admin

About admin

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far admin has created 123 blog entries.

How the Growth of Organic Farming and Indigenous Food Sovereignty Support Each Other

Long before the United States existed, this land has been and continues to be inhabited by hundreds of distinct Indigenous nations. Methods of resource utilization, harvesting, agricultural and management practices differ by region and by culture. However, through the examination of oral traditions and archaeological evidence, we know that a deep emotional and spiritual connection between humans and the land threads together most, and potentially all, of the belief systems of native peoples on this continent. Highly diverse Indigenous spirituality systems and creation stories set the foundation of a dynamic, living universe, upon which all beings are interconnected. Storytelling, a critical facet of Indigenous transmission, has passed down generations of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK), providing a framework for responsible, sustainable human interaction and understanding of the natural world.

Strides have been made in the U.S and elsewhere to improve sustainability and reduce the harmful effects of our dominant food production system, partly by incorporating practices that are considered standard within the organic farming methodology, such as cover cropping. However, the prevalence of, and forced dependence upon industrial agriculture continues to undermine Indigenous food sovereignty and utilization of TEK in farming and ranching, as well as disproportionately affect the physical and mental health of Native communities.

“Indigenous food sovereignty” is not a universally defined concept, but generally refers to a community’s ability to control, oversee and cater their food production and distribution to the determined nutritional and cultural needs of the people. Food sovereignty additionally seeks to establish food security, working to eradicate hunger and poverty by emphasizing community engagement, and making healthy, nutritious food widely available. A large component of the food sovereignty movement in the United States centers around the reincorporation of traditional food sources, as well as cultivation and preparation processes. Overall, supporting food sovereignty means supporting decolonization: restoring many Indigenous peoples to their historical role as highly successful custodians and managers of the earth.

At its roots, organic and regenerative agriculture both seek to foster a greater understanding of the needs of the land, fostering a harmonious relationship between the farmer, the farm, and the consumer. The organic system was defined in response to the advent of chemical pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers in the 1930s and 40s, a shunning of attempts to naturally manage agricultural land in ways that would build soil resilience. The holistic philosophy behind organic and regenerative agriculture methods are rooted in TEK, and in the goal of seeking to mend previous anthropogenic damage, a result of colonization, capitalism, and industrialization. Focusing on the rebuilding of soil health, conservation of water, reduction of runoff, and practices such as polyculture (growing multiple, mutually beneficial crops on the same plot) all tie in to create an approach that can work in tandem with the uplifting of native techniques of farming and environmental maintenance.

As we hurtle towards an uncertain future dictated by how we will be able to reverse and/or adapt to the devastating impacts of climate change, we must also grapple with the question of who will be affected most in the coming decades. Advocacy for the increased study and adoption of these alternative systems of farming is a way that OFRF supports the Indigenous food sovereignty movement, in addition to funding research that creates space for crucial dialogue and collaboration with BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) farmers.

Here are a few inspiring and thought-provoking resources we found to continue the conversation:

*Images courtesy of the linked sources.

Globalising Hope: The courageous journey of La Via Campesina

The advocacy and influence of La Via Campesina: an international social justice movement centered around food sovereignty, uplifting rural, small-scale and subsistence farmers, and providing both technical and political agroecology training at over 70 LVC schools globally.

Read more here.

Seeding Food Sovereignty: Black and Indigenous Farming Leaders Share Their Strategies

A panel discussion amongst BIPOC community leaders, activists, and farmers on the future of the food sovereignty movement, and the critical importance of highlighting BIPOC voices in dismantling the destructive system of industrial agriculture.

Read more here.

What is the Land Back Movement? Tribal lands were stolen. What happens when those ancestral territories are returned?

A brief history of the Land Back Movement and federal Land Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations, and how Indigenous land reclamation is leading to successful restorative climate resilience projects.

Read more here.

Indigenous Food & Agriculture Initiative: Putting Tribal Sovereignty in Food Sovereignty

The Indigenous Food and Agriculture Initiative through the University of Arkansas is focused on supporting tribal nations in reaching food sovereignty goals, largely through policy and legal analysis and the promotion of tribally-backed, sustainable growth and distribution.

Read more here.

Murmurations: Climate Solutions Require Black Ecology 

This article traces the forced disconnection of Black and Indigenous peoples from the land to our present-day responsibility of dismantling the myth of white supremacy. Reversing the environmental destruction created by the industrialization of colonized lands demands the acknowledgement of the relationship between Black liberation and ecology.

