admin

About admin

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far admin has created 167 blog entries.

Advancing Organic Agriculture: Examining How to Make the Midwest a Center of Organic Oat and Buckwheat Production with Congressman Scott Fitzgerald

Different buckwheat flour formulations are being tested by evaluating different milling techniques. This photo shows light (left) vs. dark (right) buckwheat flours, which have different flavor and texture properties.

By Dr. Nicole Tautges with support from Vinnie Trometter, OFRF Policy Manager

As the Research Director of the Michael Fields Agricultural Institute in Wisconsin, I recently had the opportunity to meet with Congressman Scott Fitzgerald’s (R-WI-05) staff to discuss how the Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative (OREI) program supports our research developing markets and supply chains for Midwestern organic oat and buckwheat producers.

Growing Small Grains for Big Impact

Carbohydrates make up about 75% of the calories in a typical diet, with most of those carbohydrate calories coming from grains. However, grains have received very little attention in terms of origins/sourcing, health benefits, quality factors, and organic share of consumption. Even for basic grain items like wheat flour, few consumers know where their flour comes from, or the differences among grains other than wheat.

This is where organic oat and buckwheat come in. Not only can these grains replace wheat for many uses but they are also more nutritious and excel in organic crop rotations. Our research focuses on how the Midwest can become a center of oat and buckwheat production in the United States. There is much work to do considering most of the oat and buckwheat consumed in the country is imported. However, there is no reason why these grains cannot be grown right here in the Midwest if the right markets and supply chains are in place.

Our research seeks to accomplish this by highlighting the nutritional and crop rotation benefits while building the knowledge and supply chains needed to make these grains more widely available. We do this by organizing focus groups with farmers and other grain supply chain actors to understand what the problems are, and design research trials to address management knowledge constraints.

Oat variety trial—different oat varieties that are currently available are being tested in organic production environments (oats are typically not bred under organic conditions, and can perform differently in organic production systems).

Our trials cover all segments of the oat and buckwheat supply chain. On the grower side, we intend to perform organic fertility trials to improve nutrient recommendations for growers. For example, we are testing no-till establishment of spring oats, which helps ensure earlier planting and higher-quality food-grade oats. We have also completed a trial that demonstrates buckwheat can be planted after small grain harvest in the same season, with enough time to produce a harvestable crop. On the processing side, we are performing milling and processing trials with oats and buckwheat. Lastly, we are performing product testing with consumers, to better understand consumer preferences and to provide guidance to organic grain millers.

Collaboration and Networking are Key to Success

We are collaborating on this project with partners such as Dr. Jacob Jungers at the University of Minnesota, the Artisan Grain Collaborative, Rooster Milling in East Troy, WI, and several dedicated organic farmers across the Upper Midwest.

To share our results, we host field days, present at grower conferences, give webinars, and post videos on YouTube and Facebook. These efforts ensure that both farmers and consumers can see what’s happening and why it matters.

Support from the Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative (OREI) has been fundamental for us. OREI is one of the few USDA programs that consistently supports organic research, which has often been neglected compared to conventional agriculture, despite rising consumer demand for agrochemical-free food.

Sharing Organic Research with Midwest Policymakers

It is important now more than ever to communicate to our legislators how organic agriculture research plays out on the ground. Agricultural science can feel abstract and difficult to understand for those outside the field. And let’s be honest—scientists aren’t always the best communicators! By sharing names, faces, and stories from real farms, we help policymakers connect research to human impact in their districts.

Buckwheat is a pseudocereal and a staple grain of northeastern Europe. It is actually in the rhubarb family! It has a pyramidal shaped grain (the dark brown part of the flower as seen above) that can be milled into flour, or dehulled and the “groat” eaten in porridge or granola.

I feel confident that I connected human impact with our research when I spoke with Congressman Fitzgerald’s staff. I deeply appreciated how receptive his office was to learning about innovative farming practices happening right here in the 1st Wisconsin Congressional District and across the Midwest. With so many demands on their time, it meant a lot to see agriculture innovation recognized as important.

I’m incredibly grateful to the Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF) for facilitating this meeting. Without their support, I wouldn’t have had the chance to share our stories directly with lawmakers.

Looking ahead, whether it be research trials or policymaker conversations, our work is about building bridges—between farms and markets, between science and consumers, and between research and policy. Oats and buckwheat may be small grains, but they represent a big opportunity for healthier diets, more resilient farming systems, and stronger local food economies in the Midwest.

Use Your Voice

Interested in sharing your research with legislators and the importance of continued public investment in organic research? Enroll in OFRF’s self-paced email course, Communicating with Legislators. This free, educational workshop is designed to equip researchers within the organic farming community with the tools and resources they need to effectively engage with and educate policymakers about the impact of their work.

Dr. Nicole Tautges

By |2025-11-11T10:09:01-05:00November 10th, 2025|News|

How OFRF is Building Bipartisan Support for Organic Research Programs in Congress

Written by Vinnie Trometter and Gordon Merrick

As we alluded in last month’s Policy Corner, there is some semblance of good news legislatively regarding OFRF’s policy priorities!  Reps. Eugene Vindman (D-VA-07) and Mike Lawler (R-NY-17) introduced OFRF’s flagship marker bill, the Organic Science and Research Investment (OSRI) Act in the House of Representatives with broad sector support. With a companion bill already introduced in the Senate by Sens. Fetterman (D-PA) and Schiff (D-CA), this legislation is now introduced in both chambers.

At its core, the OSRI Act is about finally investing in the research capacity needed to keep pace with a fast-growing organic sector. This bill would:

  • Increase funding for the only two USDA research programs dedicated to organic research: the Organic Research and Extension Initiative (OREI) and the Organic Transitions Program (ORG).
  • Direct USDA’s Research, Education, and Economics (REE) mission area to catalog existing organic research and recommend pathways to expand the work.
  • Charge the USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) to examine the economic impact of organic agriculture on rural and urban communities.
  • Continue the growth of the Organic Data Initiative, ensuring robust market and production data remains available to farmers, businesses, researchers, and policymakers.

