News

Three Springs Farm: Small-scale Farming Rooted in Organic Principles

By Clare Boland, Communications & Outreach Fellow, and OFRF staff

Three Springs Farm is a certified organic farm located in eastern Oklahoma in the Ozark Hills. Farmers Mike Appel and Emily Oakley cultivate over forty different crops and more than 150 individual varieties on three acres of land. Their goal is to maintain a family operation that demonstrates the economic viability of small-scale farming.

Originally, Three Springs sold the majority of their produce at farmers’ markets, but since the pandemic, they’ve transitioned into being majority Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). Instead of giving customers a pre-packed box like a traditional CSA, they offer a free choice model, allowing customers to pick what veggies they want to receive at their weekly pick-up in Tulsa. CSA members also receive a newsletter containing recipes, photos, and stories from the farm. “It’s non-traditional, but we still have that community support,” says Mike. In addition to their CSA, they also sell wholesale to a restaurant and a Food is Medicine Program.

For Mike and Emily, farming organically was their intention from the start. Both studied agriculture in college, and afterward gained experience working at organic farms like Full Belly Farm in California. After Emily finished her graduate degree at the University of California-Davis, they relocated to Oklahoma, where Emily was raised, to start a farm of their own.

But finding a permanent home for their farm took a bit longer than they had hoped. They looked at more than 100 properties over the course of three years. During this time, they farmed on leased land, but were unable to become certified because of soil amendments used on the land prior to their lease. Eventually, they found land in Eastern Oklahoma, about an hour east of Tulsa, where they have been farming for the past 22 years.

“Oklahoma is really difficult because there’s not a lot of good soil,” Mike explains. “The best land tends to be river valleys, but they’re prone to flooding. Or, there might be really great land but no water. The best land we saw was south of Tulsa, but it was too expensive for us. We were at the eleventh hour when we just kind of stumbled upon our place.”

Why Organic

The land they purchased hadn’t been farmed before, so they didn’t have to go through the three-year organic transition period to obtain organic certification. “It’s why we do what we do,” Michael said when asked about the decision to be certified organic. “There was never a question of doing anything other than that… We actually don’t need it for marketing purposes.”  

Despite that, Mike says their CSA customers are still interested in the organic label – what it means and the integrity behind it. He also thinks the bashing of big organics doesn’t do a lot to support the label overall. “When you’re doing that consistently, the consumer doesn’t understand and is going to equate organics as something that is fraudulent. That’s a worry. It has to be a lot more delicate and balanced. There are a lot of us out there doing it right. There’s a lot of concern, and I think we’re riding a very fine line of losing consumer support if we don’t make integrity and strict standards the priority.”

In addition to being USDA-certified organic, Three Springs Farm is also certified through the Real Organic Project. Emily served on the National Organic Standards Board from 2016-2021 and advocated against the inclusion of hydroponic vegetables under the USDA label. The USDA’s decision to include hydroponics was what led to the founding of the Real Organic Project, where Emily currently serves on the standards board. The Real Organic Project label goes beyond the USDA organic label, differentiating organic food produced in concert with healthy soils and pasture, and offering customers greater transparency.

Mike’s top reasons why people should choose organic whenever possible start with the obvious. “You don’t want poisons in your food. That to me is fundamental. We don’t want to eat food grown with chemicals and we don’t want other people to either. 

“Also, farmworkers shouldn’t be working in fields that have nasty chemicals. We have a long way to go to ensure people have good working conditions, but at least we can ensure people aren’t being exposed to bad chemicals when they’re growing our food.”

Then there are the larger environmental impacts. “Living near a creek and seeing the life that’s there is incredible. While it is resilient, it’s also very vulnerable to our influences. It’s important to make sure your food choices don’t impair that. When we buy organic, we think beyond ourselves. Our choices have huge impacts in other parts of the world. Just try to make the best choices you can with what you have in front of you.

Cover Cropping for Scale and Climate Extremes

Although Mike and Emily own around 100 acres, they only keep three to four acres in production since it’s just the two of them and their daughter. The majority of their land is in conservation for wildlife habitat and native ecosystem restoration. Determining the right schedule for their cover cropping has helped not only to build biomass, but also to manage their farm with minimal staff.

”Anything that was spring crops gets turned into a summer cover crop. And then any land that isn’t gonna be utilized at all that year is also in summer cover crop. We end our season on Labor Day to get our winter cover crop planted. So we spend most of September, and a little bit of October, cleaning up fields and just selling to the restaurant and the Food is Medicine program.” The goal, Mike says, is to get the entire farm into cover crop by mid-fall. “Over time, we’ve figured out how to sustain the farm as two people; not growing year-round is one way to do that.”

Though, climate irregularities have caused them to adapt their plans season to season. “ Our falls have been a lot drier, so we’re not able to plant until we get a rain, and those rains haven’t been coming until October. So we’ve modified our winter cover crop a little bit because of that, adding more winter-hardy [varieties].”

In addition to fall droughts, they’ve also been experiencing heavy rains in the spring. This past year was “the wettest spring we’ve ever had, which is saying a lot for this region because we have pretty wet springs. We get pretty severe storms. It’s usually a deluge. And this spring was the worst in our 20 years of farming. We just could not get back into the field. And there were a lot of disease problems in our potatoes and onions because of it.”

Along with the changes they’ve made to their cover crop mix, Mike and Emily are also experimenting with reduced tillage to combat climate extremes. This year, instead of rototilling their summer crop prior to winter planting, they tried discing it in instead. “We’re really happy the way that turned out. The soil is a lot less abused when we don’t rototill.” In the coming year, they are hoping to experiment with interseeding, planting cover crops alongside cash crops, to combat soil erosion and build resilience for rain events.

Learning Through On-Farm Research

Mike and Emily have also developed a good relationship with Oklahoma State University. “We’ve done some varietal trials with them, which helped us figure out what works,” says Mike. “What’s been interesting is to see the extension agents become more interested in cover cropping. They’re still very conventional, but they’ve become more interested after seeing what cover crops have done for us—the fact that we’re organic, our plants are healthy, and our yields are good—without having to put down chemical fertilizers.”

