OFRF Announces Applications Opening for 2026 Farmer-Led Trials Program

OFRF Announces Applications Opening for 2026 Farmer-Led Trials Program

By |2025-10-15T11:34:58-04:00October 15th, 2025|News, Press Release|

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Applications are now open for a new cohort of farmer-researchers to receive technical support in conducting innovative on-farm research trials across the country

SANTA CRUZ, Calif., Oct. 15, 2025 — The Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF) is excited to announce that applications are open for the next cohort of organic farmers who will be leading on-farm research trials with OFRF technical assistance in 2026.

OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials (FLT) Program provides technical assistance and a small amount of funding to a select cohort of organic and transitioning-to-organic growers each year. Built in the spirit of curiosity and collaboration, the FLT program provides support to farmers so that they can try new practices, inputs, varieties, or animal breeds that can improve profitability and environmental sustainability. Applications are open October 15th through December 3rd, 2025. Selected participants will be announced in early 2026.

“By partnering with OFRF, we get to create a project that will help us determine the very best cover crops to solve some of our soil health issues. We get expert advice and feedback through all stages of the project, from planning, implementing, data collection, and interpreting results,” Tim Colby, farmer at Colby Farms in Papillion, Nebraska, and former participant in OFRF’s FLT Program.

Organic farming takes a great deal of dedication, financial investment, and continuous trial and error to adapt to an array of challenges, including pests, diseases, soil management, and climate change. To address the specific challenges that certified organic and transitioning-to-organic growers face, it is essential that farmers are at the center of efforts to identify problems and trial solutions. The FLT program supports farmers in developing a viable trial plan, provides support and accountability in data collection, and then helps farmers compile and assess results at the end of the trial. This equips farmers to not only implement the findings into their own farm practices but also to share the experience and knowledge gained with other producers.

“There is no limit to the interesting questions and thoughtful considerations that arise from organic farmers across the country. Our work at OFRF is to help bring the scope of the trial to an achievable level, grounded in the scientific method. With the results of each trial, farmers can make a small, accurate statement about what took place on their farm. Each statement is like a brick, adding one piece at a time to build the foundation of our understanding,” Mary Hathaway, OFRF Research & Education Program Manager.

To learn more or apply for OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials Program, please visit our program page for updates and to read testimonials from previous cohorts. Additionally, we encourage curious farmers to consider attending the FLT Virtual Forum on Oct 21st, where three FLT farmers will share results of their trials, and to check out OFRF’s free guidebook, Farmers’ Guide to Conducting On-Farm Research, for guidance on structuring your farm experiments so the results are useful, reliable, and repeatable.

###

About Organic Farming Research Foundation
The Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF), headquartered in Santa Cruz, California, with a remote team based across the U.S., works to foster the improvement and widespread adoption of organic farming systems. OFRF cultivates organic research, education, and federal policies that bring more farmers and acreage into organic production. For more information about OFRF, please visit our website: www.ofrf.org.

Media Contact:
Ashley Dulaney, Communications Director, OFRF
ashley@ofrf.orf, ‪(518) 310-6771‬‬
P.O. Box 440, Santa Cruz, CA 95061

Katelyn Hemmer (she/her)

By |2025-10-09T14:50:00-04:00October 9th, 2025|Interns|

Tech & Data Intern

email: katelyn[at]ofrf.org

Katelyn Hemmer (she/her) graduated from Carleton College in 2024 with a B.A. in Political Science. During her time at Carleton, she conducted an in-depth research project examining the history of food commodification, post-industrial farm models, and the growing social movement toward local food systems. After graduation, she spent a year at Earth Sky Time Community Farm in southern Vermont and is now completing a Farmer in Training program at the Old Fort through Fort Lewis College in Hesperus, Colorado. Her experiences span the entire food system, from seed to compost, including work with farms, food banks, co-ops, restaurants, and composting operations. Outside of her work, Katelyn enjoys reading, trying new recipes, and hiking.

The Government Shutdown: What it Means for Organic Farming and Research

By |2025-10-08T16:31:51-04:00October 8th, 2025|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

As you might have been reading, hearing, or seeing in the news, the federal government is in the midst of a limited shutdown following a lapse in appropriations legislation. In plain terms, this means Congress has failed to pass the bills that keep the lights on; and when that happens agencies can’t spend money they don’t have.

Most federal employees are placed on furlough until funding is restored. Some, deemed essential, are required to continue working without pay until a deal is reached. For some historical context, the last government shutdown occurred during the 2018 Appropriations debate, which also coincided with the Farm Bill debate (time is a flat circle). Once funding resumes, all employees typically receive backpay (although that is now being called into question), but the programs they administer lose time that can’t be made up.

This particular standoff stems from broader political battles over domestic spending, primarily subsidies that make health insurance under the Affordable Care Act more . . . affordable. But whatever the cause of a shutdown, the result is the same: a complete freeze in all federal work which impacts the entire country. We’re in a historic period of partisan brinksmanship, and it is directly affecting the nation’s programming at USDA, especially for organic producers and the agricultural research they depend on.