Taken together, these provisions would strengthen the scientific foundation of organic agriculture, ensure farmers have access to regionally relevant research, and support a new generation of scientists committed to agroecological approaches.

Bipartisan By Design

The bipartisan approach we are pursuing is an intentional attempt to communicate that the growth of the organic agriculture sector is a national priority, not a partisan project, and we aim to have the cosponsor list reflect that reality.

While quiet support for organic agriculture does exist across both parties, public leadership on organic issues has historically been stronger among Democrats. That’s shifting. Interest in soil health, regenerative systems, and farmer-driven innovation is growing in Republican circles, but many offices prefer to see key agricultural interests and members support policies before they cosponsor legislation.

This strategy is especially important because the House introduction occurred at the outset of what has become the longest federal government shutdown in U.S. history. In an environment where basic governing has become difficult, moving new legislation requires patience, persistence, and a fundamentally nonpartisan posture. That is exactly how OFRF operates, and we are here to meet this moment.

Moving Forward

Because of the current political landscape exacerbated by the current shutdown, Farm Bill 2.0 discussions have slowed to a standstill. But this pause also creates space. As Congress turns back toward core Farm Bill negotiations in the coming months, the OSRI Act is well-positioned to gain traction, especially if organic research is understood as an economic development and competitiveness package rather than a niche priority.

That’s why your outreach matters.

Over the coming months, OFRF will continue to share targeted district-level information, elevate producer voices, and build bipartisan support so that organic research is properly valued, and fully funded, in the next Farm Bill. Check out our Communicating with Legislators course and reach out to us to get started!

OFRF and our allies are continuing to meet with Congressional offices to highlight how organic research delivers tangible benefits to farmers through practical tools to strengthen on farm resilience, expanded market opportunities, and rural economic revitalization.

At a moment when the organic sector is the fastest growing segment of U.S. agriculture, the need for its fair share of research investments has never been clearer. Farmers are on the front lines of climate disruption and supply-chain volatility, and organic research projects have actively provided methods to help them continue to thrive.

When the tide rises for organic research, all producers benefit.

Stay tuned for more, and thanks for being in this work with us.

Vinnie and Gordon

By |2025-11-05T13:00:46-05:00November 5th, 2025|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

The Organic Science and Research Investment Act: What It Is and How It Benefits All Farmers

By Gordon Merrick, OFRF Policy Program Director

Ensuring that there are sufficient research resources for organic producers is central to OFRF’s mission and represents the backbone of a resilient food system. That’s why we’re proud to announce that we have led the development of a letter urging Congress to include the Organic Science and Research Investment (OSRI) Act in the next Farm Bill, just introduced this month by Representatives Eugene Vindman (D-VA-07) and Mike Lawler (R-NY-17). This bill provides substantial support and funding for agricultural research programming that benefits all farmers, from those certified organic, transitioning to organic farming, and those who are not certified. The bipartisan introduction of the OSRI Act builds on the collaborative work with Senator John Fetterman’s (D-PA) and Senator Alex Schiff’s (D-CA) offices to introduce this bill in the Senate earlier this year.

What Is the Organic Science and Research Investment Act?

The OSRI Act would strategically identify and expand the USDA’s investments into organic research and data programs. Key provisions include:

  • Coordinating and Expanding Organic Research Initiative – Directs USDA’s Research, Education, and Economics agencies to catalog and strengthen organic research, ensuring coordination and growth across programs.
  • Increased funding for Organic Research and Extension Initiative (OREI) – Steps up funding from $60 million in 2026 to $100 million by 2031, while expanding priorities to include climate change, organic alternatives to prohibited substances, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge.
  • Authorization of Researching the Transition to Organic Program (RTOP) – Provides Congressional authorization for the RTOP, currently known as the Organic Transitions Research Program (ORG), with $10 million annually from 2026–27 and $12 million from 2028–31.
  • Doubling funding for the Organic Data Initiative (ODI) – $10 million over the life of the Farm Bill to improve data for risk management and market development, while directing ERS to conduct a comprehensive study of the economic impacts of organic agriculture.

These policies directly respond to the reality that organic agriculture currently represents over 6% of U.S. food sales and 15% of produce sales, yet the USDA’s investments into organic-applicable research are less than 2% of research budgets.  Importantly, organic agricultural research is applicable to all farm operations, while research into more efficient use of synthetic inputs, or compatibility of genetic engineering with chemistry applications can never apply to an organic farm.

How Does the OSRI Act Help All Farmers?

Investing in organic agriculture research isn’t just about advancing one production system; it’s about giving farmers across the United States the tools, knowledge, and resources to stay resilient in the face of a variety of consistent issues, from climate disruptions and volatile supply chains to rapidly changing market dynamics. While the OSRI Act focuses on organic systems, the innovations developed through these programs regularly spill over to the broader agricultural sector. From cover cropping to integrated pest management, organic innovations often set the stage for widespread adoption of ecologically sustainable and economically beneficial practices and systems. Ultimately, these investments empower farmers to make the right choices for their land and market opportunities.

Alongside this direct benefit to farmers through answering questions and addressing agronomic issues, this research funding also flows to the rural communities that host agricultural research stations. According to analysis done by the Economic Research Service, for every $1 invested into agricultural research, over $20 of economic benefit is triggered, both through the project work itself—which can be high-paying and not require an advanced degree—but also through the long-term gains in farm profitability and competitiveness that are the backbones of rural economies.

Broad Support for the OSRI Act Exists, You Can Help!

OFRF is joined by over 100 farms, businesses, and organizations from across the country in signing a letter urging the House Agriculture Committee to incorporate OSRI into the Farm Bill.  But there is always more we can do to ensure Congress understands the importance of this bill and the policies it represents.

You can help strengthen the future of agricultural research by:

Please reach out if you have any questions about how to get involved, we’re here to help! Contact gordon[at]ofrf.org

. . . . .