“We’re a bit far away from the university, so it makes it harder to collaborate, but we’ve told them to call us whenever they do variety trials. We have lots of ideas and have trialed a bunch of different crops.”

His best advice for new farmers? Perseverance.

“There are times I’ve definitely wanted to just throw in the towel. But in the end, things work out. You talk to people, figure out the problems. Each year it gets better, but you’ll still have setbacks, like the weather for us this year. Know that while nothing is static, each year you’ll be able to build on your experience.”

By |2025-12-18T11:47:59-05:00December 17th, 2025|Farmer Stories, News|

Lessons from the Plains on the Transition to Organic

A Farmer Panel recap from the Transitioning to Organic Farming Conference at the Eastern Nebraska Research, Extension, and Education Center in Ithaca, NE

By Brian Geier, OFRF Communications Manager.

“I used to write checks to chemical companies. Now I write them to my kids,” explains Tom Schwarz, a 5th-generation farmer from southern Nebraska, while discussing the advantages of organic production. The Schwarz Family Farm has been farming organically since transitioning the farm in 1988. Along with his wife and two kids, Tom raises corn, soybeans, wheat, field peas, alfalfa, oats, and numerous cover crops. He was speaking at the Transition to Organic Farming Conference hosted by the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, alongside two other organic farmers. 

As may be the case for many farmers in rural Nebraska, farming is not new to any of the organic farmers on this particular panel. Each spoke with a familiarity and vocabulary that comes with decades of experience. All three of them are from families who are farming hundreds or thousands of acres, some owned, many rented, in various stages of leases. And all of them had, at some point in the past few decades, switched a portion of their farming enterprises to certified organic production. For these farmers, who carry on family legacies of farming that survived the farm crises of the 1970s and 80s, organic is, among other things, a way to survive. It is also a path toward passing a farm operation onto the next generation that is better, safer, and more profitable than when they started. 

No-till, organic corn at Young Family Farm in Nebraska. Photo credit: Barry Young, farmer-presenter on the “Organic Production: Nebraska Growers’ Perspectives” panel. 

Like most farming, organic is not all easy. Tom presented what he sees as the disadvantages of organic: it is management-intensive (more machinery passes per season), requires extra recordkeeping, and WEEDS (emphasis via capitalization added from Tom’s presentation). “It’s just plain harder,” he explained, citing the need to be able to adapt on the fly and to creatively problem solve.

Matt Adams, who started farming with his dad in 2016 and operates about 600 acres in Seward, Nebraska, also spoke on the panel. He agreed that there can be difficulties with the transition to organic, particularly with having machinery settings or setups needed for larger-scale grain production. “Get everything ready way before,” he warns, “so the day you need to be out there, you’re ready.” 

Matt transitioned non-irrigated land that was previously in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) to organic hay and row crops. Since the land was in CRP, the land had no prohibited substances applied to it, and it was ready to certify, meaning he did not have to steward the land through the three-year transition period to organic. But since the land had not been fertilized or cultivated, Matt is finding that yields have been low and weed pressure high, putting extra strain on the need for timely, effective cultivation setups. 

When addressing challenges, the number one source of information for organic farmers is other farmers. And Nebraska’s organic farmers on this panel are no exception. 

“I do have some original thoughts. But I always throw them to the wolves first,” explains Barry Young, the third panelist who operates Young Family Farm in southeast Nebraska. “I should call it ‘Young Community Farm’”, he chuckles, giving credit to past mentors that first taught him about polyculture planting, and acknowledging fellow farmers and family members that he discusses ideas with before trying them. Barry finds that sourcing inputs is one of his biggest challenges. Despite living in farm country, “No one around me was doing what I’m doing,” he said. Still, by persistently asking questions of fellow organic and regenerative farmers, who he finds are more apt to share knowledge than many conventional growers, he has learned to meet main challenges like developing inter-species planting mixes for weed control. 

Organic farmer Barry Young explains his polyculture planting mix for organic wheat, which includes a custom mix of 120 pounds of wheat with 2 pounds of radish and 3 pounds of flax. The flax, a legume, helps enhance the soil microbiome while the radish helps break compaction especially following alfalfa. Both winterkill and the wheat matures as a pure stand for harvest the next season.

Earthworms and good soil structure in a November cover crop at Young Family Farm.

A high biomass (10-ton per acre) pea/oat cover crop following no-till corn planting at Young Family Farm

Corn grows with a soil-building mix in wheat stubble at Young Family Farm.

Secondary roots on organic, no-till corn at six weeks post-emergence at Young Family Farm.

“This is the way we’re intended to farm.”

-Nebraska organic farmer

All three of the farmers spoke about several advantages of organic production, too. One described lying down in a field, observing the increase in bug and bird life following the switch away from pesticides, and thinking, “This is the way we’re intended to farm.” 

Other advantages cited include organic’s market stability, and the regional control and accountability within the market chains. With organic grain production, many farmers are selling niche crops to regional processors who are then selling food back to the community. This creates a market and economy that farmers form long-term relationships with, and it stands in contrast to the volatility and lack of accountability from larger, conventional commodity crop markets where crops are shipped out of state or country for processing. It is “consumer-based as opposed to commodity-based,” Tom points out. 

But ultimately, for Tom and others on the panel, it is about their farms’ future, and that is about the quality of life of the next generation. Today, there are challenges with organic, for sure, but farming has been a difficult profession for generations of Nebraskans. With organic production as at least a part of the farm, Tom feels he is creating something that will be passed on to the next generation and be better than what he inherited. Aside from now being a paid part of the organic operation, Tom notes that “The kids will not be exposed to chemicals like I was,” adding, matter-of-factly, “that’s the biggest reason I do it.”

For Plains farmers interested in learning more about the USDA’s National Organic Program, we encourage you to explore resources and upcoming events hosted by the region’s Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP). You may also want to explore OFRF’s step-by-step guides, printable tools, and farmer experiences to help you access USDA programs and funding, such as the NRCS’s Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and the RMA’s Whole-Farm Revenue Protection (WFRP) program.

