Farmer Stories

Working with NRCS: April Joy Farm’s Story and Recommendations

Written by Rebecca Champagne, PhD, OFRF Conservation Scientist

OFRF is currently working with the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) on a cooperative agreement to help build institutional knowledge of NRCS staff and equip them to better support the unique needs of organic and transitioning-to-organic farmers across the country. As part of this work, we are helping tell the stories of organic farmers and their experiences working with NRCS. We hope other farmers can use this information to learn more about NRCS and feel inspired to pursue conservation programs for their farm. For more information regarding our cooperative agreement with the agency, please reach out to Rebecca Champagne, OFRF Conservation Scientist, at rebecca@ofrf.org.

Meet April Joy Farm

April Joy Farm is a 24-acre certified-organic farm located in Ridgefield, Washington, owned and operated by April and Brad Thatcher since 2006. The Thatchers run a diversified crop and livestock operation, growing organic vegetables, fruit, herbs, and flowers, as well as layer hens, cows, and goats. Some of the vegetables they grow include beets, cabbage, kale, greens, cucumbers, onions, tomatoes, and squash, among many others. The fruit they grow includes apples, plums, pears, and table grapes. April Joy Farm was also the first Pacific Northwest pork producer to receive the Animal Welfare approval, and while they no longer raise pigs, the farm’s logo was inspired by their former farm pig, Rosie.

“I have dedicated myself to caring for our precious soil and restoring relationships between agricultural lands and humans. I love farming because the work is fascinating, challenging, inspiring, and—let’s be real—I love to eat,” said April.

Over the last two decades, April Joy Farm has sold its produce to restaurants, grocers, and through a CSA. Currently, the majority of the farm products are distributed through Farm to Heart, April’s food justice initiative. 

Source: April Joy Farm

“Farm to Heart is a matchmaker – we connect farmers, families, and community partners to reduce food waste and create an equitable food system,” April described. The initiative buys from 22 area farms to make local, organic food available to families experiencing hunger while also paying farmers fairly.

April Joy Farm achieved USDA organic certification in 2007, just one year after the farm started. April wanted to become certified as soon as possible, saying, “I considered organic the baseline if I was going to farm. I wanted to be a responsible steward of the land. Yes, there were market value considerations, but that was secondary.”

When April started the farm, she found many opportunities to create a more functional operation, such as soil compaction, broken drainage tiles, and restoration of previously logged land. “I had the time, energy, and passion to do the work, but needed the financial support and technical assistance,” April said. This drive to be a steward of the land led April to pursue assistance from NRCS, whose various programs and technical assistance can help farmers implement conservation practices to improve their crops and land while conserving natural resources.

Working with NRCS

Source: April Joy Farm

April was “reading anything she could get her hands on” when she started farming, and came across NRCS and its conservation programs. She admits she was initially naive about how NRCS worked, including the agency’s processes and terminology, but was determined to do more conservation on the farm. She has since had 10 contracts with NRCS, starting back in 2009. She has utilized both the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP), with multiple practice standards and enhancements under each contract to help meet her conservation goals. 

“CSP has been valuable because we were already using baseline conservation methods, and now we can go above and beyond that.”

Under her current CSP contract, April is utilizing several conservation practices, including native hedgerows to provide a buffer against a neighboring conventional farm’s spray drift, fencing for rotational livestock grazing, cover crop mixes to build soil health, and a riparian forest buffer for low swale planting that filters and improves water quality and provides habitat for beneficial organisms.

April has seen many benefits from implementing various practices under her NRCS conservation contracts. The riparian forest buffer has resulted in stacked benefits, including habitat for native songbirds and beneficial insects, and shade that cools livestock in the summer. The fencing not only helps with rotational grazing, but also keeps deer out of the crops. She’s also gained an understanding of different native plant species and uses that knowledge to think about other places or situations across the farm that could benefit from them.

April credits the local NRCS staff she’s worked with over the years for much of the success of her involvement with the agency and her conservation contracts. “They all went above and beyond to support me and help me through the process, helping me fill out forms, visiting my farm, and clarifying different parts of the process,” she said. She admitted that the staff sometimes had learning curves about diversified organic operations and organic requirements, but gave them a lot of credit — “They wanted to learn and help me be successful. They met me where I was at.”

She’s currently working with Lisa Schuchman, Resource Conservationist for NRCS in Washington. When talking about her approach to working with organic farmers, Lisa said, “My standpoint and mode of planning is really listening to the farmer’s goals for their operation, thinking about what NRCS has to offer, and how to fit them together. I try to offer good customer service, be flexible, and follow the farmer’s lead where I can.”

Lessons and Recommendations

Even though April is now much more familiar with NRCS and the agency’s processes, she’s not sure she’d still be pursuing these conservation programs if it weren’t for the staff she’s worked with, due to the many parts of the application process and the fact that it can be difficult to fit some organic practices into existing NRCS Conservation Practice Standards (CPS). Crop rotations are complex and diversified at April Joy Farm. Cover crops are often overseeded or interseeded, and high seeding rates for multi-species mixes are used (for maximum biomass production). April found that her cover cropping practices sometimes do not match the specs for the cover crop practice standard. For example, she found that the forms for cover cropping were set up for monocultures or simpler rotations. “I’m using an 8-12-species cover crop mix, and not following a specific timeline of cover crop / disk / cash crop. I’m using methods like overseeding and interseeding, and the documentation was not set up for these more complex methods and smaller scale,” April said. This is why it was so important for Lisa to meet April where she was at with the scale and diversity of her farm and make the contracts work for her. Having an NRCS agent familiar with the complexities of April’s system has been helpful for April to utilize the current practice standard for cover cropping.

Source: April Joy Farm

April’s experiences with NRCS also taught her a lot about documentation. Each CPS has specific documentation needed to show NRCS that you’ve fulfilled the requirements of the practice standard, and this documentation may or may not be the same as the recordkeeping already required for organic certification. Understanding these documentation requirements before getting started with a practice standard, and seeing if your organic certification recordkeeping will fulfill it, is a good practice to successfully implement your NRCS contracts.

The lessons that April has learned offer valuable insights for other farmers interested in participating in federal support programs, and also highlight opportunities for NRCS to further enhance its processes and staff training. For farmers, aligning federal conservation programs with an organic production system can be a significant challenge. Organic farmers can benefit from more specialized support in meeting certification standards and finding service providers with organic expertise who can help them succeed. Through OFRF’s cooperative agreement with NRCS, we aim to work with the agency to streamline these connections and get more organic and transitioning-to-organic farmers involved in conservation programs that both reward them for practices they are likely already doing and build their operation’s resiliency even further. 

Lisa offered the following advice to other NRCS staff who may be new to working with organic producers: 

“They’re farmers too—I don’t see them any differently myself. They are growing food and want to take care of the land. Some approaches are non-traditional, but the goals are the same. NRCS is here to help people help the land. Treat them like any other farmer.”

When asked what she’d say to organic farmers who are considering pursuing NRCS conservation programs for the first time, April offered the following advice: 

“Do your homework ahead of time, and understand the process and costs involved. Make sure your contracts are aligned with your business and production model.”

She also recommends having a solid recordkeeping system and flagging for NRCS anything in your contracts that won’t work for an organic operation. April also stressed the importance of building relationships — “You really need to find the right partner at NRCS. Someone who is willing to go the extra mile and make it an effective partnership.”

Interested in NRCS Programs? Here Are a Few Helpful Resources

Source: April Joy Farm

If you’re a farmer considering applying for NRCS programs, here are some helpful links and tips to get started:

  • Explore NRCS programs & initiatives: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs-initiatives 
  • Connect with your local NRCS office to receive free technical assistance or to start developing a conservation plan: nrcs.usda.gov/contact
  • Know your eligibility. Farmers who are classified as beginning, limited-resource, socially disadvantaged, or veterans may qualify for higher reimbursement rates and advance payments.
  • Ask about the advance payment option early. This can be a game-changer for small farms with limited cash flow.

Download OFRF’s EQIP flyer and CSP flyer for more information on the federal funding programs, including eligibility and application details. Both resources are available in English and Spanish.

This case study was produced with support from the United States Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) under Cooperative Agreement No. FBC24CPT0013867. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USDA-NRCS.

