News

What Research Tells Us

Written by Mark Schonbeck and OFRF staff

We recently launched a new newsletter section, “Ask OFRF,” a place where our community can submit questions for our staff to answer. Our first question came from Brian Caldwell of Hemlock Grove Farm, a certified organic farm in NY.

The life within our soils provides the foundation for successful farming and all terrestrial ecosystems. The diverse community of soil organisms—bacteria, fungi, protozoa, worms, and more—forms what we now call the soil food web. This web of life converts fresh residues into soil organic matter (SOM) and supports essential soil functions critical for agricultural production. Ever since the early 20th century, pioneers of organic agriculture like Sir Albert Howard and Ehrenfried Pfeiffer understood that “if you feed the soil, the soil will feed the plant.” Yet, despite their insights, mainstream agricultural science of the time often overlooked the vital role of soil life in plant nutrition.

In recent decades, extensive research has begun to illuminate how an optimally functioning soil biota feeds crops, enhances resilience, protects water quality, and contributes to long-term farm viability. However, concerns about the impact of agrochemicals, including herbicides and synthetic fertilizers, on soil health and soil life remain pressing.

Recently an important question was raised:

“Do you know if there is much research on the impacts of herbicides and synthetic fertilizer on SOM or soil health? Organic pioneers reported that soil health declined under chemical fertility management. For reasons that are not clear to me, some scientists discount the Morrow plot findings of Khan et al (2007), which support that. Do you have other research reports on that topic?”

To address this, we turned to OFRF’s Senior Research Associate, Mark Schonbeck. A respected researcher and long-time advocate for organic farming systems, Mark has dedicated his career to exploring the complex interactions between soil management, crop resilience, and farm sustainability. With his extensive knowledge, Mark offers valuable insights into the impacts of herbicides and synthetic fertilizers on SOM and overall soil health. Here’s what he has to say (all resources can be found at the end of this post):

Expert Insights from Mark Schonbeck on Soil Health

There is a growing body of research showing that all classes of crop protection chemicals (insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, nematicides, etc.) adversely affect all major taxa of soil organisms. From prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) and fungi through nematodes, micro-arthropods (mites, springtails, etc), earthworms, and more, the soil biotic community is harmed by chemical applications. In fact, routine use of conventional agricultural chemicals have shown greater negative impacts on soil microbiomes than routine tillage in several recent meta analyses.

As for synthetic fertilizers and the Khan and Mulvaney analyses out of the University of Illinois, those papers (this one and this one) included not only the results from the Morrow plots themselves but also a review of a large number of other medium to long-term (5-100+ year) farming systems trials around the world. I used to emphasize those findings, which show that adding synthetic Nitrogen (N) undermines soil carbon sequestration as clear evidence that synthetic Nitrogen, Potassium, Phosphorous (NPK) fail to build Soil Organic Matter (SOM) despite higher crop biomass, and even sometimes burns up SOM.   

In a 2023 personal conversation, Dr. Ray Weil of University of Maryland (whom I respect highly as a world-class soil scientist) raised concerns about the reliability of the Khan and Mulvaney papers during a National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) project meeting (for OREI and ORG) in Washington, DC in 2023. He shared that the studies are being questioned because those showing negative impacts of soluble NPK on SOM may have been selectively chosen in the literature review while those showing positive or neutral effects were de-emphasized. Recent research suggests that soluble fertilizer used along with organic inputs can build SOM and I believe that it is more a matter of what soluble fertilizer by itself lacks and not what it contains that can harm soil life. Recent research suggests that it’s not the presence of soluble nitrogen itself that harms soil health, but rather the imbalance between N and organic carbon inputs.

If a farmer is providing lots of organic inputs (high biomass cover crops, compost, etc.) and then uses some synthetic N or NPK, the yield increase elicited by the synthetic fertilizer can indeed improve SOM accrual. There was at least one meta-analysis comparing organic, organic + synthetic, and synthetic-only fertilization on microbial (fungal and bacterial) biomass. The result was: organic ~ organic + synthetic >> synthetic only (with a highly significant two-fold difference). 

When it comes to fertility and nutrient sources and soil life or SOM, it is a matter of balance between organic carbon inputs and nitrogen inputs (whether organic and/or synthetic). When there is sufficient organic carbon (C) and the C:N ratio is balanced (~15-25:1), the soil life thrives and microbial biomass and respiration increase, as does the formation of stable mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) and more labile or active particulate organic matter (POM)—both important to the functions of healthy soil.

If the C:N ratio is too narrow (for example poultry litter is 7:1), less SOM accrues and the soil microbiome is less capable of cycling N to ensure crop nutrition while minimizing leaching and denitrification losses. In an organic systems study, researchers at Washington State University found that vegetable rotations fertilized with compost (C:N ~20) accrued much more SOM (active and total) and sustained higher microbial activity and function than vegetable rotations fertilized with poultry litter (7:1) at the same total N rate. Crop yields were similar in the two systems. (More on that here).

In conclusion, the intricate relationship between chemical inputs, soil health, and agricultural productivity is a complex one. As research continues to illuminate the complexities of soil ecology, the importance of organic practices in preserving this vital resource becomes increasingly apparent. To foster sustainable agricultural practices, a holistic approach is essential. A transition to more organic and regenerative agricultural systems is essential for ensuring the health of our planet and future generations. Prioritizing soil health through practices like cover cropping and organic matter incorporation is crucial for long-term agricultural success. By understanding the complex interactions between soil organisms, nutrients, and crop production, we can develop strategies to enhance both yield and environmental sustainability.

A Deeper Dive: Key Studies and Findings

The following is a series of excerpts from a webinar Mark gave on Soil Disturbance, where he dives more into each of these topics, including specific studies that are relevant to this question.