Read more here.

Indigenous Food Sovereignty Movements Are Taking Back Ancestral Land

There is a growing momentum behind the Indigenous food sovereignty movement. Over the past few decades, Native American tribes in the U.S. have been fighting for the return of ancestral lands for access to traditional foodways through organizing and advocacy work, coalition building, and legal procedure—and increasingly seeing success.

Read more here.

If you want to keep up to date with our work expanding community research and representation of organic agriculture in policy, please consider joining our mailing list.

By |2025-03-18T18:17:58+00:00March 18th, 2025|News|

Action Alert! Tell Congress: Don’t Fail Our Farmers

Gordon’s Policy Corner, March 2025. By OFRF & NSAC Staff

In much of the country, spring is on its way. For farmers and ranchers, it’s time for planting decisions, for calving and lambing, for lining up their financial capital and markets for a busy season, and more.

But this year, it’s different: across the country, tens of thousands of farmers and farmer-serving organizations have been thrown into limbo by an unprecedented freeze of federal funding and subsequent mass firings of USDA employees. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is currently withholding payments owed under signed, lawful contracts, causing turmoil across the food system. And in a move that will have far-reaching consequences–including disrupting critical research, data collection, and economic analysis that farmers, the businesses they sell to, and policymakers rely on–the administration has dismissed hundreds of thousands of federal employees.

We wrote about The Consequences of Mass Firings Across the USDA in a recent blog, and now we’re taking space in this month’s Policy Corner to share an important action alert from our allies at the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC):

Our Farmers and Neighbors Need Your Voice, Now More than Ever 

The disruption of USDA programs is already having serious consequences for farmers, food systems, and our communities:

  • Farmers who’ve already installed new irrigation equipment or planted cover crops with support from USDA are now unable to receive the reimbursements they were promised, jeopardizing their financial stability.
  • Programs that pair local farmers with local food banks are pausing their procurement plans, at the exact time growers most need to know their markets for the season.
  • Organizations who train and support beginning farmers are instead having to lay off staff.
  • Families are anxious about grocery store prices and the availability of food long term.

These immediate impacts could compound and lead to further suffering without swift intervention from Congress.

None of this should be happening: these are signed agreements with the federal government, and USDA must follow through on its commitments before impacts worsen in communities nationwide. Congress has the ability to ensure that USDA restores access to critical programs and funding, and they need to hear directly from folks who are affected – along with all of us who care about our local farmers and ranchers, our fellow neighbors, and the organizations that help us strengthen our communities.

Calling takes only 60 seconds: can you call and email your members of Congress, urging them to protect our farmers and communities from further harm?

Our OFRF Advocacy Page has a new #GetActive Guide to help you prepare to stay active and engaged in policy issues impacting food and farmers at this critical time.

By |2025-03-05T16:03:00+00:00March 6th, 2025|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

The Consequences of Mass Firings Across the USDA

A Blow to Agricultural Research and Rural Communities

Written by Gordon Merrick and OFRF staff

Editor’s note: Since the publication of this post, the USDA has announced plans to reinstate affected employees. However, the situation remains fluid, and the long-term impacts on agricultural research funding and capacity are still unfolding. OFRF remains committed to advocating for strong, stable investment in organic research to ensure farmers and researchers have the resources they need to innovate and thrive.

In a sweeping, indiscriminate move that has sent shockwaves through the agricultural community, the administration has dismissed thousands of federal employees with the stated goal of reducing government spending and increasing operational efficiency. While the full scope of these staff cuts is still emerging, recent communications requesting employees justify their continued employment have added to the uncertainty. What is already clear, however, is that the USDA has been acutely impacted, particularly within the agencies that form the backbone of our nation’s agricultural research and farmer technical and financial assistance programs.

The Role of USDA Research Agencies and the Impacts of These Firings

The agencies within the Research, Education, and Economics division of the USDA (USDA-REE) are the Agricultural Research Service (ARS), the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), the Economic Research Service (ERS), and the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). These agencies are cornerstones of our agricultural assistance systems, conducting and awarding grants for high-quality research that informs and improves our conservation, risk management, and market development programming in other USDA mission areas.

As these mass firings unfold, it remains difficult to assess the full extent of the cuts, with many agency personnel pages having been taken down. What’s already evident is that these mass firings will have far-reaching consequences—disrupting critical research, data collection, and economic analysis that farmers, the businesses they sell to, and policymakers rely on.