All photos credit April Joy Farm.

By |2026-06-12T12:20:25-04:00June 4th, 2026|Farmer Stories, News|

Farmer-Led Trials Program Spotlight: Perkins’ Good Earth Farm

Tackling Aphids from the Inside Out: Nutrition, Sap Analysis, and Tomato Health

Written by Mary Hathaway, OFRF’s Research & Education Program Manager, and Dan Perkins, FLT Program participant

This project at Perkins’ Good Earth Farm will evaluate whether foliar nutrition can improve tomato health and reduce aphid pressure through proactive nutrient management. Results from this study will help organic vegetable growers better understand the impact of timing on aphid interventions.

Farmer Dan Perkins with a foliar sprayer.

Farmer Dan Perkins with his backpack sprayer.

Dan Perkins farms at Perkins’ Good Earth Farm, a certified organic, diversified vegetable operation that utilizes no-till, permanent deep-compost beds. Located in De Motte, Indiana, they grow produce and 18,000 bulbs of hardneck garlic for a 200 member CSA, on-farm stand, commercial kitchen, and local wholesale accounts.

In addition to their garlic focus, Dan has spent years refining his approach to high tunnel tomato production, guided by a commitment to proactive plant health management and ecological balance. His farm includes five high tunnels dedicated to tomato production, each featuring long east-west beds that support intensive, season-extended growing.

With an eye toward both soil health and market quality, Dan is invested in understanding the connection between plant nutrition and pest resilience. His work with sap analysis and customized foliar feeding reflects a broader vision: growing crops that are nutritionally robust, naturally resistant to pressure from pests, and consistently high in quality for his customers.

A Proactive Approach to Aphids

For many high tunnel tomato growers, aphids are a recurring and costly challenge. For Dan Perkins, the question has never simply been how to eliminate aphids, it’s been why are they there in the first place? Dan’s approach to pest management is rooted in plant physiology: the hypothesis that plants with well-balanced nutrition are inherently less attractive to aphids. Specifically, Dan has observed that plants with elevated free nitrates, which can signal nutritional imbalance, may be more susceptible to aphid colonization, as those compounds serve as a ready food source for the insects.

Dan has been exploring sap analysis as a proactive diagnostic tool, likening it to “blood work” for his tomato plants. Unlike standard soil or tissue tests, sap analysis captures a real-time snapshot of what nutrients are circulating within the plant, identifying imbalances before visible symptoms appear. Working with Advancing Eco Agriculture (AEA), Dan formulates customized foliar sprays based on sap analysis results that deliver chelated ions directly to plant tissue to rapidly correct deficiencies and support overall plant immunity.

This integrated approach of reading the plant, responding with precision, and then measuring the result, reflects Dan’s broader farming philosophy. Rather than reacting to pest outbreaks after the fact, he wants to understand the nutritional conditions that allow aphid populations to take hold, allowing him to intervene earlier and more intelligently.

On-Farm Trial Plan

This figure shows the randomized tomato plots being used in the trial.

With technical support from OFRF, Dan is conducting a randomized, replicated trial in his propagation house to investigate how the timing of sap analysis-guided foliar feeding affects aphid populations, yield, and tomato nutrient density. The trial uses 84 ‘Cuba Libre’ indeterminate slicer tomato plants arranged across two adjacent beds, with three treatment groups: a control (no foliar spray), an early spray (first application approximately two weeks post-transplant), and a late spray (first application at the economic threshold for aphid damage). Each treatment is replicated four times across plots of five plants each, with buffer plants sprayed with the early treatment to minimize drift between plots.

Sap samples will be collected before and after each foliar application across all treatment groups to track changes in plant nutrition and support the development of a predictive nutritional model. Aphid populations will be monitored weekly by a designated farm team member, using a consistent method of flagging representative infested leaves at the top, middle, and bottom of the three central plants in each plot. Yield will be tracked by marketable grade (A and B) and unmarketable categories. Fruit samples will be submitted for nutrient density analysis through an outside lab. The design also includes a built-in flexibility: if aphid pressure warrants a second spray in the early group, those plots can be converted to an “early + late” treatment, providing a practical real-world comparison of proactive versus threshold-based intervention.

Trial Updates

Tomatoes have been planted for Dan’s trial, and the second round of sap analysis has been conducted. Check back later in the season for the results!

Farmers at Perkins Good Earth farm plant tomatoes in a high tunnel.

Dan planted ‘Cuba Libre’ slicer tomato plants across two adjacent high tunnel beds.

“I applied for the FLT program to conduct research on specific production challenges on my farm. Additionally, being part of a cohort of other farmers sounded fun; farming can be lonely, so connecting with other similarly-minded farmers is important. Working with Mary and Heather has been like having my own research support team. They ensure I stay on task during the busy season and that my questions get answered in a rigorous and valid way.” 

– Dan Perkins, FLT Program Participant

A tomato plant with the label "buffer."

Two buffer plants are placed in between spray groups. 

This is part of a series of blogs highlighting farmers who are participating in OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials program. Farmers receive technical support to address their production challenges through structured on-farm trials. To learn more about OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials Program, visit our website page at https://ofrf.org/research/farmer-led-research-trials/ 

To learn more about Sap Testing visit ask.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/CV004

To learn more about Perkins’ Good Earth Farm visit perkinsgoodearthfarm.com/

By |2026-06-09T15:35:11-04:00May 29th, 2026|Farmer Stories, News|

Conservation at Work: Cover Cropping through CSP at Mora Mora Farm

By Clare Boland, Communications Manager

OFRF is currently working to increase farmer and community awareness of the federal funding opportunities available to organic and transitioning farms. As part of our work with the Northwest region of the USDA’s Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP), we’re spotlighting the experience of one farm—Mora Mora Farm in Oregon—that received funding and support through the Natural Resource Conservation Service’s Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP)

Their story offers a transparent look at what it’s really like to work with NRCS: the benefits, the obstacles, and the lessons they’ve learned. We hope other farmers can use their experience to navigate the process of applying for and implementing CSP contracts more easily.

Meet Mora Mora Farm

Catherine Nguyen bunches greens in a swiss chard field. Source: Emilie Chen

For Catherine Nguyen, a farmer in Troutdale, Oregon, the ethos of her farm is encompassed by the name, Mora Mora Farm, which means “slowly slowly.” After a busy season of farming, Catherine was catching up with a friend who had recently traveled to Madagascar. Her friend shared the phrase “mora mora,” which captured the pace of life there; instead of rushing, there was a culture of patience and contentment, acknowledging that all things take time. The phrase stayed with Catherine, so much so that when she started her own farm in 2018, she used it for the name. “[Farming] is an industry about high production,” Catherine said. “I know my tendency is to go, go, go. The name reminds me to take a moment to slow down.”

True to the sentiment that good things take time, Mora Mora Farm has been steadily growing over the years. Catherine began her farm as part of the East Multnomah Soil and Water Conservation District’s Headwaters Farm Business Incubator, a five-year program that provides land access, equipment, infrastructure, and business support for beginning farmers. After graduating, she moved her farm to a parcel of land being farmed collectively by previous Headwaters graduates. Today, Mora Mora Farm has one and a half acres in production with a diversity of 40 to 60 different crops, including Asian heritage varieties. Catherine considers her community-supported agriculture (CSA) model “the heart of the farm,” but also supplements the farm’s income by vending at the King Farmers Market, restaurant accounts, and nonprofit partnerships.

In May 2024, the farm obtained organic certification through the Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP). “We had been practicing organic since the start,” Catherine shared, but she decided to pursue certification to build trust with the customer base at the Portland Farmers’ Market. To her, organic farming is about “growing healthy food and feeling good about what you’re doing.” 

When it comes to growing her operation, Catherine cites other farmers as her greatest resource. “Everyone is so open and generous with their knowledge,” she said, and when facing specific challenges, “farmers in the region have usually already dealt with what I’m curious about.” A fellow farmer on her land is how Catherine first heard about the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP). CSP is a program administered by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) that compensates agricultural producers committed to increasing conservation on their farms. In 2024, Catherine started a contract to reduce soil compaction on her property through cover cropping.

Why CSP?

