admin

About admin

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far admin has created 262 blog entries.

Brands, Farm Groups, and Research Organizations Call for Organic Research Support in the Farm Bill

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

WASHINGTON, June 9, 2026 — The Organic Farming Research Foundation, International Fresh Produce Association, Organic Farmers Association, the Organic Trade Association, and the National Organic Coalition are proud to have led a letter sent to the Senate Agriculture Committee today about the importance of supporting organic research, specifically the Organic Agriculture Research Extension Initiative (OREI) and the Organic Transitions Program (ORG), in the Farm Bill.

These National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) programs are the only two dedicated organic research programs under the USDA. OREI is the flagship competitive grant program dedicated to organic agricultural research. It supports research, education, and extension programs that enhance the ability of established organic producers and processors to grow and market high-quality products. ORG awards competitive grants to improve the competitiveness of organic livestock and crop producers, as well as those who are adopting organic practices, through research, extension, and higher education. Both programs are critical to advancing innovation, productivity, and long-term competitiveness within the organic market, projected to grow from $76.6 billion in 2025 to over $100 billion by 2030. They also produce valuable resources for non-organic farmers interested in adopting organic practices.

The Senate Farm Bill will build off the progress the House Farm Bill made for organic research, most notably, reauthorizing OREI and providing first-time authorization for the Organic Transitions Program, which was renamed to the Researching the Transition to Organic Program (RTOP). The latter was a great accomplishment because the program was previously receiving funding as an unauthorized program. Since OREI is already a Farm Bill-derived program, this means that both dedicated organic research programs are now tied to the Farm Bill, and any changes to either program must effectively be done through the once-in-five-year legislative vehicle.

The letter was supported by major brands, such as Mondelez Global LLC, Driscoll’s, Organic Valley, Stoneyfield Organic, and United Natural Foods, Inc.. It was also supported by a wide array of farm groups and research organizations, such as the Texas International Produce Association, the “Tri-Societies”, Society of Nematologists, and Arizona State’s Swette Center for Sustainable Food Systems. Of course, there was also great support from organic groups across the country, like the Iowa Organic Association, Pennsylvania Certified Organic, California Certified Organic Farmers, the Northeast Organic Farming Association-Interstate Council, and others. All of this shows that there is broad acknowledgment across the food and agricultural space that more dedicated organic research is needed to ensure organic farmers have the best tools and practices to capitalize on the explosive growth in the organic market.

View the sign-on letter.

###

About Organic Farming Research Foundation
The Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF), headquartered in Santa Cruz, California, with a remote team based across the U.S., works to foster the improvement and widespread adoption of organic farming systems. OFRF cultivates organic research, education, and federal policies that bring more farmers and acreage into organic production. For more information about OFRF, please visit our website: www.ofrf.org.

Media Contact:
Ashley Dulaney, Communications Director, OFRF
ashley@ofrf.orf, ‪(518) 310-6771‬‬
P.O. Box 440, Santa Cruz, CA 95061

By |2026-06-09T09:49:27-04:00June 9th, 2026|News, Press Release|

Farm Bill Victories, Coalition Building, and Fighting USDA Restructuring

By Vinnie Trometter, OFRF Policy Manager

With the Senate Farm Bill now taking shape and USDA restructuring moving forward, there is a lot at stake for organic farmers and researchers right now.

OFRF remains on the frontlines of organic research policy in Washington, D.C. On April 30th, the House of Representatives passed its version of the Farm Bill. We published a blog post shortly after explaining the victories for organic research that we fought for, including reauthorization of the Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative (OREI) and the first-time authorization of the Organic Transitions Program (ORG), which would be renamed the Researching the Transition to Organic Program (RTOP).

With eyes now on the Senate, we spearheaded a coalition letter, co-led by the Organic Farmers Association, Organic Trade Association, International Fresh Produce Association, and the National Organic Coalition, urging the Senate to increase funding for OREI and RTOP in its version of the Farm Bill. This was one of the strongest letters we have ever led, bringing together nontraditional organic allies from the specialty crop, livestock, and research communities to make the case that increased funding for both programs is essential to meeting the research demands of a rapidly growing organic market.

Finally, we continue to monitor the proposed restructuring of USDA’s research, education, and economics agencies and the potential closure of the Beltsville Agriculture Research Station. We are deeply concerned about this plan and are working with the broader agricultural research community to prevent and mitigate its worst impacts.

There are two ways you can help right now—and both are free and take less than a minute. Tell Congress to stop the USDA restructuring plan, and tell your Senator to support organic research in the Farm Bill. Your voice matters.

By |2026-06-09T15:35:03-04:00June 8th, 2026|News, Policy Corner|

Organic Pest and Weed Management for Service Providers in the West

An Organic Pest and Weed Management Guide for Extension Agents and Technical Service Providers (TSPs).

This factsheet is meant to provide extension agents and technical service providers in the west with an overview of organic pest and weed management, and increase knowledge of organic systems to effectively support organic and transitioning-to-organic farmers.

Prefer to listen? Watch our Organic Pest and Weed Management for Extension Agents in the West webinar.

In this 75-minute session, presenters will walk through the most common insects, diseases, and weeds found across the WSARE region — from apple maggot and wheat stem sawfly to kochia and field bindweed — and connect that regional context to the pest management requirements outlined in the National Organic Program. Drawing on research conducted in the West, the session will focus on practical, science-backed strategies that extension agents and TSPs can bring directly to the farmers they serve, covering approaches to weed management, insect and disease control, and the “many little hammers” IPM framework that underpins organic production.

Image of the front page of a four-page factsheet on organic pest and weed management for extension agents in the west.
By |2026-06-04T15:56:27-04:00June 4th, 2026|Certification & Compliance, Resource|

Working with NRCS: April Joy Farm’s Story and Recommendations

Written by Rebecca Champagne, PhD, OFRF Conservation Scientist

OFRF is currently working with the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) on a cooperative agreement to help build institutional knowledge of NRCS staff and equip them to better support the unique needs of organic and transitioning-to-organic farmers across the country. As part of this work, we are helping tell the stories of organic farmers and their experiences working with NRCS. We hope other farmers can use this information to learn more about NRCS and feel inspired to pursue conservation programs for their farm. For more information regarding our cooperative agreement with the agency, please reach out to Rebecca Champagne, OFRF Conservation Scientist, at rebecca@ofrf.org.

Meet April Joy Farm

April Joy Farm is a 24-acre certified-organic farm located in Ridgefield, Washington, owned and operated by April and Brad Thatcher since 2006. The Thatchers run a diversified crop and livestock operation, growing organic vegetables, fruit, herbs, and flowers, as well as layer hens, cows, and goats. Some of the vegetables they grow include beets, cabbage, kale, greens, cucumbers, onions, tomatoes, and squash, among many others. The fruit they grow includes apples, plums, pears, and table grapes. April Joy Farm was also the first Pacific Northwest pork producer to receive the Animal Welfare approval, and while they no longer raise pigs, the farm’s logo was inspired by their former farm pig, Rosie.

