, are a persistent reality for farmers in the Northwest. 

Farmer panelists shared that environmental unpredictability, such as extreme drought in Oregon (Rainshadow Organics) and heavy, unpredictable rain in Montana (Trust Land Farm), is stressing plants, making them vulnerable to new and pre-existing threats, including beet curly top virus (BCTV), flea beetles, and spider mites.

During the discussion, panelists shared their backgrounds in farming and research, then each dove into key challenges on the pest and disease front and the tactics and tools they use to try to mitigate damage done and preempt future crop loss. 

The common themes of tenacity and critical thinking rang through, along with two wise concepts: diversity equals resilience, and just because a tactic or treatment fails doesn’t mean you’ve failed as a farmer. “‘You’re definitely trying’ is a mantra I need left and right when starting,” Ellie Costello echoed.

Meet the Panelists

Sarahlee Lawrence is the owner and lead farmer in her 17th season managing Rainshadow Organics, a full-circle, Real Organic Project-certified organic family farm located in Central Oregon with 20 hoophouses and 15 acres in production. She operates the farm as a full-diet operation, including grains, pork, beef, dairy, honey, meat, chickens, eggs, turkeys, and vegetables. Sarahlee farms year-round and offers CSA memberships, sells to wholesale outlets, and participates in farm-to-table events.

Ellie Costello serves as owner and farmer of Trust Land Farm in Missoula, Montana. She is in her third season at their current farm site, an eight-acre mixed-vegetable farm with approximately 4.5 acres in production. It is the first community land trust farm in Montana. They offer a farmstand market, a vegetable CSA, and U-pick. 

Dr. Robert Orpet, an Oregon State University Assistant Professor of Entomology, plays an active role in research, Extension services, and teaching, with a focus on integrated pest management (IPM) in orchard systems. He develops pest management programs for OSU’s research farm, and he sees farms like it as essential. With dedicated funding, staff, and acreage free from market pressures, research farms can take on pest and disease problems more intensively than working farms can.

Challenges & Responses

Each farmer panelist shared their top pest, disease, and weed pressures, along with the hard-won knowledge of what works and doesn’t work against these pressures on their farm.

Sarahlee Lawrence of Rainshadow Organics (Oregon):

Sarahlee Lawrence (Rainshadow Organics) shared that central Oregon, which is considered high desert, suffers from ongoing drought and high summer temperatures, facilitating aphids on their kale and spider mites on cucumbers, tomatillos, and eggplant.

“Cinerate is a cinnamon-based product that we’ve been pretty excited about for our hoop houses.” Lawrence shared that using this broad-spectrum fungicide/bactericide on susceptible crops, before heat and drought could further weaken their defenses, has proven successful.

This year brought a new pest and virus challenge. When four acres of beets were starting to shrivel, Lawrence decided to engage research support from Oregon State University (OSU). She shipped samples to OSU, where they identified beet curly top virus (BCTV), vectored by the beet leafhopper. While the cost for testing and a slow response time posed slight challenges, Lawrence shared that “in the grand scheme of things, it felt very worth it to be able to identify the fact that we do indeed have beet curly top virus, which affects almost everything we grow.” 

This confirmation helped Lawrence and her partner dive into possible solutions and connect with a researcher at Washington State University who specialized in BCTV and leafhoppers and their hugely detrimental impact on Columbia Basin farms.

“I did lose two successions of beets, and in my third succession, I was able to spray with neem oil as a deterrent blanket. You can’t really kill them [flea beetles]; they’re so mobile, and that’s not really how we approach things anyway here. We try to just have airflow and healthy plants; we do a lot of our own biodynamic teas and cultivate our soil and the soil community. These things interact to help the plants overcome these challenges.”

While Sarahlee and her team are still testing various approaches to eradicate this issue and mitigate damage, Dr. Orpet echoed the wisdom in Lawrence’s approach of reaching out to researchers, and he also recommends local Extension support. He spoke, too, about weighing the costs and benefits of aggressive (and often costly) treatments for this type of crop pressure. 

According to Dr. Orpet, farmers must clarify their economic threshold for treating these issues and whether the cost of intervention (spraying, etc.) will outweigh the cost of damage done. Seeking support from local Extension reps can help farmers gain a clearer picture of this threshold, while also offering possible solutions.

Ellie Costello of Trust Land Farm (Montana)

In Montana, Ellie Costello noted that her current focus is on crop planning to meet market and sustainability goals and address challenges from seasons past. 

“We are heavy greens-based operations, both for cut salad mixes and bunch greens. That’s the bulk of what we do for restaurants, wholesale, and direct sales. So having enough space between where things are planted from year to year in the brassica family to cut off flea beetles, which are one of our biggest pests, is really challenging.”

Even with strong crop rotations and minimal overlap, flea beetles are a tenacious pest, and Costello and her team are working to understand why certain spots harbor the beetles and continue to refine their rotation process. “We blocked all of our crops so that we can cut that off well.” 

Dr. Orpet confirmed that flea beetles are “one of a trifecta: flea beetles, cucumber beetles, and squash bugs. That trifecta is what vegetable farmers have the biggest problem with.”