Catherine Nguyen tills her field with a BCSSource: Megan Clark

For Catherine, the CSP program presented an opportunity to get financial support for work she was already doing. CSP supports farmers by providing a minimum of $4,000 per year for a 5-year contract to install, maintain, or improve a conservation practice on their farm. One of the requirements of the Headwaters program is that any land that is not in production over the winter must be put in cover crop. “The practice was already instilled in my growing practices,” Catherine shared, but through the CSP program, she was able to get financial and technical support for it. “It’s an incredible program,” she added. “Every farmer wants to be growing food. They also want to be doing good things for the environment. But it’s costly to do both.” CSP helped bridge the gap between generating income and investing in conservation.

She emphasized that the financial component can’t be overstated; in an industry with razor-thin margins, choosing to seed a cover crop rather than another round of cash crop can feel like a “double loss” in the short term. But with CSP, that burden is reduced, making it easier to prioritize the overall health of the land for the long term.

Deciding on a Conservation Practice

After graduating from Headwaters and moving onto a new property, Catherine had to adjust to a new set of challenges. “Technically, I’m on a wetland, which makes water management key to this site.” Catherine has experienced issues like standing water, flooded aisles, and soil-borne diseases on her new land. When approaching NRCS, her primary focus was on determining how to best move water throughout the farm.

As part of the application process, applicants have a one-on-one consultation with an NCRS staff member to discuss resource management on their farm and determine which “enhancement,” or conservation strategy, will work best. After considering a few different strategies, she and her NRCS agent decided on “cover crop to minimize soil compaction (E340F).” Having living roots in soil can help mitigate excess water. “They kind of act as straws to pull water out of the soil and keep it moving,” she explained. Since she had utilized cover crops before, it “felt like an easy step into improving the soil.”

“I remember being surprised when I was looking at the enhancements online,” Catherine shared. “They were so detailed in a good way. It’s like this is the enhancement, and this is how you implement it. It’s very specific. They gave me a list of cover crops to choose from, and from there it was just me trying to decide, which ones do I want? Which ones are readily available in my area?”

Timeline

Catherine first heard about the CSP program in spring 2024 and was able to seed her first round of CSP-funded cover crop in October of that year. The first step was reaching out to her local NRCS office and reviewing her conservation options. After that, farmers need to register with the Farm Service Agency (FSA). Catherine was already in the system from utilizing other USDA programs. Her advice is to register sooner rather than later: “Once you’re in the system for NRCS or for FSA, everything becomes so much easier.”

Next, she worked with her NRCS agent to make sure she had all the required documents to begin her conservation work. Catherine said the biggest myth about working with NRCS is “the amount of paperwork.” “A lot of farmers hate doing admin, but it really is manageable.” She described the timeframe as about “a month of emailing going back and forth.” But after the documentation is complete, farmers can focus fully on farm work.

In terms of implementation, “the contract itself is so simple.” She was given a list of recommended cover crops, a designated amount of acreage, and a timeframe to complete the work by. “There’s not a lot of hoops to jump through,” she said. “[The Program] lets us actually be able to be out in the field and not be consumed by paperwork.” 

NRCS determines the payment amount per project, but after that, it “is up to the farmer to figure out where it gets distributed.” Farmers receive their project payments as lump sums per each tax year of the contract. Outside of purchasing the cover crop seed, Catherine used the CSP payments to cover the labor costs of the project. Having the CSP funds allowed her “a little bit more wiggle room to have my employee do [the work] versus me.

That fall, an NRCS agent came out to Mora Mora farm to do a site visit and assess how the project was going. Catherine received her first reimbursement payment later that year.

Doing CSP on Leased Land

Accessing farmland is increasingly cited as a barrier for beginning farmers. Young farmers, like Catherine, often will lease land rather than buying. The land she currently farms is shared with several other farm businesses. When Catherine first considered an NRCS contract in 2023, through the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), she wasn’t able to because another farm business was already tied to her land in the system.

When she applied for CSP in 2024, NRCS worked with her to subdivide the plot she farms into three different managing farms in the system. Through the other farms on the property, the land houses multiple NRCS projects, including hedgerows for wind management and high tunnels through EQIP.

>> Related Reading: Héktor Calderón-Victoria of Three Feathers Farm shares his experience working with NRCS’s EQIP to install a hedgerow border and two high tunnels on his four-and-a-half-acre farm in Morgan Hill, California. Read his story.

Outside of the issue of subdividing the property, Catherine has had an easy time implementing her contract on leased land. Besides sharing a lease with NRCS, there are no additional requirements for farmers who lease. “Our landowner is pretty hands-off in terms of the production site,” she shared, “and he is also all for conservation.”

Working with NRCS

Catherine described her experience of working with NRCS as overwhelmingly positive. “Everyone I’ve worked with in the NRCS—and at this point, I’ve probably worked with three separate people—has been so prompt in their responses and really easy to work with,” she said. As an organic farmer, Catherine found that the program generally aligned with her organic certification requirements, though there was some confusion around sourcing organic cover crop seeds. “There was a specific type of clover that’s part of my enhancement that I had a really hard time finding,” but through some back and forth with her agent, she was able to determine a seed that would still meet the requirements of the program and certification.

One hiccup during the process was the 2025 funding freeze of USDA programs. She received an email instructing participants to hold off on implementing their CSP projects unless they could take on the financial risk themselves. During that period of uncertainty, many NRCS offices experienced layoffs, and there was “a weird time of not knowing who my point of contact actually was.” Later that year, funds were released, and Catherine received her reimbursement as planned. Despite staffing changes at NRCS, Catherine noted that the current representative covering Multnomah County has been “amazing,” and she still usually gets a response within 48 hours of emailing her office.

Conversation at Work

Two years into her CSP contract, Catherine has completed two rounds of winter cover cropping. The practice has aided with soil compaction as planned, noting that “where there is cover crop, the water is being absorbed faster.” Without a clear baseline for the property—Catherine has been using a cover crop since she moved to the site—it’s hard to say how significant the enhancement has been. But she has “definitely seen less standing water since I’ve been on the site.” Catherine considers cover cropping “part of a holistic strategy to figure out water management” on her farmland. 

One of the most helpful resources NRCS gave her was a list of cover crops for the project. Having worked on farms in the past, Catherine said that “most farms have their go-to cover crop rotations,” and she had defaulted to using mixes she had previously worked with. Being part of CSP gave her room to experiment and determine what mix works best for her property. Currently, she uses a mix of clover and triticale for her winter rotation. In future seasons, she’s hoping to include a summer cover crop as well. “NRCS was kind of the first entity that put summer cover crops on my radar,” she said, “[working with them] has provided more depth to my crop rotation.”

More than anything, the program has allowed Catherine the time and funding to prioritize cover cropping. Rather than stressing to maximize profit, Catherine said that CSP has “given me a little bit more breathing room, knowing that this project is funded.” Having that comfort has allowed her to commit more fully to the practice, for example, taking extra time to prep her beds to ensure better germination. The experience has led to her putting more of her land into her cover crop rotation. In 2026, she’s planning to “have two acres under management, one in production, one in cover crop.”

“[CSP] allows you to start dreaming a little bit more,” Catherine said. “Cover cropping is a practice I have done before, but I was able to do it better and to think a little bit bigger in terms of conservation.” 

Advice for Farmers Considering CSP

For Catherine, working with CSP has been a big help to her farm. She praises the program for letting “farmers do what they’re good at, which is food production.”

In terms of her advice for farmers considering the program, she shared:

  • Get into the system. Already being registered with her FSA office expedited the process. Once you’re in the system, it “opens the doors to all these other programs.”
  • Start early. “It will likely take 3 to 6 months to actually get everything signed,” Catherine said. “And especially if you’re taking an off-season, you might as well be cozied up in your house doing a bunch of office work.”

Overall, Catherine wants to share with other farmers “how easy it was.” “It takes a little bit of time to get everything squared away and to learn the definitions of things,” she said, “but the payoff for the work is worth it. The return on investment is great.”