Organic Programming During a Shutdown

For organic producers, this shutdown hits several critical programs at once, including:

  • The Organic Certification Cost Share Program (OCCSP), which helps farmers recoup part of the cost of certification, and operates through the Farm Service Agency (FSA). With nearly all county FSA offices closed, farmers may find it hard to submit and process their cost-share applications.
  • The National Organic Program, the regulatory and enforcement agency operated by the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), has furloughed nearly all of its roughly 40 staff members. That means no compliance, no enforcement, no rulemaking, and no certification review or accreditation activities until the government reopens.
  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) staff, who provide critical in-the-field conservation support have also been sidelined. This affects all farmers, but hits organic operations as well. Farmers use NRCS conservation programs to address resource concerns on their operations, like erosion control and biodiversity conservation.

The delays stemming from the shutdown will ripple across the entire agricultural sector, but especially the organic sector. From the small diversified producer waiting for their NRCS or OCCSP cost-share funding, to the certifier waiting for regulatory guidance.

Impacts on Research Programming

The shutdown does not only impact the programming that directly serves producers, but also the underlying research infrastructure that provides the foundation for all regulatory frameworks for agricultural systems.

At the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), the agency that administers competitive grant programs, only 13 of roughly 400 employees remain on duty. That means functionally no work is able to be continued on releasing Requests for Applications (RFAs), and no new awards can move forward. Many competitive grant programs, like the Organic Research and Extension Initiative (OREI), are already running nearly a full year behind their normal grant cycle.

Meanwhile, the Agricultural Research Service faces similar disruptions. This can be particularly harmful at this agency given that it manages long-term research trials vital to understanding soil health, pest management, livestock research, and climate adaptation. When these programs pause, data collection and continuity is lost, impacting the ability for these projects to deliver results to farmers.

Even data collection efforts like the Economic Research Service (ERS) and National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) are affected. The organic sector depends on ERS and NASS for production and market data, which informs everything from policy development to private investment. Losing access to this data hampers strategic planning for an entire sector. It is also worth noting some of dissonance here: this shutdown comes just months after a 100% increase in funding for the Organic Market and Production Data Initiative was included in the budget reconciliation package, a recognition by both Congress and the Executive branch how vital this work is.

What Happens Next?

No one can predict how long this shutdown will last. We do know that the deadlock in Congress is real, and it’s being played out at the expense of federal workers, farmers, researchers, and the general public alike. The USDA exists to carry out the policies Congress enacts and provides funding for. The current shutdown doesn’t just interrupt that process, it undermines it. The longer it continues, the more it erodes public trust in the government’s ability to deliver for rural America.

There isn’t a clear path forward for action yet, but OFRF will continue tracking these developments closely, and sharing what they mean for organic producers and researchers across the United States. In the meantime, we are looking forward to sharing good news regarding legislative work next month!

Until then, eat well and breathe deeply,

Gordon

Two Years of Farmer-Led Trials

By |2025-10-01T16:04:50-04:00October 1st, 2025|FLT Highlight, News|

Mary (on right) with OFRF’s Research & Education Program Director, Thelma Velez (left)

By Mary Hathaway, OFRF Research & Education Program Manager

Organic farmers are curious. Working with nature to grow an abundance of food provides countless opportunities to learn and continue to improve farm production systems. OFRF has been listening to farmers since our inception, and the constant hum of curiosity, experimentation, and innovation has never diminished. In fact, as we have worked with more and more farmer and researcher teams, we’ve heard farmers express increasing interest in exploring questions and testing out what makes sense for their operations.

The launch of our Farmer-Led Trial program

Urged on by farmers’ questions, and with encouragement from the wonderful work of Practical Farmers of Iowa (PFI) and Ecological Farmers Association of Ontario (EFAO), OFRF took the leap to launch our Farmer-Led Trials (FLT) Program in 2024. This program supports organic farmers across the US who want to use the scientific method to trial ideas—in the hopes of learning the research process and what works for them and their farm system.

It has now been two years of working with farmers on their trials, and we are about to open applications for our third season. We started with our guidebook, “Farmers Guide to Conducting On-Farm Research,” which provides practical information, including examples from farmers and ranchers conducting on-farm research, links to additional resources, and worksheet templates for designing a sound research trial. It is available for free as a reference for any farmer or rancher wanting to conduct their own on-farm trials. Our goal is to support farmers in conducting trials in a way that generates reliable data and actionable results. We consider this free resource required reading for farmers who participate in the FLT Program, a 101, if you will. But like so many of my tactile friends, I learn from doing. And there is a lot of doing in farm trials!

Developing an on-farm trial

plot map for on-farm trial at Woven Trifecta Farm

Trial plot map we developed with Women Trifecta Farm

Every on-farm trial begins with the farmer’s ideas—what have they been observing on their farm? What is it that they hope to achieve? We talk through their ideas, their production system, and their goals. From there, we walk through the seven core steps of setting up an on-farm trial, as outlined in the Farmers Guide. Together, we hone in on an appropriate research question, develop the trial plan, and come up with a strategy for collecting the necessary data. OFRF continues to provide support throughout the season, meeting with participants via phone two or three times after the plan is laid out, and helping to evaluate results and compile a final report at the end of the trial. As many of the farmers discover by the end of the trial, the year is just the beginning of a journey of testing out ideas. Once they get a behind-the-scenes peek and grasp how researchers might trial an idea and what that looks like for a farm, they see endless opportunities for continued investigation.