Sarahlee Lawrence shared that at Rainshadow Organics, they’ve had success with beneficial nematodes, insect netting, and crop rotation. “I also hit my brassicas that really get destroyed with a neem and safer soap cocktail that has really knocked back the population this year. And this is actually the first year I’ve ever had Napa cabbage and Asian greens that are marketable.”

Nurturing Resilience

According to these farmers and researchers, crop diversity and strong community were cited as key indicators of success when facing the numerous challenges of organic farming.

Sarahlee Lawrence of Oregon’s Rainshadow Organics shared: “I continue to lean into some pretty epic diversity. We have a full-diet farm, so we raise meats, grains, vegetables; it’s a really complex place. And so when things start to look really challenging, you could lean into other parts of the farm and have resiliency there. Diversity equals resilience.”

Ellie Costello of Trust Land Farm cited a less-considered, but highly valuable resource: relationships with local market partners (including chefs and a local smoothie place) who are willing to work with holey greens, ensuring that damaged but still edible produce can retain value. She has also accessed NRCS support to help diagnose and tackle huge weed pressures.

Dr. Orpet added words of encouragement for organic farmers seeking to control the damage of pests and disease: “There are a lot of challenges and difficulties, but the intentions and the outcomes are amazing. The concept of sustainability is economic, environmental, and social. And so, you know, mentioning having a group message with other farmers and building a community is part of being organic and doing a good thing.”

Additional Resources

See below for resources from OFRF, including OFRF’s Research Hub, with scientific and technical resources addressing the above topics and beyond.

Overview of organic resources from OFRF:

  • OFRF’s Organic Research Hub: a curated collection of scientific and technical resources to help organic farmers understand and solve their production challenges.
  • Farmer-Led Trials: OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials Program provides farmers with technical assistance and support to investigate and learn about solutions to their most pressing production challenges. Read more to find out how you can be part of this program!
  • The Farmers Guide to Conducting On-Farm Research: A guide for the organic farmer or rancher who is curious about conducting some type of trial or experiment on their farm in a more structured way. Whether you are looking to reduce the use of off-farm inputs, minimize disease pressure, try out new crop varieties or animal feed, or test new cover crop techniques or irrigation sensors, this practical guide was created to assist you along the way.

Connect with OFRF:

By |2026-09-30T11:07:43-04:00September 30th, 2026|News|

Your Region, Your Research: What’s New on the Organic Research Hub

Written by: Ashley Dulaney, OFRF’s Communications Director

Versión en español a continuación.

If you farm organic, you already know the problem: the research you need is out there, but finding it means digging through university extension sites, government databases, and search results that are built for conventional agriculture—not yours.

That’s exactly why OFRF built the Organic Research Hub and why we’re excited to share what’s new. 

What Is the Organic Research Hub?

OFRF's Organic Research Hub logo with an illustration of a hub-and-spoke visual with different illustrations in each spoke (farmers, cow, barn, wheat, magnifying glass over a leaf, beet in soil) with a map of the US with stars spread across it and a report-looking illustration below it, in the center of the illustration

The Organic Research Hub is a free, USDA-funded, searchable library of research-backed resources built specifically for organic and transitioning producers. Whether you’re navigating a conservation program like the Natural Resources Conservation Service’s Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) or Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP), working through your organic transition, or troubleshooting a challenge on the farm, the Hub puts practical, science-backed answers in one place, instead of scattered across the internet.

For many of the studies in the Hub, you don’t have to wade through a dense academic paper to get what you need. Our team translates the research into plain-language summaries that lay out the methods and outcomes up front, so you can see what was tested and what it means for your farm in a few minutes. Many resources already have summaries, and for those that don’t, we’re adding more all the time.

We’ve spent over three decades as a trusted source of organic farming research and technical guidance. The Hub makes that trove of knowledge searchable in one place for the first time.

What’s New on the Hub

Over the past few months, we’ve been adding new features based on what organic farmers have told us they need. Here’s what’s new:

Pages built for your region. 

The Hub now has dedicated pages for each of the six TOPP regions—Midwest, Northeast, Northwest, Plains, Southeast, and West/Southwest—bringing together the resources, experts, and grants most relevant to your climate, soil, and growing conditions. No more filtering through results that don’t apply to you. 

A bigger Directory of Experts. 

You can now search over 300 verified Extension agents, researchers, and technical service providers nationwide by name, state, region, or on a clickable map of the U.S. Every person listed is vetted by OFRF and works in organic or organic-adjacent agriculture, so you’re not sorting through contacts who don’t know the difference between organic and conventional practices. If you’d rather talk through a decision with a real person than read another factsheet, this is where to start.

You can now view the Hub in Spanish.

Growers can select their preferred language, English or Spanish, so more research is accessible to more farmers.

A dedicated USDA Organic Research Grant Database. 

Curious what organic research is currently being funded? You can now browse USDA OREI (Organic Agriculture Research & Extension Initiative) and ORG (Organic Transition Program) grant projects and reports directly, searchable by keyword, program, year, or award number.