Ready to Apply? Here Are a Few Helpful Resources

If you’re a farmer considering applying for CSP or other NRCS programs, here are some helpful tools to get started:
NCRS CSP Mora Mora Farm Flyer cover page

By |2026-06-09T15:35:22-04:00May 11th, 2026|Farmer Stories, Federal Assistance, News|

Earth Day Spotlight: Organic Farming as Stewardship

By Clare Boland, Communications Manager

Earth Day is a reminder that the health of our planet is intrinsically tied to the way we grow food. No one understands that connection more than farmers! To celebrate Earth Day, we’re featuring four organic farms from across the country that prioritize the health of the planet through stewardship, working in partnership with natural systems, and caring for the land for future generations.

Vilicus Farms

Doug Crabtree and Anna Jones-Crabtree are the owners and operators of Vilicus Farms, a first-generation organic dryland crop farm in Northern Hill County, Montana. For Anna and Doug, organic farming is rooted in a deep commitment to stewardship and working with natural systems to improve the health of the land. As Doug explains, “We philosophically don’t believe you should grow food using poison or subject the earth to the kind of products that are used in non-organic production. We’re committed to stewardship. That really drives what we do, how we do it, and why.”

Anna echoes this philosophy, emphasizing that “organic farming is not a recipe… it’s not a checklist,” but rather “a process of continuous improvement and actually being a partner with your natural systems.” She highlights the importance of building relationships—with land, plants, animals, and customers—and using practices that support soil health, which in turn leads to healthier food and communities. Their approach is reflected in Vilicus Farms’ focus on soil-building, carbon sequestration, pollinator-friendly conservation, minimal-disturbance tillage practices, and utilizing a seven-year crop rotation.

You can follow Vilicus Farms on Facebook and Instagram (@vilicusfarms).

Pea flowers in a field.Source: Vilicus Farms

“We’re committed to stewardship. That really drives what we do, how we do it, and why.”

Doug Crabtree, Vilicus Farms

Anna Crabtree-JonesSource: Vilicus Farms

Hiddendale Farm

Glen Philbrick is the operator of Hiddendale Farm, a fifth-generation family farm in Turtle Lake, North Dakota. The 700-acre farm includes certified organic cropland and rangeland, a cow-calf livestock system, and a wide range of experimental horticultural and specialty crops. Research is central to Glen’s farming operation: he regularly conducts variety trials, soil health experiments, and crop rotation testing, and collaborates with organizations like the Organic Seed Alliance and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).

Growing up, the farm used some conventional practices, like spraying herbicides, and Glen noticed that 1.) it wasn’t working and 2.) it was adversely affecting the health of farmers and livestock.  ”I recognize the dangers of it over and over again,” he said of herbicides. Hiddendale Farm has been certified organic since 2016 and uses practices like limited tillage, rotational grazing, and cover cropping. And being a research-focused farm, Glen prioritizes soil testing, working from the results to balance PH and manage nutrient levels to inform overall soil health. “It is the health of me, of people, of my livestock, and of the whole ecosystem,” Glen shared. “That’s why organic is important to me.”

A farmer poses in a field with a cow.Source: Hiddendale Farm

“It is the health of me, of people, of my livestock, and of the whole ecosystem. That’s why organic is important to me.”

Glen Philbrick, Hiddendale Farm

A farmer poses in front of a red barn at dusk.Source: Hiddendale Farm

Stephens Land & Cattle

Stephens Land & Cattle is a fifth-generation family farm located in Jennings, Kansas, managed by Demetria Stephens, who has been farming the land since she was a teenager. The farm raises livestock and grows organic Turkey Red wheat, which grows well in the semi-arid region of northwest Kansas. In addition to being certified organic for over 30 years, the farm is also certified biodynamic, a holistic approach to farming that centers on the interconnectivity of the natural landscape. Becoming certified biodynamic was a long-term goal of her parents, who studied anthropology and were interested in the human role in fostering ecological systems. Demetria uses organic and biodynamic principles as a framework: “I think of organic as a guide for me to be a better farmer, more than the rules that restrict me from doing things. It is more saying, no pesticides, no synthetics, no GMOs, and those kinds of things.”

Growing in a region with mostly conventional agriculture, and without formal agronomy training, organic principles propel her learning and investment in the land. Stephens Land & Cattle uses practices like limited tillage, cover cropping, and green manures. “I think [of organic as] a way for me to be a more professional farmer,” Demetria shares. “And also raise good food for the next generation.

A tractor moves through a field of wheat.Source: Stephens Land & Cattle

“I think of organic as a guide for me to be a better farmer, more than the rules that restrict me from doing things. It is more saying, no pesticides, no synthetics, no GMOs, and those kinds of things.”

Demetria Stephens, Stephens Land & Cattle

Source: Stephens Land & Cattle

PrairieSun Organics

PrairieSun Organics is a diversified organic, family farm in Vermillion, South Dakota, owned and operated by Angela Jackson-Pulse and her husband. Spanning about 20 acres, the farm integrates poultry (meat and eggs), livestock (sheep and cattle), fruits and vegetables, and specialty grains. Angela keeps half the land in crop production, and the other half in perennial pasture for livestock grazing. Angela originally managed the farm using more conventional organic methods, but transitioned into using regenerative organic practices in 2019 after experiencing declining soil health, and increased disease and livestock mortality. She is now certified regenerative through the Regenerative Organic Alliance. “It put the joy back into farming,” she said of the switch.

At the heart of her farming practices is land stewardship: “stewarding this beautiful ecosystem, that is interrelated and interconnected, and making sure it functions as healthy as it possibly can be.” By focusing on minimizing soil disturbance, expanding crop rotations, integrating cover crops, and prioritizing soil biology, Angela saw her farm come alive again. She highlights the importance of a systems-based approach, centering the overall health of the land to set her farm up for the best possible future: “It’s a blessing that we have [this land] and I want to take really good care of it. I know that it’s not going to be in my possession forever. And so I want to leave it to the next generation, whoever that is, so it can be the best possible thing for the next family.”

You can follow PrairieSun Organics on Facebook.

At the heart of it is stewardship. Stewarding this beautiful ecosystem that is interconnected and making sure that the whole farm functions as healthy as it possibly can be.

Angela Jackson-Pulse, PrairieSun Organics

By |2026-06-09T15:35:27-04:00April 22nd, 2026|Farmer Stories, News|

Working with NRCS: North Star Organics’ Story and Recommendations

Written by Rebecca Champagne, PhD, OFRF Conservation Scientist

OFRF is currently working with the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) on a cooperative agreement to help build institutional knowledge of NRCS staff and equip them to better support the unique needs of organic and transitioning-to-organic farmers across the country. As part of this work, we are helping tell the stories of organic farmers and their experiences working with NRCS. We hope other farmers can use this information to learn more about NRCS and feel inspired to pursue conservation programs for their farm. For more information regarding our cooperative agreement with the agency, please reach out to Rebecca Champagne, OFRF Conservation Scientist, at rebecca@ofrf.org.

Meet North Star Organics

organic farmers, Alan and Cheryl, of North Star Organics, stand in front of weathered red barn wall, beneath a hand painted sign that says Welcome to North Star OrganicsSource: North Star OrganicsNorth Star Organics, owned and operated by Cheryl and Alan Kobernik, is a 40-acre certified-organic cherry farm located in Frankfort, Michigan. They bought the farm in 1985 and recently celebrated their 40th season in operation. Out of the 40 total acres, 26 acres are dedicated to fruit production of tart and sweet cherries. In total, they currently have 2,600 tart cherry trees and 180 sweet cherry trees.

The Koberniks have historically machine-harvested their cherries and delivered them to a processor for juice, freezing, or drying. They used to bring their cherries to CSAs in the state and even did some mail orders for repeat customers and some chocolatiers. One of their biggest markets the past several years was the on-farm pick-your-own (PYO). This used to be a thriving market for them, but has started to slow in recent years due to lower crop yield caused by the effects of extreme weather and new pests moving into the region.

“Organic 20 years ago had a lot of excitement, but it seems to be fizzling out with processors. Processors want bigger contracts and not smaller producers. It’s hard to meet their threshold.”

Source: North Star OrganicsNorth Star Organics began the process of transitioning their farm to organic production in 1999 and has been certified since 2002. The Koberniks mentioned the difference between conventional and organic crop prices as one reason for seeking certification. “Production was becoming unsustainable. When we started the transition to organic, the price for conventional cherries was just $0.04 per pound. We decided to go organic as a niche market.” They also attended a local agricultural conference that year and learned more about how organic production could help them sustain their operation beyond just economic reasons.