By |2025-12-16T15:07:47-05:00December 16th, 2025|News|

Something to be Grateful For: Northeastern State Secretaries of Agriculture Send Letter to Secretary Rollins about OREI

Written by Vinnie Trometter and Gordon Merrick of OFRF’s Policy Team

Before we all rushed to our dinner tables for Thanksgiving, we at the Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF), organic agriculture researchers, and organic farmers were thankful for actions taken by several state capitols across the country. On November 20th, the state secretaries of agriculture from Connecticut, Delaware, and New Jersey joined Pennsylvania Secretary Redding to submit a letter to the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, requesting unreleased FY2025 funding for the Organic Agriculture Research Extension Initiative (OREI) be included on top of new fiscal year funds for the program in FY2026.

OFRF’s policy team spurred this effort because we wanted to make sure that state departments of agriculture were aware that their land-grant universities did not have an opportunity to apply for the largest organic research program under USDA despite it being a permanent and mandatory program under the Farm Bill. OREI represents $50 million out of the $72.5 million which USDA dedicates to answering organic farmer’s questions each year. However, USDA did not release an RFA for the program for FY25, resulting in zero awards being given out. Consequently, researchers have endured disruptions in the continuation of their work and in the delayed study of organic topics that focus on many new and emerging issues facing organic farmers.

OREI recipients are overwhelmingly agriculture researchers at land-grant universities who develop projects in partnership with working certified-organic farms. These projects are critical steps towards finding ways to unlock organic producers’ ability to be more productive and better market their goods. The need for programs that study organic productivity and supply chains is becoming increasingly important because the U.S. has a spiraling organic trade deficit and has lost more than 16% of its certified acreage since 2021. Yet at the same time, domestic demand for organically produced goods grew 5.2% last year, more than double the rate of the overall marketplace.

Shortly after the release of this letter, OFRF received word from USDA that FY2026 OREI funding will include all of FY2025’s monies, which is an outcome we are very thankful for. State-level advocacy is an important and effective strategy that OFRF uses to inform federal officials about the localized impacts of federal policy.

We encourage organic farmers, researchers, and stakeholders to engage with their state representatives, senators, and departments of agriculture to amplify their challenges and successes as it comes to deployment of federal funds targeting organic agriculture research topics.

If you want to read more blogs like this, sign up for our newsletter here; if you want to take a next step in engaging with the policy process at a local, state, or federal level, sign up for our free, email-based Communicating with Legislators course!

Eat well and breathe deep,

Vinnie and Gordon

By |2025-12-09T09:02:15-05:00December 5th, 2025|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

Farmer-Led Trials Program Spotlight: Oxbow Farm and Conservation Center

Investigating Seeding Rate of Cover Crops for Biomass and Nutrient Content

Written by Mary Hathaway, OFRF’s Research & Education Program Manager, and Anthony Reyes, FLT Program participant

Anthony Reyes, FLT Program Participant. Photo credit Washington Soil Health Initiative, https://washingtonsoilhealthinitiative.com/2025/02/soil-health-ambassador-anthony-reyes-cover-crops/

Oxbow Farm & Conservation Center is a nonprofit farm in the floodplains of Snoqualmie Valley, WA. Anthony Reyes, the Agricultural Program Manager, manages 81 acres of certified organic land by experimenting and trialing climate adaptive and resilient agricultural practices. Along with his team, he works to reconcile our expanding human needs and the health of our ecosystem through sustainable agriculture, thoughtful management of our forests, ecological restoration, and education.

Oxbow Farm cultivates a variety of different crops well suited to the Snoqualmie Valley floodplain, and maintains a crop rotation to allow the soil to recover and regenerate. Anthony strategically removes fields from production each year and leaves them fallowed in cover crop to help protect the watershed, build up nutrients, and manage weeds, pests, and diseases.

Finding a Cover Crop that Works

Anthony was interested in understanding how to find a cover crop that would meet the needs of the farm – managing climatic challenges, erosion, and weed pressure. Ideally, anything that would be planted would help add biomass and could withstand drought conditions. Manipulating the seeding rate of the cover crops had been one way that the farm had considered better coverage of the soil, and Anthony was curious if the recommended seeding rate was the right density for their soil.

Farm Trial Plan

A portion of the cover cropped trial field.

With technical support from OFRF, Anthony is investigating the impact of seeding rate on biomass and nutrient content for German Foxtail, Pearl Millet, and Sudex cover crops. He will plant single varieties at two different seeding rates: the recommended rate and 25% above the recommended drilling rate.

The trial was arranged in  a randomized complete block design, with 24 rows, each 100’ x 10’ wide, with 1’ pathways and borders on outside rows. Each of the 4 replications contained  6 plots (3 varieties at 2 different seeding rates), for a total of 24 plots.

Measurements were taken from a random 3×3’ quadrat from each plot, including a biomass and leaf tissue sample. These samples were sent to Ward Lab for analysis of biomass, nutrient content, dry matter, and C:N ratio of the crop matter.

Trial updates

The quadrat samples were taken in September and lab results were returned in late October. The OFRF team is now reviewing the data with Anthony, for a full report on how the trial went and findings from the data.

Trial fields at Oxbow Farm and Conservation Center

“I have long been interested in conducting and furthering our on-farm research, having worked on and set up many trials throughout my career. The Farmer-Led Trial Program goes beyond and centers the experience and voice of farmers by identifying us as the content experts and by playing a highly supportive and facilitative role in creating sound research from our identified goals. I have greatly valued the time and care given by OFRF staff and am so appreciative of this program.” 