Alerts that do the searching for you.

Set up a free, personalized alert by topic, region, or keyword, and new matching resources will land in your inbox daily, weekly, monthly, or as soon as they’re posted. Subscribe once, and stop searching the same terms over and over.

Get Your Region’s Resource Factsheet

Alongside the Hub itself, we’ve put together a printable, one-page factsheet for each region. It’s a quick reference guide to the research, tools, and local experts curated specifically for your area, plus a QR code straight to your region’s page on the Hub. 

Download your region’s factsheet below as it becomes available:

Front page of TOPP Midwest Organic Research Hub Regional factsheet

AR, IL, IN, IA, KY, MI, MN, MS, OH, TN, WI

Front page of TOPP Northwest Organic Research Hub Regional factsheet

AK, ID, MT, OR, WA, WY

Front page of TOPP Plains Organic Research Hub Regional factsheet

CO, KS, NE, ND, OK, SD

Front page of TOPP SE Organic Research Hub Regional factsheet

AL, FL, GA, LA, MS, NC, PR, SC, USVI

Front page of TOPP West/Southwest Organic Research Hub Regional factsheet

 AZ, CA, HI, NV, NM, TX, UT

Coming Soon!

Northeast/Mid-Atlantic
(CT, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, VA, WV)

Want more organic farming resources for your region? Sign up here, and we’ll email them to you as they become available.

Explore What’s Been Built for You

The research, tools, and people you need to farm organically with confidence are already gathered in one place: the Organic Research Hub, built for your region, now in Spanish, and free to use.

Have a resource that should be included, or a question about what you find? Reach out to our team; we’re always adding to the Hub.

Su región, su investigación: lo nuevo en el Organic Research Hub

Si usted produce de manera orgánica, ya conoce el problema: la investigación que necesita existe, pero encontrarla implica rebuscar entre sitios de extensión universitaria, bases de datos gubernamentales y resultados de búsqueda pensados para la agricultura convencional, no para la suya.

Justamente por eso OFRF creó el Organic Research Hub y por eso nos entusiasma compartir las novedades. 

¿Qué es el Organic Research Hub?

OFRF's Organic Research Hub logo with an illustration of a hub-and-spoke visual with different illustrations in each spoke (farmers, cow, barn, wheat, magnifying glass over a leaf, beet in soil) with a map of the US with stars spread across it and a report-looking illustration below it, in the center of the illustration

El Organic Research Hub es una biblioteca gratuita, financiada por el USDA y con buscador, de recursos respaldados por la investigación, creada específicamente para productores orgánicos y en transición. Ya sea que usted esté gestionando un programa de conservación del Natural Resources Conservation Service (Servicio de Conservación de Recursos Naturales, NRCS) como el Environmental Quality Incentives Program (Programa de Incentivos para la Calidad Ambiental, EQIP) o el Conservation Stewardship Program (Programa de Administración de la Conservación, CSP), esté realizando su transición a lo orgánico o esté resolviendo un problema en la finca, el Hub reúne respuestas prácticas y con respaldo científico en un solo lugar, en vez de dispersas por todo el internet.

En muchos de los estudios del Hub, usted no tiene que abrirse paso entre un denso artículo académico para obtener lo que necesita. Nuestro equipo traduce la investigación a resúmenes en lenguaje sencillo que presentan los métodos y los resultados desde el inicio, para que en pocos minutos vea qué se puso a prueba y qué significa para su finca. Muchos recursos ya cuentan con resúmenes y, para los que aún no los tienen, seguimos agregando más todo el tiempo.

Llevamos más de tres décadas siendo una fuente confiable de investigación y orientación técnica sobre agricultura orgánica. El Hub hace que ese acervo de conocimiento sea consultable en un solo lugar por primera vez.

Lo nuevo en el Hub

Durante los últimos meses hemos agregado nuevas funciones a partir de lo que los agricultores orgánicos nos han dicho que necesitan. Esto es lo nuevo:

Páginas hechas para su región. 

El Hub ahora tiene páginas dedicadas a cada una de las seis regiones de TOPP — Medio Oeste, Noreste, Noroeste, Grandes Llanuras, Sureste y Oeste/Suroeste—que reúnen los recursos, expertos y subvenciones más pertinentes para su clima, su suelo y sus condiciones de cultivo. Ya no tendrá que filtrar resultados que no le aplican.

Un directorio de expertos más amplio. 

Ahora puede buscar entre más de 300 agentes de Extensión, investigadores y proveedores de servicios técnicos verificados de todo el país, por nombre, estado, región o en un mapa interactivo de los Estados Unidos. Cada persona incluida ha sido verificada por OFRF y trabaja en agricultura orgánica o afín a lo orgánico, así que usted no estará revisando contactos que no distinguen entre prácticas orgánicas y convencionales. Si prefiere conversar una decisión con una persona real en lugar de leer otra hoja informativa, este es el lugar para empezar.

Ahora puede ver el Hub en español.