Managing contingencies with on-farm research

Life happens, and as farmers know all too well, weather really happens. In developing an on-farm trial, as with farming in general, there is a plan, and then there is what ends up happening. Together, OFRF and the farmers create the plan, and we hope the timelines work and pieces all fall into place. But inevitably it will be a wetter or drier year than expected, or livestock will get out and eat part of the trial plot, or some other unexpected thing will occur. Farmers get used to this, and just as with all other things, they keep moving, pivoting, and adapting to new situations. It can be challenging to stick with a trial. What seemed fun and exciting at the beginning of the season can become much more difficult to keep up with midway through the season, with dozens of other things vying for a farmer’s attention. In the spring, we love to plan and plot and scheme. Mid-season, when daylight lengthens with our workload, it is an extra piece in the day’s puzzle to make sure the data is collected and recorded, the marked out plots stay marked despite weeds or wind. Dedication at this point is what makes a trial successful. There can be no results without accurate data.

Analyzing data and learning together

Soil solarization in a high tunnel at Salad Days Farm

After months of growing, tending, and collecting information, eventually the time comes in the season when all the data is in. The yields have been weighed, or soil moisture has been measured, or compaction has been calculated. Generally, this is when things have slowed down for the season and farmers start to have a little more breathing room to reflect on results. I am not a statistical expert, but I am lucky to be paired with one. My colleague, Heather, works with the numbers, helping boil down the data into understandable results. We meet again with the participating farmers to talk through what the numbers are saying, and what that means for the farm. Many times, the results are surprising. For example, a farmer tested soil solarization, and we saw microbial biomass bounce back quicker than expected, and the fungal-to-bacterial ratio turned up higher under solarization than in bare soil, which was not what we had hypothesized. Whether surprising or affirming of what we suspected, the trial results are always informative. Time and again, what we have seen is learning—farmers learning something new about their farm, seeing data that confirms something they’d always suspected but weren’t sure was true, or understanding how to apply the scientific method to their operation in approachable ways.

While all of the farmers we’ve worked with have shared with us how much they learned throughout the on-farm trial process, I know that I am learning from them as much as they are from me. Each farmer teaches me so much. There is no limit to the interesting questions and thoughtful considerations that arise about what is happening on organic farms across the country, from the community level down to the microscopic. I only wish that I was able to visit each farm in person to connect more deeply with the farmer, their operation, and their research questions.

The observations each farmer comes to as they complete their trials can often be one of the biggest outcomes, even beyond the actual trial results. There is something to setting a frame around an object, such as setting aside a certain plot for a trial, or committing to walking an area of a field more often to take data points. There is much to be gained from letting our gaze fall with more attention. As Tim Colby, FLT participant and farmer at Colby Farms, put it, “We learned a lot by doing this trial. This land is still pretty new to me. So, the trial put me out walking the rows a lot more often and becoming more familiar with the soil and seeing how it’s changed. So, that is a tangible takeaway.”

Working with the farmers on these trials, I am also reminded how human we all are—how hard it is to narrow the questions down to test just one thing. The temptation to do so much at once seems universal. Almost every farmer we’ve worked with initially wants to create an ambitious, all-encompassing statement. My work with OFRF is to help ground us in science, and bring the scope of the trial down to an achievable level—a level where we can make a small, but accurate statement. But each statement is like a brick, adding one piece at a time to build the foundation of our understanding.

Looking ahead

Source: Colby Farms

Tim Colby uses a penetrometer to measure soil compaction

As preparations begin for the third year of OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials program, I find myself humbled by the research questions and the outcomes. The generous and authentic work each farmer is doing to care for their land and feed their regions, while not harming the environment, is admirable. And the common interest among agriculturalists to better understand how things work—on a macro and micro-system scale—is inspiring.

I have worked as a farmer, with farmers, and for farmers. It is the thread that has tied my adult career together. I am so grateful that in this role, I get to be a small part of a journey for farmers around the country participating in OFRF’s FLT Program. As the ripple of this program grows larger with each year, we hope to see farmers we work with go on to build resilient systems, take on more robust trials such as with a SARE grant, or work with a researcher from their state or region to help build the body of knowledge we need to push organic farming systems into the forefront of production in the US. Like all the farmers embarking on these trials with us, I know that this is just the beginning, and there are so many more great questions out there to test.

Learn more

If you’d like to read more about the farmers who’ve participated in the FLT program so far, and what their trials have entailed, we’ve gathered a collection of the stories and final reports from past FLT Program participants here.

If you’re interested in participating in our next FLT cohort, applications are open Oct 15th-Dec 3rd, 2025, for the 2026 growing season. You can learn more about the program on our FLT page, or join our upcoming FLT Forum on Tuesday, October 21st, 2025, to hear from three former FLT farmer-researchers and gain an overview of the on-farm trial process.