“I have dedicated myself to caring for our precious soil and restoring relationships between agricultural lands and humans. I love farming because the work is fascinating, challenging, inspiring, and—let’s be real—I love to eat,” said April.

Over the last two decades, April Joy Farm has sold its produce to restaurants, grocers, and through a CSA. Currently, the majority of the farm products are distributed through Farm to Heart, April’s food justice initiative. 

Source: April Joy Farm

“Farm to Heart is a matchmaker – we connect farmers, families, and community partners to reduce food waste and create an equitable food system,” April described. The initiative buys from 22 area farms to make local, organic food available to families experiencing hunger while also paying farmers fairly.

April Joy Farm achieved USDA organic certification in 2007, just one year after the farm started. April wanted to become certified as soon as possible, saying, “I considered organic the baseline if I was going to farm. I wanted to be a responsible steward of the land. Yes, there were market value considerations, but that was secondary.”

When April started the farm, she found many opportunities to create a more functional operation, such as soil compaction, broken drainage tiles, and restoration of previously logged land. “I had the time, energy, and passion to do the work, but needed the financial support and technical assistance,” April said. This drive to be a steward of the land led April to pursue assistance from NRCS, whose various programs and technical assistance can help farmers implement conservation practices to improve their crops and land while conserving natural resources.

Working with NRCS

Source: April Joy Farm

April was “reading anything she could get her hands on” when she started farming, and came across NRCS and its conservation programs. She admits she was initially naive about how NRCS worked, including the agency’s processes and terminology, but was determined to do more conservation on the farm. She has since had 10 contracts with NRCS, starting back in 2009. She has utilized both the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP), with multiple practice standards and enhancements under each contract to help meet her conservation goals. 

“CSP has been valuable because we were already using baseline conservation methods, and now we can go above and beyond that.”

Under her current CSP contract, April is utilizing several conservation practices, including native hedgerows to provide a buffer against a neighboring conventional farm’s spray drift, fencing for rotational livestock grazing, cover crop mixes to build soil health, and a riparian forest buffer for low swale planting that filters and improves water quality and provides habitat for beneficial organisms.

April has seen many benefits from implementing various practices under her NRCS conservation contracts. The riparian forest buffer has resulted in stacked benefits, including habitat for native songbirds and beneficial insects, and shade that cools livestock in the summer. The fencing not only helps with rotational grazing, but also keeps deer out of the crops. She’s also gained an understanding of different native plant species and uses that knowledge to think about other places or situations across the farm that could benefit from them.

April credits the local NRCS staff she’s worked with over the years for much of the success of her involvement with the agency and her conservation contracts. “They all went above and beyond to support me and help me through the process, helping me fill out forms, visiting my farm, and clarifying different parts of the process,” she said. She admitted that the staff sometimes had learning curves about diversified organic operations and organic requirements, but gave them a lot of credit — “They wanted to learn and help me be successful. They met me where I was at.”

She’s currently working with Lisa Schuchman, Resource Conservationist for NRCS in Washington. When talking about her approach to working with organic farmers, Lisa said, “My standpoint and mode of planning is really listening to the farmer’s goals for their operation, thinking about what NRCS has to offer, and how to fit them together. I try to offer good customer service, be flexible, and follow the farmer’s lead where I can.”

Lessons and Recommendations

Even though April is now much more familiar with NRCS and the agency’s processes, she’s not sure she’d still be pursuing these conservation programs if it weren’t for the staff she’s worked with, due to the many parts of the application process and the fact that it can be difficult to fit some organic practices into existing NRCS Conservation Practice Standards (CPS). Crop rotations are complex and diversified at April Joy Farm. Cover crops are often overseeded or interseeded, and high seeding rates for multi-species mixes are used (for maximum biomass production). April found that her cover cropping practices sometimes do not match the specs for the cover crop practice standard. For example, she found that the forms for cover cropping were set up for monocultures or simpler rotations. “I’m using an 8-12-species cover crop mix, and not following a specific timeline of cover crop / disk / cash crop. I’m using methods like overseeding and interseeding, and the documentation was not set up for these more complex methods and smaller scale,” April said. This is why it was so important for Lisa to meet April where she was at with the scale and diversity of her farm and make the contracts work for her. Having an NRCS agent familiar with the complexities of April’s system has been helpful for April to utilize the current practice standard for cover cropping.

Source: April Joy Farm

April’s experiences with NRCS also taught her a lot about documentation. Each CPS has specific documentation needed to show NRCS that you’ve fulfilled the requirements of the practice standard, and this documentation may or may not be the same as the recordkeeping already required for organic certification. Understanding these documentation requirements before getting started with a practice standard, and seeing if your organic certification recordkeeping will fulfill it, is a good practice to successfully implement your NRCS contracts.

The lessons that April has learned offer valuable insights for other farmers interested in participating in federal support programs, and also highlight opportunities for NRCS to further enhance its processes and staff training. For farmers, aligning federal conservation programs with an organic production system can be a significant challenge. Organic farmers can benefit from more specialized support in meeting certification standards and finding service providers with organic expertise who can help them succeed. Through OFRF’s cooperative agreement with NRCS, we aim to work with the agency to streamline these connections and get more organic and transitioning-to-organic farmers involved in conservation programs that both reward them for practices they are likely already doing and build their operation’s resiliency even further. 

Lisa offered the following advice to other NRCS staff who may be new to working with organic producers: 

“They’re farmers too—I don’t see them any differently myself. They are growing food and want to take care of the land. Some approaches are non-traditional, but the goals are the same. NRCS is here to help people help the land. Treat them like any other farmer.”

When asked what she’d say to organic farmers who are considering pursuing NRCS conservation programs for the first time, April offered the following advice: 

“Do your homework ahead of time, and understand the process and costs involved. Make sure your contracts are aligned with your business and production model.”

She also recommends having a solid recordkeeping system and flagging for NRCS anything in your contracts that won’t work for an organic operation. April also stressed the importance of building relationships — “You really need to find the right partner at NRCS. Someone who is willing to go the extra mile and make it an effective partnership.”

Interested in NRCS Programs? Here Are a Few Helpful Resources

Source: April Joy Farm

If you’re a farmer considering applying for NRCS programs, here are some helpful links and tips to get started:

  • Explore NRCS programs & initiatives: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs-initiatives 
  • Connect with your local NRCS office to receive free technical assistance or to start developing a conservation plan: nrcs.usda.gov/contact
  • Know your eligibility. Farmers who are classified as beginning, limited-resource, socially disadvantaged, or veterans may qualify for higher reimbursement rates and advance payments.
  • Ask about the advance payment option early. This can be a game-changer for small farms with limited cash flow.

Download OFRF’s EQIP flyer and CSP flyer for more information on the federal funding programs, including eligibility and application details. Both resources are available in English and Spanish.