Capitol building, The United States Congress covered with snow in winter time and Capitol hill area covered with snow

The United States Congress covered with snow.

Among the agencies most directly affected by these cuts is ARS, which plays a crucial role in advancing agronomic research. ARS is the sole intramural research agency at the USDA, conducting long-term research that will undoubtedly face disruptions due to these firings. Reports indicate significant staffing reductions at ARS stations, with sources stating that 10-50% of the workforce at different stations has been dismissed, reportedly due to performance-related concerns. While the scope and rationale for these firings remain unclear, they have already disrupted critical research programs across the country.

It is still unclear how NIFA has been affected by these firings. NIFA doesn’t conduct its own research but rather operates competitive grant programs that fund research conducted by farmers themselves (SARE), land-grant institutions, and nonprofits across the country (OREI). As we’ve written about in the past weeks, the RFAs for these grant programs are still under review, and application portals, including for grants that were supposed to be open for applicants, are not currently available, impacting critical funding for universities and other institutions.

Focused more on understanding the past, present, and future status of agricultural markets and related information are the USDA’s NASS and ERS agencies. NASS works to collect and publish raw data about the agricultural system in the United States through their Census of Agriculture and supplemental surveys, like the Organic Survey. ERS provides crucial economic analyses on agriculture, food markets, and the environment. Their research has led to a better understanding of the economic impact of publicly-funded agricultural research: every $1 invested triggers $20 of economic activity, a massive return on investment (ROI). This fact highlights the point that cutting research dollars will negatively impact the agricultural economy.

Immediate Consequences

The abrupt firing of USDA scientists and their lab staff at ARS has thrown vital research projects into chaos. Initiatives aimed at critical topics like improving crop resilience, combating pests and diseases, and improving livestock production systems are now jeopardized, facing setbacks due to reduced research capacity. This is not isolated to any one region or station, derailing research projects that have been able to continue for decades, even through the COVID pandemic, due to the dedication of the civil servants that are now being cast aside.

These firings not only impact the research projects, though; they impact the local and often rural communities that host the research stations and the employees who work there. As mentioned above, the massive ROI of agricultural research will be drastically reduced. In one case, the research station in Salinas, California, has had four researchers and seven lab staff fired, reflecting hundreds of thousands of dollars that will no longer be circulating in that community, meaning that the industries that provide supplies and services to these staff will also be taking a significant hit.

Long-term Consequences

The long-term ramifications of these mass firings are profound. Aside from the economic impacts on the businesses directly involved with the research, this will impact the agricultural industry for decades to come. The United States risks falling even farther behind in meeting the growing demand for organic products as domestic production struggles to keep pace without the support of robust research programming. For example, if NIFA does not award funds through their competitive grant programs, this will lead to significant setbacks at land-grant universities across the nation, simultaneously affecting both the institutions that conduct the research while also hurting the farmers that rely on the research that these programs fund.

Most privately-funded research conducted is focused on generating patentable genetics and compatible products, not the public-welfare-oriented research that NIFA competitive grants fund and ARS conducts. Put simply, cutting federal research funding and personnel undermines the economic engine and weakens the resilience of the agricultural systems against climate change and supply chain disruptions.

Why This Matters

Agricultural research is the backbone of the technical and financial assistance programs operated by the USDA that ensure food security, food safety, environmental sustainability, and economic vitality for the United States. Disruptions in research will lead to higher food prices, reduced innovation in sustainable agriculture systems, and ultimately weakened rural economies. It is imperative to recognize that supporting agricultural research is an investment in the nation’s future success, ensuring that our domestic food supply is stable and resilient, especially in the face of a continually unpredictable international trade environment.

But, it is important to highlight that these firings were not just in USDA-REE’s agencies. The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), the primary conduit for free technical assistance for farmers, had over 1,200 field staff fired; the Farm Service Agency (FSA) has been significantly impacted, in some cases being forced to close entire county offices; and the Risk Management Agency (RMA), which supports farms securing of insurance products and other risk-reduction assistance, have seen significant firings which are just starting to be understood. Ultimately, these firings are impacting these programs’ ability to access high-quality agronomic research and economic information that improves their operation, as well as their specific on-the-ground operation.

OFRF’s Commitment to Farmers

The Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF) has a longstanding history of advocating for policies, research, and programs that support organic farmers, both certified and non-certified. Our efforts have directly led to increased USDA funding for organic research, the development of conservation programs tailored to organic producers, and the inclusion of organic priorities in federal farm policies and appropriations allocations. Looking ahead, we have outlined our key policy priorities to strengthen organic research and ensure farmers have the resources they need to succeed.