The Story Behind HEAL: Collective Power for Food System Change

By |2025-11-13T12:45:15-05:00September 15th, 2025|News|

By Elizabeth Tobey

HEAL Food Alliance is a multi-sector, multi-racial coalition dedicated to transforming food and farm systems through policy, education, and grassroots support. With nearly 60 member organizations, HEAL is focused on protecting farm and food system workers, advocating for climate justice, and supporting BIPOC-led organizations. HEAL stands for Health, Environment, Agriculture, Labor, and the Alliance was born out of the understanding that no single individual, organization, or sector can transform systems in isolation.

Nichelle Harriott is the Policy Director at HEAL, and also serves on OFRF’s board of directors. She recently gave a presentation to OFRF staff and board members about HEAL’s work, as part of a series of “Lunch and Learn” events that OFRF is coordinating to build stronger connections between our organization and others working in the food and agriculture sectors. Here are our key takeaways from meeting with Nichelle and learning about the powerful work that HEAL is doing.

How It Started

HEAL began around 2016, when four organizations came together at a conference and started talking about the intersection of health, environment, agriculture, and labor. Those four organizations were Real Food Generation, National Black Food and Justice Alliance, Union of Concerned Scientists, and Food Chain Workers Alliance. From that initial conversation, HEAL was born and has since grown to over 60 member organizations, consisting mostly of local groups with a few regional and national organizations involved as well.

How It’s Going

As Nichelle put it, “HEAL believes that everyone has the right to have access to foods that are nutritionally and culturally appropriate, free from exploitation, and grown in harmony with the rest of the natural world.”

The Alliance utilizes five core methods for conducting their work to achieve this vision:

Connecting and uniting groups

As an alliance of member organizations, HEAL focuses on connecting groups to leverage and support each other in creating effective change. All members play a guiding role by identifying and uplifting priority issues for HEAL to advocate around. Core Members are BIPOC-led or BIPOC-serving, while Connecting Members include others who align with HEAL’s mission. The four founding organizations continue to play a key role within HEAL, as part of the membership and serving on the steering committee.

HEAL supports members through regranting programs. Earlier this year, they were able to regrant $400K to 26 members facing budget gaps due to the federal funding freeze in early 2025. Annually, they provide approximately $50K in rapid response funds to support smaller, less-resourced members.

Political education and analysis

The School of Political Leadership team in San Diego. Photo credit HEAL Food Alliance.

HEAL facilitates the School of Political Leadership (SOPL), a six-month program to equip young leaders with policy and advocacy skills. Made up of a mix of virtual and in-person sessions, this program includes lobbying experience in Washington, D.C. As of our conversation in mid-2025, SOPL has graduated 6 cohorts of young political leaders and advocates with the training needed to effectively advocate for a future they believe in.

In their policy work, HEAL prioritizes worker protections, climate justice, corporate consolidation, and support for BIPOC producers. They focus on federal-level policy, especially the Farm Bill, and held their first Congressional briefing on workers and the Farm Bill in 2023.

Advancing a shared narrative

The communications team at HEAL Food Alliance is intentional about how they tell their stories, ensuring that messaging around priority issues aligns with a Race Class Narrative (RCN) framework. This framework prioritizes telling stories that unify rather than divide people across class and race, and build power to take on corporate and political entities that historically and currently seek to divide and exploit us. Their “Rooted, Ready, & Resilient: Uplifting a BIPOC-led Vision for Crisis-Proof Food Systems” guide, developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, is a great example of this strategic and purposeful work.

Connecting and nurturing existing and emerging campaigns

HEAL is currently working on a narrative of abundance messaging guide for members, to challenge the false narrative that there is not enough to go around. “Scarcity is manufactured by those in power,” Nichelle explained. HEAL is working to flip that script, showing what’s possible when we move from a mindset of scarcity to a one of abundance. They are promoting the message that we can and should choose policies that reflect what is possible when we invest in people, not corporations.

Ensuring underserved communities have the resources they need to bring about grassroots change

Nichelle discussed the impact that discrimination and exploitation have on Black and brown communities. Addressing this is a foundational and ongoing priority area for HEAL’s work. For instance, they have worked extensively with Senator Booker (D–NJ)’s office on campaigns to improve working conditions of meatpacking workers. They are also engaged in advocating for heat stress protections and immigration reform for farmworkers. HEAL is unique in that they focus on food and farm workers across supply chains, including in farm fields, processing facilities, and restaurants. Their goal is to help shape policy that “safeguards those that grow, harvest, and serve the foods that we rely on,” as Nichelle said.

Collaboration Opportunities

Recognizing the strength in collaborative efforts, Nichelle pointed to several areas where HEAL is open to connecting with other food and agriculture organizations. She noted the messaging work they are doing around abundance, and invited organizations such as OFRF to incorporate that framework into their communications. Another area she noted as important to continue to highlight is the connection between climate change and agricultural communities.

Next Steps

To learn more about the work that HEAL Food Alliance is doing, visit their website at https://healfoodalliance.org/. If you’re ready to jump in and get involved, head straight for their Take Action page, where you can Join the Alliance, Connect, Explore, or Support. You can scroll to the bottom to sign up for their newsletter and follow them on social media to stay in the loop.