Support for the OSRI Act:

“Investing in organic agriculture research helps farmers and communities improve resiliency to both climate and supply chain disruption. These research programs build essential knowledge that empowers regionally appropriate organic programs to thrive. In turn, the benefits ripple across society by lifting rural communities, strengthening organic supply chains, and expanding healthy options for consumers.” – Renaud des Rosiers, Amy’s Kitchen

“The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition strongly endorses the Organic Science and Research Investment Act (OSRI Act). The OSRI Act makes meaningful investments in providing organic producers with the research and tools they need to continue to improve upon already resilient farming systems and meet the growing market demand for organic products. A boost in funding for scientific research and economic data and analysis within NIFA and ARS will support both organic and conventional agricultural producers so they can sustain and improve their operations while helping us reach meaningful solutions for the climate crisis.” – Nick Rossi, National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC)

“Research is critical to the growth of the organic sector, which is an extraordinarily important tool in mitigating the threats to health, biodiversity, and climate.”  – Jay Feldman, Beyond Pesticides

“Expanding American consumers’ access to healthy foods, free of synthetic pesticides, will significantly contribute to Making America Healthy Again. Organic agriculture remains the single best way to achieve this goal. Developing strong research and extension programs to support US organic agriculture are critical to the expansion of this important sector of our food economy.” – Matthew Grieshop, Grimm Family Center for Organic Production and Research at California Polytechnic State University

“Organic research is vital to maintain the backbone of critical agricultural efforts that help small-scale farmers and ensure that farming works for consumers as well.” – Colehour Bondera, Kanalani Ohana Farm

“Supporting the Organic Science and Research Investment Act means investing in soil health, the living foundation of organic farming and long-term sustainability.” – Karlin Warner, OneCert, Inc.

“We have heard time and time again from our local organic extension office that their organic extension agents serve more non-organic producers than they do already certified producers.  There is a lot of interest from non-organic producers in learning new and innovative ways to incorporate organic practices on their farms.  This reinforces what organic advocates have been suggesting for decades – that investments in organic research benefits ALL producers.” – Mike Dill, Organically Grown Company

“Strong, verifiable peer-reviewed research is needed to give organic farmers the tools that they need to be successful and competitive with sustainable organic cropping systems.   Funding research so that researchers, such as those in the American Society for Horticultural Science, can continue to develop innovative research-based solutions and technologies is critically important to farm success.” – Curt R Rom, American Society for Horticultural Science

By |2025-10-30T13:30:19-04:00October 27th, 2025|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

Addressing Challenges Farmers Face in the Great Lakes

The Organic Research Hub

By Brian Geier, OFRF Communications Manager. This article was originally published in the Fall 2025 Organic Broadcaster by Marbleseed.

Every day, farmers make decisions that can have short-term and long-term effects on our farms. And as organic farmers, we depend on complex, intertwining relationships amongst all the moving parts of an organic system to work with us: plants, animals, soils, climate, microbes, workers, insects, processors, consumers, and more. To put it mildly, good information is key for our success, and wrong or misguided information can be costly.

Many farmers will tell you that the best information comes from our experiences on the land. “A farmer’s footstep is the best fertilizer,” they say. Our second-best source of information, reflected in survey after survey, is the information farmers get from other farmers. Third may arguably be what we find using the internet. But there, we risk running into an overwhelming array of sources of info with varying degrees of reliability, which may or may not be accessible or useful to anyone, let alone organic farmers!

Introducing the Organic Research Hub

A new tool seeks to remedy this overwhelm, and it is worthy of a close look. The Organic Research Hub, launched in early 2025 by the Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF), is a curated collection of scientific and technical resources to help organic farmers understand and solve their challenges. It is a gateway to research and resources that are applicable to organic farmers, and it is a connection place between farmers, researchers, technical service providers, and extension agents. 

Ohio dairy farmer Jordan Settlage, who serves on the Organic Stewardship Council for OFRF, described his first experience testing out the “Hub” at a recent advisory meeting:

“We’re changing our compost management right now, and I had some questions about it. I searched the site, and within about 30 seconds, I found the answers I was looking for. I thought, ‘Wow, this is a powerful tool. This is fantastic.’ What really stood out is that it wasn’t just some random person on YouTube or a questionable link from Google. The information came from Rodale and other credible sources. It was actually helpful—and I was able to make real management decisions based on what I read.” –Jordan Settlage, Settlage and Settlage Farms

The Hub is easy to use. It can be searched by typing a keyword, by selecting from one or more of 17 topics (for example, Cropping Systems, Tools and Technology, or Livestock Feeding), by choosing a USDA-SARE region, or filtering by production category. You can also combine these options for a more refined search. Let’s take a look at how it works, using the Great Lakes region as an example.

Challenges for Organic Farmers in the Great Lakes Agro-Ecoregion

The Great Lakes agro-ecoregion, as defined by the National Organic Research Agenda (NORA), includes Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. (National data and larger USDA-SARE regions, including the “Northcentral” region, are also used in the NORA report. Smaller agro-ecoregions like the Great Lakes are used to provide a finer scale of categorization that reflects geographical specialization of farm commodities, and regional differences in soil types, climates, and environmental stressors.) In the NORA report, Great Lakes organic farmers identified the following challenges:

  • The top production challenges are: controlling weeds (66% of respondents struggle with this), maintaining adequate yields (50%), and managing production costs (45%).
  • The non-production challenges are: finding and developing markets for organic products (56%) and accessing labor (52%).
  • The preferred source of information is other organic farmers (91% of respondents say so, a preference observed in all regions but strongest in the Great Lakes). 
  • The most influential methods for learning are field days, followed by printed materials, then online resources, and then conferences. 

The top concerns are organic fraud and integrity, industrial organic, crop contamination, imbalance of domestic certified organic supply and demand, and funds for organic research.

Addressing the Top Organic Production Challenge of the Great Lakes: Weed Management

What would an organic farmer find on the Hub if they chose the Weed Management topic and the North Central region? At the time of this writing, this search generates 19 resources that farmers in the Great Lakes may find helpful when addressing their #1 production issue.

For example, farmers using plastic mulches might be interested in a study at Michigan State University that looked at the effects of several weed prevention strategies (cultivation, dead mulch, living mulch cover crops, and mowing) between plastic mulch rows on weed control, soil health, and cash crop quality/yield. 