Organic crop price premiums can help farmers stay competitive, and the various programs offered by NRCS can help finance conservation practices and assist farmers in achieving sustainability goals, thereby hedging against production risks.

Working with NRCS

Source: North Star OrganicsThe Koberniks first learned about NRCS and the agency’s programs through their own research and from agricultural groups in the state. “Our local office didn’t reach out to farmers back when we first bought the farm,” they stated. However, the planner they currently work with, Scott Hughey, makes a point to visit farms and property owners in the area to directly establish relationships.

“I just want to serve all the farmers/land owners in my area, try to understand their perspectives and priorities, and provide them all with the same level of service,” said Scott.

Their relationship with the regional NRCS planner and hearing from other farmers about their experiences is a big reason the Koberniks were motivated to pursue technical and financial assistance through the agency. Reflecting on the past few decades, The Koberniks noticed fewer farmers in the state getting together at events where those conversations can be shared organically.

Source: North Star Organics“Fewer farmers are getting together now in Michigan at things such as Farm Bureau events and trade shows. The average farmer age is older, and the ag community is more behind in technology. A lot of outreach and materials are done electronically and not through the mail. And, a lot of folks don’t trust the government and won’t pursue programs because they don’t want government staff on their farms. We believe farmer education on NRCS is important!”

North Star Organics is currently utilizing the NRCS Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP). This program is designed to help farmers, ranchers, and forest landowners address a variety of resource concerns on a farm, including soil health, water quality, wildlife habitat, and mitigation against extreme weather effects. Their contracts consist of cover crops (radish, clover, and oat mix) to build soil health, habitat for pollinators, and enhancing windbreaks by planting food producing trees and shrubs. North Star Organics has also used the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) to assist with a storage facility for on-farm fuel storage, including Agrichemical Handling Facilities and Heavy Use Area Protection for high traffic areas.

Source: North Star OrganicsSince implementing their contracts, Cheryl and Alan have noticed positive changes on their farm. They have seen a visual increase in pollinator populations, and addressing soil health has helped them cut costs. “Our compacted soils were alleviated from the radish in the cover crop. Scott taught us a lot about building soil organic matter (SOM). Now we are consistent with our soil testing (using the Haney Soil Test) so we can better understand what’s going on.”

The Koberniks describe their experience working with NRCS as very positive and helpful. But, they also acknowledged that some farmers have different experiences and may have to advocate more for themselves and for organic operations. When describing how their planner helped them, the Koberniks said:

“[Scott] sat with us at the kitchen table and helped us fill out paperwork. There was no pressure on anything. You, as the farmer, have to do the lift if you really want it, but he guided us through it.”

Lessons, Challenges, and Recommendations

The lessons and challenges that North Star Organics has encountered offer valuable insights for other farmers interested in participating in federal support programs. They also highlight areas where NRCS could improve processes and staff training. For farmers, navigating federal conservation programs and making them work within an organic production system can be a significant challenge. Organic farmers may face extra hurdles in meeting certification standards and finding service providers with organic literacy who can help them succeed.

Source: North Star OrganicsThe Koberniks again emphasized how their experience with NRCS was positive, but there were still a couple of unexpected challenges. They found that they couldn’t always follow the contract timelines, so a contract modification was needed. “It’s important to talk with your NRCS planner along the way about what’s going on,” said Cheryl. They also mentioned that there are many guidelines and regulations to follow, but they personally didn’t feel that these interfered with their ability to work with NRCS.

They hope NRCS staff and other organic farmers will read this story and see how positive experiences can arise from working with NRCS. They hope more organic farmers will get involved with the agency, and urge NRCS to communicate more effectively with organic farmers. Additionally, they hope that NRCS will promote organic-specific initiatives to help farmers get involved and pursue conservation programs in the first place. For other organic or transitioning to organic farmers, the Koberniks emphasized “Be relentless, and advocate for yourself!” They also think it is important for farmers who are considering working with NRCS to do a bit of background research on their own, and come prepared to talk with NRCS about what they’re hoping to do on their farm.

Scott offered the following advice for NRCS staff working with organic producers – “As an NRCS planner, you have to become really well versed in the practices that are adopted in your county. Ask, “what are they already adopting? What could they also adopt to advance conservation?” Conservation can sell itself, you just have to help producers along and give examples of where conservation practices are working in that area.”

Interested in NRCS Programs? Here Are a Few Helpful Resources

Source: North Star Organics

If you’re a farmer considering applying for CSP, EQIP, or other NRCS programs, here are some helpful links and tips to get started:

This case study was produced with support from the United States Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) under Cooperative Agreement No. FBC24CPT0013867. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USDA-NRCS.

All photos credit North Star Organics.

By |2026-06-12T12:20:14-04:00April 15th, 2026|Farmer Stories, News|

Farmer-Led Trials Program Spotlight: Mesta Meadows

The Impact of Grazing Lespedeza Pastures on Reducing Parasitic Worm Load

Written by Mary Hathaway, OFRF’s Research & Education Program Manager, and Ed Crowley, FLT Program participant

A sheep and a lamb. Source: Mesta Meadows

Lambing for Mesta Meadows FLT trial began in January 2026.

Tucked into the hills of the Ozarks, Mesta Meadows sprawls over 235 acres. The ranch, owned and operated by Ed Crowley, specializes in raising a variety of pasture-based livestock, including lamb, beef, pork, and poultry, along with sheep dairy production and fine wool harvesting. Ed prioritizes responsible land and animal stewardship, using practices like rotation grazing, establishment of native grasses, and providing low stress environments for all of his animals. The farm is currently in transition to organic certification.

Ed wears many hats–his off farm job is teaching entrepreneurship at Southeast Missouri State University, and his ranch hosts many micro-businesses, including an on-farm retail store, the Atelait Creamery (a premium ice cream brand manufacturing facility), and a nationally-renowned Fiber Festival on the farm. He is also Chairman of the Mayfield Entrepreneurial Center.

Using Forage Species as a Natural Deworming Agent

The ranch’s location in Glenallen, Missouri has very high humidity and usually sees more than 60 inches of rain annually. This results in lush pastures, but also increases the incidence of barber pole (Haemonchus contortus) worm load and a high lamb mortality rate after weaning. The treatment for barber pole worms is chemical drenches, however, Ed has seen increased resistance to almost all drenches for internal parasites.

Wanting to find a natural way to reduce the amount of chemical drenches he uses to protect his lambs, Ed has been investigating the potential of different forage species as an addition to his pasture grasses of fescue and clover. Anti-parasitic effects have been reported for a number of condensed tannin-containing forages, including lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), a warm season perennial legume which is well adapted to the warm climatic conditions of the southern states. In previous studies on goats in Oklahoma, lower fecal egg counts (FEC) were reported in goats grazing lespedeza compared with grass pasture. Ed is hopeful that working with lespedeza may help with internal parasite load in sheep and become a cost-effective, natural deworming agent.

On-Farm Trial Plan

A mix of fescue and lespedeza in a forage field. Source: Mesta Meadows

A mix of lespedeza and orchard grass was used for the trials.

With support from OFRF, the trial aims to quantify the effect of weaning lambs on lespedeza pastures compared to the ranch’s pastures that are planted in fescue and clover.

The trial will test the FEC on about 100 lambs. The lambs will be randomly assigned to one of eight groups: four lespedeza groups; four control groups; with 16 lambs in each group, respectively. All of the lambs will have fecal samples taken at four different time points: pre-weaning, to establish a baseline; at 3-4 weeks post-weaning; at 6-7 weeks post-weaning; and post-trial (2-3 weeks after groups are returned to the fescue/red clover mix). The final sampling will help to assess potential residual effects of the lespedeza pasture.

Trial Updates

The trial was initiated in June of 2025 to help establish the lespedeza in the pasture. Lambing began in January of 2026. The lambs will begin pre-weaning from the ewes in April or May, with sampling to begin prior to the lambs being placed out in the pasture.

Four lambs nestled in hay.Source: Mesta Meadows

Lambs born in the 2026 season that will take part in the FLT trial. 

“The FLT program was a great opportunity to partner with other researchers to find new, holistic methods to control barber pole worm, a major challenge for producers in my area.” 