This case study was produced with support from the United States Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) under Cooperative Agreement No. FBC24CPT0013867. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USDA-NRCS.

All photos credit April Joy Farm.

By |2026-06-09T15:35:15-04:00June 4th, 2026|News|

Farmer-Led Trials Program Spotlight: Perkins’ Good Earth Farm

Tackling Aphids from the Inside Out: Nutrition, Sap Analysis, and Tomato Health

Written by Mary Hathaway, OFRF’s Research & Education Program Manager, and Dan Perkins, FLT Program participant

This project at Perkins’ Good Earth Farm will evaluate whether foliar nutrition can improve tomato health and reduce aphid pressure through proactive nutrient management. Results from this study will help organic vegetable growers better understand the impact of timing on aphid interventions.

Farmer Dan Perkins with a foliar sprayer.

Farmer Dan Perkins with his backpack sprayer.

Dan Perkins farms at Perkins’ Good Earth Farm, a certified organic, diversified vegetable operation that utilizes no-till, permanent deep-compost beds. Located in De Motte, Indiana, they grow produce and 18,000 bulbs of hardneck garlic for a 200 member CSA, on-farm stand, commercial kitchen, and local wholesale accounts.

In addition to their garlic focus, Dan has spent years refining his approach to high tunnel tomato production, guided by a commitment to proactive plant health management and ecological balance. His farm includes five high tunnels dedicated to tomato production, each featuring long east-west beds that support intensive, season-extended growing.

With an eye toward both soil health and market quality, Dan is invested in understanding the connection between plant nutrition and pest resilience. His work with sap analysis and customized foliar feeding reflects a broader vision: growing crops that are nutritionally robust, naturally resistant to pressure from pests, and consistently high in quality for his customers.

A Proactive Approach to Aphids

For many high tunnel tomato growers, aphids are a recurring and costly challenge. For Dan Perkins, the question has never simply been how to eliminate aphids, it’s been why are they there in the first place? Dan’s approach to pest management is rooted in plant physiology: the hypothesis that plants with well-balanced nutrition are inherently less attractive to aphids. Specifically, Dan has observed that plants with elevated free nitrates, which can signal nutritional imbalance, may be more susceptible to aphid colonization, as those compounds serve as a ready food source for the insects.

Dan has been exploring sap analysis as a proactive diagnostic tool, likening it to “blood work” for his tomato plants. Unlike standard soil or tissue tests, sap analysis captures a real-time snapshot of what nutrients are circulating within the plant, identifying imbalances before visible symptoms appear. Working with Advancing Eco Agriculture (AEA), Dan formulates customized foliar sprays based on sap analysis results that deliver chelated ions directly to plant tissue to rapidly correct deficiencies and support overall plant immunity.

This integrated approach of reading the plant, responding with precision, and then measuring the result, reflects Dan’s broader farming philosophy. Rather than reacting to pest outbreaks after the fact, he wants to understand the nutritional conditions that allow aphid populations to take hold, allowing him to intervene earlier and more intelligently.

On-Farm Trial Plan

This figure shows the randomized tomato plots being used in the trial.

With technical support from OFRF, Dan is conducting a randomized, replicated trial in his propagation house to investigate how the timing of sap analysis-guided foliar feeding affects aphid populations, yield, and tomato nutrient density. The trial uses 84 ‘Cuba Libre’ indeterminate slicer tomato plants arranged across two adjacent beds, with three treatment groups: a control (no foliar spray), an early spray (first application approximately two weeks post-transplant), and a late spray (first application at the economic threshold for aphid damage). Each treatment is replicated four times across plots of five plants each, with buffer plants sprayed with the early treatment to minimize drift between plots.

Sap samples will be collected before and after each foliar application across all treatment groups to track changes in plant nutrition and support the development of a predictive nutritional model. Aphid populations will be monitored weekly by a designated farm team member, using a consistent method of flagging representative infested leaves at the top, middle, and bottom of the three central plants in each plot. Yield will be tracked by marketable grade (A and B) and unmarketable categories. Fruit samples will be submitted for nutrient density analysis through an outside lab. The design also includes a built-in flexibility: if aphid pressure warrants a second spray in the early group, those plots can be converted to an “early + late” treatment, providing a practical real-world comparison of proactive versus threshold-based intervention.

Trial Updates

Tomatoes have been planted for Dan’s trial, and the second round of sap analysis has been conducted. Check back later in the season for the results!

Farmers at Perkins Good Earth farm plant tomatoes in a high tunnel.

Dan planted ‘Cuba Libre’ slicer tomato plants across two adjacent high tunnel beds.

“I applied for the FLT program to conduct research on specific production challenges on my farm. Additionally, being part of a cohort of other farmers sounded fun; farming can be lonely, so connecting with other similarly-minded farmers is important. Working with Mary and Heather has been like having my own research support team. They ensure I stay on task during the busy season and that my questions get answered in a rigorous and valid way.” 

– Dan Perkins, FLT Program Participant

A tomato plant with the label "buffer."

Two buffer plants are placed in between spray groups. 

This is part of a series of blogs highlighting farmers who are participating in OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials program. Farmers receive technical support to address their production challenges through structured on-farm trials. To learn more about OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials Program, visit our website page at https://ofrf.org/research/farmer-led-research-trials/ 

To learn more about Sap Testing visit ask.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/CV004

To learn more about Perkins’ Good Earth Farm visit perkinsgoodearthfarm.com/

By |2026-06-09T15:35:11-04:00May 29th, 2026|Farmer Stories, News|

NRCS and Organic Producers: Organic Participation in Conservation Programs

By Rebecca Champagne, PhD, OFRF Conservation Scientist, Becky Schewe, PhD, NSAC Research & Policy Analyst, and Gordon Merrick, J.D., former OFRF Policy & Programs Director

This is part two of a two-part blog post series highlighting NRCS conservation programs, how these programs have been utilized by organic producers over the past several years, and how USDA can invest more in organic. Read part one here!

Organic in EQIP and CSP

The Natural Resources Conservation Service, known as NRCS, is a federal agency within the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). NRCS supports the adoption of conservation practices through federal programs such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP), and helps producers and landowners achieve conservation goals to enhance the long-term sustainability of US agriculture. Certified organic farmers and those in the process of transitioning to organic are already using conservation practices such as diverse crop rotations, cover crops, rotational grazing, and nutrient management to meet robust certification requirements and National Organic Program (NOP) regulations. However, these producers’ involvement in federal conservation programs is lacking. 

According to the 2022 Census of Agriculture, there are 21,488 organic farms in the United States—and organic accounts for 6% of total U.S. food sales and 15% of all produce sales. Yet in 2024, only 1,298 organic producers held EQIP contracts and just 323 held CSP contracts (Table 1).

While these numbers represent an encouraging uptick driven by an influx of Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) funding in 2023 and 2024 (Table 1), they still reflect that only a small fraction of the nation’s organic producers are being reached by these programs (Figures 1-3), pointing to significant room for growth in the USDA’s conservation support for the organic sector. Additionally, for both conservation programs, the top 10 states with the most contract obligation dollars account for a large percentage of the funding allocations (Figure 4).