School Lunches Might Look Different This Year: Federal Funding Freezes Pinch School Food Programs

By |2025-09-04T17:15:43-04:00September 8th, 2025|News|

By Marina Santos. Marina was OFRF’s Policy & Communication Intern in the summer of 2025. For a research project, Marina dove into understanding the impact of federal funding freezes on school lunch programs. Marina said “As a person who grew up on free & reduced lunches, I was saddened to hear the news [of the funding freezes].” In this blog, Marina explores the landscape of school lunch and local food procurement programs, and their impacts on farmers and the communities they feed.  

Since the beginning of 2025, the federal government has been experiencing internal changes. As you’re probably aware, a government agency previously known as the U.S Digital Service (USDS) was rebranded to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Part of this rebranding effort came with a new mission, to find financial inefficiencies in the government process in order to slim spending. With a new administration came new priorities, including ending programs and closing field offices across the United States. In early March, Politico announced that the USDA would lose billions of dollars in federal funding due to “inefficiencies” found in the agency. Two of the programs that lost funding were focused on providing food for children and people in need. They are:

All 50 states plus 4 of the U.S. territories participate in these programs. Both LFS and LFPA provide a boost in the local economy by nourishing the local food system. They provide buying power to nonprofit organizations and introduce a new income source to farmers. Both programs directly benefit local and regional producers, especially those that are beginning, socially disadvantaged, or veteran farmers who may need a leg up to access these larger institutional markets.

These programs, as well as others focusing on strengthening rural communities, received increased funding amounts during 2021’s American Rescue Plan Act, a Biden administration plan, in hopes of boosting the American economy during the COVID pandemic. The pandemic highlighted the cracks in America’s food system infrastructure and the American Rescue Plan Act was Biden’s attempt to fix the issue. In 2024 Biden released another $1.7 billion investment to these programs to continue supporting farmers, schools and other food nutrition programs that were still recovering from the pandemic. Shortly after President Trump took office, news broke that LFS and LFPA contracts would not be fulfilled. Many farmers who had already started their planting season were pushed into a panic with the sudden realization they would have to reconsider their entire operating plan without the help of these federal programs.

The Impact of Funding Cuts  on Farms

Oaks and Sprouts, in Ohio, is one of those farms that had a contract worth up to $25,000 that was suddenly gone due to the cancellation of the LFS and FLPA programs. This farm has been participating in LFPA for the last three years and they were in the middle of planting when they initially heard the news. LFPA contracts helped fund 2 out of their 4 seasonal employees as well as provided the farm the means to diversify their crops. Oaks and Sprouts were supplying fresh local produce to two food pantries, and had to make a quick pivot to revert back to their previous practices of selling only to restaurants and farmer’s markets.

In the heartland of Nebraska, West End Farms is also dealing with the damages from loss of federal funding. The owner of West End Farms learned about the cuts through their local newspaper. Sudden program cuts limit the access of fresh local foods to a community. Farmers want to feed their communities, and these federal programs have been a way to support them in doing so.

Funding Cuts Hurt The Community

These cuts do not only affect the farmers who were relying on signed contracts for their crop planning and cash flow–states are also scrambling to adjust to the cuts for the upcoming school year. According to the Food Research and Action Center, over 28 million children received school lunches, with nearly 20 million receiving free or reduced lunch from 2022-2023. Minnesota was previously awarded roughly $13.3 million in funding, which allowed schools to purchase and distribute local, fresh foods for their students. The awarded money would also go towards the state’s initiative to provide free meals for all their students, nearly 150 million meals would have been provided between breakfast and lunch.

Food Banks, which generally also receive State support, are also feeling the heavy impact of lost funding. Approximately 50 million people rely on food banks and nutrition assistance programs each year. For example, the El Paso food bank provided over 88.5 million meals to low-income families in Texas. Due to the program cuts they are forced to limit their operations, resulting in 20% of their mobile pantries no longer receiving food. The effects of these program cuts have been seen and felt immediately.

So What Now?

Amidst all the bad news there are some highlights. Many state run groups have taken up the mantle in hopes to reestablish the connections between schools and farms. For instance, Maine’s Local Food Processing Infrastructure Workgroup has created a program called Local Food Switchboard which is designed to help connect local food producers and processors to schools in need.

The National Farm to School Network, an organization whose mission is to connect farms to local schools, will maintain their Local Food Purchasing Incentive for states. This program helps fund schools to purchase food from local producers.

Another ray of hope is that not every program cut is permanent. Some programs have seen their funding “unfreeze.” Local Food Promotion Program and Local Agriculture Market Program (LAMP) were both programs that were part of the March cuts and were then reinstated a couple months later. Both these programs are designed to help create and support local agriculture markets.

It is critical that we continue to let our policymakers know the importance of these programs for supporting farmers and feeding our communities. The most effective way to ensure that LFS and LFPA receive their funding is by contacting your local legislators to ask that they support the Local Farmers Feeding our Communities Act, a bipartisan bill that would reestablish these programs. For advice and help on how to reach out to your policymakers, check out OFRF’s free, self-paced, online Communicating With Legislators Email Course.

Marina Santos, OFRF Policy & Communications Intern

A Trio of Comments: OFRF Chimes in on USDA Actions

By |2025-09-05T08:48:49-04:00September 5th, 2025|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

Three piglets, one for each of the comments we submitted to the USDA last month.