Producers interested in using reusable black tarps to smother weeds might note that in a recent study at Cornell, it only took 3 weeks to kill weeds with tarps, and results suggest that following tarping, mechanical cultivation, or field prep can be accomplished with less depth (and fuel). 

And, with other results from this search, any farmer could: 

Mike Lucas, of Farmacea in Munith, Michigan, like most organic farmers in the Great Lakes, is looking for ways to successfully address weed management. An on-farm research trial led by Farmacea is looking at comparing synthetic and living mulches. Results are forthcoming and will be available on the Hub. 

Resources for the Top Non-production Challenge: Finding and Navigating Markets

Over half of the organic farmers in the Great Lakes say that finding and navigating organic markets is a significant challenge. Looking at Hub results for the “Managing Production Costs: Business and Marketing” topic and the Northcentral region reveals an array of resources that provide valuable insights. 

There are podcasts like Field, Lab, Earth Podcast, where filmmaker Anders Gurda and agricultural professional Paul Dietmann discuss finding markets for organic grains and the business side of transitioning to organic. A video from the Organic Agronomy Training Service explains the opportunities with locking in prices for future sales using ‘forward contracts’. Another publication could help producers price organic products where organic markets may not already be established. And although not directly market-related, another search result is a podcast with farmer Tom Frantzen exploring the importance of long-term planning and thinking for organic farmers.

Organic Farming Extension Directory and Other Resources From OFRF

In addition to digital resources like factsheets, videos, and podcasts, farmers can now find a list of Extension agents and Technical Service Providers with organic expertise on the Hub. At the time of this writing, the Hub’s “Organic Farming Extension Directory” lists 15 organic farming experts in Wisconsin, two in Michigan, and nine in Minnesota. More specialists are expected to be added, and nominations are welcome (see below). 

In addition to the Hub and Directory, this Resource page is the go-to spot for OFRF factsheets, webinars, networking sessions, and farmer-led resources like this suite on Crop-Livestock Integration. The Advocacy page also hosts our Organic Research State-by-State factsheets, which detail the size of the organic market, the importance of organic research investments, local organic research projects, and regional research priorities in each state, including Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin

Building and Farming Into the Future

The Hub and the Directory are living resources open to additions. Feedback or suggestions for additions can be submitted via this form or by contacting OFRF staff at the email on the form. If farmers, ranchers, researchers, extension agents, or anyone has suggestions for additions to these resources, OFRF welcomes your input! 

Results from on-farm trials being conducted by organic farmers in the Great Lakes are among the latest additions to the Hub. OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials (FLT) program provides financial and technical support to organic farmers to investigate and learn about solutions to their most pressing production challenges. Applications for the next round of FLT projects will be open this fall. Recent and forthcoming additions to the Hub from Great Lakes farmers in the FLT program include:

Results on anaerobic fermentation as a closed-loop farm-made fertilizer from Samantha Otto of The Woven Trifecta, in Whitehall, Michigan.

Samantha Otto, at The Woven Trifecta in western Michigan, leads an on-farm trial looking at incorporating waste from her livestock and compost into anaerobic ferments to improve soil fertility and plant health. Results are forthcoming and will be posted on the Hub.

Addressing the myriad of challenges organic farmers face is not easy or formulaic. We need relevant, updated information from a wide swath of science areas. We want to see real results on working farms. Our information needs to be specific to production systems and regional factors. The Hub is a powerful step in this direction, and I hope readers will join me in using it and sharing it.

Want to stay up-to-date with OFRF? The best way is to join our monthly newsletter, where you’ll receive alerts about new resources, upcoming events and webinars, paid internships with the organization, federal programs and funding for organic farmers and research, and policy updates relevant to the organic community.

By |2025-10-20T10:17:53-04:00October 16th, 2025|News|

Katelyn Hemmer (she/her)

Tech & Data Intern

email: katelyn[at]ofrf.org

Katelyn Hemmer (she/her) graduated from Carleton College in 2024 with a B.A. in Political Science. During her time at Carleton, she conducted an in-depth research project examining the history of food commodification, post-industrial farm models, and the growing social movement toward local food systems. After graduation, she spent a year at Earth Sky Time Community Farm in southern Vermont and is now completing a Farmer in Training program at the Old Fort through Fort Lewis College in Hesperus, Colorado. Her experiences span the entire food system, from seed to compost, including work with farms, food banks, co-ops, restaurants, and composting operations. Outside of her work, Katelyn enjoys reading, trying new recipes, and hiking.

By |2025-10-09T14:50:00-04:00October 9th, 2025|Interns|

Two Years of Farmer-Led Trials

Mary (on right) with OFRF’s Research & Education Program Director, Thelma Velez (left)

By Mary Hathaway, OFRF Research & Education Program Manager

Organic farmers are curious. Working with nature to grow an abundance of food provides countless opportunities to learn and continue to improve farm production systems. OFRF has been listening to farmers since our inception, and the constant hum of curiosity, experimentation, and innovation has never diminished. In fact, as we have worked with more and more farmer and researcher teams, we’ve heard farmers express increasing interest in exploring questions and testing out what makes sense for their operations.

The launch of our Farmer-Led Trial program

Urged on by farmers’ questions, and with encouragement from the wonderful work of Practical Farmers of Iowa (PFI) and Ecological Farmers Association of Ontario (EFAO), OFRF took the leap to launch our Farmer-Led Trials (FLT) Program in 2024. This program supports organic farmers across the US who want to use the scientific method to trial ideas—in the hopes of learning the research process and what works for them and their farm system.

It has now been two years of working with farmers on their trials, and we are about to open applications for our third season. We started with our guidebook, “Farmers Guide to Conducting On-Farm Research,” which provides practical information, including examples from farmers and ranchers conducting on-farm research, links to additional resources, and worksheet templates for designing a sound research trial. It is available for free as a reference for any farmer or rancher wanting to conduct their own on-farm trials. Our goal is to support farmers in conducting trials in a way that generates reliable data and actionable results. We consider this free resource required reading for farmers who participate in the FLT Program, a 101, if you will. But like so many of my tactile friends, I learn from doing. And there is a lot of doing in farm trials!