The Case of Glyphosate: making sense of conflicting results

While the overall impact of pesticides on soil health is clear, the specific effects of individual chemicals can be more nuanced. Glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide in conventional agriculture across the world, is a prime example of this complexity.

There are plenty of studies showing everything from no harmful effect to subtle yet alarming disruptions to plant physiology, soil microbiology, or ecosystem functions due to glyphosate applications. Here are a sample of findings:

• Experiments were conducted within long-term farming systems trials at Beltsville, MD and Stoneville, MS to determine whether foliar applications of glyphosate at normal rates (two applications at 0.75 lb active ingredient per acre) would affect rhizosphere microbiomes (Kepler et al., 2020). Glyphosate-resistant (GR) corn and soybean cultivars were planted in plots with (conventional) or without (organic at Beltsville, unsprayed perennial grass at Stoneville) a history of glyphosate use, and either foliar-sprayed with the herbicide or left untreated. Root and root zone soil samples collected 20 days after treatment showed no differential effect of glyphosate sprays on endophytic, rhizosphere, or bulk soil microbiomes (Kepler et al. 2020). 
• Field applications of glyphosate at 1⁄4 and 1X recommend rates sharply (>80%) reduced the spore viability of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in soil samples collected 10 or 30 days after field application and reduced the ability of AMF to form functional arbuscules in ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) roots (Druille et al., 2013).
• Application of glyphosate at roughly half-label rates to orchard grass, dandelion, or white clover growing in greenhouse mesocosm trials (large pots, 12-gallon capacity) significantly reduced the activity and reproductive success of two earthworm species (Lumbricus terrestris and Apporectodea caligenosa) that were introduced into the pots five weeks before treatment (Gaupp-Berghausen et al., 2015). Herbicide treatment also caused a sharp increase in soluble soil N and a slight increase in soluble P. Field studies would be needed to clarify the practical implications of these greenhouse observations for earthworms, soil health, and water quality in agricultural production.
• A study of the prevalence of wheat head blight caused by two species of Fusarium in wheat production in Saskatchewan showed an apparent positive association between the disease and a history of glyphosate use (Fernandez et al., 2009).
• Ten years of field trials in Missouri showed significantly increased root colonization by Fusarium fungi of glyphosate-resistant corn and soybean treated with the herbicide compared to the same crop cultivars without herbicide treatment. Glyphosate treatment also appeared to affect soil microbes involved in manganese (Mn) availability, N fixation, and disease suppression (Kremer and Means, 2009). It is notable and surprising that this trial gave such different results from Kepler et al. (2020). One possible factor is different regions and soil types. In a review of 67 published studies of the impacts of herbicides on soil invertebrates (arthropods, earthworms, pot worms, and nematodes), 77% of “tested parameters” studied in lab experiments and 32% of parameters in field conditions showed negative impacts (Gunstone et al., 2021).

Glyphosate showed adverse effects in some studies, and no effect in others, and appeared less damaging to soil life than amide/anilide herbicides and most insecticides and fungicides. Possible mechanisms of glyphosate effects on soil life include direct exposure via spray reaching the soil surface or translocation of the chemical from sprayed foliage to the root system, changes in the physiological condition of treated plants that curtail or alter the composition of root exudates including chemical signals, and long-term effects of low-level herbicide exposure year after year. One concern is that, given its frequent and widespread use and sometimes overuse, glyphosate may exert significant agroecosystem impacts despite its relatively low toxicity compared to other crop protection chemicals.

Pesticide Impacts on Soil Organisms: A Quantitative Perspective

To gain a clearer picture of the extent to which pesticides affect soil organisms, it is essential to examine quantitative data from multiple studies. A recent meta-analysis provides valuable insights into this complex issue. The following is another excerpt from the Soil Disturbance webinar:

• In an extensive review of 398 studies that included a total of 2,842 tested parameters, Gunstone et al. (2021) evaluated the impacts of five classes of crop protection chemicals—insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, bactericides, and mixtures of two or more chemicals—on a wide range of soil invertebrates including nematodes, annelids (earthworms and pot worms), and arthropods (mites, springtails, insects, centipedes, etc). The authors defined a “tested parameter” as the chemical’s effect on one aspect of the health of one species or larger taxonomic group of soil organisms—the survival, growth, reproduction, or a behavioral or physiological function of the organism studied. Most studies addressed multiple organisms and/or multiple indicators of pesticide impacts on a single organism. All classes of pesticides affected all groups of organisms with negative impacts found in 70% of tested parameters. Lab studies found negative impacts more often (81%) than field trials (53%), and the field studies found more negative impacts of insecticides (61%) than fungicides (38%) or herbicides (32%). Earthworms were the most widely studied organisms (1,321 tested parameters) and showed sensitivity to all classes of agrochemicals including insecticides (82%), fungicides (78%), and herbicides (72%).
• Researchers have documented significant impacts of corn and soybean seed treatments (fungicides and neonicotinoid pesticides) on the crop rhizosphere microbiomes (bacteria and fungi) and on several trophic levels of the soil fauna (Atwood et al., 2018; Nettles et al., 2016). Neonic seed treatment had a greater impact on non-target soil organisms, especially predatory and mixed-feeding guilds, while having relatively little impact on the target herbivore (pest) species.
• In laboratory studies, mixtures of Mesotrione and S-metolachlor herbicides degraded more slowly and exerted a tenfold greater impact on soil microbial biomass and activity than either herbicide alone (Joly et al., 2012). A similar synergism related to enhanced persistence was documented for diflufenican and glyphosate (Tejada, 2009).