In this current environment of uncertainty, OFRF is actively working to both understand and address the challenges posed by these mass firings by engaging with policymakers, providing resources to affected communities, and amplifying the voices of farmers and researchers who have been affected.

We have already been working to get in contact with researchers and their support staff who have been unjustly fired during this time. If you have a story or experience you are willing to share, please reach out directly to our Senior Policy & Programs Manager at gordon@ofrf.org or through his Signal account at 207.408.3086.

How To Take Action

Staying informed and taking action right now is crucial to counteract these impacts.

  • Get Educated: We at OFRF have developed a newly updated advocacy page that will help you understand the issues and access resources. We will be continually updating this webpage as new materials and resources are developed.
  • Contact Your Representatives: Share your concerns about the impact of these layoffs on agricultural research, the technical and financial assistance that it impacts, and the rural communities that benefit from these investments. Personal stories about what these mean are oftentimes more important than impersonal data. Find their contact information here.
  • Engage in Community Advocacy: Participate in local meetings that help raise awareness of these impacts, write Letters to the Editor and opinion pieces in your local news outlets, and collaborate with organizations like OFRF to raise awareness.
  • Support Affected Workers: Offer assistance to those who have lost their jobs, whether through networking opportunities or whatever is possible given your current situation.

By taking these steps, you can contribute to a collective effort to uphold the rule of law and the integrity of agricultural research, the technical and financial assistance programs that it bolsters, and the communities that depend on it.

By |2025-03-13T17:51:05+00:00February 26th, 2025|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

OFRF kicks off NRCS webinar series with a deep dive into Technical Note 12

Written by Rebecca Champagne, OFRF Conservation Scientist

The Organic Farming Research Foundation recently led two webinars for the USDA National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) on Technical Note 12 as part of our Cooperative Agreement with the agency. These two webinars were the first of several that will be held over the next four years to help build institutional knowledge of NRCS staff and equip them to better support the unique needs of organic and transitioning-to-organic farmers across the US.

Mark Schonbeck, OFRF Research Associate, led the webinars with support from Rebecca Champagne, OFRF’s Conservation Scientist. The first webinar, held on January 16, covered the first half of Technical Note 12 including topics such as soil health, climate, and nutrients. The second webinar, held on February 5, covered the second half of the Technical Note including topics like organic integrated pest management (IPM), livestock, pastures, and buffers. The webinars concluded with Question & Answer sessions so participants could ask follow up questions and get clarification on the topics discussed. During these webinars we fielded questions relating to OMRI-approved materials, composting, shallow disturbance cultivation tools for weed management, and in-row drip irrigation challenges.

Interested in viewing these webinars? Recordings are available online through Conservation Webinars.

Technical Notes such as this one are meant to give detailed information for the conservation planning and implementation of a specific subject. Technical Note 12 provides this information as it relates to organic production and how conservation practices can meet national organic standards while addressing resource concerns related to soil, water, plants, animals, and air. NRCS staff can use this resource when working with organic and transitioning-to-organic farmers to propose appropriate conservation practices for an operation as they relate to organic requirements. Learn more about Technical Note 12 here!

OFRF will be hosting three webinars each year over the next four years, covering various topics related to organic farming. Webinar participants also have the chance to test what they learn and earn Certified Crop Advisor Continuing Education Units (CEU) credits by answering quiz questions at the end of each webinar. By identifying and summarizing the latest peer-reviewed research and highlighting real-world farm examples, we aim to help NRCS staff and Technical Service Providers better understand organic production requirements, challenges, and what successful conservation practice implementation can look like.

To learn more about our Cooperative Agreement with NRCS, contact Rebecca Champagne at rebecca@ofrf.org

To stay up-to-date with the latest organic farming news, research updates, and opportunities for advocacy, sign-up to receive the OFRF newsletter at https://ofrf.org/get-involved/receive-news/

By |2025-02-26T14:19:23+00:00February 21st, 2025|News|

Unlocking the Full Potential of Organic Agriculture: OFRF’s Policy Priorities for the Future

Gordon’s Policy Corner, February 2025

Organic agriculture is not just a method for growing our food and fiber, it is a proven solution to many of the challenges facing U.S. agriculture today. It reduces dependence on imported synthetic inputs, strengthens rural and urban economies, and builds resilience to a changing climate through supporting healthy soils and agroecological systems. But, despite its rapid growth and growing importance, public investment in organic agriculture programs has not kept pace.