Developing an on-farm trial

plot map for on-farm trial at Woven Trifecta Farm

Trial plot map we developed with Women Trifecta Farm

Every on-farm trial begins with the farmer’s ideas—what have they been observing on their farm? What is it that they hope to achieve? We talk through their ideas, their production system, and their goals. From there, we walk through the seven core steps of setting up an on-farm trial, as outlined in the Farmers Guide. Together, we hone in on an appropriate research question, develop the trial plan, and come up with a strategy for collecting the necessary data. OFRF continues to provide support throughout the season, meeting with participants via phone two or three times after the plan is laid out, and helping to evaluate results and compile a final report at the end of the trial. As many of the farmers discover by the end of the trial, the year is just the beginning of a journey of testing out ideas. Once they get a behind-the-scenes peek and grasp how researchers might trial an idea and what that looks like for a farm, they see endless opportunities for continued investigation.

Managing contingencies with on-farm research

Life happens, and as farmers know all too well, weather really happens. In developing an on-farm trial, as with farming in general, there is a plan, and then there is what ends up happening. Together, OFRF and the farmers create the plan, and we hope the timelines work and pieces all fall into place. But inevitably it will be a wetter or drier year than expected, or livestock will get out and eat part of the trial plot, or some other unexpected thing will occur. Farmers get used to this, and just as with all other things, they keep moving, pivoting, and adapting to new situations. It can be challenging to stick with a trial. What seemed fun and exciting at the beginning of the season can become much more difficult to keep up with midway through the season, with dozens of other things vying for a farmer’s attention. In the spring, we love to plan and plot and scheme. Mid-season, when daylight lengthens with our workload, it is an extra piece in the day’s puzzle to make sure the data is collected and recorded, the marked out plots stay marked despite weeds or wind. Dedication at this point is what makes a trial successful. There can be no results without accurate data.

Analyzing data and learning together

Soil solarization in a high tunnel at Salad Days Farm

After months of growing, tending, and collecting information, eventually the time comes in the season when all the data is in. The yields have been weighed, or soil moisture has been measured, or compaction has been calculated. Generally, this is when things have slowed down for the season and farmers start to have a little more breathing room to reflect on results. I am not a statistical expert, but I am lucky to be paired with one. My colleague, Heather, works with the numbers, helping boil down the data into understandable results. We meet again with the participating farmers to talk through what the numbers are saying, and what that means for the farm. Many times, the results are surprising. For example, a farmer tested soil solarization, and we saw microbial biomass bounce back quicker than expected, and the fungal-to-bacterial ratio turned up higher under solarization than in bare soil, which was not what we had hypothesized. Whether surprising or affirming of what we suspected, the trial results are always informative. Time and again, what we have seen is learning—farmers learning something new about their farm, seeing data that confirms something they’d always suspected but weren’t sure was true, or understanding how to apply the scientific method to their operation in approachable ways.

While all of the farmers we’ve worked with have shared with us how much they learned throughout the on-farm trial process, I know that I am learning from them as much as they are from me. Each farmer teaches me so much. There is no limit to the interesting questions and thoughtful considerations that arise about what is happening on organic farms across the country, from the community level down to the microscopic. I only wish that I was able to visit each farm in person to connect more deeply with the farmer, their operation, and their research questions.

The observations each farmer comes to as they complete their trials can often be one of the biggest outcomes, even beyond the actual trial results. There is something to setting a frame around an object, such as setting aside a certain plot for a trial, or committing to walking an area of a field more often to take data points. There is much to be gained from letting our gaze fall with more attention. As Tim Colby, FLT participant and farmer at Colby Farms, put it, “We learned a lot by doing this trial. This land is still pretty new to me. So, the trial put me out walking the rows a lot more often and becoming more familiar with the soil and seeing how it’s changed. So, that is a tangible takeaway.”

Working with the farmers on these trials, I am also reminded how human we all are—how hard it is to narrow the questions down to test just one thing. The temptation to do so much at once seems universal. Almost every farmer we’ve worked with initially wants to create an ambitious, all-encompassing statement. My work with OFRF is to help ground us in science, and bring the scope of the trial down to an achievable level—a level where we can make a small, but accurate statement. But each statement is like a brick, adding one piece at a time to build the foundation of our understanding.

Looking ahead

Source: Colby Farms

Tim Colby uses a penetrometer to measure soil compaction

As preparations begin for the third year of OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials program, I find myself humbled by the research questions and the outcomes. The generous and authentic work each farmer is doing to care for their land and feed their regions, while not harming the environment, is admirable. And the common interest among agriculturalists to better understand how things work—on a macro and micro-system scale—is inspiring.

I have worked as a farmer, with farmers, and for farmers. It is the thread that has tied my adult career together. I am so grateful that in this role, I get to be a small part of a journey for farmers around the country participating in OFRF’s FLT Program. As the ripple of this program grows larger with each year, we hope to see farmers we work with go on to build resilient systems, take on more robust trials such as with a SARE grant, or work with a researcher from their state or region to help build the body of knowledge we need to push organic farming systems into the forefront of production in the US. Like all the farmers embarking on these trials with us, I know that this is just the beginning, and there are so many more great questions out there to test.

Learn more

If you’d like to read more about the farmers who’ve participated in the FLT program so far, and what their trials have entailed, we’ve gathered a collection of the stories and final reports from past FLT Program participants here.

If you’re interested in participating in our next FLT cohort, applications are open Oct 15th-Dec 3rd, 2025, for the 2026 growing season. You can learn more about the program on our FLT page, or join our upcoming FLT Forum on Tuesday, October 21st, 2025, to hear from three former FLT farmer-researchers and gain an overview of the on-farm trial process.

By |2025-10-01T16:04:50-04:00October 1st, 2025|FLT Highlight, News|

The Story Behind HEAL: Collective Power for Food System Change

By Elizabeth Tobey

HEAL Food Alliance is a multi-sector, multi-racial coalition dedicated to transforming food and farm systems through policy, education, and grassroots support. With nearly 60 member organizations, HEAL is focused on protecting farm and food system workers, advocating for climate justice, and supporting BIPOC-led organizations. HEAL stands for Health, Environment, Agriculture, Labor, and the Alliance was born out of the understanding that no single individual, organization, or sector can transform systems in isolation.