Balancing C:N for optimal soil health

To optimize soil health and crop productivity, it is essential to consider the balance of nutrients provided to the soil. The following research explores how different nutrient management strategies impact soil microbial communities and overall ecosystem function.

• Based on five meta-analyses, Young et al. (2022) found that fertilizer regimens that combined organic and soluble N sources supported at least as much SOC accrual (1.3% per year) as all-organic N fertilization. The combination reduced leaching and NH3 volatilization by 28% (intermediate values between all organic and all soluble N treatments), but eliminated the increase in N2O emissions seen with all-organic sources.
• In a long-term (10-year) greenhouse vegetable production trial, substituting half of the soluble NPK inputs with organic nutrient sources (manure, straw, manure + straw) enhanced soil taxonomic and functional microbial diversity, and specifically promoted the diversity and function of soil microbes involved in P cycling, resulting in greater P mineralization for crop uptake and at the same time holding excess P against leaching or runoff losses (Zhang et al., 2022b).

These findings suggest that soluble N sources disturb the soil microbiome not because of what they contain (nitrate, ammonium, urea) but because of what they lack—organic carbon. Soil microbes thrive on a balanced mixture of organic carbon and nitrogen, and soil health can suffer under organic management if C and N inputs are not balanced. This was clearly illustrated in an 11-year organic vegetable farming systems trial conducted in Washington State comparing plots fertilized with poultry litter (C:N ~7) versus finished compost (C:N ~ 20) at equivalent total N rates. While the two treatments gave similar crop yields, the compost-amended soil had 43% higher total SOC, 65% higher active SOC, and 35% higher microbial activity than the poultry litter-amended soil (Bhowmik et al., 2016, 2017).

The evidence presented underscores the critical role of organic agriculture in safeguarding soil health. By eschewing synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, organic systems inherently protect soil biota from harmful chemicals, fostering a thriving ecosystem beneath the surface. The emphasis on organic matter inputs in organic farming is crucial for building soil structure, enhancing water retention, and providing a steady supply of nutrients.

Mark Schonbeck has worked for 37 years as a researcher, consultant, and educator in sustainable and organic agriculture. He has participated in on-farm research into mulching, cover crops, minimum tillage, and nutrient management for organic vegetables. For many years, he has written for the Virginia Association for Biological Farming newsletter and served as their policy liaison to the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition. He has also participated in different research projects to analyze, evaluate, and improve federally funded organic and sustainable agriculture programs. In addition, Mark offers individual consulting in soil test interpretation, soil quality and nutrient management, crop rotation, cover cropping, and weed management. He has worked with OFRF as a research, education, and policy consultant for many years. 

For more from Mark on this topic, you may be interested in checking out the Conservation Agriculture Webinar Series he presented, which we hosted in partnership with the NRCS: https://ofrf.org/news/conservation-ag-webinars/

References

Baas, D. G., G. P. Robertson, S. R. Miller, N. and Millar, N. 2015. Effects of Cover Crops on Nitrous Oxide Emissions, Nitrogen Availability, and Carbon Accumulation in Organic versus Conventionally Managed Systems. ORG award 2011-51106-31046. https://nifa.usda.gov/data/data-gateway. 

Berthong, S. T, D. H. Buckley, and L. E. Drinkwater. 2013. Agricultural management and labile carbon additions affect soil microbial community structure and interact with carbon and nitrogen cycling. Microbial Ecology 66: 158-170.

Bhowmik, A. A-M. Fortuna, L. J. Cihacek, A. Bary, P. M. Carr, and C. G. Cogger. 2017. Potential carbon sequestration and nitrogen cycling in long-term organic management systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 32 (6): 498-510.

Bhowmik, A., A. Fortuna, L. J.Cihacek, A. I.Bary, and C. G.Cogger. 2016. Use of biological indicators of soil health to estimate reactive nitrogen dynamics in long-term organic vegetable and pasture systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 103: 308-319.

Bowles, T. M., A. D. Hollander, K. Steenwerth, and L. E. Jackson. 2015. Tightly-Coupled Plant-Soil Nitrogen Cycling: Comparison of Organic Farms across an Agricultural Landscape. PLOS ONE peer-reviewed research article. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.013188l 

Brennan, E. 2018. Lessons from long-term, cover crop research in the Salad Bowl of the World – 10 minute youtube video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JurC4pJ7Lb4 

Brennan, E. B., and V. Acosta-Martinez. 2017. Cover cropping frequency is the main driver of soil microbial changes during six years of organic vegetable production. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 109: 188-204.

Carr, P. M, M. A. Cavigelli, H. Darby, K. Delate, J. O. Eberly, H. K. Fryer, G. G. Gramig, J. R. Heckman, E. B. Mallory, J. R. Reeve, E. M. Silva, D. H. Suchoff, and A. Woodley. 2020. Green and animal manure use in organic field crop systems. Review article. Agronomy Journal 112 (2): 648-674.

Cogger, C. G. M. Ostrom, K. Painter, A. Kennedy, A. Fortuna, R. Alldredge, A.; Bary, T. Miller, Collins, J. Goldberger, A. Antonelli, and B. Cha. 2013. Designing Production Strategies for Stewardship and Profits On Fresh Market Organic Farms. OREI award 2008-51300-04460. https://nifa.usda.gov/data/data-gateway. 

Collins, D. P. and A. Bary. 2017. Optimizing nitrogen management on organic and biologically intensive farms. Proceedings of the Special Symposium on Organic Agriculture Soil Health Research at the Tri-Societies Annual Meeting, Tampa, FL, October 22-25, 2017. http://articles.extension.org/pages/74555/live-broadcast:-organic-soil-health-research-special-session-at-the-tri-societies-conference 

Cuartero, J., J. A. Pascual, J-M Vivo, O. Őzbolat, V. Sánchez-Navarro, M. Egea-Cortines, R. Zornoza, M. M. Mena, E. Garcia, and M. Ros. 2022. A first-year melon/cowpea intercropping system improves soil nutrients and changes the soil microbial community. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment vol. 328 article 107856.