At OFRF, we know that strong, transparent, and farmer-informed federal agencies are essential for the success of all U.S. agriculture, but especially organic agriculture. This month, we acted on that knowledge when we submitted three different comments on USDA actions: one to the USDA on their reorganization plan and two to the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) on proposed changes to the Application Kit and Scientific Review Process. Each of these actions may seem bureaucratic and technical on the surface, but together they shape the future of agricultural research and technical service delivery.

NIFA Comments

Earlier this summer, NIFA announced that they are requesting public input on proposed changes to its Application Kit and Proposal Review Process. These processes, and the changes described, directly affect the accessibility, quality, and impact of all USDA-funded research projects.

OFRF raised concerns with the proposed addition of a “Disclosure of Foreign Relationships” form added to the Application Kit, related to a recent memo from the Secretary. While framed as a transparency measure, this new requirement risks chilling international collaborations and excluding non-citizen scientists who have long contributed to the strength of the United States’ agricultural research system. Already, we are seeing foreign-born researchers being impacted. Rather than strengthening national security, this has the risk of hollowing out our research capacity and weakening America’s leadership in agricultural innovation. OFRF urged NIFA to pause implementation of this requirement and engage with agricultural communities, from farmers to university researchers, in assessing its real-world impacts on research quality, workforce development, and international collaboration.

In a second Notice and Comment opportunity, OFRF emphasized the importance of peer review as the cornerstone of scientific integrity and accountability. NIFA’s competitive grants depend on fair, transparent, and diverse review processes that balance scientific merit with on-farm relevance. We recommended a variety of pathways for improving the process’s ability to respond to the needs of farmers and reflecting observations applicable to real-world farm operations. These improvements are not just about improving the administration of NIFA’s research grant programs, they are about making sure that USDA research funding is awarded to projects that matter to farmers, communities, and the environment.

Reorganization Comments

In a less formal comment opportunity, OFRF weighed in on the USDA’s proposed reorganization plan, announced on July 25, 2025. This plan threatens to further erode the research and technical service capacity farmers depend on. Our comments highlighted major risks relating to scientific capacity and program administration, and the very public-interest scientific mission this plan aims to achieve. We learned from the relocation of NIFA and ERS in 2018 that when relocation takes place rapidly and without community engagement, there are significant staff losses that persist for years into the future. We called on USDA to halt this reorganization until it engages in a transparent, public process with a cost-benefit analysis, regional listening sessions, and clear justifications for how changes will improve core services.

OFRF’s Commitment

OFRF works to engage in both legislative and administrative advocacy to reaffirm our commitment to ensuring agricultural research is led with scientific merit, farmer relevance, and diverse perspectives. Whether it is protecting the integrity of peer review, opposing exclusionary policies in grant applications, or defending USDA’s research and service capacity, we will continue to ground our policy priorities in the needs of organic farmers as well as the researchers and technical service professionals that support them.

Take Action, Support Our Work

The future of organic research depends on strong, transparent, and farmer-centered federal institutions. If you want to help defend that future:

Together, we can ensure that USDA research and services remain a public good that builds a future for resilient farms and thriving communities.

Eat well and breathe deeply,

Gordon

Farmer-Led Trials Program Spotlight: The Woven Trifecta

By |2025-12-09T17:35:10-05:00September 2nd, 2025|Farmer Stories, FLT Highlight, Livestock, News, On-Farm Research, Soil Health|

Testing the Impact of Anaerobic Ferments on Crop Health

Written by Mary Hathaway, OFRF’s Research & Education Program Manager, and Samantha Otto, FLT Program participant

Samantha Otto is the founder and farmer of The Woven Trifecta, a 10-acre farm in western Michigan. Currently in transition to organic, the farm focuses on diversified vegetables for a CSA, local farmers market, as well as farm-to-school sales throughout the school year. Samantha raises Jacob sheep for fiber as well as assorted poultry for meat and eggs. The livestock is rotationally grazed on just over 3 acres of pasture, with 2 acres of no-till beds in production.

Samantha has a decade of hands-on farming experience and is a graduate of Michigan State University’s Agricultural Technology program. Since she started the farm, her primary focus has been on cultivating no-till organic vegetables and cut flowers. But as a curious farmer, she is continuously exploring innovative approaches to sustainable agriculture. Last year, as a participant in the Midwest GRIT program, she began integrating grains into her system, and  she has also recently incorporated livestock into her rotations to create a closed-loop system to help improve soil fertility.

From Waste Product to Resources: Building Fertility and Reducing Reliance in Off-Farm Inputs

One of the main goals of The Woven Trifecta is to reduce reliance on off-farm inputs, and to transform the farm waste products into a resource. Samantha has experimented with different anaerobic fermentation, and was interested in scaling up and fine-tuning its use as a soil amendment. She is particularly interested in incorporating waste from her livestock and compost into anaerobic ferments to improve soil fertility and plant health.

With the help of OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trial (FLT) Program, Samantha hopes to understand how anaerobic ferments impact the health of her crops. When considering which vegetable to test, the team landed on artichokes – a promising crop that her CSA members love and that has yielded well in past seasons. As a long-season vegetable with a short harvest window, the Tavor Artichoke was an ideal crop to trial.