Cover crop in the field at Mora Mora Farm.Source: Mora Mora Farm
A cover crop is part of a CSP contract at Mora Mora Farm in Troutdale, OR. Read more: “Conservation at Work: Cover Cropping through CSP at Mora Mora Farm” blogpost.
Table that shows a very small percentage of federal funds for EQIP and CSP have went to organic producers from 2018-2025.

Given the conservation practices that are inherent to organic production, more efforts should be made to engage organic and transitioning-to-organic producers in these conservation programs, particularly small-scale farms and underrepresented states.

Insight from this USDA data is supported by organic farmer interviews, which reveal a number of barriers to conservation program participation (Whelan et al., 2024). When farmers have a greater understanding of these programs and have positive interactions with the agency, the conservation programs are more well-received by the farmer, who is then more likely to pursue them. On the other hand, many organic farmers find that the programs are not designed for organic operations, that staff knowledge of organic systems is lacking, and the overall administrative burdens of the programs outweigh any economic benefit. Given this information, the case for investing more in organic producers and streamlining participation is clear.

Organic engagement with both EQIP and CSP has varied over recent years, as seen in Table 1 above. Both programs show their lowest organic contract acreage in 2019, the first year covered by the current federal Farm Bill that funds both programs. This decline in 2019 is likely due to the transition to the new Farm Bill and disruptions caused by changes to how the NRCS Organic Initiative was funded. While the changes ultimately increase funding for organic farms, restructuring payment rules can cause temporary administrative delays and disruptions to enrolling new organic contracts.

Both EQIP and CSP enrolled their highest number of organic contracts in 2024. Combined, EQIP and CSP distributed approximately $94.7 million to organic farmers in 2024, roughly three times the amount in 2018. This increased support is a result of the influx of funding available from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) for NRCS conservation programs. Unfortunately, both EQIP and CSP saw a decline in the number of organic contracts awarded in 2025, likely related to the widespread service disruptions experienced due to NRCS staffing losses, a long-lasting government shutdown, and funding delays.

Pie charts show a small percentages of EQIP and CSP funding that goes to organic producers, 2-3%.

Most Commonly Used Practice Standards

Farmers with NRCS EQIP or CSP contracts work with their NRCS staff to adopt practices that are best suited to their farm and the natural resource needs of their area. The practices they ultimately end up implementing as part of their contracts must come from a list of NRCS Conservation Practice Standards (CPS). Think of them as a sort of menu of approved conservation activities for which farmers can receive technical and financial assistance to implement. There are hundreds of standards covering everything from installing irrigation systems to planting buffer zones around waterways, and NRCS staff work with farmers to identify which ones are the best fit for their land and goals. NRCS state technical committees also inform staff decision-making in an advisory capacity to ensure proper recommendations are given.

The list to the right identifies the NRCS Conservation Practice Standards (CPS) that were most commonly used by organic and transitioning-to-organic producers under EQIP and CSP contracts in 2024. These practice standards are listed alphabetically, and standards with an asterisk (*) indicate they are considered a priority under the new USDA Regenerative Agriculture Pilot Program (described below).

Underutilized Conservation Practice Standards

Organic farmers use many different practices to work with nature and mirror ecological systems. A close look at the practice standards most often used by organic producers in FY2024 also reveals many that are being underutilized in organic systems (Table 2), and should be considered by NRCS planners while doing farm assessments, given the practice standards’ fit with organic practices and principles.

The practices listed below represent untapped opportunities for organic farmers and their NRCS partners. These practices are well-suited to organic management and are already available on NRCS’s menu of conservation practices. Investing in NRCS staff training and outreach on organic systems, and in stronger outreach to organic communities, could help address this gap and underutilization.

Table shows ten conservation practice standards that are underutilized by organic producers, alongside the practices' benefits.

State Level Trends & Outreach

Several states have organic industries that are currently underserved by CSP and EQIP organic contracts. When comparing the size of the organic acreage in a state to the NRCS organic contract acreage, thirteen states show a particularly large gap (Figure 4).

Colorado and Wyoming both have organic acreage that places them in the top one-third of all states, but NRCS organic contract acreage that is in the bottom one-third of all states (USDA NASS, 2021). Organic producers in these two Western states are particularly underserved by NRCS organic contracts. 

Montana, North Dakota, and Ohio all have organic acreage in their states that places them in the top one-third of all states, but NRCS organic contract acreage is only in the middle one-third of all states, meaning their organic producers are also poorly covered by NRCS organic contracts, although to a slightly lesser degree. 

Arizona, Arkansas, Kansas, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Virginia all have organic acreage that places them in the middle one-third of all states, but NRCS organic contract acreage that is in the lowest one-third of all states, again demonstrating a significant gap between the extent of the organic farming in a state and organic participation in NRCS CSP and EQIP contracts. 

The map in Figure 4 shows the extent of organic acreage in a state (the background color) and the total NRCS obligations to organic contracts in that state (the circles). The thirteen underserved states described above are highlighted with red borders.In the Midwest and Plains regions, North Dakota, South Dakota, Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, Nebraska, and Montana produce a significant amount of organic corn, soybeans, wheat, hay, livestock, and poultry, but have relatively few organic contracts with CSP and EQIP. 

A map of the United States shows organic acreage and organic conservation contracts in each state, and reveals underserved organic sectors in some states.

According to USDA NASS data (2021), organic livestock sales in Nebraska were valued at $106 million in 2021, and organic egg sales in Montana were valued at $23 million. Indiana’s organic livestock and poultry sales combined were valued at  $110 million in 2021. Ohio and Kentucky’s organic sales grew by 52% and 84%, respectively, from 2019 to 2021 due to rising consumer demand for organic products. Texas, which is ranked 13th in the country for the number of organic businesses, contributes $572 million in organic sales but only represented 26 conservation program contracts in 2024.

Similarly, in southern states such as North and South Carolina, Florida, and Georgia—where many high-value organic specialty crops, such as fruits and vegetables, are grown—only 95 contracts were awarded in 2024, despite 1,005 organic farms across these four states (Figure 4). For more information regarding organic at a state level, check out OFRF’s downloadable state-by-state guides

These states greatly contribute to total organic acreage and sales, but have few conservation program contracts relative to other states (Figure 4), and could benefit from greater outreach by NRCS to boost organic and transitioning-to-organic farmer enrollment in EQIP and CSP. By boosting organic producer involvement in these federal programs, the organic sector can continue to grow and meet consumer demand, contributing to domestic agricultural conservation and economic vitality.

Get Involved

Organic & Transitioning-to-Organic Farmers

We often hear that farmers may be hesitant to reach out to their local NRCS office. It is important to remember that NRCS wants to help all farmers with their conservation and land stewardship goals. We encourage you to stop by your local office and introduce yourself, and talk about the importance of the organic farms in your county and state. Establishing these relationships is an important first step and could open the door for other farmers as well.