At the Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF), we believe that strategic, science-based policies can unlock the full potential of organic farming. That is why we have developed a new set of Policy Priorities designed to align research investments with market opportunities, enhance technical and financial assistance for organic farmers and farmworkers, and strengthen the incentive structures that reward sustainable stewardship of our natural, social, and economic resources.

By embracing these policies, Congress and the USDA can ensure that organic agriculture continues to be a thriving part of the United States’ food system; creating economic opportunities, empowering producers, and delivering environmental benefits far beyond the farm.

Bridging the Research Investment Gap to Drive Innovation and Resilience

Organic agriculture is the fastest-growing sector in the United States’ food market, accounting for over 6% of total food sales and 15% of all produce sales. Despite this growth, organic research receives less than 2% of USDA’s research funding, and less than 1% of the Agricultural Research Service’s research budget. Simultaneously, public agricultural research funding has declined by 20% since 2000, even though every $1 invested generates over $20 in economic benefits. Private funding has attempted to fill this gap, but it often prioritizes proprietary technologies over public welfare.

This underinvestment slows the ability of U.S. farmers to keep up with demand, increasing our national reliance on imported organic goods and products. Public research funding is vital to closing the domestic supply gap and ensuring that communities across the United States benefit from the economic growth of the organic sector. Increasing federal investments in organic agriculture research will drive innovation, improve resilience to agronomic and economic disruptions, and ensure U.S. farmers have access to high quality science-backed tools.

Key Policy Solutions:

  • Establish an Organic Research Coordinator at the USDA
  • Expand ARS Intramural Research on Organic Systems
  • Strengthen NIFA Competitive Grant Programs for Organic Research
  • Improve Organic Market Data Collection and Dissemination

Read more in our Policy Priorities

Ensuring Farmers Get the Support They Need

The USDA alongside state and local governments offer a range of financial and technical assistance programs for farmers, but many organic farmers struggle to access these resources. There are multiple, related, reasons for this, from a general lack of awareness, administrative barriers, or insufficient organic knowledge among USDA field staff. These must be addressed to ensure organic farmers receive the support they deserve.

Many agricultural service providers, from NRCS conservation planners to private Technical Service Providers (TSPs) lack training and knowledge of organic systems, leading to guidance and advice that might not be practical or relevant for an organic farmer. Simultaneously, many organic farmers are not aware of the USDA resources available to them, leading to them missing out on key financial and technical support.

Key Policy Solutions:

  • Increase Organic Knowledge Among Technical Service Providers
  • Improve Outreach to Organic Farmers about Available Programs
  • Expand Organic-Focused services at USDA Agencies

Read more in our Policy Priorities

Understanding Organic’s Role as an Economic Engine

Organic agriculture isn’t just good for farmers and farmworkers, it’s a powerful economic engine for rural and urban communities. Research shows that regions with high levels of organic production, known as “organic hotspots,” have higher household incomes, and lower poverty rates compared to regions with lower levels of organic production. Importantly, this research shows that organic agriculture generates wealth in these areas through a variety of methods, like local capital cycling and decreased reliance on imported inputs.

A significant limiter on this economic engine is the lack of organic supply chains and connections to markets. Investing in organic infrastructure and market development will help U.S. farmers capture more of the organic market’s economic value.

Key Policy Solutions:

  • Expand Funding for Organic Market Development
  • Support Research on the Economic Benefits of Organic Agriculture
  • Develop Policies that Recognize Organic’s Environmental and Social Benefits

Read more in our Policy Priorities

Moving Forward With a Bold Vision for Organic Agriculture

Organic farming systems provide economic, environmental, and social benefits that impact entire communities. But to fully realize the organic method’s potential, Congress and the USDA must take action: investing in research, strengthening farmer technical and financial support, and ensuring organic agriculture remains a competitive and viable option for agricultural businesses across the country.

At OFRF, we are committed to advocating for policies that advance organic agriculture, support producers, and strengthen the entire food system. With the right investments, organic can continue to blaze the trail and foster economic opportunity, environmental resilience, and a healthier food system for all.

We invite policymakers, farmers, farmworkers, and the general public to join us in pushing for these critical investments in organic agriculture. The future of farming depends on it.

Stay engaged, stay informed, and together we can make a difference.