Delate, K. 2013. Developing Carbon-positive Organic Systems through Reduced Tillage and Cover Crop Intensive Crop Rotation Schemes. ORG award 2008-51106-19021. https://nifa.usda.gov/data/data-gateway. 

Delate, K., C. Cambardella, and C. Chase. 2015. Effects of cover crops, soil amendments, and reduced tillage on carbon sequestration and soil health in a long-term vegetable system. ORG award 2010-51106-21857. https://nifa.usda.gov/data/data-gateway. 

Donne, L. J. 1990. Nutrition Almanac, 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill, 339 pp.

Franzluebbers, A. J. 2018. Soil-Test Biological Activity with the Flush of CO2: III. Corn Yield Responses to Applied Nitrogen. Soil Science Society of America Journal, Volume 82, Issue 3, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2018.01.0029. 

Franzluebbers, A. J., S. Pehim-Limbu, and M. H. Poore. 2018a. Soil-Test Biological Activity with the Flush of CO2: IV. Fall-Stockpiled Tall Fescue Yield Response to Applied Nitrogen. Agronomy Journal, Volume 110, Issue 5, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.03.0146. 

Franzluebbers, A. J., M. R. Pershing, C. Crozier, D. Osmond, and M. Schroeder-Moreno. 2018b. Soil-Test Biological Activity with the Flush of CO2: I. C and N Characteristics of Soils in Corn Production. Soil Science Society of America Journal, Volume 82, Issue 3, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.12.0433. 

Franzluebbers, A. J., S. C. Reberg-Horton, and N. G. Creamer. 2020. Soil carbon and nitrogen fractions after 19 years of farming systems research in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina. Soil Science Society of America Journal, Volume 84, pp 856-876.

Gaskell, M., M. Bolda, J. Muramoto, and O. Daugovish, 2009. Strawberry Nitrogen Fertilization from Organic Nutrient Sources. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 842:385-388.

Goldstein, W. 2015. Breeding corn for organic farmers with improved N efficiency/N fixation, and protein quality. Proceedings of the Organic Agriculture Research Symposium. https://eorganic.info/node/12972. 

Goldstein, W. 2016. Partnerships between Maize and Bacteria for Nitrogen Efficiency and Nitrogen Fixation. Bulletin 1. Mandaamin Institute, Elkhorn, Wisconsin, 49 pp. http://www.mandaamin.org/about-nitrogenfixing-corn. 

Goldstein, W. 2018. High Methionine, N Efficient Field Corn from the Mandarin Institute/Nokomis Gold Seed Co.Proceedings of the 9th Organic Seed Growers Conference, Feb 14-17, 2018, Corvallis OR, pp 25-26. https://seedalliance.org/all-publications/. 

Grandy, S., and C. Kallenbach. 2015. Microbes drive soil organic matter accumulation in organic cropping systems. Recording from the Organic Agriculture Research Symposium, LaCrosse, WI February 25-26, 2015, http://eorganic.info/node/12972. 

Han, Z., M. T. Walter, and L. E. Drinkwater. 2017. Impact of cover cropping and landscape positions on nitrous oxide emissions in northeastern U.S. agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment vol. 245: pp 124-134.

Hurisso, T. T., S. W. Culman, W. R. Horwath, J. Wade, D. Cass, J. W. Beniston, t. M. Bowles, S. Grandy, A. J. Franzluebbers, M. E. Schipanski, S. T. Lucas, and C. M. Ugarte. 2016. Comparison of Permanganate-Oxidizable Carbon and Mineralizable Carbon for Assessment of Organic Matter Stabilization and Mineralization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 80 (5): 1352-1364.

Jackson, L. 2013. Researcher and Farmer Innovation to Increase Nutrient Cycling on Organic Farms. OREI project 2009-51300-19827. https://nifa.usda.gov/data/data-gateway. 

Jackson, L. and T. Bowles. 2013. Researcher and Farmer Innovation to Increase Nitrogen Cycling on Organic Farms (Webinar). http://articles.extension.org/pages/67391/researcher-and-farmer-innovation-to-increase-nitrogen-cycling-on-organic-farms-webinar. 

Khan, S. A., R. L. Mulvaney, T. R. Ellsworth, and C. W. Boast. 2007. The myth of nitrogen fertilization for soil carbon sequestration. J. Environ. Qual. 36:1821–1832.

Khan, S. A., R. L. Mulvaney, and T. R. Ellsworth. 2013. The potassium paradox: implications for soil fertility, crop production, and human health. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems: doi:10.1017/S1742170513000318. 25 pp.

Kloot, Robin. 2017. Rethinking P and K fertility in coastal plain soils. Presentation at the 2017 Organic Agriculture Research Symposium, Lexington, KY, January 26, 2017.

Kloot, Robin. 2018. Using adaptive nutrient management to answer “how much fertilizer do you actually need?” NRCS webinar May 8, 2018. Science and Technology Training Library, http://www.conservationwebinars.net/listArchivedWebinars. 

Li, C., Salas, W. and Muramoto, J. 2009. Process Based Models for Optimizing N Management in California Cropping Systems: Application of DNDC Model for nutrient management for organic broccoli production. Conference proceedings 2009 California Soil and Plant Conference, 92-98. Feb. 2009. http://ucanr.edu/sites/calasa/files/319.pdf. 