Los productores pueden seleccionar su idioma preferido, inglés o español, para que más investigación sea accesible para más granjeros.

A dedicated USDA Organic Research Grant Database. 

Una base de datos dedicada a las subvenciones de investigación orgánica del USDA.
¿Le interesa saber qué investigación orgánica se está financiando actualmente? Ahora puede consultar directamente los proyectos e informes de las subvenciones OREI, Iniciativa de Investigación y Extensión en Agricultura Orgánica y ORG, Programa de Transición Orgánica del USDA con búsqueda por palabra clave, programa, año o número de adjudicación.

Alertas que buscan por usted.

Configure una alerta gratuita y personalizada por tema, región o palabra clave, y los nuevos recursos que coincidan llegarán a su correo a diario, semanalmente, mensualmente o apenas se publiquen. Suscríbase una vez y deje de buscar los mismos términos una y otra vez.

Obtenga la hoja informativa de recursos de oeste/suroeste

Junto con el Hub, hemos preparado una hoja informativa imprimible de una página para el oeste/suroeste. Es una guía de referencia rápida sobre la investigación, las herramientas y los expertos locales seleccionados específicamente para su zona, además de un código QR que lleva directamente a la página de su región en el Hub. 

Descargue la hoja informativa del oeste/suroeste:

Explore lo que se construyó para usted

La investigación, las herramientas y las personas que usted necesita para producir de manera orgánica con confianza ya están reunidas en un solo lugar: el Organic Research Hub, creado para su región, ahora en español y de uso gratuito.

¿Quiere más recursos de agricultura orgánica para su región? Regístrese aquí y se los enviaremos por correo electrónico conforme estén disponibles.

¿Tiene un recurso que debería incluirse o una pregunta sobre lo que encontró? Comuníquese con nuestro equipo; siempre estamos agregando contenido al Hub.

By |2026-10-28T07:36:55-04:00September 25th, 2026|News|

Start Here! An Organic Farmer/Rancher’s Guide to Government Programs

Versión en español a continuación.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) offers myriad programs to farmers and ranchers seeking financial and technical assistance support. But with so many options, it can be hard to know where to start! OFRF has made a series of guides to demystify government programs, with easy, step-by-step application support. Use this guide to find the specific help you’re looking for, so you can get off your computer and back into the field!

What type of support do you need?

Tip: Get into the System Early! Most government assistance programs require you to have an account with farmers.gov. The sooner your farm is verified and in the system, the sooner you can begin accessing USDA resources.

Funding and Financial Resources

Accessing funding is a vital part of every farm’s journey. Whether you are looking to purchase land, insure your crops, fund a new conservation or research projects, or just cover day to day operation costs, financial resources are available to you!

Farm Service Agency (FSA) Loans

Accessing funding is a vital part of every farm’s journey. Whether you are looking to purchase land, insure your crops, fund a new conservation or research projects, or just cover day to day operation costs, financial resources are available to you!

The Farm Service Agency (FSA) is a crucial financing resource for farmers. It can help guarantee loans made by commercial lenders or issue direct loans to farmers when they cannot access credit or favorable terms and rates from a bank. The FSA can also be the “Lender of First Opportunity” for beginning farmers.

Eligible Applicants: Family-size farmers/ranchers who cannot obtain commercial credit from a bank, Farm Credit System institution, or other lender.

Funding Available: Direct and guaranteed farm ownership (FO) and operating loans (OL).

Projects Funded: FSA offers a variety of loan types including but not limited to: farm ownership and operating, beginning farmers, emergencies, and more.

Application Deadline: Applications are accepted on a rolling basis.

Whole Farm Revenue Program (WFRP)

The Whole-Farm Revenue Protection (WFRP) policy is a crop insurance option developed by the Risk Management Agency (RMA) and administered by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC). Through WFRP, farmers can get a single crop insurance policy for their entire farm, making it a great option for organic and diversified farms.

Eligible Applicants: Farmers/Ranchers in the U.S. or territories. It is best suited to farms with a range of commodities that sell to wholesale markets.

Insurance Coverage: WFRP protects against revenue loss due to natural disasters or market shifts, up to $17 million. Actual coverage amount will depend on the specific farm. Use our WFRP calculator to get an estimate!

Application Deadline: Dates will vary by crop and location, with the first filing date usually occurring in Spring.

More Financial Opportunities

If you are looking for financial support for organic certification, see OCCSP.

If you are looking for financial support for implementing conservation practices on your farm, see EQIP or CSP.

If you are looking for financial support for research projects on your farm, see SARE.

USDA Organic Certification

The USDA’s National Organic Program (NOP) is a federal regulatory program that enforces standards for organic products sold in the U.S. Farmers pursue organic certification for various reasons, including improving soil health, reducing reliance on synthetic inputs, enhancing biodiversity, contributing to a more sustainable food system, and taking advantage of the economic opportunities it presents, such as accessing new organic markets and higher price premiums. Certification requires additional recordkeeping, and may include a transitional period before certification can be administered. If you’ve decided that certification is the right path for your farm, we have resources to guide you through.