Eat well and breathe deeply,

Gordon

By |2025-02-28T16:17:44+00:00February 6th, 2025|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

OFRF Welcomes Two New Members to Its Board of Directors

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Carrie-Anne Palmeri of Nature’s Path Organic Foods and Bryan Wood of Organic Valley/CROPP Cooperative join OFRF’s Board of Directors.

SANTA CRUZ, Calif., Jan. 13, 2025 – The Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF) is proud to announce the addition of two esteemed professionals to its Board of Directors: Carrie-Anne Palmeri, Organic Program Manager at Nature’s Path Organic Foods, and Bryan Wood, Director of Farm Resources at Organic Valley’s CROPP Cooperative. These two highly respected leaders bring valuable expertise to help guide OFRF’s mission to foster the improvement and widespread adoption of organic farming systems.

OFRF board member Bryan Wood smiling at camera, black and white

Bryan Wood

OFRF board member Carrie-Anne Palmeri in the woods in winter, black and white

Carrie-Anne Palmeri

Carrie-Anne Palmeri serves as Organic Program Manager to Nature’s Path Organic Foods, North America’s largest independent organic breakfast food company whose pursuit has been to “leave the Earth better than we found it” throughout its upwards of 50-year legacy as a pioneer & steward to the organic community. With the personal mission of advancing organic integrity from seed to fork and championing equitable access to the organic opportunity across borders, Palmeri builds on nearly two decades of extensive experience across the industry to lead the Nature’s Path Sustainable Supply Chain Program as well as its Organic Policy Advocacy, Regulatory Affairs, and Strategic Partnerships.

“It is an honor to join the Organic Farming Research Foundation Board to support the critical work they’re doing to equip the organic sector for success,” said Palmeri. “OFRF’s powerful farmer-driven research; commitment to meaningful and equitable access to organic education and technical outreach; coupled with targeted organic-first policy advocacy is key to the health of our collective food future.” 

Bryan Wood, a seasoned advocate for organic farmers, brings over a decade of experience from Organic Valley/CROPP Cooperative, where he develops programs and services that strengthen farmer support and enhance financial stability. Through his hands-on leadership, Wood has advanced initiatives such as farm financial analysis and strategic pay price tools, ensuring organic farmers receive fair compensation for their work. 

“Joining OFRF’s board is an opportunity to further amplify the voices of organic farmers and build critical bridges between growers and the broader industry,” said Wood. “I’m excited to support OFRF’s work advancing research and policies that empower farmers to succeed.”

Palmeri and Wood join a distinguished group of board members committed to OFRF’s farmer-first mission. Their combined expertise with major organic brands will enhance OFRF’s capacity to connect the needs of organic farmers with the wider organic industry. This alignment is crucial as OFRF advances its strategic plan for 2024-2029, which prioritizes farmer-focused research, education, and advocacy for organic systems.

These appointments come at a pivotal time for OFRF, which recently launched its Organic Stewardship Council (OSC)—a new initiative to complement the board’s efforts by assembling a farmer-led group dedicated to advancing organic systems and research nationwide. The OSC, alongside the expertise of Palmeri and Wood, underscores OFRF’s commitment to fostering collaboration that uplifts farmers while driving sustainable change across the organic sector.

“The organic sector thrives on collaboration,” said April Jones Thatcher, OFRF Board President, and Farmer/Founder of April Joy Farm. “With Carrie-Anne and Bryan’s extensive backgrounds and their dedication to organic farming, we’re better positioned than ever to bridge the needs of organic farmers with the broader industry and continue driving impactful change.”

As OFRF continues to champion farmer-driven research and equitable access to organic education, these new board members will play a pivotal role in steering the organization toward a more sustainable and resilient future for organic agriculture.

For more information about OFRF, its mission, and the Organic Stewardship Council, please visit www.ofrf.org.

###

About Organic Farming Research Foundation
The Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF), headquartered in Santa Cruz, California, with a remote team based across the U.S., works to foster the improvement and widespread adoption of organic farming systems. OFRF cultivates organic research, education, and federal policies that bring more farmers and acreage into organic production. For more information about OFRF, please visit our website: www.ofrf.org.