We also encourage you to contact your elected officials to discuss the importance of farming in your community and how funding for organic research programs benefits conservation practices in both organic and conventional systems. Not sure how to get started? Check out our free, online Communicating with Legislators email course and learn how to share your story and influence the policies shaping the future of food and farming. You can also learn more about NRCS and the agency’s conservation programs on our website – https://ofrf.org/nrcs/.

NRCS

As important as it is for farmers to contact their local NRCS office, it is equally important for NRCS planners to reach out to organic farmers in their region. Letting farmers know about the technical and financial assistance that is available for them, regardless of what kind of operation they run, will go a long way in getting more farmers in the door. Farming practices that are foundational to organic operations and boost conservation and natural systems can also be utilized on conventional farms, strengthening regional farming as a whole.

We encourage NRCS staff to lean on organic farming organizations for resources and research surrounding organic systems. OFRF’s resources page and Organic Research Hub offer many free resources to help you build knowledge of organic farming. You can further increase your organic literacy by checking out internal agency documents such as Technical Note 12 and the NRCS Organic Farming Handbook.

References:

USDA NASS. (2021). Organic Agriculture Survey. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Surveys/Guide_to_NASS_Surveys/Organic_Production/index.php

Whelan, S.J., Orlander, D., Balsam, J., & Dimitri, C. (2024). Fitting a square peg in a round hole: Applying U.S. farm policy to organic farms. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 13(4), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2024.134.002

By |2026-05-20T14:03:18-04:00May 20th, 2026|Federal Assistance, News|

Conservation at Work: Cover Cropping through CSP at Mora Mora Farm

By Clare Boland, Communications Manager

OFRF is currently working to increase farmer and community awareness of the federal funding opportunities available to organic and transitioning farms. As part of our work with the Northwest region of the USDA’s Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP), we’re spotlighting the experience of one farm—Mora Mora Farm in Oregon—that received funding and support through the Natural Resource Conservation Service’s Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP)

Their story offers a transparent look at what it’s really like to work with NRCS: the benefits, the obstacles, and the lessons they’ve learned. We hope other farmers can use their experience to navigate the process of applying for and implementing CSP contracts more easily.

Meet Mora Mora Farm

Catherine Nguyen bunches greens in a swiss chard field. Source: Emilie Chen

For Catherine Nguyen, a farmer in Troutdale, Oregon, the ethos of her farm is encompassed by the name, Mora Mora Farm, which means “slowly slowly.” After a busy season of farming, Catherine was catching up with a friend who had recently traveled to Madagascar. Her friend shared the phrase “mora mora,” which captured the pace of life there; instead of rushing, there was a culture of patience and contentment, acknowledging that all things take time. The phrase stayed with Catherine, so much so that when she started her own farm in 2018, she used it for the name. “[Farming] is an industry about high production,” Catherine said. “I know my tendency is to go, go, go. The name reminds me to take a moment to slow down.”

True to the sentiment that good things take time, Mora Mora Farm has been steadily growing over the years. Catherine began her farm as part of the East Multnomah Soil and Water Conservation District’s Headwaters Farm Business Incubator, a five-year program that provides land access, equipment, infrastructure, and business support for beginning farmers. After graduating, she moved her farm to a parcel of land being farmed collectively by previous Headwaters graduates. Today, Mora Mora Farm has one and a half acres in production with a diversity of 40 to 60 different crops, including Asian heritage varieties. Catherine considers her community-supported agriculture (CSA) model “the heart of the farm,” but also supplements the farm’s income by vending at the King Farmers Market, restaurant accounts, and nonprofit partnerships.

In May 2024, the farm obtained organic certification through the Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP). “We had been practicing organic since the start,” Catherine shared, but she decided to pursue certification to build trust with the customer base at the Portland Farmers’ Market. To her, organic farming is about “growing healthy food and feeling good about what you’re doing.” 

When it comes to growing her operation, Catherine cites other farmers as her greatest resource. “Everyone is so open and generous with their knowledge,” she said, and when facing specific challenges, “farmers in the region have usually already dealt with what I’m curious about.” A fellow farmer on her land is how Catherine first heard about the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP). CSP is a program administered by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) that compensates agricultural producers committed to increasing conservation on their farms. In 2024, Catherine started a contract to reduce soil compaction on her property through cover cropping.

Why CSP?

Catherine Nguyen tills her field with a BCSSource: Megan Clark

For Catherine, the CSP program presented an opportunity to get financial support for work she was already doing. CSP supports farmers by providing a minimum of $4,000 per year for a 5-year contract to install, maintain, or improve a conservation practice on their farm. One of the requirements of the Headwaters program is that any land that is not in production over the winter must be put in cover crop. “The practice was already instilled in my growing practices,” Catherine shared, but through the CSP program, she was able to get financial and technical support for it. “It’s an incredible program,” she added. “Every farmer wants to be growing food. They also want to be doing good things for the environment. But it’s costly to do both.” CSP helped bridge the gap between generating income and investing in conservation.

She emphasized that the financial component can’t be overstated; in an industry with razor-thin margins, choosing to seed a cover crop rather than another round of cash crop can feel like a “double loss” in the short term. But with CSP, that burden is reduced, making it easier to prioritize the overall health of the land for the long term.

Deciding on a Conservation Practice

After graduating from Headwaters and moving onto a new property, Catherine had to adjust to a new set of challenges. “Technically, I’m on a wetland, which makes water management key to this site.” Catherine has experienced issues like standing water, flooded aisles, and soil-borne diseases on her new land. When approaching NRCS, her primary focus was on determining how to best move water throughout the farm.

As part of the application process, applicants have a one-on-one consultation with an NCRS staff member to discuss resource management on their farm and determine which “enhancement,” or conservation strategy, will work best. After considering a few different strategies, she and her NRCS agent decided on “cover crop to minimize soil compaction (E340F).” Having living roots in soil can help mitigate excess water. “They kind of act as straws to pull water out of the soil and keep it moving,” she explained. Since she had utilized cover crops before, it “felt like an easy step into improving the soil.”

“I remember being surprised when I was looking at the enhancements online,” Catherine shared. “They were so detailed in a good way. It’s like this is the enhancement, and this is how you implement it. It’s very specific. They gave me a list of cover crops to choose from, and from there it was just me trying to decide, which ones do I want? Which ones are readily available in my area?”

Timeline

Catherine first heard about the CSP program in spring 2024 and was able to seed her first round of CSP-funded cover crop in October of that year. The first step was reaching out to her local NRCS office and reviewing her conservation options. After that, farmers need to register with the Farm Service Agency (FSA). Catherine was already in the system from utilizing other USDA programs. Her advice is to register sooner rather than later: “Once you’re in the system for NRCS or for FSA, everything becomes so much easier.”