– Anthony Reyes, Oxbow Farm and Conservation Center

An overhead drone shot of Oxbow Farm and Conservation Center

This is part of a series of blogs highlighting farmers who are participating in OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials program. Farmers receive technical support to address their production challenges through structured on-farm trials. To learn more about OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials Program, visit our website page at https://ofrf.org/research/farmer-led-research-trials/ 

To learn more about Oxbow Farm and Conservation Center, visit their website at https://www.oxbow.org/ 

By |2025-12-17T17:31:33-05:00December 2nd, 2025|Farmer Stories, News|

USDA NIFA Announces 2025 Organic Transitions Program Awards

November 20, 2025

This week USDA-NIFA announced seven new research project awards through the Organic Transitions Program (ORG), totaling over $6 million to support a better understanding of the processes of organic transition and the best ways to support farmers who are in that process.

Photo of electric weed control equipment from https://theweedzapper.oldschoolmanufacturing.com/electric-weed-control-organic-farms/

The ORG program funds research and extension work that help those farmers stay competitive during the transition process, while also strengthening our understanding of the ecological benefits related to organic production. This program prioritizes the development of educational tools for farmers, technical service providers, and extension to support a farm during the sometimes tumultuous transition process.

The awards announced are going to Land Grant Universities across the country, and taken together, these projects are tackling some of the most pressing challenges facing organic and transitioning farms. 

The projects represent a continued step towards supporting practical, farmer-focused science that will help more producers transition successfully to organic systems, maintain profitability, and meet growing consumer demand for organic food. 

They also highlight the continued importance of programs like ORG and the Organic Research and Extension Initiative in driving innovation across the organic sector and beyond. We are looking forward to the release of the FY26 OREI and ORG Notice of Funding Opportunities (NOFOs).

Want to stay in the know about opportunities for funding like this? Sign up for our newsletter.

By |2025-11-20T12:57:32-05:00November 20th, 2025|News|

OFRF Launches National Organic Farmer Survey to Shape the Future of Organic Agriculture

SANTA CRUZ, Calif., Nov. 19, 2025 — The Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF) has launched its 2025-2026 National Organic Farmer Survey, a nationwide effort to understand the challenges, priorities, and needs of organic and transitioning farmers. The survey will remain open through January 31, 2026, and will inform research, education, and policy decisions that directly impact the future of organic agriculture in the United States and across North America.

Since 1990, OFRF has worked to support the producers who grow the nation’s food and fiber. Farmer input is central to the organization’s work. Insights from previous surveys, including the 2022 National Organic Research Agenda (NORA), have guided farmer-led research projects, influenced university and Extension priorities, and helped policymakers direct more resources to organic producers.

“Organic farmers are experts in their fields, and their perspectives must guide decisions about agricultural research, education, and policy,” said Brise Tencer, executive director of OFRF. “This survey ensures that investments in the organic sector reflect the real needs of producers on the ground.”

The survey is open to all certified and in-transition organic farmers nationwide. Participation takes approximately 25 minutes, and upon completion, all respondents will receive a discount code to Johnny’s Selected Seeds and have the opportunity to enter to win prizes, including boots from The Original Muck Boot Company, FELCO pruners, and a farm consultation with a veteran organic farming expert.

Dr. Alex Woodley, associate professor in the Department of Crop and Soil Sciences at North Carolina State University, emphasizes the importance of this survey: “It’s important to make it clear that the surveys OFRF conducts on farmers’ needs are incredibly valuable. I’ve used the results to justify knowledge gaps in my grants, and that’s been really important. Getting a pulse on what farmers need right now is something we don’t always know—especially because I’m in research, not full Extension—so these surveys have been really important to me.”

Farmers can access by emailing communications[at]ofrf.org. The survey is available in English and Spanish, and paper copies are available upon request. The 2022 NORA report, which shares the findings from the most recent survey, can be found at www.ofrf.org/research/nora/.

– end – 

About Organic Farming Research Foundation

The Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF), headquartered in Santa Cruz, California, with a remote team based across the U.S., works to foster the improvement and widespread adoption of organic farming systems. OFRF cultivates organic research, education, and federal policies that bring more farmers and acreage into organic production. For more information about OFRF, please visit our website: www.ofrf.org.

 

Media Contact

Ashley Dulaney, Communications Director, OFRF
ashley[at]ofrf.org, ‪(518) 310-6771‬‬
P.O. Box 440, Santa Cruz, CA 95061

Photo in featured image: Claire Lichtenfels, Whitestone Mountain Orchard in Tonasket, WA

By |2025-11-19T14:04:05-05:00November 19th, 2025|News, Press Release|

Advancing Organic Agriculture: Examining How to Make the Midwest a Center of Organic Oat and Buckwheat Production with Congressman Scott Fitzgerald

Different buckwheat flour formulations are being tested by evaluating different milling techniques. This photo shows light (left) vs. dark (right) buckwheat flours, which have different flavor and texture properties.

By Dr. Nicole Tautges with support from Vinnie Trometter, OFRF Policy Manager

As the Research Director of the Michael Fields Agricultural Institute in Wisconsin, I recently had the opportunity to meet with Congressman Scott Fitzgerald’s (R-WI-05) staff to discuss how the Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative (OREI) program supports our research developing markets and supply chains for Midwestern organic oat and buckwheat producers.

Growing Small Grains for Big Impact

Carbohydrates make up about 75% of the calories in a typical diet, with most of those carbohydrate calories coming from grains. However, grains have received very little attention in terms of origins/sourcing, health benefits, quality factors, and organic share of consumption. Even for basic grain items like wheat flour, few consumers know where their flour comes from, or the differences among grains other than wheat.

This is where organic oat and buckwheat come in. Not only can these grains replace wheat for many uses but they are also more nutritious and excel in organic crop rotations. Our research focuses on how the Midwest can become a center of oat and buckwheat production in the United States. There is much work to do considering most of the oat and buckwheat consumed in the country is imported. However, there is no reason why these grains cannot be grown right here in the Midwest if the right markets and supply chains are in place.

Our research seeks to accomplish this by highlighting the nutritional and crop rotation benefits while building the knowledge and supply chains needed to make these grains more widely available. We do this by organizing focus groups with farmers and other grain supply chain actors to understand what the problems are, and design research trials to address management knowledge constraints.

Oat variety trial—different oat varieties that are currently available are being tested in organic production environments (oats are typically not bred under organic conditions, and can perform differently in organic production systems).