Farm Trial Plan

To answer Samantha’s question, ‘Does an anaerobic compost tea impact yield or plant nutrition in artichokes?,’ she will weigh all harvested artichokes from each plot. Marketable artichokes will be weighed and counted separately. In addition to weights, leaf tissue samples will be collected prior to flowering stalk emergence. 10 representative samples will be taken from each plot, with one leaf collected per plant.

There are two treatments in the trial: a control with no ferment spray, and the anaerobic ferment foliar drench. Samantha will plant in 8 plots to provide sufficient replication. The trial is in a 30′ x 90′ space, in 3′ wide no-till beds, with each row containing 10 plants spaced 36’ apart. Buffer plots will be added on each side, planted with sunflowers.

plot map for on-farm trial at Woven Trifecta Farm

The recipe for the anaerobic fermentation is 60/40 with vegetation scraps and rabbit manure. Samantha brews a fresh batch every two weeks, beginning in early June and applies the fermented drench application biweekly.  A 5-gallon bucket will be suitable for each batch.

Recipe for Anaerobic Fermentation Fertilizer

Using 5-gallon buckets, mix: 

  • 60% vegetation scraps from on-farm and/or compost club program 
  • 40% manure from our rabbits.  
  • 4 cups of soil. 

These will be well mixed, with scraps being chopped into small pieces, and will fill about 3/4 of the 5-gallon bucket.  This mix will then be submerged in water (from well), covered with a lid and stored in the pump shed. The bucket will be fitted with a fermentation lid with spout to release any built-up gases over the course of the fermentation process. 

Ferment will be checked at 7, 14, and 21 days; ready to use at  21 days. Solids are then strained, and the liquid is bottled for use.  

Application: 1 part recipe to 20 parts water every 14 days, and apply it as a soil drench via backpack sprayer.

Samantha is excited to see how the ferment impacts the health and yield of her plants. The process of testing her application of the anaerobic ferment is something she hopes can impact her farm system, and possibly provide sustainable answers for other small farms like The Woven Trifecta.

Sunset over a crop field at The Woven Trifecta

“Working with OFRF has been an amazing opportunity for our farm! Closing the loop in our production is a long-term goal of ours, and this project has provided the opportunity to take the time to explore a potential process for making that happen. It has been especially delightful to work with OFRF on creating the foundation of our project, making a once-intimidating idea very fun and feasible to trial! It has been a thrill to find on-farm solutions that support both our livestock and vegetable production. While we are a ways away from harvest, our on-farm ferment is visually showing benefits in our test plot. I look forward to collecting further data as the season progresses! This data will help us make decisions on how to incorporate ferments in our wider production in the future so that we can continue to grow beautiful, healthy, thriving vegetables for our community.

– Samantha Otto, The Woven Trifecta

One of the livestock that Samantha integrates into her crop rotations

This is part of a series of blogs highlighting farmers who are participating in OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials program. Farmers receive technical support to address their production challenges through structured on-farm trials. To learn more about OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials Program, visit our website page at https://ofrf.org/research/farmer-led-research-trials/ 

To learn more about The Woven Trifecta, visit their website at https://thewoventrifecta.com/

OFRF Raises Concerns on USDA Reorganization Plan

By |2025-08-28T13:14:52-04:00August 28th, 2025|News, Press Release|

Proposed changes threaten research, conservation assistance, and farmer access to USDA programs.

WASHINGTON, D.C., August 28, 2025 — At the Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF), we are committed to advocating for organic research as well as the institutions and programs that make that work possible. That is why OFRF submitted comments to the USDA regarding the reorganization proposed in a July 25th memo.

The USDA’s proposed plan—developed without input from affected communities or Congress—comes at a time when public agricultural research and technical assistance are more vital than ever. For organic and transitioning-to-organic farmers, this plan threatens the very foundation of the USDA’s ability to deliver on its mission, particularly in research and conservation assistance. 

“All farmers and researchers, not just those using or studying organic farming systems, need continuity, not turmoil,” said Gordon N. Merrick, OFRF’s Policy Program Director. 

In our comments, linked here, OFRF highlighted how the actions outlined in this plan would:

  • Erode institutional capacity agency-wide. The 2018 relocation of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) and Economic Research Service (ERS) demonstrated how hasty relocations result in significant attrition of seasoned employees, an impact that the agency has yet to fully recover from.
  • Hinder grant administration. Staff reductions would only worsen the current delays in RFA administration, undermining research timelines and trust.
  • Delay on-the-ground assistance for farmers. Natural Resource Conservation Services (NRCS) field offices, already understaffed, are crucial to conservation implementation and free technical assistance. This plan would exacerbate delays despite growing demand and programmatic funding levels.
  • Disrupt public-good science. Agricultural Research Service (ARS) sites and Germplasm Collection Programs, vital for long-term research and system resiliency, would be lost. 
  • Reduce access to USDA programs for rural communities. OFRF and partners serve as bridges to USDA programs, but we all ultimately need robust employment in all county-level offices. Centralizing systems and closing offices would cut farmers off from essential assistance.