Nichelle Harriott is the Policy Director at HEAL, and also serves on OFRF’s board of directors. She recently gave a presentation to OFRF staff and board members about HEAL’s work, as part of a series of “Lunch and Learn” events that OFRF is coordinating to build stronger connections between our organization and others working in the food and agriculture sectors. Here are our key takeaways from meeting with Nichelle and learning about the powerful work that HEAL is doing.

How It Started

HEAL began around 2016, when four organizations came together at a conference and started talking about the intersection of health, environment, agriculture, and labor. Those four organizations were Real Food Generation, National Black Food and Justice Alliance, Union of Concerned Scientists, and Food Chain Workers Alliance. From that initial conversation, HEAL was born and has since grown to over 60 member organizations, consisting mostly of local groups with a few regional and national organizations involved as well.

How It’s Going

As Nichelle put it, “HEAL believes that everyone has the right to have access to foods that are nutritionally and culturally appropriate, free from exploitation, and grown in harmony with the rest of the natural world.”

The Alliance utilizes five core methods for conducting their work to achieve this vision:

Connecting and uniting groups

As an alliance of member organizations, HEAL focuses on connecting groups to leverage and support each other in creating effective change. All members play a guiding role by identifying and uplifting priority issues for HEAL to advocate around. Core Members are BIPOC-led or BIPOC-serving, while Connecting Members include others who align with HEAL’s mission. The four founding organizations continue to play a key role within HEAL, as part of the membership and serving on the steering committee.

HEAL supports members through regranting programs. Earlier this year, they were able to regrant $400K to 26 members facing budget gaps due to the federal funding freeze in early 2025. Annually, they provide approximately $50K in rapid response funds to support smaller, less-resourced members.

Political education and analysis

The School of Political Leadership team in San Diego. Photo credit HEAL Food Alliance.

HEAL facilitates the School of Political Leadership (SOPL), a six-month program to equip young leaders with policy and advocacy skills. Made up of a mix of virtual and in-person sessions, this program includes lobbying experience in Washington, D.C. As of our conversation in mid-2025, SOPL has graduated over 10 cohorts of young political leaders and advocates with the training needed to effectively advocate for a future they believe in.

In their policy work, HEAL prioritizes worker protections, climate justice, corporate consolidation, and support for BIPOC producers. They focus on federal-level policy, especially the Farm Bill, and held their first Congressional briefing on workers and the Farm Bill in 2023.

Advancing a shared narrative

The communications team at HEAL Food Alliance is intentional about how they tell their stories, ensuring that messaging around priority issues aligns with a Race Class Narrative (RCN) framework. This framework prioritizes telling stories that unify rather than divide people across class and race, and build power to take on corporate and political entities that historically and currently seek to divide and exploit us. Their “Rooted, Ready, & Resilient: Uplifting a BIPOC-led Vision for Crisis-Proof Food Systems” guide, developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, is a great example of this strategic and purposeful work.

Connecting and nurturing existing and emerging campaigns

HEAL is currently working on a narrative of abundance messaging guide for members, to challenge the false narrative that there is not enough to go around. “Scarcity is manufactured by those in power,” Nichelle explained. HEAL is working to flip that script, showing what’s possible when we move from a mindset of scarcity to a one of abundance. They are promoting the message that we can and should choose policies that reflect what is possible when we invest in people, not corporations.

Ensuring underserved communities have the resources they need to bring about grassroots change

Nichelle discussed the impact that discrimination and exploitation have on Black and brown communities. Addressing this is a foundational and ongoing priority area for HEAL’s work. For instance, they have worked extensively with Senator Booker (D–NJ)’s office on campaigns to improve working conditions of meatpacking workers. They are also engaged in advocating for heat stress protections and immigration reform for farmworkers. HEAL is unique in that they focus on food and farm workers across supply chains, including in farm fields, processing facilities, and restaurants. Their goal is to help shape policy that “safeguards those that grow, harvest, and serve the foods that we rely on,” as Nichelle said.

Collaboration Opportunities

Recognizing the strength in collaborative efforts, Nichelle pointed to several areas where HEAL is open to connecting with other food and agriculture organizations. She noted the messaging work they are doing around abundance, and invited organizations such as OFRF to incorporate that framework into their communications. Another area she noted as important to continue to highlight is the connection between climate change and agricultural communities.

Next Steps

To learn more about the work that HEAL Food Alliance is doing, visit their website at https://healfoodalliance.org/. If you’re ready to jump in and get involved, head straight for their Take Action page, where you can Join the Alliance, Connect, Explore, or Support. You can scroll to the bottom to sign up for their newsletter and follow them on social media to stay in the loop.

By |2025-09-30T09:35:04-04:00September 15th, 2025|News|

School Lunches Might Look Different This Year: Federal Funding Freezes Pinch School Food Programs

By Marina Santos. Marina was OFRF’s Policy & Communication Intern in the summer of 2025. For a research project, Marina dove into understanding the impact of federal funding freezes on school lunch programs. Marina said “As a person who grew up on free & reduced lunches, I was saddened to hear the news [of the funding freezes].” In this blog, Marina explores the landscape of school lunch and local food procurement programs, and their impacts on farmers and the communities they feed.  

Since the beginning of 2025, the federal government has been experiencing internal changes. As you’re probably aware, a government agency previously known as the U.S Digital Service (USDS) was rebranded to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Part of this rebranding effort came with a new mission, to find financial inefficiencies in the government process in order to slim spending. With a new administration came new priorities, including ending programs and closing field offices across the United States. In early March, Politico announced that the USDA would lose billions of dollars in federal funding due to “inefficiencies” found in the agency. Two of the programs that lost funding were focused on providing food for children and people in need. They are:

All 50 states plus 4 of the U.S. territories participate in these programs. Both LFS and LFPA provide a boost in the local economy by nourishing the local food system. They provide buying power to nonprofit organizations and introduce a new income source to farmers. Both programs directly benefit local and regional producers, especially those that are beginning, socially disadvantaged, or veteran farmers who may need a leg up to access these larger institutional markets.