Our trials cover all segments of the oat and buckwheat supply chain. On the grower side, we intend to perform organic fertility trials to improve nutrient recommendations for growers. For example, we are testing no-till establishment of spring oats, which helps ensure earlier planting and higher-quality food-grade oats. We have also completed a trial that demonstrates buckwheat can be planted after small grain harvest in the same season, with enough time to produce a harvestable crop. On the processing side, we are performing milling and processing trials with oats and buckwheat. Lastly, we are performing product testing with consumers, to better understand consumer preferences and to provide guidance to organic grain millers.

Collaboration and Networking are Key to Success

We are collaborating on this project with partners such as Dr. Jacob Jungers at the University of Minnesota, the Artisan Grain Collaborative, Rooster Milling in East Troy, WI, and several dedicated organic farmers across the Upper Midwest.

To share our results, we host field days, present at grower conferences, give webinars, and post videos on YouTube and Facebook. These efforts ensure that both farmers and consumers can see what’s happening and why it matters.

Support from the Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative (OREI) has been fundamental for us. OREI is one of the few USDA programs that consistently supports organic research, which has often been neglected compared to conventional agriculture, despite rising consumer demand for agrochemical-free food.

Sharing Organic Research with Midwest Policymakers

It is important now more than ever to communicate to our legislators how organic agriculture research plays out on the ground. Agricultural science can feel abstract and difficult to understand for those outside the field. And let’s be honest—scientists aren’t always the best communicators! By sharing names, faces, and stories from real farms, we help policymakers connect research to human impact in their districts.

Buckwheat is a pseudocereal and a staple grain of northeastern Europe. It is actually in the rhubarb family! It has a pyramidal shaped grain (the dark brown part of the flower as seen above) that can be milled into flour, or dehulled and the “groat” eaten in porridge or granola.

I feel confident that I connected human impact with our research when I spoke with Congressman Fitzgerald’s staff. I deeply appreciated how receptive his office was to learning about innovative farming practices happening right here in the 1st Wisconsin Congressional District and across the Midwest. With so many demands on their time, it meant a lot to see agriculture innovation recognized as important.

I’m incredibly grateful to the Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF) for facilitating this meeting. Without their support, I wouldn’t have had the chance to share our stories directly with lawmakers.

Looking ahead, whether it be research trials or policymaker conversations, our work is about building bridges—between farms and markets, between science and consumers, and between research and policy. Oats and buckwheat may be small grains, but they represent a big opportunity for healthier diets, more resilient farming systems, and stronger local food economies in the Midwest.

Use Your Voice

Interested in sharing your research with legislators and the importance of continued public investment in organic research? Enroll in OFRF’s self-paced email course, Communicating with Legislators. This free, educational workshop is designed to equip researchers within the organic farming community with the tools and resources they need to effectively engage with and educate policymakers about the impact of their work.

Dr. Nicole Tautges

By |2025-11-11T10:09:01-05:00November 10th, 2025|News|

How OFRF is Building Bipartisan Support for Organic Research Programs in Congress

Written by Vinnie Trometter and Gordon Merrick

As we alluded in last month’s Policy Corner, there is some semblance of good news legislatively regarding OFRF’s policy priorities!  Reps. Eugene Vindman (D-VA-07) and Mike Lawler (R-NY-17) introduced OFRF’s flagship marker bill, the Organic Science and Research Investment (OSRI) Act in the House of Representatives with broad sector support. With a companion bill already introduced in the Senate by Sens. Fetterman (D-PA) and Schiff (D-CA), this legislation is now introduced in both chambers.

At its core, the OSRI Act is about finally investing in the research capacity needed to keep pace with a fast-growing organic sector. This bill would:

  • Increase funding for the only two USDA research programs dedicated to organic research: the Organic Research and Extension Initiative (OREI) and the Organic Transitions Program (ORG).
  • Direct USDA’s Research, Education, and Economics (REE) mission area to catalog existing organic research and recommend pathways to expand the work.
  • Charge the USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) to examine the economic impact of organic agriculture on rural and urban communities.
  • Continue the growth of the Organic Data Initiative, ensuring robust market and production data remains available to farmers, businesses, researchers, and policymakers.

Taken together, these provisions would strengthen the scientific foundation of organic agriculture, ensure farmers have access to regionally relevant research, and support a new generation of scientists committed to agroecological approaches.

Bipartisan By Design

The bipartisan approach we are pursuing is an intentional attempt to communicate that the growth of the organic agriculture sector is a national priority, not a partisan project, and we aim to have the cosponsor list reflect that reality.

While quiet support for organic agriculture does exist across both parties, public leadership on organic issues has historically been stronger among Democrats. That’s shifting. Interest in soil health, regenerative systems, and farmer-driven innovation is growing in Republican circles, but many offices prefer to see key agricultural interests and members support policies before they cosponsor legislation.

This strategy is especially important because the House introduction occurred at the outset of what has become the longest federal government shutdown in U.S. history. In an environment where basic governing has become difficult, moving new legislation requires patience, persistence, and a fundamentally nonpartisan posture. That is exactly how OFRF operates, and we are here to meet this moment.

Moving Forward

Because of the current political landscape exacerbated by the current shutdown, Farm Bill 2.0 discussions have slowed to a standstill. But this pause also creates space. As Congress turns back toward core Farm Bill negotiations in the coming months, the OSRI Act is well-positioned to gain traction, especially if organic research is understood as an economic development and competitiveness package rather than a niche priority.

That’s why your outreach matters.

Over the coming months, OFRF will continue to share targeted district-level information, elevate producer voices, and build bipartisan support so that organic research is properly valued, and fully funded, in the next Farm Bill. Check out our Communicating with Legislators course and reach out to us to get started!

OFRF and our allies are continuing to meet with Congressional offices to highlight how organic research delivers tangible benefits to farmers through practical tools to strengthen on farm resilience, expanded market opportunities, and rural economic revitalization.