Next, she worked with her NRCS agent to make sure she had all the required documents to begin her conservation work. Catherine said the biggest myth about working with NRCS is “the amount of paperwork.” “A lot of farmers hate doing admin, but it really is manageable.” She described the timeframe as about “a month of emailing going back and forth.” But after the documentation is complete, farmers can focus fully on farm work.

In terms of implementation, “the contract itself is so simple.” She was given a list of recommended cover crops, a designated amount of acreage, and a timeframe to complete the work by. “There’s not a lot of hoops to jump through,” she said. “[The Program] lets us actually be able to be out in the field and not be consumed by paperwork.” 

NRCS determines the payment amount per project, but after that, it “is up to the farmer to figure out where it gets distributed.” Farmers receive their project payments as lump sums per each tax year of the contract. Outside of purchasing the cover crop seed, Catherine used the CSP payments to cover the labor costs of the project. Having the CSP funds allowed her “a little bit more wiggle room to have my employee do [the work] versus me.

That fall, an NRCS agent came out to Mora Mora farm to do a site visit and assess how the project was going. Catherine received her first reimbursement payment later that year.

Doing CSP on Leased Land

Accessing farmland is increasingly cited as a barrier for beginning farmers. Young farmers, like Catherine, often will lease land rather than buying. The land she currently farms is shared with several other farm businesses. When Catherine first considered an NRCS contract in 2023, through the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), she wasn’t able to because another farm business was already tied to her land in the system.

When she applied for CSP in 2024, NRCS worked with her to subdivide the plot she farms into three different managing farms in the system. Through the other farms on the property, the land houses multiple NRCS projects, including hedgerows for wind management and high tunnels through EQIP.

>> Related Reading: Héktor Calderón-Victoria of Three Feathers Farm shares his experience working with NRCS’s EQIP to install a hedgerow border and two high tunnels on his four-and-a-half-acre farm in Morgan Hill, California. Read his story.

Outside of the issue of subdividing the property, Catherine has had an easy time implementing her contract on leased land. Besides sharing a lease with NRCS, there are no additional requirements for farmers who lease. “Our landowner is pretty hands-off in terms of the production site,” she shared, “and he is also all for conservation.”

Working with NRCS

Catherine described her experience of working with NRCS as overwhelmingly positive. “Everyone I’ve worked with in the NRCS—and at this point, I’ve probably worked with three separate people—has been so prompt in their responses and really easy to work with,” she said. As an organic farmer, Catherine found that the program generally aligned with her organic certification requirements, though there was some confusion around sourcing organic cover crop seeds. “There was a specific type of clover that’s part of my enhancement that I had a really hard time finding,” but through some back and forth with her agent, she was able to determine a seed that would still meet the requirements of the program and certification.

One hiccup during the process was the 2025 funding freeze of USDA programs. She received an email instructing participants to hold off on implementing their CSP projects unless they could take on the financial risk themselves. During that period of uncertainty, many NRCS offices experienced layoffs, and there was “a weird time of not knowing who my point of contact actually was.” Later that year, funds were released, and Catherine received her reimbursement as planned. Despite staffing changes at NRCS, Catherine noted that the current representative covering Multnomah County has been “amazing,” and she still usually gets a response within 48 hours of emailing her office.

Conversation at Work

Two years into her CSP contract, Catherine has completed two rounds of winter cover cropping. The practice has aided with soil compaction as planned, noting that “where there is cover crop, the water is being absorbed faster.” Without a clear baseline for the property—Catherine has been using a cover crop since she moved to the site—it’s hard to say how significant the enhancement has been. But she has “definitely seen less standing water since I’ve been on the site.” Catherine considers cover cropping “part of a holistic strategy to figure out water management” on her farmland. 

One of the most helpful resources NRCS gave her was a list of cover crops for the project. Having worked on farms in the past, Catherine said that “most farms have their go-to cover crop rotations,” and she had defaulted to using mixes she had previously worked with. Being part of CSP gave her room to experiment and determine what mix works best for her property. Currently, she uses a mix of clover and triticale for her winter rotation. In future seasons, she’s hoping to include a summer cover crop as well. “NRCS was kind of the first entity that put summer cover crops on my radar,” she said, “[working with them] has provided more depth to my crop rotation.”

More than anything, the program has allowed Catherine the time and funding to prioritize cover cropping. Rather than stressing to maximize profit, Catherine said that CSP has “given me a little bit more breathing room, knowing that this project is funded.” Having that comfort has allowed her to commit more fully to the practice, for example, taking extra time to prep her beds to ensure better germination. The experience has led to her putting more of her land into her cover crop rotation. In 2026, she’s planning to “have two acres under management, one in production, one in cover crop.”

“[CSP] allows you to start dreaming a little bit more,” Catherine said. “Cover cropping is a practice I have done before, but I was able to do it better and to think a little bit bigger in terms of conservation.” 

Advice for Farmers Considering CSP

For Catherine, working with CSP has been a big help to her farm. She praises the program for letting “farmers do what they’re good at, which is food production.”

In terms of her advice for farmers considering the program, she shared:

  • Get into the system. Already being registered with her FSA office expedited the process. Once you’re in the system, it “opens the doors to all these other programs.”
  • Start early. “It will likely take 3 to 6 months to actually get everything signed,” Catherine said. “And especially if you’re taking an off-season, you might as well be cozied up in your house doing a bunch of office work.”

Overall, Catherine wants to share with other farmers “how easy it was.” “It takes a little bit of time to get everything squared away and to learn the definitions of things,” she said, “but the payoff for the work is worth it. The return on investment is great.”

Ready to Apply? Here Are a Few Helpful Resources

If you’re a farmer considering applying for CSP or other NRCS programs, here are some helpful tools to get started:
NCRS CSP Mora Mora Farm Flyer cover page

By |2026-06-09T15:35:22-04:00May 11th, 2026|Farmer Stories, Federal Assistance, News|

Congress Is Paying More Attention to Organic Research. Here’s Why It Matters.

By Vinnie Trometter, OFRF Policy Manager

OFRF has been working hard to increase support for organic research on Capitol Hill. Every year, OFRF submits requests for organic research priorities as part of the annual Congressional appropriations process. Our actions ensure that OFRF is fighting for more organic research funding that can result in breakthrough innovations for organic farmers each year, even outside of the Farm Bill.

Feedback from Congress shows that support for increasing organic research funding is growing. Ten Senators submitted an organic research support letter to the Senate Appropriations Committee. This was double the number from last year. In the House of Representatives, a bipartisan group of 31 members of Congress submitted a similar letter to the House Appropriations Committee. This was five more than last year. Last year’s letter was also not bipartisan.