– Ed Crowley, FLT Program Participant

forage mix with lespedezaSource: Mesta Meadows

Lespedeza was established in 2025 to be ready for pasture in 2026.

This is part of a series of blogs highlighting farmers who are participating in OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials program. Farmers receive technical support to address their production challenges through structured on-farm trials. To learn more about OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials Program, visit our website page at https://ofrf.org/research/farmer-led-research-trials/ 

To learn more about Ed Crowley and Mesta Meadows, visit their website at https://mestameadows.com/

By |2026-06-09T15:35:42-04:00April 4th, 2026|Farmer Stories, News|

From Conventional to Certified: Transitioning to Organic in the Northwest

By Clare Boland, Communications and Outreach Fellow

For many farmers, transitioning to certified organic production presents a learning curve. During the three-year transition period, farmers face unique challenges in the field (restoring soil health, managing weeds without herbicides, acquiring new equipment and infrastructure) and off (maintaining financial viability, navigating National Organic Program (NOP) paperwork, and recordkeeping). At a recent Seeds of Success panel, three farmers with roots in conventional agriculture shared their experience of transitioning to organic in the Northwest, demystifying some of the challenges they faced and offering their advice on the process.

Their stories reveal not only the technical challenges of organic production, but also the mindset shifts, economic realities, and long-term resilience that come with farming in an organic system.

About the Farmers

Headshot of farmer Aaron FlansburgSource: Flansburg Farm

 

Aaron Flansburg, of Flansburg Farm in Palouse, Washington, is a fifth-generation farmer. After graduating from Washington State University in 2002, he returned to work with his parents on the family farm. Now in his 23rd crop year, Aaron farms roughly 2,000 acres of dryland wheat, barley, peas, lentils, chickpeas, canola, and alfalfa alongside his wife and three children.

Aaron says his family has always been “innovative and progressive in terms of trying to maintain soil, keep it in place, and, in general, doing farming practices the best that we can.” Because of this, transitioning to organic felt like a logical next step.

Aaron began transitioning to organic production in 2020 with 50 acres. Today, 160 acres are certified organic, with additional acreage currently in transition and more planned. Six years into farming without chemical inputs, Aaron’s main focus is self-sufficiency – controlling costs, limiting soil input, and building resilient domestic markets so he can rely less on foreign inputs and global trade.

 

Tracey Dion is a third-generation farmer at Yellowstone River Farms in Terry, Montana. Tracey and her husband transitioned their 500-acre family operation from conventional sugar beet production to a diversified, certified organic cattle and crop farm.

When she first acquired the farm from her parents, she continued to farm conventionally until it “dawned on me that I didn’t have any worms and I was working with land that was devoid of life.” That realization spurred her decision to transition to organic, starting by growing 10 acres of alfalfa on previously unfarmed land. Gradually, they transitioned the entire farm using practices like rotational livestock grazing and cover crops. They now produce alfalfa, specialty crops, certified organic cattle, and, as of 2024, the farm expanded into selling lamb to restaurants.

Tracey believes healthy soil is the foundation of agriculture’s future. She currently serves as chair of the Montana Organic Association and mentors transitioning farmers through the Great Northwest Healthy Soils Program.

Headshot of Farmer Lynn SchallSource: Life Springs Farm

 

Lynn Schaal of Life Springs Farm in Twin Falls, Idaho, was raised in a multi-generational farming and ranching family in eastern Colorado. Growing up on a sugar beet farm, he experienced severe reactions to agricultural chemicals. “I had told myself back then that if I ever had a chance to farm myself, I would never use chemicals.”

Today, Lynn and his wife farm more than 70 acres of certified organic land, producing wheat, barley, dry beans, silage corn, buckwheat, and alfalfa for organic dairy and beef operations, as well as organic lamb and poultry for restaurants.

After purchasing land that had been fallow for over two decades, they transitioned it to organic production and have been farming without chemical inputs for more than 15 years. Life Springs Farm is guided by their belief that soil is a living organism that must be nurtured, not merely a medium to hold plants. Now entering his 16th year at Life Springs Farm, Lynn also mentors other transitioning farmers in the Northwest.

Navigating the First Three Years of Transition

The NOP requires a three-year transition period for land previously farmed with prohibitive inputs, which can cause uncertainty around markets, land management, and financial risk for farmers.

For Lynn, the transition was eased by the fact that part of his land qualified for immediate certification. Located in dairy country, organic barley provided a ready market. During the transition, he farmed organic and conventional barley side by side and was struck by the price difference: “The conventional barley got one-third of what the organic barley got.” While income was limited until the entire farm was certified, the family was fully committed to becoming organic as quickly as possible.

He noted that input costs are drastically different from conventional systems, using strategies like cover cropping rather than using traditional soil inputs. “It seems like a lot of people want to concentrate on yield, you know, how many bushels to the acre are you gonna get? But to that question, I’d say, what are your input costs?” However, the comparison is not always cut-and-dry on the accounting books – while conventional farms spend more money on inputs, organic farming requires more labor and time.

Field of green Scots Bere Barley at Flansburg Farm.Source: Flansburg Farm

Scots Bere barley growing at Flansburg Farm.

Aaron’s transition began with growing hemp seed in 2020. Because hemp could not be treated with most conventional chemicals, organic production made economic sense. The next year, severe drought further reinforced his decision to move towards organic: conventional wheat with full chemical inputs yielded only modestly better than volunteer wheat grown with no inputs at all.  “I thought, huh, I actually really like growing half the crop for twice the price. That led me into thinking that [organic production] would work.”

Tracey’s transition was shaped by the physical layout of her farm, which is parceled out into separate fields. They transitioned these parcels in phases, starting with growing alfalfa to suppress weeds and rebuild nitrogen naturally. Over time, she noticed that weed species common under conventional sugar beet production began to disappear after going organic. While yields initially dropped, soil health eventually rebounded, and long-term resilience improved.

Soil Health in Organic Systems

Moving from conventional to organic, all three farmers emphasized the overall improvement in soil health after transitioning. Rather than depending on purchased soil inputs, they focus on systems that build fertility from within the farm.

Lynn uses a closed-loop approach that integrates livestock, compost, and crop rotation. Cattle play a central role in nutrient cycling, rotating alfalfa and straw help suppress weeds, and compost is applied annually, though dry conditions in the area slow on-farm compost production. He closely monitors soil health; “I go out at night and check my worms. That tells me how healthy my soil is.”

For Aaron, his perspective on tillage has evolved significantly over time. “I thought tillage was a four letter word at one point,” he shared. Now, he sees it as a practical tool, especially on a non-irrigated farm that depends solely on rainfall. Without the ability to manage weeds by controlling water, he has had to adapt, experimenting by incorporating older, mechanical tillage equipment, some of it dating back to the 1980s and 1990s. Crop rotation, planting timing, seeding direction, and cover crops all play a role in suppressing weeds as well. “My whole perspective has shifted,” Aaron shared. “I found that the soil is healing itself on the organic ground in a way I never would’ve expected. Bacteria, fungus, soil micro- and macro- organisms are working to get soil aggregation back without being suppressed by the use of chemical fertilizers, fungicides, and herbicides.”

Tracey emphasized a similar mindset shift: “You’re looking at things completely differently when you are trying to do nothing but create life.” Her farm uses manure, livestock grazing, tillage, and diverse cropping systems to build soil naturally. She views weeds as indicators of soil imbalance and uses them as diagnostic tools rather than enemies to be eradicated.

Livestock grazing helps build soil health at Yellowstone River Farms. 

Learning from Fellow Farmers

 

“The organic community is my best resource.”

-Tracey Dion, Yellowstone River Farms

When asked about key resources, all three farmers pointed to people as their most valuable source of knowledge.

Tracey relies heavily on conversations with other farmers, learning through trial and error and shared experience.  “The organic community is my best resource,” she said. Lynn echoed this, drawing inspiration from older generations who farmed without chemicals and relied on observation and experimentation. “[Older generations] didn’t have the latest and greatest, they didn’t have chemicals, they didn’t have herbicides and all of that stuff available at their fingertips, yet they produced some great crops.” He continues to try out older equipment and find inspiration in traditional agricultural knowledge.