At a moment when the organic sector is the fastest growing segment of U.S. agriculture, the need for its fair share of research investments has never been clearer. Farmers are on the front lines of climate disruption and supply-chain volatility, and organic research projects have actively provided methods to help them continue to thrive.

When the tide rises for organic research, all producers benefit.

Stay tuned for more, and thanks for being in this work with us.

Vinnie and Gordon

By |2025-11-05T13:00:46-05:00November 5th, 2025|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|

Funding On-Farm Innovation: SARE Farmer/Rancher Grants

By Gordon Merrick, Policy Program Director at OFRF

Versión en español a continuación.

At the Organic Farming Research Foundation, we’ve seen firsthand that some of the most meaningful innovation happens on working farms, not just research plots. When farmers take the lead in experimenting and observing what works on their land, they build confidence, share new knowledge, and drive progress across the organic movement. That’s the spirit behind our Farmer-Led Trials Program—and the reason why we’re excited to release a new toolkit to help producers who utilize organic farming systems to access the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) Farmer/Rancher Grant Program.

SARE provides direct funding for producers to test ideas and share solutions with their communities. This toolkit is designed to make that process more accessible than ever for organic and transitioning-to-organic producers.

What Is the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program?

A farmer leans down in a field with a clip board, conducting research.The SARE Farmer/Rancher Grant Program is a competitive grant program that provides funding to producers who have designed their own research projects and teams. This program aims to award funding to projects that address real-world, on-farm challenges and include both research and outreach components.

Farmers and ranchers apply as the Principal Investigator and work with Technical Advisors, like Extension agents, university researchers, or nonprofit organizations. Together, they run projects lasting one to three years, testing new practices while sharing their findings with others.

The 2026 Call for Proposals was recently released and offers a funding limit of $15,000-35,000 for projects, depending on your region! 

For farms in the SARE Western Region

(Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming)

  • Up to $35,000 of funding available for 1-3 year projects. 
  • The submission deadline is Noon (12 pm Mountain Time) on November 20, 2025, and projects must start between May and October of 2026. Learn more and apply here.

For farms in the SARE North Central Region

(North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio)

  • Up to $15,000 of funding for individuals, and up to $30,000 for teams, available for 23 month projects. 
  • The submission deadline is 4 pm Central Time on December 4, 2025. Learn more and apply here.

For farms in the SARE Southern Region

(Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands)

  • Up to $20,000 of funding for individuals, and up to $25,000 for teams, available for 2 year projects. 
  • The submission deadline is Noon (12 pm Eastern Time) on December 5, 2025. Learn more and apply here.

Why Does SARE Matter for Organic and Transitioning-To-Organic Producers?

Organic producers have long been at the forefront of innovation, whether experimenting with cover cropping strategies, biological pest and disease controls, diversified rotations, or the interaction of all of these different practices.

Research shows that farmers benefit greatly when they lead on-farm research trials at their farms. Conducting your own research allows you to address your farm-specific questions and has historically supported the adoption and innovation of sustainable agricultural practices worldwide.

Programs like SARE’s Farmer/Rancher Grant Program give farmers the opportunity to test what works under real conditions on their farms and ensure that knowledge benefits others in their communities.

The outreach component required by the program guarantees that the benefits extend beyond a single farm. For operations transitioning to organic certification, this grant offers a valuable chance to research how best to manage that transition, making it easier for others to follow suit.

How To Get Started With a SARE Proposal

Our new toolkit walks you through the process, from project idea to submission, offering resources and general guidance tailored to organic operations. There are five primary steps:

  • Define Your Project Idea. Think about a real challenge on your farm. Use the SARE project database to make sure you’re not repeating a funded study, and ask how the project will improve sustainability for more than just your farm.
  • Build Your Team. In the Western region, a Technical Advisor is required, ideally this is a preexisting relationship with an Extension agent, university researcher, or a non-profit organization. In the North Central and Southern regions, you can apply as an individual farm, or as part of a group of multiple farms.
  • Design the Research and Outreach. Outline your methods, timeline, budget, and outreach plan. Use our free guidebook, Farmers Guide to Conducting On-Farm Research, to support you at every step of this process.
  • Submit Your Application Before Your Region’s Deadline. The best way to avoid any technical difficulties is to submit your application earlier than the deadline, and to make sure you have an active account on their platform!
  • Conduct Your Research and Share What You Learn. If awarded, you’ll conduct the research you’ve outlined and then report results, host outreach activities, and help build the region’s body of applied research and connected producers.

SARE In Action

Across the country, past SARE-funded projects have examined a wide range of topics. In the western region, a few funded projects look at organic pest control in pastured pork production and varroa mite management for beekeepers in Hawaii. These are tangible, farmer-driven projects that answer real questions and create resilient resources others can use—exactly the kind of work this grant aims to support.

Farmer-led research isn’t just a nice idea; it is essential for advancing organic production systems that are resilient, profitable, and rooted in ecological stewardship. With this toolkit and the updated SARE Farmer/Rancher Grant Program, we hope you’ll see a clear path to turning your ideas into action.

When good ideas aren’t kept bottled up, but are spread and shared abundantly within communities, that’s when real change happens.

All of this information is summarized in a printable, downloadable PDF.

visual of the first page of a SARE flyer made by OFRF
visual of the second page of a SARE flyer made by OFRF

Fondos para proyectos de innovación en la granja: becas de SARE para agricultores / ganaderos

En la Fundación de Investigación de Agricultura Orgánica (Organic Farming Research Foundation), hemos visto de primera mano que algunas de las innovaciones más significativas ocurren en granjas en funcionamiento, no solo en parcelas de investigación. Cuando los agricultores toman la iniciativa de experimentar y observar lo que funciona en sus tierras, generan confianza, comparten nuevos conocimientos e impulsan el progreso en todo el movimiento orgánico. Ese es el espíritu detrás de nuestro Programa de Ensayos Dirigidos por Agricultores, y la razón por la que estamos entusiasmados de lanzar un nuevo conjunto de herramientas para ayudar a los productores que utilizan sistemas de agricultura orgánica a acceder al Programa de becas para agricultores/ganaderos de Investigación y Educación en Agricultura Sostenible (SARE).