The results of these letters indicate that more policymakers want more organic research funding to keep up with the rapidly growing organic market in the U.S. This increased support helped secure two victories in the FY2027 House Agriculture Appropriations bill that will benefit organic farmers. The first is the inclusion of language requiring the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to conduct an economic impact study to analyze how organic agriculture affects the labor market, environmental quality, land ownership, social dynamics, and vitality of local economies. Organic farmers and those interested in transitioning to organic agriculture will be able to use the results of this study to better understand holistically how organic agriculture affects their communities. Another victory is the language that tasks the Agriculture Research Service (ARS) with continuing support for organic research that studies critical producer-identified constraints in the Upper Midwest, such as weed management and soil fertility, and with supporting coordinated research on crops, livestock integration, soil health, and nutrient efficiency to meet demand for organic foods.

Though we were unsuccessful in increasing funding for important research programs like the Organic Transitions Program (ORG) and the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program (SARE), this was largely because of the tight fiscal environment in Washington, D.C. However, we believe our small successes will be critical in better informing organic and organic interested farmers with farming decisions and innovations that, as a whole, will benefit organic agriculture.

Broadly, funding for organic agriculture research needs to increase in parallel with the growth of the overall organic market. In 2025, the domestic organic market grew by almost 7%, which was the largest annual growth rate since the pandemic. The market is now worth over $76.6 billion and is expected to reach $100 billion by the end of the decade. However, less than 2% of the USDA’s agricultural research budget is allocated to dedicated organic research, despite organics accounting for around 6% of all U.S. food sales, including 15% of all produce sales, across the country.

Publicly funded agricultural research has a high return on investment for both taxpayers and farmers. The USDA Economic Research Service states that every $1 invested in agriculture research generates $20 dollars of economic activity and that increases in productivity arising from innovation and changes in technology are the main contributors to economic growth in agriculture.

Imagine how much the organic market would grow if dedicated organic research got the same proportion of funding as its market penetration? This would mean more funding for researchers at state land-grant universities, non-profits, and ARS to find solutions for the most pressing organic agricultural issues in their regions and nationwide. Extension services would also expand in tandem since the bulk of all dedicated organic research are competitive grants under the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), which must have extension activities built into each project. Additionally, many of these projects also help with market development. As a result, increased funding for organic research would not only provide more tools and best practices for organic farmers, but also more opportunities for them to learn from researchers and sell into expanded markets.

Regions with underdeveloped organic agricultural footprints but strong increases in demand for organic foods stand to benefit the most from broad increases in organic research funding. Take, for instance, the Southeastern U.S. This region had the highest growth in demand for organic produce, yet was among the least productive for organic agricultural output in the country. This dichotomy makes the Southeast a perfect region for projects that integrate research, extension, and market development. Regions with more established organic agricultural sectors will, of course, also benefit as their organic producers become even better positioned to capitalize on growing nationwide demand. Nationwide, increased organic research will improve the competitiveness of our domestic industry as a whole. This is particularly important for certain industries, such as organic beef, where the majority of its 44% growth seen last year was due to imports.

OFRF will continue to update organic farmers and researchers about changes to organic research as the United States Senate Agriculture Appropriations Committee develops its own FY2027 Agriculture Appropriations bill. OFRF will be tracking the markup, so be sure to sign up for our email list and follow us on social media (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn) to see how organic research is impacted!

photo of cherry blossoms blooming with US Capitol building in the background and a button to "sign up for our newsletter"
By |2026-05-05T11:22:55-04:00May 7th, 2026|Advocacy, News|

NRCS and Organic Producers: What EQIP, CSP, and the Regenerative Pilot Program Can Do for Your Farm

By Rebecca Champagne, PhD, OFRF Conservation Scientist, Becky Schewe, PhD, NSAC Research & Policy Analyst, and Gordon Merrick, J.D., former OFRF Policy & Programs Director

Introduction to NRCS

The Natural Resources Conservation Service, known as NRCS, was founded in 1933 and is a federal agency within the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). NRCS supports the adoption of conservation practices by providing farmers, ranchers, foresters, and landowners with technical and financial assistance. They work to address resource concerns related to soil, water, plants, animals, air, and energy; help producers and landowners achieve conservation goals; and enhance the long-term sustainability of US agriculture.

NRCS offers free technical assistance to producers, and alongside this, can also determine whether you might be eligible for financial assistance through a number of available conservation programs. Organic and transitioning-to-organic farmers are already required to prioritize soil health, biodiversity, and ecological vitality as part of their Organic System Plan (OSP) for certification, but a significant barrier to developing sustainable practices and infrastructure is resource scarcity. Two NRCS programs in particular can help organic farms achieve these conservation goals – the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP). The newly launched Regenerative Pilot Program also offers producers a way to prioritize conservation, and is described more below.

This is part one of a two-part blog post series highlighting NRCS conservation programs, the new USDA Regenerative Pilot Program, and how these programs can be utilized by organic producers. Stay tuned for part two!

EQIP helps farmers and ranchers establish new conservation practices on their operations. Through EQIP, they can receive financial assistance to implement a wide variety of practices, including cover cropping, mulching, composting infrastructure, high-tunnel systems, efficient irrigation, and interior fencing for rotational grazing systems. The program is flexible and adapts to different types of farms and conservation goals. Your local NRCS office can help determine whether you qualify for one of these organic-specific funding streams and guide you through the application process. For more of an overview on EQIP and the steps to utilizing the program, check out OFRF’s EQIP toolkit and read about one California farmer’s experience with EQIP

CSP is designed for farmers and landowners who are already meeting certain conservation thresholds and are interested in going further. Through CSP, producers can receive annual payments over a five-year contract to maintain their existing practices while adopting additional practices that enhance the operation’s overall ecological sustainability. This might include increasing the diversity or duration of cover crops, implementing more complex crop rotations, expanding riparian buffers, or modifying pasture management to optimize forage quality and soil health. For more of an overview on CSP and the steps to utilizing the program, check out OFRF’s CSP toolkit

Farmer at Three Feathers Farm points at young plants in the soil.Source: Three Feathers Farm
Farmer Héktor Calderón-Victoria at Three Feathers Farm in Morgan Hill, CA, utilized EQIP for hedgerows and high tunnels. Read “Real Talk on EQIP” to learn more about Héktor and the benefits and lessons they learned working with NRCS. 
Clover in the field at Mora Mora Farm.Source: Mora Mora Farm
A cover crop at Mora Mora Farm in Troutdale, OR helps to minimize soil compaction. Read more about why farmer Catherine Nguyen calls CSP an incredible program in this “Conservation at Work: Cover Cropping through CSP at Mora Mora Farm” blogpost.

Organic is Regenerative

The term regenerative continues to gain traction in the farming and food industries, and is now the focus of the USDA’s $700 million Regenerative Pilot Program: a new priority program operating within EQIP and CSP announced by Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins in December of 2025. Organic farming shares many of the same goals as regenerative agriculture, but organic is a verifiable legal standard that can be relied upon to create more regenerative farming systems. It has a clear and accepted legal definition that holds farmers, food producers, and the entire supply chain accountable to sustainable practices, letting consumers know what they are supporting with their food purchases. Simply put, organic is the original climate-smart agriculture.