Organic Certification Cost Share Program (OCCSP)

The Organic Certification Cost Share Program (OCCSP) is a USDA program that helps cover part of your organic certification costs, including registration in a state organic program. In the past, the OCCSP has reimbursed 75% of fees up to a maximum of $750 per scope. Scopes include crops, wild crops, livestock, and processing/handling.

Eligible Applicants: Certified organic producers and handlers in the United States or its territories.

Funding Available: 75% reimbursement of their organic certification fees up to a maximum of $750 per certification. If you have multiple certification scopes, you can apply for assistance with each certification.

Covered Costs: Application fees, organic inspection costs, fees related to equivalency requirements, travel and per diem fees for inspectors, user fees, sales assessments, and postage.

Application Deadline: Applications are generally due at the end of the calendar year.

The Organic Transition Initiative (OTI)

The Organic Transition Initiative (OTI) is a USDA agency that works to help transitioning farmers. Before becoming certified organic, farmers must complete a 36-month period managing their land without prohibited inputs. This time period can present challenges for growers, as their land adapts to organic management and they are not yet benefiting from the higher price premium from the organic label. Explore OTI’s resources to aid with the transitional period.

Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP)

The Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP) is a collaborative partnership created to guide transitioning farmers. Through the program, producers can be matched with a mentor to guide them through becoming certified organic and offer ongoing support.

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Support

NRCS offers help to producers implementing conservation activities required for certification, receiving expert technical support, and recovering foregone income due to reduced yields during the organic transition period through OTI. Read our guide to learn how to communicate with your NRCS agent about accessing support for your organic transition.

If you are looking for support on implementing conservation practices on your farm, see Increasing Conservation.

Learn more about USDA Organic Certification

The organic transition period and USDA requirements present a learning curve for farmers. Luckily, we have advice from farmers who have done it before!

Increasing Conservation

The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) is a federal agency that supports the adoption of conservation practices by providing farmers, ranchers, foresters, and landowners with technical and financial assistance. They work to address resource concerns related to soil, water, plants, animals, air, and energy; help producers and landowners achieve conservation goals; and enhance the long-term sustainability of US agriculture. If you are interested in increasing conservation practices on your land, your local NRCS office is a good place to start!

NRCS Farmer Stories:

Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP)

The Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) from NRCS offers a variety of technical and financial assistance opportunities for farmers and ranchers, including the High Tunnel Initiative, the On Farm Energy Initiative, and the Organic Initiative.

Eligible Applicants: Agricultural producers; non-industrial private forest-owners; federally recognized tribes; water management entities.

Funding Available: Cost-share covering building, resource, and labor costs. Amount of funding varies on availability.

Projects Funded: New projects or infrastructure addressing a natural resource concern. Ex. building a high tunnel, establishing a cover cropping system, fencing for rotational grazing.

Project Length: 1-10 years.

Application Deadline: Applications are accepted on a rolling basis throughout the year, with the first batching deadline generally falling in early January.

Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP)

The Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) from NRCS offers technical and financial assistance to help agricultural and forest producers take their conservation efforts to the next level, through practices like cover cropping, integrated grazing, supporting wildlife habitats, and more.

Eligible Applicants: Agricultural producers; non-industrial private forest-owners; federally recognized tribes.

Funding Available: Annual minimum payments of $4,000.

Projects Funded: Projects that maintain or enhance conservation efforts, e.g., trialing new cover crop mixes, planting agroforestry projects, increasing pollinator habitats.

Project Length: 5 years, with renewal available.

Application Deadline: Applications are accepted on a rolling basis throughout the year, with the first batching deadline generally falling in early January.

CSP Farmer Stories

EQIP and CSP: What’s the Difference? Both programs provide funding opportunities for conservation efforts, and many farmers use both on their farm. EQIP is a cost-share program for projects that address a specific natural resource concern and establish a new conservation practice (like establishing a cover cropping system or planting natives to reduce erosion). CSP provides annual payments to help farmers maintain or enhance existing conservation strategies on their farm (like trialing new cover crop mixes or planting natives to increase pollinator habitats). EQIP contracts are a specified length (1-10 years), while CSP contracts are 5 years and can be renewed. Farmers often start with an EQIP contract to address a specific issue, and then maintain the practice through an ongoing CSP contract.

Conservation Programs and Organic Certification

Despite both being administered by USDA, NRCS conservation practices and USDA certification requirements may not perfectly align. NRCS’s Technical Note 12 strives to bridge that gap, outlining the overlap between NRCS resource concerns and NOP organic standards.

Conducting Research

Organic farmers and ranchers often test and experiment with new ideas to improve their farming operations. If you are looking to turn your informal farm research into more structured research projects, OFRF has the tools to get you started!

Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE)

The Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) Farmer/Rancher Grant Program is a competitive grant program that provides funding to producers who have designed their own research projects and teams. This program aims to award funding to projects that address real-world, on-farm challenges and include both research and outreach components.

Eligible Applicants: Commercial farmers and ranchers with an income of at least $1,000 annually.

Funding Available: Financial assistance for the entirety of your proposed project, up $15,000-35,000; varies regionally.