SARE proporciona fondos directos para que los productores prueben ideas y compartan soluciones con sus comunidades. Este kit de herramientas está diseñado para hacer que ese proceso sea más accesible que nunca para los productores orgánicos y en transición a orgánicos.

¿Qué es el Programa de Investigación y Educación sobre Agricultura Sostenible?

A farmer leans down in a field with a clip board, conducting research.El Programa de Becas para Agricultores/Ganaderos de SARE es un programa de becas competitivo que proporciona fondos a los productores que han diseñado sus propios proyectos y equipos de investigación. Este programa tiene como objetivo otorgar fondos a proyectos que abordan desafíos del mundo real en la granja e incluyen componentes de investigación y divulgación.

Los agricultores y ganaderos se postulan como Investigador Principal y trabajan con Asesores Técnicos, como agentes de extensión, investigadores universitarios u organizaciones sin fines de lucro. Juntos, ejecutan proyectos que duran de uno a tres años, probando nuevas prácticas mientras comparten sus hallazgos con otros.

¡La Convocatoria de Propuestas 2026 se publicó recientemente y ofrece un límite de financiamiento de $15,000-35,000 por proyecto, dependiendo de la región!

Para granjas en la región occidental de SARE

(Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawái, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Nuevo México, Oregón, Utah, Washington y Wyoming)

  • Hasta $35,000 de financiación para proyectos de 1 a 3 años.
  • La fecha límite de presentación es el mediodía (12 pm hora de la montaña) del 20 de noviembre de 2025, y los proyectos deben comenzar entre mayo y octubre de 2026. Obtenga más información y presente su solicitud aquí.

Para granjas en la región central norte de SARE

(Dakota del Norte, Dakota del Sur, Nebraska, Kansas, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio)

Para granjas en la región sur de SARE

(Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Florida, Carolina del Sur, Carolina del Norte, Virginia, Puerto Rico y las Islas Vírgenes de EE. UU.)

¿Por qué es importante SARE para productores orgánicos y en transición a orgánicos?

Los productores orgánicos han estado durante mucho tiempo a la vanguardia de la innovación, ya sea experimentando con estrategias de cultivos de cobertura, controles biológicos de plagas y enfermedades, rotaciones diversificadas o la interacción de todas estas prácticas diferentes.

La investigación muestra que los agricultores se benefician enormemente cuando lideran ensayos de investigación en sus granjas. Realizando su propia investigación le permite abordar sus preguntas específicas de la granja e históricamente ha apoyado la adopción e innovación de prácticas agrícolas sostenibles en todo el mundo.

Programas como el Programa de Becas para Agricultores/Ganaderos de SARE brindan a los agricultores la oportunidad de probar lo que funciona en condiciones reales en sus granjas y garantizar que el conocimiento beneficie a otros en sus comunidades.

El componente de divulgación requerido por el programa garantiza que los beneficios se extiendan más allá de una sola granja. Para las operaciones que hacen la transición a la certificación orgánica, esta beca ofrece una valiosa oportunidad para investigar la mejor manera de gestionar esa transición, lo que facilita que otros sigan su ejemplo.

Cómo empezar con una propuesta de SARE

Nuestro nuevo kit de herramientas lo guía a través del proceso, desde la idea del proyecto hasta la presentación, ofreciendo recursos y orientación general adaptados a las operaciones orgánicas. Hay cinco pasos principales:

  • Defina su idea de proyecto. Piense en un verdadero desafío en su granja. Utilice la base de datos del proyecto SARE para asegurarse de que no está repitiendo un estudio financiado y pregunte cómo el proyecto mejorará la sostenibilidad para algo más que su granja.
  • Construya su equipo. En la región occidental, se requiere un Asesor Técnico, idealmente se trata de una relación preexistente con un agente de Extensión, investigador universitario o una organización sin fines de lucro.
  • Diseñar la investigación y la divulgación. Describa sus métodos, cronograma, presupuesto y plan de divulgación. Utilice nuestra guía gratuita Guía Para Agricultores: Cómo Realizar Investigación en Su Campo para apoyarle en cada paso de este proceso
  • Envíe su solicitud antes de la fecha límite de su región. La mejor manera de evitar cualquier dificultad técnica es enviar su solicitud antes de la fecha límite y asegurarse de tener una cuenta activa en su plataforma.

Realice su investigación y comparta lo que aprende. Si se le otorga, llevará a cabo la investigación que ha descrito y luego informará los resultados, organizará actividades de divulgación y ayudará a construir el cuerpo de investigación aplicada y productores conectados de la región.

SARE en acción

En todo el país, los proyectos anteriores financiados por SARE han examinado una amplia gama de temas. En la región occidental, algunos proyectos financiados analizan el control orgánico de plagas en la producción de carne de cerdo de pastoreo y el manejo de ácaros varroa para apicultores en Hawái. Estos son proyectos tangibles impulsados por agricultores que responden preguntas reales y crean recursos resilientes que otros pueden usar, exactamente el tipo de trabajo que esta beca pretende apoyar.

Conclusión

La investigación dirigida por agricultores no es solo una buena idea; Es esencial para avanzar en sistemas de producción orgánica que sean resilientes, rentables y arraigados en la administración ecológica. Con este kit de herramientas y el Programa de Becas para Agricultores/Ganaderos de SARE actualizado, esperamos que vea un camino claro para convertir sus ideas en acción.

Cuando las buenas ideas no se mantienen reprimidas, sino que se difunden y comparten abundantemente dentro de las comunidades, es cuando ocurre el cambio real.