Organic systems rely on practices that work with natural cycles to build healthy soils, biodiversity, retain water, store carbon, and build resiliency. The practices emphasized in the Regenerative Pilot Program include those which organic farmers are already required to use for organic certification, such as crop rotation, keeping the soil covered, nutrient management, and pest management. However, certified organic farms continue to account for only a very small percentage of those receiving financial support through EQIP and CSP, even though they are already succeeding in using regenerative practices. 

In part two of this blog post series, we will explore organic producer participation in EQIP and CSP from 2018 to 2025, the most commonly used conservation practices, and how the USDA can invest more in organic producers and help them be a greater part of these federal programs.

Get Involved

Organic & transitioning-to-organic farmers

We often hear that farmers may be hesitant to reach out to their local NRCS office. It is important to remember that NRCS wants to help all farmers with their conservation and land stewardship goals. We encourage you to stop by your local office and introduce yourself, and talk about the importance of the organic farms in your county and state. Establishing these relationships is an important first step and could open the door for other farmers as well.

We also encourage you to contact your elected officials to discuss the importance of farming in your community and how funding for organic research programs benefits conservation practices in both organic and conventional systems. Not sure how to get started? Check out our free, online Communicating with Legislators email course and learn how to share your story and influence the policies shaping the future of food and farming. 

You can also learn more about NRCS and the agency’s conservation programs on our website – https://ofrf.org/nrcs/

NRCS Staff

As important as it is for farmers to contact their local NRCS office, it is equally important for NRCS planners to reach out to organic farmers in their region. Letting farmers know about the technical and financial assistance that is available for them, regardless of what kind of operation they run, will go a long way in getting more farmers in the door. Farming practices that are foundational to organic operations and boost conservation and natural systems can also be utilized on conventional farms, strengthening regional farming as a whole.

“We like to do a lot of dividing and putting farmers in different buckets. But at the end of the day, farmers are farmers. We care about our land, we care about our communities. Maybe the strategies and techniques that organic farmers are using may be different than farmers you’ve worked with in the past, but we’re still farmers at heart. So coming from that place of ‘what are the goals’ and ‘what are the farmers trying to achieve’.” – April Thatcher, April Joy Farm, Ridgefield, WA

We encourage NRCS staff to lean on organic farming organizations for resources and research surrounding organic systems. OFRF’s resources page and Organic Research Hub offer many free resources to help you build knowledge of organic farming. You can further increase your organic literacy by checking out internal agency documents such as Technical Note 12 and the NRCS Organic Farming Handbook.

April Jones Thatcher is a farmer at April Joy Farm in Ridgefield, WA, and serves as President of OFRF’s Board of Directors. Read more about April in “Why I spend My Time With OFRF”.

By |2026-05-19T14:35:54-04:00May 5th, 2026|News|

The Proposed USDA Restructuring Will Hurt Farmers, Not Bring the Agency Closer to Them

By Vinnie Trometter, OFRF Policy Manager

Record-high input costs, low commodity and specialty crop prices, and lack of access to markets are placing massive economic pressures on farmers. In January of this year, over 300 farm groups sent a letter to Congressional leadership issuing a dire warning that the long-term viability of American agriculture is under threat unless conditions change. 

Since then, the situation has only gotten worse. The war in Iran has spiked fertilizer prices during the peak spring planting season, affecting the vast majority of farmers who hadn’t pre-booked their fertilizer. Exacerbating pressures, a record-warm winter in the Western United States is contributing to a drought that covers over 70% of the acres for many major commodities. 

With this as the backdrop, the USDA plans to restructure its research, education, and economics agencies so they “can be closer to farmers” and coordinate better. Though OFRF has advocated for better USDA organic research coordination, this restructuring will only move the department further away from the producers it’s meant to serve due to lapses in service and the loss of USDA employees who fill important functions. 

The major part of this proposed restructuring is to move more personnel from the USDA’s core research and data agencies—the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), Economic Research Service (ERS), and National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)—to Kansas City and St. Louis. Though the most recent restructuring proposal claims there will be no job losses or disruption to farmers’ services, recent history suggests otherwise. After NIFA and ERS were relocated to Kansas City in 2019 during the first Trump administration, about 75% of those slated to move left the USDA entirely, including large numbers of employees with decades of experience who are not easily replaced; it is not easy for career employees with homes, families, and lives to pick up and start again in a new state with little notice. As a result, the number of economic reports out of USDA agencies dropped by half, and funding for land-grant universities was significantly delayed. 

Another part of the recently announced restructuring is to close down the nation’s largest agricultural research station, the Beltsville Agriculture Research Station in Maryland, and move its research efforts to different stations across the country. Beltsville has been a center of advanced research in organic and non-organic agriculture for decades. It is currently developing state-of-the-art techniques to track and target weeds and improve soil health for organic corn, soybean, and cotton producers. It also houses the Electron and Confocal Microscopy Unit (ECMU), which researchers can access and use to identify plant diseases and pathogens that put crops at risk. Beltsville research also developed and licensed a patented antibody designed for the wide-spectrum identification of potyviruses, which has protected bean, potato, and hemp producers from billions of dollars in damage. It also houses long-term on-farm research trials that, by their nature, cannot be relocated yet are crucial for measuring slow-changing agricultural elements, such as soil organic carbon, and for testing farming systems against annual weather variations. Despite all of this, the USDA speaks about facilities at Beltsville being decrepit and behind on maintenance. Much of this is true. However, they have only been degraded due to the lack of seriousness shown by successive Congresses and presidential administrations toward agricultural research since 2002, when public agricultural research expenditures peaked

USDA restructuring and the closure of Beltsville will further erode the USDA workforce. 2025 alone saw the departure of almost 23% of USDA’s research, education, and economic staff through broad deferred resignations and separations caused by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which even the House Agriculture Committee Chairman, GT Thompson (R-PA-15), deemed as “short-sighted.”    

It is not clear whether the USDA has the legal authority to restructure its agencies without Congressional approval. In particular, regarding Beltsville’s closure, the Democratic Maryland Congressional Delegation sent a letter to the USDA on April 27th condemning the action. However, illegality did not stop the first Trump administration from restructuring back in 2019 when the USDA Inspector General found that the 2019 efforts violated appropriation law. 

Ultimately, any USDA claims that this restructuring will be a good thing because these jobs will be “closer to farmers” is a ruse. Farmers, researchers, and universities can judge for themselves how the 2019 restructuring went and how the 15,000 USDA employees who took deferred resignations last year have helped farmers. Considering the woeful farm economy that is forcing farmers to juggle a growing list of natural and man-made crises at once—without sufficient labor, markets, farm services, and amid rising costs—restructuring right now is the last thing that would bring the USDA closer to those it serves.

Take action today!

It’s free and takes less than a minute. Tell your representatives in Congress to oppose the USDA restructuring and protect Beltsville from closure. Fill out our action alert here or by clicking the image below.

By |2026-05-11T11:05:21-04:00April 29th, 2026|Advocacy, News|
Go to Top