Media Contact
Ashley Dulaney, Communications Director, OFRF
ashley@ofrf.orf
P.O. Box 440, Santa Cruz, CA 95061

By |2025-01-13T12:56:25+00:00January 13th, 2025|News, Press Release|

Bryan Wood

OFRF board member Bryan Wood smiling at camera, black and white

Director of Farm Resources, Organic Valley

Bryan Wood is the Director of Farm Resources at Organic Valley / CROPP Cooperative, where he leads programs and services that advance organic farming practices across the United States. His team’s efforts focus on enhancing farm profitability through management practices, providing veterinary and nutritional support, offering organic certification assistance, and improving animal husbandry.

With over 12 years of experience at Organic Valley, Bryan has held multiple roles, including Regional Pool Manager for Michigan and Northern Indiana, where he provided support to member-owner dairy farmers, and Mideast Divisional Manager, overseeing a team of field staff supporting more than 500 farmers across four states.

Bryan holds degrees in Finance and Economics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He currently resides in Michigan, where he enjoys fishing, hunting, and raising four children.

By |2025-01-10T18:50:25+00:00January 10th, 2025|Board|

Looking Back, Planning Ahead: The Farm Bill, Government Funding, and Political Gridlock

Gordon’s Policy Corner, January 2025

2024 was a year to remember in the political realm, not for the actions taken by Congress, but rather the cans kicked down the proverbial road. We at OFRF wanted to take a moment to review some of the happenings at the close of last year, and give a brief overview of what that means for the legislative and administrative agendas in 2025. 

What Happened in 2024?

Long story short, the last year of the 118th Congress was defined by lots of aspiration and almost no delivery. Here’s a quick rundown of the items we’ve been watching:

  • The 2018 Farm Bill was extended (for the second time) for a year, expiring in September 2025. This extension did not include crucial programs that do not receive mandatory levels of funding, like the Organic Certification Cost Share Program and the 1890 Land Grant University Scholarship program. 
  • FY25 Appropriations was delayed well into the fiscal year by passing a Continuing Resolution (CR) that funds the government at FY24 levels into March of 2025. For reference, Congress usually starts working on the next fiscal year budget in February of the preceding year, potentially creating a log jam with all of the rest of the legislative actions needed this year. 
  • The federal debt limit was not raised or amended, which means that the United States Treasury will need to order all agencies to begin “extraordinary measures” almost immediately in the new administration.

What Needs to Happen in 2025?

Because of the lack of action in 2024, that has just added more work to the legislative calendar in 2025:

  • The Farm Bill is in desperate need of updating, and the Farm Bill process starts over from square one; meaning that marker bills and priorities need to be reintroduced and revisited, and new Members of Congress must be educated on the importance and impacts of the Farm Bill’s many policies on their States and Districts.
  • Both FY25 and FY26 Appropriations packages will need to be finished and passed to both avoid a government shutdown, and also make sure the programs and supports that our farmers and researchers need continue!
  • One of the biggest things taking up space on the legislative calendar so far this year has been Reconciliation, which is a detailed budget and legislative process that Congress can use to move money around that has not yet been obligated to a specific program or line item. As some might remember from the Democrat’s use of this early in the Biden Administration it is difficult and very procedurally demanding.
  • Another budget-related task is the debt limit, mentioned above. This is different from the need to pass a budget, or reconcile for different priorities; this is the authority of the United States Treasury to establish new debts to pay for ongoing obligations. To put simply, this is the debt limit on the nation’s credit cards, and we’re close to hitting it once again. 

What You Can Do

While this legislative gridlock is frustrating, there are ways to make your voice heard and advocate for the programs that matter most:

Call Your Representatives and Senators: Ask them what their stance is on organic agriculture and agricultural research. Let us know how those conversations go!

Highlight the Impacts: Share personal stories about how these programs benefit you, your community, or your operation. Legislators are more likely to act when they hear directly from their constituents.

Stay Engaged: Keep up with the latest developments and participate in advocacy opportunities as they arise. Sharing information with your network can amplify the message and drive greater action.

This continuing situation underscores the importance of public engagement and advocacy to ensure that the programs supporting organic farmers, agricultural research, and rural resilience remain funded and effective. As Congress resumes discussions in the coming months, OFRF will continue to push for robust investments in organic agriculture and support for critical orphan programs.

Your voice is vital. Together, we can ensure that the value of organic farming, research, and education is recognized and supported in Washington.

Stay engaged. Stay informed. Together, we can make a difference.