OFRF is urging the USDA to pause this reorganization immediately, and instead:

  • Conduct a cost-benefit analysis that assesses service disruption risks and other factors.
  • Publish a public justification report showing how changes will strengthen USDA’s mission.
  • Launch a formal notice-and-comment process, including listening sessions in agricultural regions.

“Disrupting institutional knowledge and service capacity now threatens the organic sector’s ability to meet the challenges of our time, from economic to ecological,” Merrick added. “This reorganization plan would not result in the strengthening of USDA to meet its mission, but a significant blow to its ability to meet that mission.”

Read the full version of OFRF’s submitted comments on our advocacy page here.

##

About the Organic Farming Research Foundation

The Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF), headquartered in Santa Cruz, California, with a remote team based across the U.S., works to foster the improvement and widespread adoption of organic farming systems. OFRF cultivates organic research, education, and federal policies that bring more farmers and acreage into organic production. For more information about OFRF, please visit our website: www.ofrf.org. 

Media Contact: Ashley Dulaney, ashley[at]ofrf.org

Advancing Organic Agriculture: Dr. Walter Goldstein on Nitrogen-Fixing Corn with Congressman Steil

By |2025-09-03T10:52:53-04:00August 25th, 2025|News|

Dr. Walter Goldstein

Written by Dr. Walter Goldstein

I recently had the opportunity to join Vinnie Trometter, Policy Fellow at the Organic Farming Research Foundation, and staff from Congressman Bryan Steil (R–WI–01)’s office to discuss how several organic agricultural research programs help the Mandaamin Institute research revolutionary, nutritious, nitrogen-fixing organic corn varieties.

Breeding Corn for a Food-Secure Future

I founded the Mandaamin Institute back in 2011 to study how to breed corn that does not require fertilizers and is more nutritious and sustainable than the corn hybrids controlled by large multinational corporations. Our goal is to change the paradigm of corn production by showing that you can breed organic corn varieties that have similar yields to conventional corn and are competitive against weeds without the need to use synthetic fertilizers or herbicides. Our research shows that this is possible.

Our corn plants have been selected to partner with beneficial bacteria and mycorrhizae. Their tissues are strongly colonized with bacteria in the roots, epidermis, plant hairs, vascular tissues, silks, pollen, glumes, and embryos. Bacteria are passed from one generation to the next through the seed, and those bacteria actively colonize the plant and are extruded into the root zone through the root tip and root hairs.

Through this, we have found that not only does root branching and root health improve, but nitrogen uptake increases substantially. This is because soil bacteria are taken up by the plant through the growing root system and then multiplied and consumed inside the plant as a result of the active oxidants produced by the plant. The dialogue with bacteria increases vitality and nutrient uptake and causes priming of the plant for stress and disease resistance. We have evidence that the defense systems in the root are dialed down to foster bacteria, but they are dialed up in the tops, which accumulate microbial nitrogen. Furthermore, we have isotopic evidence that some of our varieties are fixing substantial quantities of nitrogen from the air.

Some of our inbred varieties and hybrids also compete better with weeds and are less strongly affected by them than conventional varieties. Furthermore, yields under fertilized conditions have been about 10% less, but are generally higher than for conventional inbred corn under unfertilized conditions.

We have also found that our plants have higher nutritional value (more methionine, lysine, minerals, and carotenoids) than conventional corn. This translates to better quality poultry feed. Unlike traditional poultry feed, which is generally composed of a mixture of corn and soybeans, Mandaamin corn varieties are naturally high in protein and contain generated amino acids, usually supplemented in soybean-mixed poultry feeds. The enhanced value of the feed means 9% less soybean meal and no synthetic methionine is required. This allows poultry feeders to pay a 10% premium for the grain without increasing their overall feed costs, resulting in higher prices for egg producers.

Funding for Sustainable and Organic Agriculture Research

The Mandaamin Institute is working with dozens of organic farms and conventional farms, or in conditions that do not use synthetic pesticides or fertilizers, and are also limited in nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus. The farms we partner with are in several states, but mostly in Wisconsin. Mandaamin Institute also does not patent the corn they give out to farmers, so they can partake in experiments themselves. For analysis, we work intensively with Rutgers University using the latest “omics” technology.

We use Organic Agriculture Research Extension Program (OREI) and Sustainable Agriculture Research Education (SARE) grants to fund our research. Using both programs allows us to experiment on both organic and non-organic land since OREI can only be used on organic acreage, while SARE usage does not have this restriction. Experimenting on both types of land is important because we can test our seeds across a range of soil conditions. 

Our Meeting with Congress

Our meeting with Congressman Bryan Steil’s office went well. We met with one of his staffers who was well-informed and engaged on agriculture issues. He was sympathetic to our call, expressing the importance of organic agriculture research programs. It is important for organic agriculture researchers to directly communicate with their members of Congress about their work and how it impacts their districts, states, and regions. Those members of Congress can then carry on the message of researchers up to the USDA or the Agriculture Committee, where agricultural policy decisions are made.

Use Your Voice

Interested in sharing your research with legislators and highlighting the importance of ongoing public investment in organic research? Enroll in OFRF’s self-paced email course, Communicating with Legislators. This free workshop gives researchers and advocates in the organic farming community the tools to confidently connect with lawmakers and make your work count where decisions are made.

Go to Top