These programs, as well as others focusing on strengthening rural communities, received increased funding amounts during 2021’s American Rescue Plan Act, a Biden administration plan, in hopes of boosting the American economy during the COVID pandemic. The pandemic highlighted the cracks in America’s food system infrastructure and the American Rescue Plan Act was Biden’s attempt to fix the issue. In 2024 Biden released another $1.7 billion investment to these programs to continue supporting farmers, schools and other food nutrition programs that were still recovering from the pandemic. Shortly after President Trump took office, news broke that LFS and LFPA contracts would not be fulfilled. Many farmers who had already started their planting season were pushed into a panic with the sudden realization they would have to reconsider their entire operating plan without the help of these federal programs.

The Impact of Funding Cuts  on Farms

Oaks and Sprouts, in Ohio, is one of those farms that had a contract worth up to $25,000 that was suddenly gone due to the cancellation of the LFS and FLPA programs. This farm has been participating in LFPA for the last three years and they were in the middle of planting when they initially heard the news. LFPA contracts helped fund 2 out of their 4 seasonal employees as well as provided the farm the means to diversify their crops. Oaks and Sprouts were supplying fresh local produce to two food pantries, and had to make a quick pivot to revert back to their previous practices of selling only to restaurants and farmer’s markets.

In the heartland of Nebraska, West End Farms is also dealing with the damages from loss of federal funding. The owner of West End Farms learned about the cuts through their local newspaper. Sudden program cuts limit the access of fresh local foods to a community. Farmers want to feed their communities, and these federal programs have been a way to support them in doing so.

Funding Cuts Hurt The Community

These cuts do not only affect the farmers who were relying on signed contracts for their crop planning and cash flow–states are also scrambling to adjust to the cuts for the upcoming school year. According to the Food Research and Action Center, over 28 million children received school lunches, with nearly 20 million receiving free or reduced lunch from 2022-2023. Minnesota was previously awarded roughly $13.3 million in funding, which allowed schools to purchase and distribute local, fresh foods for their students. The awarded money would also go towards the state’s initiative to provide free meals for all their students, nearly 150 million meals would have been provided between breakfast and lunch.

Food Banks, which generally also receive State support, are also feeling the heavy impact of lost funding. Approximately 50 million people rely on food banks and nutrition assistance programs each year. For example, the El Paso food bank provided over 88.5 million meals to low-income families in Texas. Due to the program cuts they are forced to limit their operations, resulting in 20% of their mobile pantries no longer receiving food. The effects of these program cuts have been seen and felt immediately.

So What Now?

Amidst all the bad news there are some highlights. Many state run groups have taken up the mantle in hopes to reestablish the connections between schools and farms. For instance, Maine’s Local Food Processing Infrastructure Workgroup has created a program called Local Food Switchboard which is designed to help connect local food producers and processors to schools in need.

The National Farm to School Network, an organization whose mission is to connect farms to local schools, will maintain their Local Food Purchasing Incentive for states. This program helps fund schools to purchase food from local producers.

Another ray of hope is that not every program cut is permanent. Some programs have seen their funding “unfreeze.” Local Food Promotion Program and Local Agriculture Market Program (LAMP) were both programs that were part of the March cuts and were then reinstated a couple months later. Both these programs are designed to help create and support local agriculture markets.

It is critical that we continue to let our policymakers know the importance of these programs for supporting farmers and feeding our communities. The most effective way to ensure that LFS and LFPA receive their funding is by contacting your local legislators to ask that they support the Local Farmers Feeding our Communities Act, a bipartisan bill that would reestablish these programs. For advice and help on how to reach out to your policymakers, check out OFRF’s free, self-paced, online Communicating With Legislators Email Course.

Marina Santos, OFRF Policy & Communications Intern

By |2025-09-04T17:15:43-04:00September 8th, 2025|News|

A Trio of Comments: OFRF Chimes in on USDA Actions

Three piglets, one for each of the comments we submitted to the USDA last month.

At OFRF, we know that strong, transparent, and farmer-informed federal agencies are essential for the success of all U.S. agriculture, but especially organic agriculture. This month, we acted on that knowledge when we submitted three different comments on USDA actions: one to the USDA on their reorganization plan and two to the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) on proposed changes to the Application Kit and Scientific Review Process. Each of these actions may seem bureaucratic and technical on the surface, but together they shape the future of agricultural research and technical service delivery.

NIFA Comments

Earlier this summer, NIFA announced that they are requesting public input on proposed changes to its Application Kit and Proposal Review Process. These processes, and the changes described, directly affect the accessibility, quality, and impact of all USDA-funded research projects.

OFRF raised concerns with the proposed addition of a “Disclosure of Foreign Relationships” form added to the Application Kit, related to a recent memo from the Secretary. While framed as a transparency measure, this new requirement risks chilling international collaborations and excluding non-citizen scientists who have long contributed to the strength of the United States’ agricultural research system. Already, we are seeing foreign-born researchers being impacted. Rather than strengthening national security, this has the risk of hollowing out our research capacity and weakening America’s leadership in agricultural innovation. OFRF urged NIFA to pause implementation of this requirement and engage with agricultural communities, from farmers to university researchers, in assessing its real-world impacts on research quality, workforce development, and international collaboration.

In a second Notice and Comment opportunity, OFRF emphasized the importance of peer review as the cornerstone of scientific integrity and accountability. NIFA’s competitive grants depend on fair, transparent, and diverse review processes that balance scientific merit with on-farm relevance. We recommended a variety of pathways for improving the process’s ability to respond to the needs of farmers and reflecting observations applicable to real-world farm operations. These improvements are not just about improving the administration of NIFA’s research grant programs, they are about making sure that USDA research funding is awarded to projects that matter to farmers, communities, and the environment.

Reorganization Comments

In a less formal comment opportunity, OFRF weighed in on the USDA’s proposed reorganization plan, announced on July 25, 2025. This plan threatens to further erode the research and technical service capacity farmers depend on. Our comments highlighted major risks relating to scientific capacity and program administration, and the very public-interest scientific mission this plan aims to achieve. We learned from the relocation of NIFA and ERS in 2018 that when relocation takes place rapidly and without community engagement, there are significant staff losses that persist for years into the future. We called on USDA to halt this reorganization until it engages in a transparent, public process with a cost-benefit analysis, regional listening sessions, and clear justifications for how changes will improve core services.