We’re here for it,

Gordon

OFRF Senior Policy & Programs Manager

gordon@ofrf.org

By |2025-02-28T14:51:34+00:00January 9th, 2025|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

Field Day Toolkit: Build Community Through Sharing Knowledge

By Gordon Merrick, Senior Policy & Programs Manager at OFRF

Field days have been a longstanding tool in the agriculture community, both to disseminate research being done at Agricultural Experiment Stations and Land Grant Universities, but also communities and non-governmental organizations. These events provide a unique space for farmers, researchers, and agricultural professionals to come together to share insights, learn from one another, and foster future collaborations. At OFRF, we know that hosting a field day can feel like a daunting task, especially if it is your first go around! That’s why we are thrilled to announce the release of a new resource to guide you through the process of planning and hosting a field day, and it’s available in both English and Spanish!

Why Host a Field Day?

Field days are about a lot more than just showcasing research findings or demonstrating a new technique or technology. They are opportunities to create meaningful connections within the larger agricultural community. We know, through our NORA-22 report, that farmers are each other’s greatest source of knowledge, and in-person events like these can amplify the exchange of ideas and information tremendously. Additionally, they offer researchers and other professionals a chance to ground their work in the realities of farming, ensuring that their research continues to be relevant, practical, and impactful.

Hosting a field day on your own farm can have some additional co-benefits too, like having a group of experts look at your operation and discuss opportunities to improve it through implementing the latest research findings with USDA programs that provide detailed technical and financial assistance.

Making Field Days Easier: OFRF’s New Toolkit!

To make harnessing these benefits as easy as possible, we’ve developed a comprehensive Field Day Toolkit that provides a roadmap and customizable materials to plan, host, and follow up on a successful event. This guide includes practical tips, checklists, and resources to streamline the process, and maximize the impact of your field day! Whether you’re new to hosting events, or looking to refine your approach, the toolkit covers every phase of organizing one. 

Highlights of the toolkit include:

  • Step-by-Step Guidance: A detailed roadmap to plan, execute, and evaluate a successful field day.
  • Audience Engagement Tips: Best practices for creating interactive, farmer-focused events that maximize learning and participation.
  • Logistics Planning: Checklists for equipment, scheduling, and accessibility to ensure a seamless experience.
  • Outreach Strategies: Ideas to promote your event and attract attendees from diverse backgrounds.

This resource is also available in Spanish, ensuring that more communities have access to tools that help build knowledge and collaboration.

We at OFRF know that agriculture thrives when we can effectively and efficiently share knowledge with one another. As the challenges facing organic and non-organic producers continue to grow, the exchange of ideas and practices through events like field days are even more valuable. This toolkit helps make these events accessible, inclusive, and impactful; ultimately leading to a stronger foundation for the agricultural community and economy.

Start Planning Your Field Day Now!

Hosting a field day doesn’t have to be overwhelming. With the right tools and a clear plan, you can create and implement an event that inspires action, builds relationships, fosters growth, and can even better your operation! Download our Field Day Toolkit today and take the first step toward bringing your community together.

Together we can continue to grow, learn, and collaborate to create a sustainable future for American agriculture, one field day at a time.

By |2025-01-09T21:34:29+00:00January 9th, 2025|News, TOPP West|

The OFRF Intern Archive

OFRF periodically hosts part-time interns who receive academic credit in exchange for 12-15 hours of work per week. Interns help us with the critical day-to-day tasks that keep our organization running, while we offer interesting work and learning opportunities. This page honors the interns who have joined us in the past and the valuable work they have contributed to the organization. You can learn more about current internship opportunities here.

Past Interns

Articles from Past Interns

Agricultural Runoff: Organic Practices as a Method for Marine Conservation

This month, our Policy & Programs intern takes a deep dive into the intersection of agriculture and marine health, highlighting how agricultural runoff impacts our oceans and estuaries. As a Religious Studies major and Oceanography minor, Jazea's unique perspective bridges land and sea, offering insights into the consequences of conventional farming practices on marine ecosystems, and the solutions that organic systems offer.

Returning to My Roots

As his internship with the OFRF comes to an end, Dakota Moore reflects on the experiences and lessons that have shaped him as a farmer, advocate, and organic professional. From supporting cutting-edge research to presenting in webinars, his internship has been "a transformative journey, equipping me with the tools to revitalize my family farm and pursue a career advancing sustainable agriculture."

From Classrooms to Congress

As Julie Nelson, former intern at OFRF, moves onto the next chapter, she reflects on her experience gaining experience with food and agricultural policy and advocacy work in the US, while building professional confidence during her internship.

By |2024-12-24T17:20:56+00:00December 24th, 2024|Uncategorized|
Go to Top