Aaron was able to find support through mentorship within the Transition to Organic Partnership Program. Farming in an area without many organic growers, seeking out fellow organic farmers through the TOPP program and attending conferences has helped him build community. Aaron also supplements farmer-to-farmer learning with books, shouting out two of his favorites: “When Weeds Talk” by Jay L. McCaman and “Weeds Control Without Poisons” by Charles Walters Jr.

Recordkeeping

For transitioning farmers, the recording-keeping associated with organic certification can seem daunting at first. To counter this, Lynn committed to managing everything digitally from day one. He scanned and digitized all applications, receipts, and documentation, creating an organized, searchable system that made inspections seamless. Using an app called Genius Scan, he converts documents into PDFs and files them instantly, eliminating the need for bulky paper records and reducing the risk of lost paperwork. The process has led to smoother inspections and less stress. He encourages other organic farmers to adopt digital recordkeeping to simplify certification requirements.

Looking Ahead

Despite the challenges presented by the organic transition period, all three farmers agreed that the results were worth it for the overall health of their farms.

“Big picture, your land is more resilient,” Tracey shared. “Yes, there’s market volatility, but you can weather the storms if you have life in your soil.” For Tracey, organic farming has deepened her sense of responsibility to the farm and its future. Her focus now includes long-term viability, succession planning, and creating a farm her children might one day want to inherit.

In the coming years, Aaron plans to transition more acres. To help with the lower yields and weed pressure during the transition period, he plans to develop a consistent crop rotation and incorporate fallow years to rebuild soil fertility. He encourages other farmers not to be discouraged by those early challenges, emphasizing that organic farming is a learning process that requires patience and adaptability. As his operation grows, he has even added labor, reflecting his belief that organic agriculture creates opportunities to bring more people back into rural communities. “I think there’s a lot of positivity for the future of organic,” Aaron said. “And I hope some of you will join the movement and be inspired the way I have been.”

Lynn is looking forward to mentoring more producers through the TOPP program. “T here’s been some great successes. And there’s also been some failures. There’s been some learning curves. But it’s been a wonderful journey.”

All three farmers’ experiences highlight that organic farming is not simply a change in inputs, but a perspective shift. While the transition can be difficult, the result is a more resilient farm, both economically and ecologically.

A sheepdog roams the pastures at Yellowstone River Farms. 

By |2026-06-09T15:35:38-04:00March 12th, 2026|Farmer Stories, News|

Farmer-Led Trials Program Spotlight: Passion Garden

Experimenting with on-farm materials to create organic soil amendments

Written by Mary Hathaway, OFRF’s Research & Education Program Manager, and Kay Bell, FLT Program participant

Mesquite bean pods, collected by Kay Bell, to use as a soil amendment at Passion Garden

Kay Bell has been farming for ten years on her three-acre farm in Waco, TX, called Passion Garden. She grows a variety of fruits, vegetables and herbs that she sells as fresh produce and herbal teas at local farmers markets and health food stores. Her farm is currently in the process of transitioning to certified organic, with a focus on building her own on-farm fertility.

Kay has a big focus on using locally available, on farm inputs to help improve her soil health, and has long considered using the pods of the Mesquite Tree Bean in her fertility plan. As a farmer focused on growing the health of her community, she looked into the nutrient content of Mesquite Bean, and realized that it has a high protein content and is rich in many nutrients. Since the tree is prevalent on her property, and the pods are not too difficult to harvest, she believed it could be a useful amendment in building her soil health.

Using Mesquite Beans as a Soil Amendment for Tomatoes

To test her idea, Kay wanted to build an experiment that would assess the impact of mesquite bean meal as a soil amendment on the yield of ‘Celebrity’ tomatoes, one of her favorite tomato varieties. She hopes that the addition of Mesquite Bean Meal (MBM) will result in a measurable increase in total or marketable tomato yield compared to her normal soil amendments in raised beds. To create the MBM, Kay harvested the pods, and used a simple mill to grind them so that they were in an easy to use powder format.

On-Farm Trial Plan

Plot map from Passion Garden’s FLT Program trial

In the beginning of August 2025, with technical support from OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials Program staff, Kay prepared eight raised beds, each measuring 4 feet wide by 8 feet long, to provide a uniform growing area for the plants. All of the beds were filled with the same base soil mixture and compost. Kay planted 4 tomato plants in each of the beds in September. At the time of transplanting, the four treatment raised beds received ½ cup of the MBM. During the growing season, all of the beds were treated consistently, with the same irrigation schedule, staking, and pest management.

By mid-October, Kay began tracking the yields, her key metric of the trial. This was recorded as total weight and marketable weight, the weight of tomatoes that meet standards for commercial sale (free from major blemishes, cracks, or rot). Kay also took observations of plant health, pest pressure, and any plant losses that might impact the findings for the trial.

Farmer-Led Trial Results: Tomato Production Increased with On-Farm Amendment

Once all of Kay’s data had been collected, the analysis revealed a significant difference in yield between the control and meal treatments, with the treatment receiving the MBM yielding more per plant and overall than the control treatment.

Anecdotally, Kay observed improved water drainage and thinks that the MBM helped improve the drainage in her clay soils. She also noted increased presence of worms and other soil organisms, and she speculates that the natural sugars in the MBM help attract more soil invertebrates.

Yield results from Passion Garden’s FLT Program trial, showing yield of tomatoes in the control group (blue) vs the group grown using Mesquite Bean Meal (red).

Kay is very motivated by the success of this trial and plans to use MBM as a pre-transplant amendment throughout her farm. She is also excited to spread the word on the many uses of Mesquite Bean – including as a coffee alternative, as a gluten free flour in baking, and a sweet jelly.

Stay tuned for a final report on Kay’s trial coming out later this year.

Prepped beds at Passion Garden during the 2025 FLT.

“I know this trial has made me stronger as a farmer. And I just look forward to experimenting with nature to grow things with resources I have on-farm.” 

– Kay Bell, FLT Program Participant

Tomatoes harvest from Passion Garden, during the 2025 trial.

Research Results

This Farmer-Led Trial evaluated the effect of an MBM soil amendment on ‘Celebrity’ tomato yields. Kay prepared eight raised beds, each measuring 4 feet wide by 8 feet long, in keeping with Kay’s space limitations. At the time of transplanting, the four treatment raised beds received ½ cup of the MBM.

Key Findings

  • Sample size in the trial was small, however, the analysis revealed a significant difference in yield between the control and meal treatment, with the treatment receiving the MBM having a positive impact on yield in both the total yield and marketable yield.
  • Kay observed improved water drainage and thinks that the MBM helped improve the drainage in her clay soils. She also noted increased presence of worms and other soil organisms, and she speculates that the natural sugars in the MBM help attract more soil invertebrates.

Kay recorded tomato yields and made observations around plant health, pest pressure, and any plant losses that might impact the findings for the trial. Data suggest that tomato yields were slightly higher in plots receiving the MBM amendment, and that there may be a benefit to utilizing the MBM in tomatoes.

For full details on the study’s methodology and results, read the final report.

This is part of a series of blogs highlighting farmers who are participating in OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials program. Farmers receive technical support to address their production challenges through structured on-farm trials. To learn more about OFRF’s Farmer-Led Trials Program, visit our website page at https://ofrf.org/research/farmer-led-research-trials/ 

To learn more about Kay Bell and Passion Garden, check out this ATTRA article.

Kay is President of the National Women in Agriculture Association Texas Chapter: https://www.nwiaa.org/texas 

By |2026-04-09T12:06:34-04:00January 27th, 2026|Farmer Stories, News|

Organic Agriculture Research in Action: High Tunnels and Cover Cropping with Moore Family Farms

Written by Rebecca Champagne, PhD, OFRF Conservation Scientist

Meet Moore Family Farms

Robert and Dakota are the father-son team behind Moore Family Farm.

Moore Family Farms is a family-owned and operated farm located in Warsaw, North Carolina. Managed by Robert Moore and his son Dakota, the farm was founded in 1833 based on principles of sustainability. Out of the 260-acre farm, 22 acres are in production—12 conventional and 10 certified organic. On the organic side of the farm, they grow watermelons, collard greens, and cabbage. The non-organic side of the farm produces bell peppers, tomatoes, and cantaloupe.