Li, J., Y. Yang, J. Wen, F. Mo, and Y. Liu. 2022. Continuous manure application strengthens the associations between soil microbial function and crop production: Evidence from a 7-year multisite field experiment on the Guanzhong Plain. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment vol. 338 article 108082.

Lin, D., R. L. McCulley, J. L. Nelson, K. J. Jacobsen, and D. Zhang. 2020. Time in pasture rotation alters soil microbial community composition and function and increases carbon sequestration potential in a temperate agroecosystem. Science of the Total Environment 698, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134233. 

Morugán-Coronado, A., P. Pérez-Rodríguez, E. Insolia, D. Soto-Gómez, D. Fernández-Calvino, and R. Zornoza. 2022. The impact of crop diversification, tillage and fertilization type on soil total microbial, fungal and bacterial abundance: A worldwide meta-analysis of agricultural sites. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment vol. 329 article 107867.

Mulvaney, R. L., S. A. Khan, and T. R. Ellsworth. 2009. Synthetic nitrogen fertilizers deplete soil nitrogen: a global dilemma for sustainable cereal production. J. Environ. Qual. 38:2295–2314.

Muramoto, J., C. Shennan, and J., M. Gaskell. 2015. Nitrogen management in organic strawberries: challenges and approaches. (Webinar) https://eorganic.org/node/14818.

Prescott, C. E., Yi. Rui, M. F. Cotrufo, and S. J. Grayston. 2021. Managing plant surplus carbon to generate soil organic matter in regenerative agriculture. J. Soil & Water Conservation 76(6): 99A-104A.

Puissant, J., C. Villenave, C. Chauvin, C. Plassard, E. Blanchart, and J.Trap. 2021. Quantification of the global impact of agricultural practices on soil nematodes: A meta-analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry Volume 161, October 2021, 108383.

Robb, D. and G. Zehnder. 2016. Weeds, nitrogen, and yield: measuring the effectiveness of an organic no-till system. Final report for Southern SARE project GS13-126. https://projects.sare.org/project-reports/gs13-126/. 

Shrestha, D., O. Wendroth, and K. L. Jacobsen. 2019. Nitrogen loss and greenhouse gas flux across an intensification gradient in diversified vegetable rotations. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-10001-8. 

Smallwood, M., D. Collins, and B. Bowell. 2015. Soil Health in Organic Farming Systems, 2015 Organicology Conference selected live broadcasts. https://eorganic.org/node/12903. 

Snyder, L., M. Schonbeck, T. Velez, and B. Tencer. 2022. 2022 National Organic Research Agenda: Outcomes and Recommendations from the 2020 National Organic & Transitioning Farmer Surveys and Focus Groups. Organic Farming Research Fdn, https://ofrf.org, 232 pp.

Spargo, J. T., M. A. Cavigelli, S. B. Mirsky, J. E. Maul, and J. J. Meisinger. 2011.Mineralizable soil nitrogen and labile soil organic matter in diverse long-term cropping systems. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst (2011) 90:253–266.

Stratton, A. E., J. J. Comin, I. Siddique, D. R. Zak, L. D. Filipini, R. R,. Lucas, and J. Blesh. Assessing cover crop and intercrop performance along a farm management gradient. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment vol. 332 article 107925.

USDA National Organic Program. Organic Regulations. https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/organic. 

Virginia Tech. 2018. Mid-Atlantic Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations. https://www.soiltest.vt.edu/Files/handbooks.html.

Wander, M. 2009. Nutrient budgeting basics for organic farming systems. https://eorganic.org/node/3060. 

Wei, Z, E. Hoffland, M. Zhuang, P. Hellegers, and Z. Cui. 2021. Organic inputs to reduce nitrogen export via leaching and runoff: A global meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118176. 

Weil, R. R., and N. C. Brady 2017. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th Edition.

Young, M. D., G. H. Ros, and W. de Vries. 2022. Impacts of agronomic measures on crop, soil, and environmental indicators: A review and synthesis of meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107551. 

Zhang, H., X, Zheng, X. Wang, and W. Xiang. 2022. Effect of fertilization regimes on continuous cropping growth constraints in watermelon is associated with abundance of key ecological clusters in the rhizosphere. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment vol. 339 article 108135.

Balancing Soil Health and Weed Management in Organic Farming

By Thelma Velez and Heather Estrada

Organic farmers are often praised for their commitment to environmental stewardship. Indeed, these growers must adhere to rigid standards set forth through the National Organic Program, which delineates what is (and is not) allowed on organic operations. These standards are key to ensuring that the certified organic label is the same across the country. While many argue there is room for improvement in the label (and its enforcement), one thing is certain—farms under organic management are more ecologically sustainable than conventional operations. Organic farms are better for the environment, better for the people, and better for the planet. 

Mattawoman Creek Farm in Virginia uses a permanent raised bed system to eliminate soil compaction. Photo used with permission from www.mattawomancreekfarms.com

That said, organic farmers also face extensive criticism regarding their use of tillage. There is no denying that excessive or poorly timed tillage can lead to soil erosion or nutrient run-off, and there is mounting evidence that tillage can disturb fungal networks, harm larger soil organisms, and increase the decomposition of soil organic matter (SOM). However, it is worth “digging in,” “turning over,” and “exposing” why organic farmers till in the first place and how tillage practices and outcomes differ.

Why Do Organic Farmers Till?

So why do organic farmers till? In 2022, we published our National Organic Research Agenda (NORA) report. Organic farmers across the country indicated that their number one production challenge is managing weeds on their farms (Snyder et al., 2022). Tillage in organic systems is used for a variety of reasons, including weed management, but also for terminating cover crops or preparing seedbeds. While conventional growers use synthetic herbicides to terminate weeds, organic farmers are not allowed to apply these chemicals to the soil, nor would they want to, given the extensive evidence of the harm these chemicals cause to both humans and ecosystems. 