Projects Funded: SARE provides grants for the entirety of a research project, from designing the trial to sharing the results. Ex. Trialing organic pest or weed management strategies, comparing cover crop mixes or rotations, testing compost or organic fertilizer effects.

Project Length: Between 1-3 years, depending on region.

Application Deadline: Applications vary by region between early fall and late winter.

Find your SARE Region: There are four SARE regions and requirements and funding availability may vary based on location.

Northeast SARE: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia.

North Central SARE: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.

Southern SARE: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, U.S. Virgin Islands, Virginia.

Western SARE: Alaska, American Samoa, Arizona, California, Colorado, CNMI, FSM, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming.

Getting Started with On-Farm Research

SARE favors farmers who have a developed research proposal and have made connections with research professionals. If you are looking to dip your toe into more structured research before submitting a SARE proposal, explore our resources!

All of this information is summarized in a printable, downloadable PDF below, available in English and Spanish.

¡Empiece aquí! Guía de programas del gobierno para agricultores y ganaderos orgánicos

El Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos (USDA, por sus siglas en inglés) ofrece innumerables programas para agricultores y ganaderos que buscan apoyo con asistencia financiera y técnica. Pero, con tantas opciones, ¡puede ser difícil saber por dónde empezar! OFRF ha creado una serie de guías para quitar los mitos acerca de los programas del gobierno, con apoyo sencillo y paso a paso para aplicar. Use esta guía para encontrar la ayuda específica que está buscando, ¡para que pueda dejar la computadora y volver al campo!

¿Qué tipo de apoyo necesita?

Consejo: ¡entre al sistema con anticipación! La mayoría de los programas de asistencia del gobierno requieren que usted tenga una cuenta en farmers.gov. Cuanto antes su granja esté verificada y registrada en el sistema, más pronto podrá comenzar a acceder a los recursos del USDA.

Fondos y recursos financieros

El acceso a fondos es una parte vital del camino de toda granja. Ya sea que usted busque comprar tierras, asegurar sus cultivos, financiar un nuevo proyecto de conservación o de investigación, o simplemente cubrir los costos de operación del día a día, ¡hay recursos financieros disponibles para usted!

Préstamos de la Agencia de Servicios Agrícolas (FSA)

La Agencia de Servicios Agrícolas (FSA, por sus siglas en inglés) es un recurso de financiamiento crucial para los agricultores. Puede ayudar a garantizar préstamos otorgados por prestamistas comerciales o emitir préstamos directos a los agricultores cuando estos no pueden acceder a crédito o a condiciones y tasas favorables en un banco. La FSA también puede ser el “prestamista de primera oportunidad” para agricultores que están iniciando.

Solicitantes elegibles: Agricultores y ganaderos de escala familiar que no pueden obtener crédito comercial de un banco, de una institución del Farm Credit System o de otro prestamista.

Fondos disponibles: Préstamos directos y garantizados para propiedad agrícola (FO, por sus siglas en inglés) y de operación (OL, por sus siglas en inglés).

Proyectos financiados: La FSA ofrece una variedad de tipos de préstamos que incluyen, entre otros: propiedad y operación agrícola, agricultores que están iniciando, emergencias y más.

Fecha límite de solicitud: Las solicitudes se aceptan de forma continua.

Programa de Protección de Ingresos para Toda la Granja (WFRP)

La póliza de Protección de Ingresos para Toda la Granja (WFRP, por sus siglas en inglés) es una opción de seguro de cultivos desarrollada por la Agencia de Manejo de Riesgos (RMA, por sus siglas en inglés) y administrada por la Corporación Federal de Seguros de Cosechas (FCIC, por sus siglas en inglés). A través del WFRP, los agricultores pueden obtener una sola póliza de seguro de cultivos para toda su granja, lo que la convierte en una gran opción para granjas orgánicas y diversificadas.

Solicitantes elegibles: Agricultores y ganaderos en los Estados Unidos o sus territorios. Es más adecuada para granjas con una variedad de productos que venden a mercados mayoristas.

Cobertura del seguro: El WFRP protege contra la pérdida de ingresos debida a desastres naturales o cambios en el mercado, hasta $17 millones. El monto real de la cobertura dependerá de cada granja. ¡Use nuestra calculadora del WFRP para obtener un estimado!

Fecha límite de solicitud: Las fechas varían según el cultivo y la ubicación; la primera fecha de presentación suele ocurrir en la primavera.

Más oportunidades financieras

Si busca apoyo financiero para la certificación orgánica, consulte el OCCSP.

Si busca apoyo financiero para implementar prácticas de conservación en su granja, consulte el EQIP o el CSP.

Si busca apoyo financiero para proyectos de investigación en su granja, consulte SARE.