Toda esta información se resume en un PDF imprimible y descargable.

first page of a SARE info flyer created by OFRF in Spanish
visual of the second page of a SARE flyer made by OFRF

By |2025-11-11T15:43:28-05:00October 30th, 2025|News, TOPP West|

The Organic Science and Research Investment Act: What It Is and How It Benefits All Farmers

By Gordon Merrick, OFRF Policy Program Director

Ensuring that there are sufficient research resources for organic producers is central to OFRF’s mission and represents the backbone of a resilient food system. That’s why we’re proud to announce that we have led the development of a letter urging Congress to include the Organic Science and Research Investment (OSRI) Act in the next Farm Bill, just introduced this month by Representatives Eugene Vindman (D-VA-07) and Mike Lawler (R-NY-17). This bill provides substantial support and funding for agricultural research programming that benefits all farmers, from those certified organic, transitioning to organic farming, and those who are not certified. The bipartisan introduction of the OSRI Act builds on the collaborative work with Senator John Fetterman’s (D-PA) and Senator Alex Schiff’s (D-CA) offices to introduce this bill in the Senate earlier this year.

What Is the Organic Science and Research Investment Act?

The OSRI Act would strategically identify and expand the USDA’s investments into organic research and data programs. Key provisions include:

  • Coordinating and Expanding Organic Research Initiative – Directs USDA’s Research, Education, and Economics agencies to catalog and strengthen organic research, ensuring coordination and growth across programs.
  • Increased funding for Organic Research and Extension Initiative (OREI) – Steps up funding from $60 million in 2026 to $100 million by 2031, while expanding priorities to include climate change, organic alternatives to prohibited substances, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge.
  • Authorization of Researching the Transition to Organic Program (RTOP) – Provides Congressional authorization for the RTOP, currently known as the Organic Transitions Research Program (ORG), with $10 million annually from 2026–27 and $12 million from 2028–31.
  • Doubling funding for the Organic Data Initiative (ODI) – $10 million over the life of the Farm Bill to improve data for risk management and market development, while directing ERS to conduct a comprehensive study of the economic impacts of organic agriculture.

These policies directly respond to the reality that organic agriculture currently represents over 6% of U.S. food sales and 15% of produce sales, yet the USDA’s investments into organic-applicable research are less than 2% of research budgets.  Importantly, organic agricultural research is applicable to all farm operations, while research into more efficient use of synthetic inputs, or compatibility of genetic engineering with chemistry applications can never apply to an organic farm.

How Does the OSRI Act Help All Farmers?

Investing in organic agriculture research isn’t just about advancing one production system; it’s about giving farmers across the United States the tools, knowledge, and resources to stay resilient in the face of a variety of consistent issues, from climate disruptions and volatile supply chains to rapidly changing market dynamics. While the OSRI Act focuses on organic systems, the innovations developed through these programs regularly spill over to the broader agricultural sector. From cover cropping to integrated pest management, organic innovations often set the stage for widespread adoption of ecologically sustainable and economically beneficial practices and systems. Ultimately, these investments empower farmers to make the right choices for their land and market opportunities.

Alongside this direct benefit to farmers through answering questions and addressing agronomic issues, this research funding also flows to the rural communities that host agricultural research stations. According to analysis done by the Economic Research Service, for every $1 invested into agricultural research, over $20 of economic benefit is triggered, both through the project work itself—which can be high-paying and not require an advanced degree—but also through the long-term gains in farm profitability and competitiveness that are the backbones of rural economies.

Broad Support for the OSRI Act Exists, You Can Help!

OFRF is joined by over 100 farms, businesses, and organizations from across the country in signing a letter urging the House Agriculture Committee to incorporate OSRI into the Farm Bill.  But there is always more we can do to ensure Congress understands the importance of this bill and the policies it represents.

You can help strengthen the future of agricultural research by:

Please reach out if you have any questions about how to get involved, we’re here to help! Contact gordon[at]ofrf.org

. . . . .

Support for the OSRI Act:

“Investing in organic agriculture research helps farmers and communities improve resiliency to both climate and supply chain disruption. These research programs build essential knowledge that empowers regionally appropriate organic programs to thrive. In turn, the benefits ripple across society by lifting rural communities, strengthening organic supply chains, and expanding healthy options for consumers.” – Renaud des Rosiers, Amy’s Kitchen

“The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition strongly endorses the Organic Science and Research Investment Act (OSRI Act). The OSRI Act makes meaningful investments in providing organic producers with the research and tools they need to continue to improve upon already resilient farming systems and meet the growing market demand for organic products. A boost in funding for scientific research and economic data and analysis within NIFA and ARS will support both organic and conventional agricultural producers so they can sustain and improve their operations while helping us reach meaningful solutions for the climate crisis.” – Nick Rossi, National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC)

“Research is critical to the growth of the organic sector, which is an extraordinarily important tool in mitigating the threats to health, biodiversity, and climate.”  – Jay Feldman, Beyond Pesticides

“Expanding American consumers’ access to healthy foods, free of synthetic pesticides, will significantly contribute to Making America Healthy Again. Organic agriculture remains the single best way to achieve this goal. Developing strong research and extension programs to support US organic agriculture are critical to the expansion of this important sector of our food economy.” – Matthew Grieshop, Grimm Family Center for Organic Production and Research at California Polytechnic State University

“Organic research is vital to maintain the backbone of critical agricultural efforts that help small-scale farmers and ensure that farming works for consumers as well.” – Colehour Bondera, Kanalani Ohana Farm

“Supporting the Organic Science and Research Investment Act means investing in soil health, the living foundation of organic farming and long-term sustainability.” – Karlin Warner, OneCert, Inc.

“We have heard time and time again from our local organic extension office that their organic extension agents serve more non-organic producers than they do already certified producers.  There is a lot of interest from non-organic producers in learning new and innovative ways to incorporate organic practices on their farms.  This reinforces what organic advocates have been suggesting for decades – that investments in organic research benefits ALL producers.” – Mike Dill, Organically Grown Company

“Strong, verifiable peer-reviewed research is needed to give organic farmers the tools that they need to be successful and competitive with sustainable organic cropping systems.   Funding research so that researchers, such as those in the American Society for Horticultural Science, can continue to develop innovative research-based solutions and technologies is critically important to farm success.” – Curt R Rom, American Society for Horticultural Science

By |2025-10-30T13:30:19-04:00October 27th, 2025|Gordon's Policy Corner, News|
Go to Top