Building and maintaining healthy soil is the key for most successful organic farming operations (yes, this includes dairy and livestock operations where animals graze on pasture). Thus, co-managing soil health while also tackling weeds is something organic farmers deal with on a regular basis. Interestingly, there are researchers and farmers who have been studying soil for decades to better understand the impacts of tillage on different parameters of soil health, and what we are learning is that not all tillage is created equal. In fact, there are organic farms across the country that have been finding ways to keep weeds at bay while also improving soil health.   

The science of the last decade has begun to unravel some of the complexities related to how tillage depth and intensity affect soil organisms and soil organic carbon. 

Impact of Tillage on Soil Health

Amanda Gillett uses a no-till drill on her farm in Montana to eliminate tillage to save moisture and build soil health. Original public domain image from Flickr.

Studies have documented improvements in active soil organic carbon (SOC) and other soil health parameters when combining cover crops and compost applications, even with tillage (Cogger et al., 2013; Delate et al., 2015). Results from six long-term farming systems trials with organic crop rotations that included legume cover or sod crops, organic nutrient sources (compost or manure), and routine tillage actually accrued significantly more SOC than conventional corn-soybean rotations (Delate et al., 2015).  

Variability in Tillage Methods

Tillage is not a one-size-fits-all approach. There are major differences between deeper inversion tillage and shallow non-inversion tillage. In one meta-analysis, shallow inversion tillage resulted in higher soil carbon, more effective weed control, and only minimal yield reductions when compared with deeper tillage (Cooper et al., 2016). 

More invasive approaches, such as a moldboard plow, disk plow, or chisel plow at depths greater than six inches, will inherently create more disturbance, but taking a more shallow and judicious tillage approach is generally less harmful to soil health and can be compatible with soil building goals (Schonbeck et al., 2017; Dimitri et al., 2012). 

Additionally, there are meta-analyses with promising findings related to enhanced soil life in reduced tillage systems (Chen et al., 2016;  Li et al., 2020; Morugán-Coronado et al., 2022). Morugán-Coronado’s 2022 paper also included findings showing that reduced tillage systems outperformed full-tillage and no-till with respect to increases in microbial and fungal biomass (Morugán-Coronado et al., 2022).

Balancing Tillage and Soil Health in Organic Farming

While tillage is an essential tool in organic farming, its impact on soil health is complex and varies depending on the method and intensity used. The evolving science of soil management suggests that organic farmers can adopt practices that minimize soil disturbance while addressing production needs. This balanced approach helps to preserve and enhance soil health, supporting the overall sustainability of organic farming systems. 

For more information on balancing tillage and soil health, check out our guidebook “Practical Conservation Tillage,” which provides a practical means to reduce tillage and protect soil organic matter, soil life, and tilth through green manures, compost applications, and other organic practices.

How do you manage tillage in your farming practices? Email us at info@ofrf.org to share your experiences and insights, and stay informed about the latest research to continually improve your soil management strategies by signing up for our newsletter here.

References

Chen, G., C. R. Hooks, M. Lekveishvili, K. H. Wang, K. H., N. Pradhan, S. Tubene, S., R. R. Weil, and R. Ogutu. 2015. Cover Crop and Tillage Impact on Soil Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emission, Pests, and Economics of Fields Transitioning to Organic Farming. Final report for project ORG 2011-04944. CRIS Abstracts.

Cogger, C. G. M. Ostrom, K. Painter, A. Kennedy, A. Fortuna, R. Alldredge, A.; Bary, T. Miller, Collins, J. Goldberger, A. Antonelli, and B. Cha. 2013. Designing Production Strategies for Stewardship and Profits On Fresh Market Organic Farms. OREI award 2008-51300-04460. https://nifa.usda.gov/data/data-gateway.

Cooper, J., Baranski, M., Stewart, G., Nobel-de Lange, M., Bàrberi, P., Fließbach, A., Peigné, J., Berner, A., Brock, C., Casagrande, M., Crowley, O., David, C., De Vliegher, A., Döring, T. F., Dupont, A., Entz, M., Grosse, M., Haase, T., Halde, C., … Mäder, P. 2016. Shallow non-inversion tillage in organic farming maintains crop yields and increases soil C stocks: a meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36, 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0354-1

Delate, K., C. Cambardella, and C. Chase. 2015. Effects of cover crops, soil amendments, and reduced tillage on Carbon Sequestration and Soil Health in a Long Term Vegetable System. Final report for ORG project 2010-03956. CRIS Abstracts

Dimitri, C., L. Kemp, J. Sooby, and E. Sullivan. 2012. Organic Farming for Health and Prosperity https://ofrf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/HP-report-web.pdf

Li, Y., Q. Zhang, Y. Cai, Q. Yang, S.X. Chang. 2020. Minimum tillage and residue retention increase soil microbial population size and diversity: implications for conservation tillage. Sci. Total Environ., 716, 137164.

Morugán-Coronado et al., 2022. Agric., Ecosystems & Envir. 329, Article 107867.  Meta-analysis.

Schonbeck, M. D. Jerkins, and J. Ory. 2017. Soil Health and Organic Farming: Practical Conservation Tillage. https://ofrf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/HP-report-web.pdf

Snyder, L., M. Schonbeck, T. Velez, and B. Tencer. 2022. 2022 National Organic Research Agenda: Outcomes and Recommendations from the 2020 National Organic & Transitioning Farmer Surveys and Focus Groups. Organic Farming Research Foundation.

Written by Katrina Heinze, OFRF Board Member 2014-2023

A planned gift is a gift to the future. I support organic farming and OFRF because I care about the future health of our planet and its people. A planned gift to OFRF is a tangible way for me to pay it forward.