Certificación orgánica del USDA

El Programa Nacional Orgánico (NOP, por sus siglas en inglés) del USDA es un programa regulatorio federal que hace cumplir las normas para los productos orgánicos que se venden en los Estados Unidos. Los agricultores buscan la certificación orgánica por diversas razones, entre ellas: mejorar la salud del suelo, reducir la dependencia de insumos sintéticos, aumentar la biodiversidad, contribuir a un sistema alimentario más sostenible y aprovechar las oportunidades económicas que esta presenta, como el acceso a nuevos mercados orgánicos y a precios más altos. La certificación requiere llevar registros adicionales y puede incluir un período de transición antes de que la certificación pueda otorgarse. Si usted ha decidido que la certificación es el camino correcto para su granja, tenemos recursos para guiarle en el proceso.

Programa de Costos Compartidos para la Certificación Orgánica (OCCSP)

El Programa de Costos Compartidos para la Certificación Orgánica (OCCSP, por sus siglas en inglés) es un programa del USDA que ayuda a cubrir parte de sus costos de certificación orgánica, incluida la inscripción en un programa orgánico estatal. En el pasado, el OCCSP ha reembolsado el 75% de las tarifas, hasta un máximo de $750 por alcance. Los alcances incluyen cultivos, cultivos silvestres, ganado y procesamiento/manejo.

Solicitantes elegibles: Productores y manejadores orgánicos certificados en los Estados Unidos o sus territorios.

Fondos disponibles: Reembolso del 75% de las tarifas de certificación orgánica, hasta un máximo de $750 por certificación. Si usted tiene múltiples alcances de certificación, puede solicitar asistencia para cada certificación.

Costos cubiertos: Tarifas de aplicación, costos de inspección orgánica, tarifas relacionadas con requisitos de equivalencia, viáticos de los inspectores, tarifas de usuario, contribuciones sobre ventas y franqueo postal.

Fecha límite de solicitud: Las solicitudes generalmente vencen al final del año calendario.

La Iniciativa de Transición Orgánica (OTI)

La Iniciativa de Transición Orgánica (OTI, por sus siglas en inglés) es una iniciativa del USDA que trabaja para ayudar a los agricultores en transición. Antes de obtener la certificación orgánica, los agricultores deben completar un período de 36 meses manejando sus tierras sin insumos prohibidos. Este período puede presentar desafíos para los productores, mientras sus tierras se adaptan al manejo orgánico y aún no se benefician del precio más alto de la etiqueta orgánica. Explore los recursos de la OTI como apoyo durante el período de transición.

Programa de Asociación para la Transición Orgánica (TOPP)

El Programa de Asociación para la Transición Orgánica (TOPP, por sus siglas en inglés) es una alianza colaborativa creada para guiar a los agricultores en transición. A través del programa, los productores pueden ser emparejados con un mentor que les guíe en el proceso de obtener la certificación orgánica y les ofrezca apoyo continuo.

Apoyo del Servicio de Conservación de Recursos Naturales (NRCS)

A través de la OTI, el NRCS ofrece ayuda a los productores para implementar las actividades de conservación requeridas para la certificación, recibir apoyo técnico especializado y recuperar los ingresos no percibidos debido a la reducción de rendimientos durante el período de transición orgánica. Lea nuestra guía para aprender a comunicarse con su agente del NRCS sobre cómo acceder a apoyo para su transición orgánica.

Si busca apoyo para implementar prácticas de conservación en su granja, consulte Aumentar la conservación.

Conozca más sobre la certificación orgánica del USDA

El período de transición orgánica y los requisitos del USDA representan una curva de aprendizaje para los agricultores. Por suerte, ¡tenemos consejos de agricultores que ya lo han hecho!

Aumentando la conservación

El Servicio de Conservación de Recursos Naturales (NRCS, por sus siglas en inglés) es una agencia federal que apoya la adopción de prácticas de conservación brindando asistencia técnica y financiera a agricultores, ganaderos, silvicultores y propietarios de tierras. Trabaja para atender los problemas de recursos relacionados con el suelo, el agua, las plantas, los animales, el aire y la energía; ayudar a los productores y propietarios de tierras a alcanzar sus metas de conservación; y mejorar la sostenibilidad a largo plazo de la agricultura de los Estados Unidos. Si le interesa aumentar las prácticas de conservación en sus tierras, ¡su oficina local del NRCS es un buen lugar para empezar!

Historias de agricultores con el NRCS

Programa de Incentivos para la Calidad Ambiental (EQIP)

El Programa de Incentivos para la Calidad Ambiental (EQIP, por sus siglas en inglés) del NRCS ofrece una variedad de oportunidades de asistencia técnica y financiera para agricultores y ganaderos, incluidas la Iniciativa de Túneles Altos, la Iniciativa de Energía en la Granja y la Iniciativa Orgánica.

Solicitantes elegibles: Productores agrícolas; propietarios de bosques privados no industriales; tribus reconocidas a nivel federal; entidades de manejo del agua.

Fondos disponibles: Costos compartidos que cubren costos de construcción, recursos y mano de obra. El monto del financiamiento varía según la disponibilidad.

Proyectos financiados: Proyectos nuevos o infraestructura que atiendan un problema de recursos naturales. Ej.: construir un túnel alto, establecer un sistema de cultivos de cobertura, cercar para pastoreo rotativo.