OFRF’s Commitment

OFRF works to engage in both legislative and administrative advocacy to reaffirm our commitment to ensuring agricultural research is led with scientific merit, farmer relevance, and diverse perspectives. Whether it is protecting the integrity of peer review, opposing exclusionary policies in grant applications, or defending USDA’s research and service capacity, we will continue to ground our policy priorities in the needs of organic farmers as well as the researchers and technical service professionals that support them.

Take Action, Support Our Work

The future of organic research depends on strong, transparent, and farmer-centered federal institutions. If you want to help defend that future:

Together, we can ensure that USDA research and services remain a public good that builds a future for resilient farms and thriving communities.

Eat well and breathe deeply,

Gordon

By |2025-09-05T08:48:49-04:00September 5th, 2025|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

Farmer-Led Trials Program Spotlight: The Woven Trifecta

Testing the Impact of Anaerobic Ferments on Crop Health

Written by Mary Hathaway, OFRF’s Research & Education Program Manager, and Samantha Otto, FLT Program participant

Samantha Otto is the founder and farmer of The Woven Trifecta, a 10-acre farm in western Michigan. Currently in transition to organic, the farm focuses on diversified vegetables for a CSA, local farmers market, as well as farm-to-school sales throughout the school year. Samantha raises Jacob sheep for fiber as well as assorted poultry for meat and eggs. The livestock is rotationally grazed on just over 3 acres of pasture, with 2 acres of no-till beds in production.

Samantha has a decade of hands-on farming experience and is a graduate of Michigan State University’s Agricultural Technology program. Since she started the farm, her primary focus has been on cultivating no-till organic vegetables and cut flowers. But as a curious farmer, she is continuously exploring innovative approaches to sustainable agriculture. Last year, as a participant in the Midwest GRIT program, she began integrating grains into her system, and  she has also recently incorporated livestock into her rotations to create a closed-loop system to help improve soil fertility.

From Waste Product to Resources: Building Fertility and Reducing Reliance in Off-Farm Inputs

One of the main goals of The Woven Trifecta is to reduce reliance on off-farm inputs, and to transform the farm waste products into a resource. Samantha has experimented with different anaerobic fermentation, and was interested in scaling up and fine-tuning its use as a soil amendment. She is particularly interested in incorporating waste from her livestock and compost into anaerobic ferments to improve soil fertility and plant health.

With the help of OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trial (FLT) Program, Samantha hopes to understand how anaerobic ferments impact the health of her crops. When considering which vegetable to test, the team landed on artichokes – a promising crop that her CSA members love and that has yielded well in past seasons. As a long-season vegetable with a short harvest window, the Tavor Artichoke was an ideal crop to trial.

Farm Trial Plan

To answer Samantha’s question, ‘Does an anaerobic compost tea impact yield or plant nutrition in artichokes?,’ she will weigh all harvested artichokes from each plot. Marketable artichokes will be weighed and counted separately. In addition to weights, leaf tissue samples will be collected prior to flowering stalk emergence. 10 representative samples will be taken from each plot, with one leaf collected per plant.

There are two treatments in the trial: a control with no ferment spray, and the anaerobic ferment foliar drench. Samantha will plant in 8 plots to provide sufficient replication. The trial is in a 30′ x 90′ space, in 3′ wide no-till beds, with each row containing 10 plants spaced 36’ apart. Buffer plots will be added on each side, planted with sunflowers.

plot map for on-farm trial at Woven Trifecta Farm

The recipe for the anaerobic fermentation is 60/40 with vegetation scraps and rabbit manure. Samantha brews a fresh batch every two weeks, beginning in early June and applies the fermented drench application biweekly.  A 5-gallon bucket will be suitable for each batch.

Recipe for Anaerobic Fermentation Fertilizer

Using 5-gallon buckets, mix: 

  • 60% vegetation scraps from on-farm and/or compost club program 
  • 40% manure from our rabbits.  
  • 4 cups of soil. 

These will be well mixed, with scraps being chopped into small pieces, and will fill about 3/4 of the 5-gallon bucket.  This mix will then be submerged in water (from well), covered with a lid and stored in the pump shed. The bucket will be fitted with a fermentation lid with spout to release any built-up gases over the course of the fermentation process. 

Ferment will be checked at 7, 14, and 21 days; ready to use at  21 days. Solids are then strained, and the liquid is bottled for use.  

Application: 1 part recipe to 20 parts water every 14 days, and apply it as a soil drench via backpack sprayer.

Samantha is excited to see how the ferment impacts the health and yield of her plants. The process of testing her application of the anaerobic ferment is something she hopes can impact her farm system, and possibly provide sustainable answers for other small farms like The Woven Trifecta.

Sunset over a crop field at The Woven Trifecta

“Working with OFRF has been an amazing opportunity for our farm! Closing the loop in our production is a long-term goal of ours, and this project has provided the opportunity to take the time to explore a potential process for making that happen. It has been especially delightful to work with OFRF on creating the foundation of our project, making a once-intimidating idea very fun and feasible to trial! It has been a thrill to find on-farm solutions that support both our livestock and vegetable production. While we are a ways away from harvest, our on-farm ferment is visually showing benefits in our test plot. I look forward to collecting further data as the season progresses! This data will help us make decisions on how to incorporate ferments in our wider production in the future so that we can continue to grow beautiful, healthy, thriving vegetables for our community.

– Samantha Otto, The Woven Trifecta

One of the livestock that Samantha integrates into her crop rotations

This is part of a series of blogs highlighting farmers who are participating in OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials program. Farmers receive technical support to address their production challenges through structured on-farm trials. To learn more about OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials Program, visit our website page at https://ofrf.org/research/farmer-led-research-trials/ 

To learn more about The Woven Trifecta, visit their website at https://thewoventrifecta.com/

By |2025-10-06T10:50:51-04:00September 2nd, 2025|Farmer Stories, FLT Highlight, News|
Go to Top