My mom fed me organic milk before “organic” was even a label. I grew up cooking and connecting with people through food. Later in my career, these interests led me to work in organic foods and organic policy. What a gift! Through my work, I learned about the care, hard work, and amazing knowledge that organic farmers bring to growing our food, as well as the challenges that make farming organically and bringing a farm’s goods to market difficult. 

In 2014, I joined OFRF’s board. Our farmer board members and farmer listening sessions taught me that organic farmers are experimenters and that we still have much to learn about the best production practices to nurture our environment, deal with and address the impacts of climate change, and provide healthy food for all—all while ensuring sustainable economics for farmers and farming communities.

OFRF’s mission is to foster the improvement and widespread adoption of organic farming systems. I love OFRF’s farmer-centered, science-based approach. Our work is long-term and requires long-term funding. For example, OFRF publishes the National Organic Research Agenda (NORA) every 5-6 years. The NORA Report is used to ask for Congressional funding for organic research, influence USDA’s grant funding, and help those of us in the organic food industry rally to support our farmers’ most important production (and non-production) needs. All of this contributes to new knowledge and support for organic farmers.

My husband and I have included OFRF in our will in addition to our regular OFRF donations. We did this to model our values for our family, demonstrate how we align our resources to those values, and be clear about the legacy we want to leave behind.

Estate planning can be easy to put off or avoid. However, we found that having conversations with our family about our wishes enriched our relationships. By discussing what mattered most to us and how we could best use our resources now and in the future, we’ve become better stewards of our resources today. We are glad we did this now instead of waiting or missing the opportunity altogether.

Planned giving can take place during your lifetime or at death, and it is a crucial part of your overall financial and estate plan. Typically larger than donations from ordinary income, planned gifts can provide income, financial security, and tax savings to you and your family, depending on how they are structured. In our case, our planned gift includes a multi-year commitment to OFRF now and a designation of a percentage of any remaining estate at our deaths.  

Planned giving is crucial for non-profits like OFRF, who depend largely on annual giving to “keep the lights on.” Although OFRF receives grants for key program initiatives, these grants don’t often pay for staff development, accounting, and the time-consuming work of helping policymakers understand the needs of farmers. Planned gifts build year-to-year stability for now and create a “savings account” for later.

I have seen the impact of planned gifts on OFRF. When I was on the Board of Directors, we received a planned gift. This single donation enabled us to hire a paid intern to support our research program. It also demonstrated to a future grant maker the value of our work, which has now resulted in a multi-year grant. Better still, the donor was unknown to us, and learning about why OFRF was important to them brought us joy and a renewed commitment to our mission.

A planned gift does not have to be complicated. Including OFRF as a beneficiary in your will or naming OFRF as a full or partial beneficiary of a life insurance policy or retirement account is a simple way to make a planned gift. Consulting with your financial and legal advisors can help you determine what is best for your situation and values. Once you have put a gift plan in place, let the beneficiary non-profit know. They will benefit from understanding what motivated you, and you will get to enjoy the impact of your thoughtful gift.

Together, let’s ensure the widespread adoption of organic farming practices. Our earth and farming communities depend on it. Please join me in planting a seed for the future by making a planned gift to OFRF today.

Sincerely,

Katrina

The Vital Role of Salinas ARS and Its Advocates

By Elizabeth Tobey and OFRF staff

Various cover crops growing in the long-term organic systems trial at the ARS station in Salinas, CA

Imagine a farming method that not only enhances soil health and reduces the need for chemical inputs but also addresses climate change and provides economic benefits to local communities. This is the promise of organic agriculture, and nowhere is this more evident than at the USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) station in Salinas, Monterey County, CA. Despite the significant benefits, the future of this critical research is at risk due to underfunding. Fortunately, the region is lucky to have a strong organic champion in Rep. Jimmy Panetta. With the recent redistricting, the region also gained a member with a strong science and research background, Rep. Zoe Lofgren. We are encouraged that Rep. Lofgren has communicated she is ready to take up the mantle of defending and growing the research station.

The benefits of organic agriculture research are numerous: it serves not only the farmers who rely on it for informed decision-making but also the communities where research stations are located. These programs and agencies significantly benefit the rural communities participating in and hosting the research projects. They generate an impressive $20 of benefits for every dollar invested in public agricultural research. Organic research findings often also benefit conventional farmers, whereas findings from conventional ag research are frequently not applicable to the organic sector.

The United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is a federal agency conducting agricultural research with stations across the country to address the evolving needs of American agriculture and beyond. Among these stations, the Salinas station stands out for its groundbreaking work in organic research. But that hasn’t always been the case.

Many years ago, organic agriculture was not a focus at the Salinas ARS, but OFRF saw the potential. We worked with Congressman Sam Farr, who represented the district at that time. Farr championed the organic research cause and secured dedicated funding that has allowed the Salinas station to become a shining example of the potential for and benefits of organic agriculture research.

Eric Brennan with cover crop samples at the Salinas station

That initial earmarked funding allowed the research station to hire Dr. Eric Brennan, a research horticulturist specializing in organic farming systems and climate-smart agriculture. Dr. Brennan is known for his work on cover crops, soil health, and sustainable farming practices, which he explains in plain language. His research aims to improve organic farming methods to enhance productivity and environmental sustainability. He often collaborates with farmers and other stakeholders to develop practical solutions for agricultural challenges. A prime example is Dr. Brennan’s research into the nutrient management services cover crops can provide.