Duración del proyecto: De 1 a 10 años.

Fecha límite de solicitud: Las solicitudes se aceptan de forma continua durante todo el año, y la primera fecha límite de agrupación generalmente cae a principios de enero.

Programa de Administración para la Conservación (CSP)

El Programa de Administración para la Conservación (CSP, por sus siglas en inglés) del NRCS ofrece asistencia técnica y financiera para ayudar a los productores agrícolas y forestales a llevar sus esfuerzos de conservación al siguiente nivel, mediante prácticas como cultivos de cobertura, pastoreo integrado, apoyo a los hábitats de vida silvestre y más.

Solicitantes elegibles: Productores agrícolas; propietarios de bosques privados no industriales; tribus reconocidas a nivel federal.

Fondos disponibles: Pagos anuales mínimos de $4,000.

Proyectos financiados: Proyectos que mantienen o mejoran los esfuerzos de conservación, p. ej., probar nuevas mezclas de cultivos de cobertura, plantar proyectos agroforestales, aumentar los hábitats de polinizadores.

Duración del proyecto: 5 años, con posibilidad de renovación.

Fecha límite de solicitud: Las solicitudes se aceptan de forma continua durante todo el año, y la primera fecha límite de agrupación generalmente cae a principios de enero.

Historias de agricultores con el CSP

El EQIP y el CSP: ¿cuál es la diferencia? Ambos programas ofrecen oportunidades de financiamiento para esfuerzos de conservación, y muchos agricultores usan ambos en su granja. El EQIP es un programa de costos compartidos para proyectos que atienden un problema específico de recursos naturales y establecen una práctica de conservación nueva (como establecer un sistema de cultivos de cobertura o plantar especies nativas para reducir la erosión). El CSP ofrece pagos anuales para ayudar a los agricultores a mantener o mejorar estrategias de conservación existentes en su granja (como probar nuevas mezclas de cultivos de cobertura o plantar especies nativas para aumentar los hábitats de polinizadores). Los contratos del EQIP tienen una duración determinada (de 1 a 10 años), mientras que los contratos del CSP son de 5 años y pueden renovarse. Los agricultores a menudo comienzan con un contrato del EQIP para atender un problema específico y luego mantienen la práctica mediante un contrato continuo del CSP.

Los Programas de Conservación y la Certificación Orgánica

A pesar de que ambos son administrados por el USDA, las prácticas de conservación del NRCS y los requisitos de certificación del USDA pueden no estar perfectamente alineados. La Nota Técnica 12 del NRCS busca cerrar esa brecha, describiendo la superposición entre los problemas de recursos del NRCS y las normas orgánicas del NOP.

Realizando investigaciones

Los agricultores y ganaderos orgánicos a menudo prueban y experimentan con nuevas ideas para mejorar sus operaciones agrícolas. Si usted busca convertir su investigación agrícola informal en proyectos de investigación más estructurados, ¡OFRF tiene las herramientas para que empiece!

Investigación y Educación en Agricultura Sostenible (SARE)

El Programa de Subvenciones para Agricultores/Ganaderos de Investigación y Educación en Agricultura Sostenible (SARE, por sus siglas en inglés) es un programa competitivo de subvenciones que otorga fondos a productores que han diseñado sus propios proyectos y equipos de investigación. Este programa busca financiar proyectos que atiendan desafíos reales dentro de la granja y que incluyan componentes tanto de investigación como de divulgación.

Solicitantes elegibles: Agricultores y ganaderos comerciales con un ingreso de al menos $1,000 anuales.

Fondos disponibles: Asistencia financiera para la totalidad del proyecto propuesto, de $15,000 a $35,000; varía según la región.

Proyectos financiados: SARE ofrece subvenciones para la totalidad de un proyecto de investigación, desde el diseño del ensayo hasta la difusión de los resultados. Ej.: probar estrategias orgánicas de manejo de plagas o malezas, comparar mezclas o rotaciones de cultivos de cobertura, evaluar los efectos del compost o de fertilizantes orgánicos.

Duración del proyecto: 

Fecha límite de solicitud: Las solicitudes varían por región entre principios del otoño y finales del invierno.

Encuentre su región de SARE: Hay cuatro regiones de SARE, y los requisitos y la disponibilidad de fondos pueden variar según la ubicación.

Northeast SARE: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia.

North Central SARE: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.

Southern SARE: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, U.S. Virgin Islands, Virginia.

Western SARE: Alaska, American Samoa, Arizona, California, Colorado, CNMI, FSM, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming.

Cómo comenzar con la investigación en la granja

SARE favorece a los agricultores que tienen una propuesta de investigación desarrollada y que han establecido conexiones con profesionales de la investigación. Si usted quiere adentrarse en una investigación más estructurada antes de presentar una propuesta a SARE, ¡explore nuestros recursos!

Toda esta información se resume en un PDF imprimible y descargable a continuación, disponible en inglés y español.

By |2026-10-02T10:18:08-04:00September 16th, 2026|Federal Assistance, News, Spanish Resources|
Go to Top