“Our farm was revived in 2018, focusing on sustainable practices to honor our heritage while also adapting to modern agricultural trends,” Dakota explained.

Their crops are sold mainly wholesale through a regional organic produce distributor called Happy Dirt. They also had a contract with the Second Harvest Food Bank through the Local Food Purchase Assistance program (LFPA), but this contract was unfortunately lost due to federal funding freezes. They are currently exploring additional markets through Feast Down East, a local non-profit organization that connects farmers, restaurants, grocers, and consumers.

Moore Family Farms began the process of transitioning part of their farm to organic production in 2020 and has been certified since late 2023. Dakota mentioned that rising input prices prompted them to seek certification. “Fertilizer prices skyrocketed between 2019 and 2021, and we couldn’t afford to buy them,” he explained. “We did a lot of economic research into organic and decided to jump in.” 

He also pointed out that other key reasons for seeking certification included market demand for organic produce and the family’s passion for environmental stewardship.

The volatility of various markets, like fertilizers, can put significant financial strain on farmers. That’s why federal funding for organic agriculture research is so important and helps family farms hedge against production risks.

The Importance of Organic Agriculture Research

During his college days at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical (A&T) State University, Dakota had the opportunity to work on agricultural research in high tunnel systems. He immediately noticed the difference in crops grown in high tunnels during extreme weather. Dakota and his father knew that with a high tunnel, they could get their watermelons planted earlier in the season and have more control of the growing environment. For farmers who rely on wholesale markets, getting their produce out of the field earlier can mean a longer growing season, protection against extreme weather, and ultimately more revenue.

Dakota with watermelon grown on their farm.

“With our high tunnel, we can now harvest watermelons before the Fourth of July,” Dakota said.

Since establishing their high tunnel for organic watermelon production, they’ve seen increased crop protection against extreme heat and cold, which has enhanced the quality of the crop. The high tunnel also extends their growing season, allowing them to plant and harvest crops earlier and later than before.

They’ve also been planting cover crops in their organic and conventional cropland, which have provided weed suppression, reduced soil runoff/erosion, and provided water retention benefits. “We were using plastic mulch for water retention to trap soil moisture, but we didn’t want to be throwing it away every season. We started using cover crops and saw that it helped keep more moisture in the soil,” said Dakota. He also saw the soil health benefits. According to soil test results, one of their fields saw an almost 3% increase in soil organic matter (SOM) over a three-year period, from 1.76% to 4.26% after using cover crops consistently.

View soil test results from Moore Family Farms BEFORE and AFTER utilizing cover crops in their cropping rotations ⬇️

Cover crops growing at Moore Family Farm.

The benefits of cover cropping on soil health and soil organic matter show that investments in organic agriculture research can benefit all farms looking to adopt conservation practices, not just organic farms. Moore Family Farms, operating as a split operation with both conventional and certified organic land, can utilize methods that are foundational to organic production across their entire farm. There has been abundant research on cover cropping across the country to provide organic and conventional farmers with the latest practices to help increase soil fertility and organic matter levels without costly synthetic fertilizers.

Without public research funding on these and other agronomic topics, the risk associated with agricultural experimentation would be placed more on farmers themselves, leading to slower development of beneficial innovations and less widespread adoption of practices that can result in greater conservation of natural resources. Investments in organic agriculture research advance environmental stewardship on more than just certified organic land as the findings from this research can give all farm types the knowledge and resources they need to make their operations more resilient. And the benefits of research extend beyond the farm, too. According to an analysis done by the USDA Economic Research Service (ERS), every $1 invested into agricultural research triggers a $20 economic benefit. This provides long-term benefits in addressing agronomic issues, increases farm productivity and profitability, and ultimately benefits the economies and resiliency of communities.

You can support farms like Moore Family and help strengthen the agricultural research all farmers depend on by:

  • Letting us know about the impact agricultural research has had on your farm (contact communications[at]ofrf.org!).
  • Enrolling in our free Communicating with Legislators email-based course and sharing your story with elected officials.
  • Writing a letter to the editor or an opinion piece in your local newspaper, talking about how research projects/programs have benefited your farm.

Dakota Moore in front of a high tunnel on their farm.

By |2026-01-15T09:46:04-05:00January 21st, 2026|Farmer Stories, News|

Organic Agriculture Research in Action: Navigating Urban Farming with Little Lighthouse Farm

Written by Rebecca Champagne, PhD, OFRF Conservation Scientist

Meet Little Lighthouse Farm

Little Lighthouse Farm is a half-acre, certified-organic urban farm founded in 2022. Located in central Phoenix, Arizona, Rachel Opio runs the farm at the house she was born and raised in. She aims to grow everything that’s in season: produce, leafy greens like collards, dandelion greens, and swiss chard, as well as herbs, pasture-raised chickens for egg production, and a beehive for honey. She also cultivates native plants that many people don’t realize they can eat, like purslane.

Rachel sells her produce and other products at the local farmer’s market, at the farm stand right on the farm, and at the food bank. She accepts SNAP, WIC, and the Senior Nutrition Program, and she’s one of only a few places in the area to do so.

“As a black female farmer, I want to ensure my neighbors of all races, backgrounds, and ethnicities have nutrient-rich foods,” Rachel said. “I also offer garden consulting for my neighbors who want to learn how to grow their own edible landscapes.”

Little Lighthouse Farm gained USDA organic certification in February 2025. It is currently the only black-owned, certified organic urban farm in Arizona. Given the history of discrimination in federal lending programs against black farmers by the USDA, it was important to Rachel to seek certification and build trust in what she produces.

(Recommended reading → USDA issues payments to address discrimination against Black farmers; Racial Equity in Organic)

Although Little Lighthouse Farm is only half an acre in size, producing crops on even a small scale comes with its challenges. Additionally, there are unique challenges to urban farming. That’s why federal funding for organic agriculture research is so important and helps producers of all sizes.

The Importance of Organic Agriculture Research

Rachel was motivated to implement conservation practices to reduce the risks associated with irrigation costs, one of the biggest concerns on her farm. During the very hot Arizona summers, Rachel can spend up to four hours a day hand-watering her crops. Not only is this time-consuming, but because she operates an urban farm that’s reliant on city water, it can be expensive. She is also passionate about soil health and providing habitat for beneficial insects, like pollinators.

Rachel is already seeing the benefits of implementing conservation practices. She began using cover crops and set up a pollinator garden when she started the farm three years ago. Cover cropping, in particular, has helped alleviate compaction that is typical of the soil in Phoenix.

“If I hadn’t used cover crops, I would have never been able to grow anything in this soil. The first day I put a trowel in the soil after amending it for over a year, the trowel just slid in like a glove. And then I saw the worms. I was crying. Soil life is amazing.”

Investments in organic agriculture research can help farmers of all backgrounds and farms of all sizes. Urban farms face unique challenges of their own but can implement conservation practices just like larger-scale farms, which means they benefit from research findings, too. Organic research projects focused on urban agriculture have published studies that can help with conservation goals such as guides about water management and access and strategies for hydroponic strawberry production.

At Little Lighthouse Farm, soil health was restored because of the years of research on the benefits of cover cropping. Better soil health allows Rachel to grow better crops, which provide nutritious products to community members. Research funding makes this all possible and demonstrates that innovations in organic agriculture research can result in widespread adoption of beneficial practices, helping farms of all sizes and production types meet conservation goals. And the benefits of research extend beyond the farm, too. According to an analysis done by the USDA Economic Research Service (ERS), every $1 invested into agricultural research triggers a $20 economic benefit. This provides long-term benefits in addressing agronomic issues, increases farm productivity and profitability, and ultimately benefits the economies and resiliency of communities.

You can support farmers like Rachel and help strengthen the agricultural research all farmers depend on by:

  • Letting us know about the impact agricultural research has had on your farm (contact communications[at]ofrf.org!).
  • Enrolling in our free Communicating with Legislators email-based course and sharing your story with elected officials.
  • Writing a letter to the editor or an opinion piece in your local newspaper, talking about how research projects/programs have benefited your farm.
By |2026-01-06T13:04:46-05:00January 6th, 2026|Farmer Stories, News|
Go to Top