In a monumental moment in policy-making, Dr. Brennan used his agricultural research experience to weigh in on Ag Order 4.0, a regulatory program that protects groundwater resources in California from agricultural runoff. Dr. Brennan’s research-backed testimony shifted the course of that decision, providing insights on the scientific flaws of the regulation as it existed and instead providing the groundwork for an amended regulation that provides nutrient management credits for producers who can meet thresholds on cover crop biomass (we highlighted his story previously here). His research continues to benefit farmers and ranchers throughout California and across the country. Brennan’s findings are available in various publications, articles, and videos.

The Salinas ARS station is now a hub of organic research. In the years since securing that initial funding, OFRF has facilitated numerous tours for policymakers there, including visits with the current congressman and organic champion, Rep. Jimmy Panetta.

From left to right: Rep Panetta, ARS Research Leader Bill Wintermantel, and researcher Eric Brennan during a site visit to the Salinas ARS station.

However, this critical research faces an uncertain future. A recent conversation between OFRF and the ARS staff brought up a concerning reality—this vital research program is significantly underfunded. The initial funding allocated in the early 2000s hasn’t grown despite the significant and steady growth of the organic sector and the costs of conducting research. The Salinas ARS serves as a shining example of successful organic research, and it desperately needs more resources to continue thriving and supporting organic farmers. 

Thankfully, Congressman Panetta has shown his leadership on organic research policy by recently organizing a group of legislators to send a letter to the appropriations committee, highlighting the station’s importance. We applaud Congressman Panetta and all who joined him for carrying on the legacy of support established by his predecessor, Rep. Sam Farr. However, the fight for adequate funding is still ongoing. The organic community must maintain and strengthen its voice to continue advocating for research like the work in Salinas.

How you can help:

• Stay Involved: Get in touch if you’d like to be part of the effort to secure funding for the Salinas ARS organic research program!
• Thank Congressman Panetta: Let him know you appreciate his support for organic agriculture research: find contact info here.
• Learn More: Reach out to OFRF for additional information: contact gordon@ofrf.org

By working together, we can ensure that the groundbreaking research at the Salinas ARS continues to benefit organic farmers and the agricultural sector as a whole.

Integrating poultry, cover crops & vegetable production can reduce purchased inputs while increasing yields

Written by Brian Geier

Dr. Ajay Nair, Department of Horticulture Chair, Iowa State University

Organic farmers with successful Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems (ICLS) report benefits ranging from increased farm productivity and reduced inputs to improvements in soil fertility and increased nutrient density in food products. Additionally, organic farmers report site-specific benefits, for instance livestock grazing that provides unique options for crop pest control or decreases the need for mechanical cultivation (learn more about these specific benefits to organic farmers in OFRF’s Crop-Livestock Integration resources). 

While these benefits are becoming better understood, researchers at Iowa State University, led by Dr. Ajay Nair, wanted to look more closely at a specific crop-livestock integration scenario: poultry and diversified organic vegetable production systems. “Commonly researched and implemented methods of crop-livestock integration in the United States,” they write, “include grazing livestock on cover crops, rotational grazing of permanent pasture, and grazing livestock on crop residues such as corn or wheat. Several reviews on crop-livestock integration discuss its benefits, such as increased soil organic carbon, aggregate stability, enhanced nutrient cycling, and increased soil nitrogen (N). There is, however, limited research on the integration of animals in vegetable production.” Now, with funding from USDA’s Organic Agriculture Research & Education Initiative (OREI), Dr. Nair and a team of researchers across the country are evaluating poultry, cover crop and vegetable integration.  

Pastured Poultry: a unique fit for diversified vegetable production

Organic vegetable production systems are often highly diversified, requiring intensive management techniques and quick turnaround times between crops. Poultry, which require less space and are easier to move than other livestock could prove to be a unique fit for organic vegetable farmers. Add to that the relatively low capital investment and many growers and researchers wonder if integrating poultry with vegetables could be profitable while still meeting food safety and National Organic Program requirements. “‘How will I integrate poultry? Where? When?’ That was the number one question our growers had,” explains project lead, Dr. Nair.

Above, left: the three rotations in the study are: 1) vegetable > vegetable > cover crop (V-CC), 2) vegetable > cover crop > poultry (V-CC-P), and 3) vegetable > poultry > cover crop (V-P-CC). Above, right: a floorless coop moves around a cover crop in a plot where treatment 2 (V-CC-P) is being evaluated.

The research evaluates the effects of pasturing poultry in movable, floorless coops through vegetable and cover crop rotations. The multi-state project, which involves research in Iowa, Kentucky and California won’t conclude until August of 2024, but it already has several key findings:

1. Poultry and cover crops can successfully be integrated with vegetable production systems.
2. Where poultry are integrated with vegetable production systems, nitrogen inputs can be reduced while vegetable yields are increased.
3. In field tests at Iowa State University, over time, more weeds accumulated in systems where poultry were integrated with vegetables than in systems without poultry.  
4. Birds in this study are more efficient at converting food to meat. The Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) of birds in this study is almost double that of conventionally raised broilers. 

The impact of USDA funding for organic research & farmers

Dr. Nair, a professor at the Department of Horticulture at Iowa State’s College of Agriculture and Life Science who in July of this year became the Department Chair, credits the USDA/NIFA’s Organic Research and Extension Initiative for making projects like his possible all over the country.

“OREI is the foundation for several of the organic projects that happen across the country, and we are very thankful for NIFA for having such a dedicated program for organic growers. It serves as a good platform for us to reach out to organic growers and for organic growers to reach out to us.” -Dr. Ajay Nair

You can learn more about this project and the importance of OREI in this video excerpt from OFRF’s interview with Dr. Nair in early 2024:

This research is funded by the USDA/NIFA’s Organic Research and Extension Initiative. To learn more about OFRF’s advocacy work to protect and increase this type of funding, and how you can help become an advocate for organic farming with us, see our Advocacy page.